[QUOTE="Dingerious"][QUOTE="insanejedi"] I dunno if you know this, but that post was made 6 months ago, and I was reffering to the Xbox original games, which still looks at least on par with the pictures shown today. And again, the best thing you can win, is the argument that it looks better than last gen games made a decade ago. It's like winning the special Olympics. insanejedi
The only argument I'd make is "welcome to 2005. Iwata just announced that Wii wouldn't focus on power".
No **** it only slightly better than last gen. It's been known for three full years, 2.5 years when you made that post. Point is, if that's what you want to use as if it's some new piece of information, then it might come as a shock to you that, well....Bruce Willis dies.
EDIT: Actually, there's only one truth coming from these Condui graphics threads. The sheer amount of posts dedicated to "la la la it looks bad la la la" is proof that HD apologists view the title as a threat to their console. I don't know why. If Conduit does well, it's not like the game will steal your developers away. They'll just make more excuses.
Or they view it as a game that is getting FAR too much undeserved attention when games like Chronicles of Riddick: Assault on Dark Athena, and FEAR 2 are getting ZERO hype for all the wrong reasons. The main reason it's getting hype is because it's a shooter that's on the wii. And to me, that is ridiculous and absurd. No, rediculous and absurd is expecting a console which is known to be underpowered since 2005 to magically compete in power with other consoles.
Besides, if being the best of the best is what you care about, you shouldn't care about those other consoles at all. Go get a high-end PC.
Log in to comment