New Forza 2 pictures

  • 54 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for aznfool07
aznfool07

3552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 aznfool07
Member since 2005 • 3552 Posts
[QUOTE="Killfox"][QUOTE="Mass_Effect"][QUOTE="dackchaar"][QUOTE="Mass_Effect"]GT:HD has no damage, poor physics, and no aesthetic customisation.

Mass_Effect

But we're talking about graphics...

That is graphics :|

Physics are not graphics. A CPU does physics. A GPU does graphics. With the exception of cell.

The other 2 are (that I mentioned). The cars look great in GT:HD in screenshots; but when you play it they move stiffly

I think GT was meant to play with a wheel. 

Avatar image for Oemenia
Oemenia

10416

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -2

User Lists: 0

#52 Oemenia
Member since 2003 • 10416 Posts
[QUOTE="Mass_Effect"][QUOTE="proof11102"][QUOTE="Killfox"]

You people must be blind. http://img393.imageshack.us/img393/1678/enzolz6.jpg

 

Killfox

anyone who watches the video I posted of GTHD (a demo that came out a month after PS3 lanunched ) and then comes back and looks at these pictures of Forza 2 for xbox360 ( a full fledged second generation game for the system) they might seriously reconsider calling what is being shown here good.

GT:HD has no damage, poor physics, and no aesthetic customisation.

Yeah its a demo and its sad that it looks better than forza2. Which is an actual game.

Yeah its a demo, it was created just to show of some of the power of the PS3. For that reason they only have to focus on a few completed assets, where Forza while it looks crap is miles ahead in terms of physics, damage and costumisation not forgetting 3D backgrounds.
Avatar image for Oemenia
Oemenia

10416

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -2

User Lists: 0

#53 Oemenia
Member since 2003 • 10416 Posts
[QUOTE="Mass_Effect"][QUOTE="dackchaar"][QUOTE="Mass_Effect"]GT:HD has no damage, poor physics, and no aesthetic customisation.

Killfox

But we're talking about graphics...

That is graphics :|

Physics are not graphics. A CPU does physics. A GPU does graphics. With the exception of cell.

Oh yeah and physics just jump out in developement offcourse. Thats why GT4 was so realistic...
Avatar image for Medic_B
Medic_B

3375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 Medic_B
Member since 2005 • 3375 Posts
great looking game
Avatar image for TheWiikestLink
TheWiikestLink

1730

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 TheWiikestLink
Member since 2006 • 1730 Posts











for the poster who said to post gthd pics,here ya go..and i guess hes right gthd just looks superior,but im sure in gameplay will be better than gthd.
Avatar image for danneswegman
danneswegman

12937

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 danneswegman
Member since 2005 • 12937 Posts

[QUOTE="danneswegman"][QUOTE="Oemenia"]The game looks pathetic in motion.aznfool07


no, it looks bad in pictures, it looks okay in motion. GT:HD looks ridiculous in motion, because the cars don't act like.... cars.. worst car sim i ever played.

Yes because cars cannot act :(. 


oh.. maybe i speeking not so good the english.. :-P