NEW Batman Arkham Asylum News!!....only on the PS3 ;)

I think this game receives more attention than it deserves.

Filthybastrd

Really? I thought they captured the essence of batman extremely well judging from the demo.

Thepart of the news I liked is that it is FREE content....not some exclusive content that you have to pay for......

darthogre

[QUOTE="Filthybastrd"]

I think this game receives more attention than it deserves.

clone01

Really? I thought they captured the essence of batman extremely well judging from the demo.

Espada12

I did'nt mean to say it was a bad game. I just think it receives a bit too much praise because it's Batman.

The demo gave me the impression that combat's is very "press X to win".

[QUOTE="AmayaPapaya"]

I can't find the hype for this game. It doesn't look to interesting to me.

HarlockJC

I did'nt mean to say it was a bad game. I just think it receives a bit too much praise because it's Batman.

The demo gave me the impression that combat's is very "press X to win".

Filthybastrd

Oh, well I thought that for a while then I actually fought some of the guys with the guns head on they pretty much owned me lol

I did'nt mean to say it was a bad game. I just think it receives a bit too much praise because it's Batman.

The demo gave me the impression that combat's is very "press X to win".

Filthybastrd

I did not heard about this game before now. But it looks fantastic.

[QUOTE="ArisShadows"]Correction. * Digital comic "The Road to Arkham" is on all versions.YekDastan316

You just know it's going to come to XBL but at a cost :lol:

I think this game receives more attention than it deserves.

PS3 version is shaping up to be fantastic. Even though im just renting it, i want to play as the Joker! Damn my 360! Damn you to hell with your none ps3 features...DaViD_99

im getting it on the PC and play it with the 360 controller and play it maxxed out at 1080p

For some reason I just don't give a hoot about this game. I don't see it scoring too well.

Nah im going with the 360 version since the PS3 version will likely be inferior graphics wise.aero250

[QUOTE="aero250"]Nah im going with the 360 version since the PS3 version will likely be inferior graphics wise.Swift_Boss_A

i was going to say this is one of the few games that looks exactly the same on both the ps3 and 360 yet the ps3 version gets more content.... it wouldnt be a smart move to get the version with less content now would it?

For some reason I just don't give a hoot about this game. I don't see it scoring too well.

Tulak_Hord

seeings how this is going to be paralelled to other superhero games (most of which were down right horrible and only a few of them are mildly interesting) and its not some movie/video game tie in...i see it easliy getting AA in most reviews

[QUOTE="aero250"]Nah im going with the 360 version since the PS3 version will likely be inferior graphics wise.Swift_Boss_A

[QUOTE="Swift_Boss_A"][QUOTE="aero250"]Nah im going with the 360 version since the PS3 version will likely be inferior graphics wise.mitu123

un sept there really isnt a differnce if you actually see both versions side by side the ps3 version looks slightly blurier, probably due to using Q-AA i guess, but yet some how the plants look alot better on that version so no, they dont look at all that much different

[QUOTE="Swift_Boss_A"][QUOTE="aero250"]Nah im going with the 360 version since the PS3 version will likely be inferior graphics wise.hyperboy152000

i was going to say this is one of the few games that looks exactly the same on both the ps3 and 360 yet the ps3 version gets more content.... it wouldnt be a smart move to get the version with less content now would it?

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="Swift_Boss_A"]

The graphics difference is unnoticeable without fanboy goggles. Do you have a pair?hyperboy152000

un sept there really isnt a differnce if you actually see both versions side by side the ps3 version looks slightly blurier, probably due to using Q-AA i guess, but yet some how the plants look alot better on that version so no, they dont look at all that much different

[QUOTE="hyperboy152000"]

[QUOTE="Swift_Boss_A"]

The graphics difference is unnoticeable without fanboy goggles. Do you have a pair?heretrix

i was going to say this is one of the few games that looks exactly the same on both the ps3 and 360 yet the ps3 version gets more content.... it wouldnt be a smart move to get the version with less content now would it?

what do you mean all of a sudden...when did i, specifically me, say it was a bad idea to get the version with more content? its always better to get the version that has more content doesnt matter if its this game, GTA, FO3, bioshock.... all these games are better on the console version with more stuff to do IMO

[QUOTE="hyperboy152000"]

[QUOTE="mitu123"] I can notice them pretty well without fanboy goggles, sucks if you can't.:P Though I'm probably getting the PS3 version for it's content.

mitu123

un sept there really isnt a differnce if you actually see both versions side by side the ps3 version looks slightly blurier, probably due to using Q-AA i guess, but yet some how the plants look alot better on that version so no, they dont look at all that much different

well thats true, every game tech. if its multiplatform will atleast have a difference in AA since nvidia cards and ATI cards sample any one scene differently so thats true there are AA differences

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="hyperboy152000"]

un sept there really isnt a differnce if you actually see both versions side by side the ps3 version looks slightly blurier, probably due to using Q-AA i guess, but yet some how the plants look alot better on that version so no, they dont look at all that much different

hyperboy152000

well thats true, every game tech. if its multiplatform will atleast have a difference in AA since nvidia cards and ATI cards sample any one scene differently so thats true there are AA differences

[QUOTE="hyperboy152000"]

[QUOTE="mitu123"] They're identical for the most part, but have some differences with AA.

mitu123

well thats true, every game tech. if its multiplatform will atleast have a difference in AA since nvidia cards and ATI cards sample any one scene differently so thats true there are AA differences

actually as you said there is a difference in AA but i think thats due to a Q-AA or blur filter on the ps3 version, which is typical but its not like theres a lower res. or lighting which is usually the par with multiplats these days

[QUOTE="heretrix"]

[QUOTE="hyperboy152000"]

i was going to say this is one of the few games that looks exactly the same on both the ps3 and 360 yet the ps3 version gets more content.... it wouldnt be a smart move to get the version with less content now would it?

hyperboy152000

what do you mean all of a sudden...when did i, specifically me, say it was a bad idea to get the version with more content? its always better to get the version that has more content doesnt matter if its this game, GTA, FO3, bioshock.... all these games are better on the console version with more stuff to do IMO

Before this, exclusive DLC was evil. Now it's great! I happen to love the fact that a company is willing to pay to do cool extra stuff for their version of the game and I've been saying this repeatedly here. It just amazes me at how some people are actually "getting it" now that it's on their system of choice. I'm sorry if I made it seem like I was accusing you of this.

[QUOTE="mitu123"][QUOTE="hyperboy152000"]

well thats true, every game tech. if its multiplatform will atleast have a difference in AA since nvidia cards and ATI cards sample any one scene differently so thats true there are AA differences

hyperboy152000

actually as you said there is a difference in AA but i think thats due to a Q-AA or blur filter on the ps3 version, which is typical but its not like theres a lower res. or lighting which is usually the par with multiplats these days

[QUOTE="hyperboy152000"]

[QUOTE="heretrix"]Well, in regards to the GTA 4 and Fallout DLC or any other game that had more content than the PS3 version quite a few people thought so.Why is it now smart all of a sudden?

heretrix

what do you mean all of a sudden...when did i, specifically me, say it was a bad idea to get the version with more content? its always better to get the version that has more content doesnt matter if its this game, GTA, FO3, bioshock.... all these games are better on the console version with more stuff to do IMO

Before this, exclusive DLC was evil. Now it's great! I happen to love the fact that a company is willing to pay to do cool extra stuff for their version of the game and I've been saying this repeatedly here. It just amazes me at how some people are actually "getting it" now that it's on their system of choice. I'm sorry if I made it seem like I was accusing you of this.

ah sorry for the misundersatanding then

but yea i think any form of dlc outside cosmetic changes, esp. free dlc can only help a game, and if a developer does infact decide to take that dlc to the other plateform(s), even though its usually much later (fo3) atleast you get to play them regardless of the system. i just despise the mindset that people will be willing to pay for ANYTHING if the game is popular enough like for example costume packs... doesnt affect gameplay and even though i dont have to buy it, they could have used to the time and resources to make an actual worthwile add-on

[QUOTE="hyperboy152000"]

[QUOTE="mitu123"] Yep, well, I'm getting the PS3 version for the content, I'm no graphics w----, I just wanted to see the differences between the versions,and it's not that huge either, LOL.mitu123

actually as you said there is a difference in AA but i think thats due to a Q-AA or blur filter on the ps3 version, which is typical but its not like theres a lower res. or lighting which is usually the par with multiplats these days

i guess the only other difference that ive seen is color saturation but ive only seen that on online compairisons

[QUOTE="mitu123"][QUOTE="hyperboy152000"]

actually as you said there is a difference in AA but i think thats due to a Q-AA or blur filter on the ps3 version, which is typical but its not like theres a lower res. or lighting which is usually the par with multiplats these days

hyperboy152000

i guess the only other difference that ive seen is color saturation but ive only seen that on online compairisons

So much fraud... just for a video game...

[QUOTE="YekDastan316"]

* Play as The Joker exclusively on PS3 - The Joker is available to play in eight Challenge Maps that will be available for download free of charge through PlayStation®Network to owners of the PS3 game
* The Batman Arkham Asylum Batcave Outpost Apartment will include experiential items such as The Batsuit, The Batmobile, The Batwing and selected Batman's gadgets and will be available free of charge to owners of the PS3 game
* Digital comic "The Road to Arkham" for viewing exclusively on the PlayStation®Portable - The digital comic will be available to owners of the PS3 game as a free download through PlayStationNetwork
* Exclusive Challenge Maps to be available 30 days after release

Here's the complete article.

linkage

who ever that doesnt get this game on the PS3 is totally out of it

Yandere

Well.. Considering those are just addons and Xbox 360 users still get the full game they aren't losing anything.. Anyways there's always a chance of it being a timed thing.

Nah im going with the 360 version since the PS3 version will likely be inferior graphics wise.aero250

Yeah, but you see, I'm not sure it does.pyromaniac223

[QUOTE="pyromaniac223"]Yeah, but you see, I'm not sure it does.YekDastan316

I enjoyed the demo a bit but it's definitely a game that I will wait for a discounted price. It left me a little disappointed.

[QUOTE="aero250"]Nah im going with the 360 version since the PS3 version will likely be inferior graphics wise.Swift_Boss_A

PS3 version seems to be somewhat superior over the 360 version in my oppinion.

What is it that you guys had a problem with in the game? Ive heard complains about the camera and stiffness of Batman. Which I think are both ridiculous, I played through the demo 3 times and never had a camera problem and the stiffness is an art style decision. Hes a stoic, badass character, he doesnt slouch. Who cares. The fighting is fun and fluid, the controls worked great and very responsive, and the graphics are definitely top notch.

Damn. After all of the whining about the Fallout exclusive DLC you'd think that people would find this to be a problem. From some of the comments it seems like paying for exclusive content is a shrewd business move after all.

Fancy that.