New Arma 3 Screens - Holy ****!! Battlefield 3 Dethroned

  • 111 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for JangoWuzHere
JangoWuzHere

19032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#51 JangoWuzHere
Member since 2007 • 19032 Posts

[QUOTE="hiphops_savior"][QUOTE="XVision84"]

A very realistic first person shooter series only for PC.

sethman410

It's not even a shooter, it's a simulator.

Still a shooter. Lol.

You shoot guns in Mirrors edge, that doesn't make it a shooter.

Avatar image for The_Pacific
The_Pacific

1804

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 The_Pacific
Member since 2011 • 1804 Posts
BF3 looks way better.
Avatar image for cobrax55
cobrax55

1364

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 cobrax55
Member since 2007 • 1364 Posts

Looks sterile and lifeless. It needs BF3's dynamic radiosity and megatons of smoke&explosions. gpuking

See this is funny, Because the scale of a game like Arma, goes way beyond anything ever done in a series like Battlefield.

Avatar image for KillerJuan77
KillerJuan77

3823

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#54 KillerJuan77
Member since 2007 • 3823 Posts

I hope they:

- make the game look as authentic and life-like as possible (we're talking about a Greek island here after all)

- make an enjoyable single-player campaign that'll also be playlable in co-op mode

- more urban combat and possible naval battles

- enable support for more than 32 players online (64 player servers would be cool)

- don't release the game in beta state (read: remove the glitches and optimize the net code and graphics engine)

nameless12345

Also, the game looks hideous (ArmA II) and pistols are USELESS.

Avatar image for sethman410
sethman410

2967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 sethman410
Member since 2008 • 2967 Posts

[QUOTE="sethman410"][QUOTE="hiphops_savior"] It's not even a shooter, it's a simulator.JangoWuzHere

Still a shooter. Lol.

You shoot guns in Mirrors edge, that doesn't make it a shooter.

It's still FPS. And that's why he meant too. He was saying it's not FPS, but it is. Jeez, I guess ppl need to be specific on system wars. It's FPS simulator.

If you still disagree, then tell me why Forza and GT are considerend 'racing games' when they are simulators too as well? Hmmm, that's what I thought.

Avatar image for gamebreakerz__
gamebreakerz__

5120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#56 gamebreakerz__
Member since 2010 • 5120 Posts
I can just tell all those trees and grass will destroy my GPU as they do in games with similar amounts of foliage.
Avatar image for theuncharted34
theuncharted34

14529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 theuncharted34
Member since 2010 • 14529 Posts

Other than Draw distance it looks mediocre.

Avatar image for sethman410
sethman410

2967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 sethman410
Member since 2008 • 2967 Posts

Other than Draw distance it looks mediocre.

theuncharted34
Pfft, do you have next generation gaming systems?
Avatar image for theuncharted34
theuncharted34

14529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 theuncharted34
Member since 2010 • 14529 Posts

[QUOTE="theuncharted34"]

Other than Draw distance it looks mediocre.

sethman410

Pfft, do you have next generation gaming systems?

No, but I have eyes.

Avatar image for sethman410
sethman410

2967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 sethman410
Member since 2008 • 2967 Posts
[QUOTE="theuncharted34"]

[QUOTE="sethman410"][QUOTE="theuncharted34"]

Other than Draw distance it looks mediocre.

Pfft, do you have next generation gaming systems?

No, but I have eyes.

They do not look medicore for crying out loud...
Avatar image for theuncharted34
theuncharted34

14529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 theuncharted34
Member since 2010 • 14529 Posts

[QUOTE="theuncharted34"]

[QUOTE="sethman410"] Pfft, do you have next generation gaming systems?sethman410

No, but I have eyes.

They do not look medicore for crying out loud...

Would decent be a better word for you? :P

The draw distance is very impressive. :)

Avatar image for sethman410
sethman410

2967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 sethman410
Member since 2008 • 2967 Posts
[QUOTE="theuncharted34"]

[QUOTE="sethman410"][QUOTE="theuncharted34"]

No, but I have eyes.

They do not look medicore for crying out loud...

