couple more here: http://www.zonared.com/pc/juegos/battlefield-3/imagenes/ver/10870/
This topic is locked from further discussion.
And people say graphics don't matter or you can't have gameplay with them... LOL.
Finally a current gen game!
I always hear sheep saying that like you can't have both.And people say graphics don't matter or you can't have gameplay with them... LOL.
Finally a current gen game!
Truth_Hurts_U
https://twitter.com/#!/ChristinaCoffin/statuses/81434840221753344
"new screens released and all I can see is the HW tesselation wasnt turned on for even more detail.I really need to lighten up #perfectionist"
lolgearsunchartedconsoles
I know the game looks good, but these are bull shots. No game looks like that. There has to be a little bit of jaggies.
[QUOTE="dream431ca"]
I know the game looks good, but these are bull shots. No game looks like that. There has to be a little bit of jaggies.
psn8214
*psst* ... it's called PC gaming.
Even for PC gaming, those look like touched up screenshots. Not saying I don't like the game, I can't wait for it! Put in 200 hours of BFBC2, but why release unrealistic screenshots?
[QUOTE="psn8214"]
[QUOTE="dream431ca"]
I know the game looks good, but these are bull shots. No game looks like that. There has to be a little bit of jaggies.
dream431ca
*psst* ... it's called PC gaming.
Even for PC gaming, those look like touched up screenshots. Not saying I don't like the game, I can't wait for it! Put in 200 hours of BFBC2, but why release unrealistic screenshots?
They could just be smushed down from their original resolution (faked super sampling) since the sight does say the resolution of the images is much higher, but there's no higher resolution available for some reason.[QUOTE="psn8214"]
[QUOTE="dream431ca"]
I know the game looks good, but these are bull shots. No game looks like that. There has to be a little bit of jaggies.
dream431ca
*psst* ... it's called PC gaming.
Even for PC gaming, those look like touched up screenshots. Not saying I don't like the game, I can't wait for it! Put in 200 hours of BFBC2, but why release unrealistic screenshots?
This is witcher 2 all over again.[QUOTE="dream431ca"][QUOTE="psn8214"]
*psst* ... it's called PC gaming.
Inconsistancy
Even for PC gaming, those look like touched up screenshots. Not saying I don't like the game, I can't wait for it! Put in 200 hours of BFBC2, but why release unrealistic screenshots?
They could just be smushed down from their original resolution (fake super sampling) since the sight does say the resolution of the images is much higher, but there's no higher resolution available for some reason.That could be it too.
I know the game looks good, but these are bull shots. No game looks like that. There has to be a little bit of jaggies.
dream431ca
If you look really, really closely you can see some. They've probably got AA jack up to 32x.
Even for PC gaming, those look like touched up screenshots. Not saying I don't like the game, I can't wait for it! Put in 200 hours of BFBC2, but why release unrealistic screenshots?
dream431ca
Nonsense. I play Bad Company 2 with 32X MSAA, and it's incredibly similar to those shots, in that it is virtually jaggy free. I don't care if you're criticizing the game or not, I'm just saying that it is in no way impossible to achieve that level of visual fidelity with the proper hardware. :P
I bought my computer from NASA. It'll look like that.I know the game looks good, but these are bull shots. No game looks like that. There has to be a little bit of jaggies.
dream431ca
[QUOTE="Animal-Mother"] :lol: The game that came out in 2007?IronBass
And that keeps destroying the competition 8)
I won't deny it, the series is good. I will buy MW3 as well. BUT people like to play it safe. Call of duty is time travel. People playin a game that came out in 07. But i'm glad you support the destruction & monochromatic fundamentals that activision is pushing.You and me both :DThey look like DX11 shots to me. And since I have a DX11 card, I can see it like that when I play it.:D
mitu123
[QUOTE="Animal-Mother"] :lol: The game that came out in 2007?IronBass
And that keeps destroying the competition 8)
The Twilight Movies destroy the competition too...
You gonna try to sell me that crap as a legit movie?
[QUOTE="dream431ca"]I bought my computer from NASA. It'll look like that. Doubt Nasa computers are all that great for gaming, all workstations... They may do it fine, but it could be glitchy (assuming they're running windows in the first place), also, I hear the quadro/firegl's actually can't work in sli/xfire('least for workstation use) so they wouldn't have superior to pc hardware anyway. And then their custom stuff wouldn't be compatible in the first place... :DI know the game looks good, but these are bull shots. No game looks like that. There has to be a little bit of jaggies.