Would decent be a better word for you? :P

The draw distance is very impressive. :)

Aww, that's a cute response. :) That's alot better. ;)
Avatar image for deactivated-5d78760d7d740
deactivated-5d78760d7d740

16386

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#63 deactivated-5d78760d7d740
Member since 2009 • 16386 Posts

Other than Draw distance it looks mediocre.

theuncharted34

They could be screens running on low settings (seeing the lack of Anti-Aliasing in the screenshots), and also this game has an entire year of development to go. Arma 3 has a lot of potential, I can just imagine these screenshots at higher resolutions, with more AA, and those draw distances, with that scale, etc. It's still very early on in development, but it's reaching what Battlefield 3 looks like, and by the time it's released it should look much better (especially when maxed).

Avatar image for PrettyHateMx
PrettyHateMx

82

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 PrettyHateMx
Member since 2011 • 82 Posts

[QUOTE="sethman410"][QUOTE="theuncharted34"]

Other than Draw distance it looks mediocre.

theuncharted34

Pfft, do you have next generation gaming systems?

No, but I have eyes.

It looks better than Crysis 1 with much larger scale. You need to get your eyes check. :P
Avatar image for Golden_Boy187
Golden_Boy187

787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 Golden_Boy187
Member since 2007 • 787 Posts

Pretty Meh MW3 looks better

Avatar image for agpickle
agpickle

3293

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 agpickle
Member since 2006 • 3293 Posts

Pretty Meh MW3 looks better

Golden_Boy187

Really?

Avatar image for Bebi_vegeta
Bebi_vegeta

13558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 Bebi_vegeta
Member since 2003 • 13558 Posts

The physics are horrible on ARMA3...

Avatar image for AdrianWerner
AdrianWerner

28441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#68 AdrianWerner
Member since 2003 • 28441 Posts

I'm sure Battlefield 3 will look "prettier", even if it's scale is miniscule compared to Arma III. Most people care more about animations, envioremental and characters details and destructability than scale. So even if Arma III is more impressive technicaly BF3 will still be considered prettier.

That said, I'm waiting for Arma III far more than for Battlefield 3. I just prefer tactical shooters over arcade shooters.

Avatar image for AdrianWerner
AdrianWerner

28441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#69 AdrianWerner
Member since 2003 • 28441 Posts

The physics are horrible on ARMA3...

Bebi_vegeta

Depends which physics you mean :) Ragdolls and boxes being thrown around? Sure. But vehicle (tanks, planes, helis) physics will be far more advanced than in BF3

Avatar image for RyviusARC
RyviusARC

5708

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 RyviusARC
Member since 2011 • 5708 Posts

Other than Draw distance it looks mediocre.

theuncharted34

I guess Uncharted 2 must look atrocious to you then.

.

.

.

.

VS a large scale shooter.

.

.

.

Avatar image for AdrianWerner
AdrianWerner

28441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#71 AdrianWerner
Member since 2003 • 28441 Posts

[QUOTE="XVision84"]

[QUOTE="SpeedsterCards"]quick question... what is arma?hiphops_savior

A very realistic first person shooter series only for PC.

It's not even a shooter, it's a simulator.

No, it's not. It's tactical shooter. The vehicle controls are to arcade for it to be ever considered simulator.

Avatar image for psn8214
psn8214

14930

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 psn8214
Member since 2009 • 14930 Posts

The physics are horrible on ARMA3...

Bebi_vegeta

That's Arma II. Arma III has full PhysX support, meaning ragdolls, the whole nine yards...

Avatar image for scar-hawk
scar-hawk

5404

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#73 scar-hawk
Member since 2008 • 5404 Posts

[QUOTE="SpeedsterCards"] Its a simulation shooter. 1shot kills, you can live for 10-15 min if you play it right.

[QUOTE="millerlight89"][QUOTE="SpeedsterCards"]quick question... what is arma?sillaris

A game that helps the insomniacs of the world. He puts them right out. Seriously, the games are super boring.

not everyone has your taste in pointless arcade shooters, aka Blackops. die, spawn, die, spawn, helicopter perk, die, spawn. x7

More like BF3. That game will definitely sell a LOT more than Arma 3, and rightfully so.
Avatar image for Bebi_vegeta
Bebi_vegeta

13558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 Bebi_vegeta
Member since 2003 • 13558 Posts

[QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"]

The physics are horrible on ARMA3...

AdrianWerner

Depends which physics you mean :) Ragdolls and boxes being thrown around? Sure. But vehicle (tanks, planes, helis) physics will be far more advanced than in BF3

I'm talking about this... look at the tank part...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bz9mIgaBmU8

Avatar image for Bebi_vegeta
Bebi_vegeta

13558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 Bebi_vegeta
Member since 2003 • 13558 Posts

[QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"]

The physics are horrible on ARMA3...

psn8214

That's Arma II. Arma III has full PhysX support, meaning ragdolls, the whole nine yards...

Yes and have you seen videos of ARMA 3 gameplay... arkward... look at the tank part.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bz9mIgaBmU8

Avatar image for deactivated-635601fd996cc
deactivated-635601fd996cc

4381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#77 deactivated-635601fd996cc
Member since 2009 • 4381 Posts
What the heck is wrong with the shadows?
Avatar image for deactivated-635601fd996cc
deactivated-635601fd996cc

4381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#78 deactivated-635601fd996cc
Member since 2009 • 4381 Posts

[QUOTE="psn8214"]

[QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"]

The physics are horrible on ARMA3...

Bebi_vegeta

That's Arma II. Arma III has full PhysX support, meaning ragdolls, the whole nine yards...

Yes and have you seen videos of ARMA 3 gameplay... arkward... look at the tank part.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bz9mIgaBmU8

Yeah that looks pretty bad. I mean the physics of the tank look a few inches larger than the actual vehicle.
Avatar image for Bebi_vegeta
Bebi_vegeta

13558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 Bebi_vegeta
Member since 2003 • 13558 Posts

[QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"]

[QUOTE="psn8214"]

That's Arma II. Arma III has full PhysX support, meaning ragdolls, the whole nine yards...

ocstew

Yes and have you seen videos of ARMA 3 gameplay... arkward... look at the tank part.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bz9mIgaBmU8

Yeah that looks pretty bad. I mean the physics of the tank look a few inches larger than the actual vehicle.

That's what I'm saying... hopefully this will be corrected, or else ouch...

Avatar image for deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab

17476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#80 deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
Member since 2008 • 17476 Posts
It looks nice, i think BF3 looks better though. And the people complaining about the physics implementation, seriously? It is obviously unfinished, they even say it isn't physically correct and they are working on it, right in the video. They were just showing off that their engine supported those types of physics now.
Avatar image for ManicAce
ManicAce

3267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#81 ManicAce
Member since 2009 • 3267 Posts

Some shots from Eurogamer


From past experience we can say it will be too inconsistent to be graphics king, but no way does it look bad or mediocre like some people say.

Avatar image for Bebi_vegeta
Bebi_vegeta

13558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 Bebi_vegeta
Member since 2003 • 13558 Posts

It looks nice, i think BF3 looks better though. And the people complaining about the physics implementation, seriously? It is obviously unfinished, they even say it isn't physically correct and they are working on it, right in the video. They were just showing off that their engine supported those types of physics now.ferret-gamer

Hey, if your going to show off something... atleast do it right... right?

Avatar image for Grey_Eyed_Elf
Grey_Eyed_Elf

7971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 Grey_Eyed_Elf
Member since 2011 • 7971 Posts
You know people said Arma II was stunning... all I saw was a glitch infested unoptimised game with good draw distance and sharp textures. From the look of Arma III... honestly it doesn't looked like its changed much visually. Also Who would play Arma II over BFBC2?... and the same question applies for Arma III and BF3 :P. I'm not hating on the game, it's really just a underdog and as soon as something is a underdog people make it seem like the greatest game of its genre and of course if its a game that sells millions... its overrated, and so for that reason and that reason only F*** ARMA!
Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#84 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts
Dethroned how exactly? Because of nice graphics? Come on now.. The graphics are good but I still prefer BF3's graphics a lot more.
Avatar image for NoodleFighter
NoodleFighter

11897

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 NoodleFighter
Member since 2011 • 11897 Posts

The physics are horrible on ARMA3...

Bebi_vegeta

The game is still far from being finished.

Avatar image for morapuler
morapuler

116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 morapuler
Member since 2005 • 116 Posts

Battleflop 3 was never a good looking game to begin with. Excessive use of high contrast, bloom etc is only a tool used to hide how ugly things are in that game. ArmA3 pisses all over it.

Avatar image for ChupacabraIII
ChupacabraIII

5314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 ChupacabraIII
Member since 2005 • 5314 Posts
Dem bullshots
Avatar image for RyviusARC
RyviusARC

5708

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 RyviusARC
Member since 2011 • 5708 Posts

Dem bullshots  ChupacabraIII

This is not a console game.

Avatar image for deactivated-62825bb2ccdb4
deactivated-62825bb2ccdb4

666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 deactivated-62825bb2ccdb4
Member since 2003 • 666 Posts

Quite possibly the most overrated game in history when it comes to graphics. The boat scene was horrible....

Avatar image for iBrodeoShowdeo
iBrodeoShowdeo

90

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 iBrodeoShowdeo
Member since 2011 • 90 Posts

BF3 never had the throne.

Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#91 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

[QUOTE="ChupacabraIII"]Dem bullshots RyviusARC

This is not a console game.

BI has a habit of releasing super high-res with lots of AA screens before launch.

What you can notice pretty easily is the lack of shadows on most of the objects in the world.

As said before in this thread, ArmA is widely inconstant with its graphics to ever be up there with the best.

Avatar image for pelvist
pelvist

9001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#92 pelvist
Member since 2010 • 9001 Posts

The game also has Ragdoll physics this time around and an entirely new physics system for the vehicles and objects in the game.

Avatar image for Kokuro_Kun
Kokuro_Kun

2339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 Kokuro_Kun
Member since 2009 • 2339 Posts
It looks good, i still think BF3 looks better overall. At least its just more appealing to look at it.
Avatar image for AdrianWerner
AdrianWerner

28441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#94 AdrianWerner
Member since 2003 • 28441 Posts

[QUOTE="AdrianWerner"]

[QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"]

The physics are horrible on ARMA3...

Bebi_vegeta

Depends which physics you mean :) Ragdolls and boxes being thrown around? Sure. But vehicle (tanks, planes, helis) physics will be far more advanced than in BF3

I'm talking about this... look at the tank part...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bz9mIgaBmU8

So yes, worse world physics, but superior vehicle physics. Altough I doubt thise weightless boxes will be left in the final game

Avatar image for AdrianWerner
AdrianWerner

28441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#95 AdrianWerner
Member since 2003 • 28441 Posts

Also Who would play Arma II over BFBC2?Grey_Eyed_Elf
Anyone who prefers realistic tactical shooters over arcadish casual shooters? Arma II has quite large player base, despite the fact that it launched in very sorry state. Despite all it's problems people still played it religiously.

I do think BF3 will be great game, but just like BF2 and BC2 before I will be bored to death with it after few months. Arma III I will play for years.

The only reason why I still have BF2 installed on my PC is Project reality and since BF3 wont be supporting mods all it will be is yet another arcade shooter. Fun for a while, but lacking things that would make me stick longer than few months.

Avatar image for gameguy6700
gameguy6700

12197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 gameguy6700
Member since 2004 • 12197 Posts
As much as I would love to get into ARMA, I don't feel like studying a game just to play it. Same reason why I couldn't get into X3, and can't get into RTS games or fighting games.
Avatar image for Bebi_vegeta
Bebi_vegeta

13558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 Bebi_vegeta
Member since 2003 • 13558 Posts

[QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"]

[QUOTE="AdrianWerner"]Depends which physics you mean :) Ragdolls and boxes being thrown around? Sure. But vehicle (tanks, planes, helis) physics will be far more advanced than in BF3

AdrianWerner

I'm talking about this... look at the tank part...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bz9mIgaBmU8

So yes, worse world physics, but superior vehicle physics. Altough I doubt thise weightless boxes will be left in the final game

I don't know... the tank is pushing the container without even touching it.

Avatar image for AdrianWerner
AdrianWerner

28441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#98 AdrianWerner
Member since 2003 • 28441 Posts

[QUOTE="AdrianWerner"]

[QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"]

I'm talking about this... look at the tank part...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bz9mIgaBmU8

Bebi_vegeta

So yes, worse world physics, but superior vehicle physics. Altough I doubt thise weightless boxes will be left in the final game

I don't know... the tank is pushing the container without even touching it.

So? That's world physics. I'm sure it will control far more realistical than tanks in BF3 will

Avatar image for Bebi_vegeta
Bebi_vegeta

13558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 Bebi_vegeta
Member since 2003 • 13558 Posts

[QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"]

[QUOTE="AdrianWerner"]So yes, worse world physics, but superior vehicle physics. Altough I doubt thise weightless boxes will be left in the final game

AdrianWerner

I don't know... the tank is pushing the container without even touching it.

So? That's world physics. I'm sure it will control far more realistical than tanks in BF3 will

Tanks look pretty good in BF3... let's wait and see.

Avatar image for nameless12345
nameless12345

15125

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#100 nameless12345
Member since 2010 • 15125 Posts

Arma is not about graphics, it's about realism and mods.