AAllxxjjnn
The Twilight Movies destroy the competition too...
You gonna try to sell me that crap as a legit movie?
Netherscourge
Twilight is a perfectly legit movie, a legitimately bad one. :D
[QUOTE="dream431ca"]I bought my computer from NASA. It'll look like that.I know the game looks good, but these are bull shots. No game looks like that. There has to be a little bit of jaggies.
AAllxxjjnn
NASA computers are supremely out dated. Can you say goverment funded? ;)
I won't deny it, the series is good. I will buy MW3 as well. BUT people like to play it safe. Call of duty is time travel. People playin a game that came out in 07. But i'm glad you support the destruction & monochromatic fundamentals that activision is pushing.Animal-Mother
How coulnd´t I support a company that gives so many gamers what they want? Acti FTW.
The Twilight Movies destroy the competition too...
You gonna try to sell me that crap as a legit movie?
Netherscourge
They´renot my cup of tea, but indeed, they destroy most the competiton.
[QUOTE="Animal-Mother"] I won't deny it, the series is good. I will buy MW3 as well. BUT people like to play it safe. Call of duty is time travel. People playin a game that came out in 07. But i'm glad you support the destruction & monochromatic fundamentals that activision is pushing.IronBass
How coulnd´t I support a company that gives so many gamers what they want? Acti FTW.
It gives the casual masses what they want. And by the way, I know my statement is a bit contradicting. But i'm buying Bf3 twice. Maybe get MW3 on my PC 8)I bought my computer from NASA. It'll look like that.[QUOTE="AAllxxjjnn"][QUOTE="dream431ca"]
I know the game looks good, but these are bull shots. No game looks like that. There has to be a little bit of jaggies.
dream431ca
NASA computers are supremely out dated. Can you say goverment funded? ;)
It's a space computer dude. Built by aliens. To run BF3.Doubt Nasa computers are all that great for gaming, all workstations... They may do it fine, but it could be glitchy (assuming they're running windows in the first place), also, I hear the quadro/firegl's actually can't work in sli/xfire('least for workstation use) so they wouldn't have superior to pc hardware anyway. And then their custom stuff wouldn't be compatible in the first place... :D[QUOTE="AAllxxjjnn"][QUOTE="dream431ca"] I bought my computer from NASA. It'll look like that. Inconsistancy
The Twilight Movies destroy the competition too...
You gonna try to sell me that crap as a legit movie?
Netherscourge
Twilight is a perfectly legit movie, a legitimately bad one. :D
They do and can. I'm on a dual quad core SLI quadro fx 580 right now. LOL it's nothing special though. Doesn't perform any better then my gaming rig but this workstation litterly cost 4 times as much! GO DELL! LOL
They could just be smushed down from their original resolution (fake super sampling) since the sight does say the resolution of the images is much higher, but there's no higher resolution available for some reason.[QUOTE="Inconsistancy"][QUOTE="dream431ca"]
Even for PC gaming, those look like touched up screenshots. Not saying I don't like the game, I can't wait for it! Put in 200 hours of BFBC2, but why release unrealistic screenshots?
dream431ca
That could be it too.
Well they are downsized, if you look on the thumbnail page for those pics it shows what res they were originally, but for some reason can't get the website to display them at that. But even if downsized they probably won't look too different, BF3 supports all sorts of type of anti aliasing, MSAA, MLAA, SRAA, TSAA. So if they just turned on the supersampling it won't have much AA anyways.Oh and if you guys didn't see already http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/battlefield_bad_company/archive/2011/06/16/physical-warfare-pack-available-to-all-battlefield-3-players.aspxAAllxxjjnn
Great news !
I'm going to buy this game for sure, but I never preorder anything. So it's great to hear everyone gets the DLC.
Pretty good but not the best I've seen. The mountain ranges in the first picture look poor and it's better to look at gameplay to observe graphics king, half of the picture is blurred.sentrygmanAs someone pointed out a DICE dev stated that tessellation wasn't turned on. DICE uses displacement mapping for their terrain.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment