New Gears of War 3 Screenshots (56K Please Stay Away)

I assume these are bullshots?jg4xchamp

Yep.

Epic Bullshots.

[spoiler] Yeah, I know, it's crap. [/spoiler]

[QUOTE="PSdual_wielder"]

honestly i think gears 3 looks really silly compared to the 1 and 2. All of a sudden you have women going marcus fenix on the locusts, flying bullets and wielding chainsaws. I'm not a sexist, but it just doesn't fit the set.

SapSacPrime

You sound pretty sexist from your post, saying you aren't is irrelevant because if that worked we would have no fanboys on system wars... a lot of girl gamers play Gears, they may like having the option to choose a character of the same sex to chainsaw the original ugly b******'s in half.

As for it fitting the set its a post apocalyptic waste land and humanity is on the edge of exstinction, I think everybody taking up arms and defending themselves makes more sense than having the women stay at home a bake :).

This is a bullshot....

This is not...

:P

Anyway, yeah, Gears 3 is shaping up to be the best yet - can't hardly wait.

I find it interesting it took them this long to integrate women into this game series... especially considering the main audience it appeals to.

Either way, those are most definitely bullshots and I really want to play me some bot-multiplayer.

i cant wait for gears 3

I don't really care if they're bullshots. I can't get over how much they changed Cole though. It also would have been nice if the new Carmine wasn't a tank like everyone else but I can live with it.

now how bout we see some gameplay pics in its native resolution.ferret-gamer

[QUOTE="Zero_epyon"]

Bullshot after bullshot. Look I know Gears 3 looks impressive but why do they still feel the need to do this? They'd get more respect from people if they just be honest about the graphics.

AAllxxjjnn

only thing that excites me about this game is beast mode. I'd still rather buy it at like $30. just not a Gears fan.

graphics are great though.

And all the game critics where saying Rage is the best looking videogame ever made, looks like Gears 3 just curb stomped it to the ground

Here 2 more off screen vids from Beast mode. The quality is pretty bad so i think it wasnt a new thread worthy.

Im expecting to see more of this game later at Comic-Con

just not a Gears fan

HavocV3

Uncharted 2 doesn't have MLAA, only 2xAA.

Uncharted 2 doesn't have MLAA, only 2xAA.

mitu123

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

Uncharted 2 doesn't have MLAA, only 2xAA.

HelloMoto56

Bullshot after bullshot. Look I know Gears 3 looks impressive but why do they still feel the need to do this? They'd get more respect from people if they just be honest about the graphics.

Zero_epyon

"dam if you do. dam if you don't"

a lot of companies would get respect if they were honest about the games graphics.

Question. Is Kinect required to have the enhanced graphics for Gears of War 3?

Question. Is Kinect required to have the enhanced graphics for Gears of War 3?

Heirren

What?

Kinect does not enhance graphics at all.

Rather, it ruins it, by taking away approximately 10% of the Xbox's power.

However, the games which use Kinect still look pretty good (River Rush, for example)

[QUOTE="Heirren"]

Question. Is Kinect required to have the enhanced graphics for Gears of War 3?

siddhu33

What?

Kinect does not enhance graphics at all.

Rather, it ruins it, by taking away approximately 10% of the Xbox's power.

However, the games which use Kinect still look pretty good (River Rush, for example)

Wait, it offers NO hardware features? I was under the impression that it worked with the 360, no? Extra RAM, etc. Why would MS, given this opportunity to beef up the hardware, not take it? The system needs all the help it can get, if it wants to compete with the immensely superior PS3--at least graphically, that is.

[QUOTE="siddhu33"]

[QUOTE="Heirren"]

Question. Is Kinect required to have the enhanced graphics for Gears of War 3?

Heirren

What?

Kinect does not enhance graphics at all.

Rather, it ruins it, by taking away approximately 10% of the Xbox's power.

However, the games which use Kinect still look pretty good (River Rush, for example)

Wait, it offers NO hardware features? I was under the impression that it worked with the 360, no? Extra RAM, etc. Why would MS, given this opportunity to beef up the hardware, not take it? The system needs all the help it can get, if it wants to compete with the immensely superior PS3--at least graphically, that is.

You must be kidding yourself if you really think that the PS3 is "immensely superior" to the 360 in graphics. In all intents and purposes, they are about equal, with about 3-4 games looking better on the PS3. How many games are there for each console?

700?

Tell me this, right now: If there was a set of data, with 696 points on both lines which are about equal, with 4 points above on one line, wouldn't that be irrelevant to the distribution?

Anyway, Gears 3, and Halo:Reach look to be some of the best looking games on the 360, and rivaling some of PS3's exclusives as is, while Crysis 2 and RAGE are looking better than anything else on the console market, while being multiplats.

[QUOTE="Heirren"]

[QUOTE="siddhu33"]

What?

Kinect does not enhance graphics at all.

Rather, it ruins it, by taking away approximately 10% of the Xbox's power.

However, the games which use Kinect still look pretty good (River Rush, for example)

siddhu33

Wait, it offers NO hardware features? I was under the impression that it worked with the 360, no? Extra RAM, etc. Why would MS, given this opportunity to beef up the hardware, not take it? The system needs all the help it can get, if it wants to compete with the immensely superior PS3--at least graphically, that is.

You must be kidding yourself if you really think that the PS3 is "immensely superior" to the 360 in graphics. In all intents and purposes, they are about equal, with about 3-4 games looking better on the PS3. How many games are there for each console?

700?

Tell me this, right now: If there was a set of data, with 696 points on both lines which are about equal, with 4 points above on one line, wouldn't that be irrelevant to the distribution?

Anyway, Gears 3, and Halo:Reach look to be some of the best looking games on the 360, and rivaling some of PS3's exclusives as is, while Crysis 2 and RAGE are looking better than anything else on the console market, while being multiplats.

I don't want to turn this into a ps3 vs 360 graphics war, really. All I'm saying is that those select ps3 games offer a level of visual fidelity yet to be seen on the 360. It doesn't only come down to the screenshot tests either--the animation is a level above as well. My brother doesn't play video games(not since Goldeneye, anyways), and he thought Uncharted 2 was an animated feature in the vein of Pixar.

Anyways, personally I think Halo Reach is better looking than Gears3. I was never impressed with the Gears series. Tooooooo much bloom and blur. Game looks decent in screens, but sucks it in motion.

Dear God... Gears of Wars 3 looks way better than Gears of War 2 and it has colors. Big contender for Uncharted 2, and I think it will surpass it. Elian2530

:P silly boy Gears already surpassed Uncharted 2 with Gears 1 in 2006, proof another shot straight from the devs, Gears 1 gfx king 2010 and beyond confirmed

[QUOTE="siddhu33"]

[QUOTE="Heirren"]

Question. Is Kinect required to have the enhanced graphics for Gears of War 3?

Heirren

What?

Kinect does not enhance graphics at all.

Rather, it ruins it, by taking away approximately 10% of the Xbox's power.

However, the games which use Kinect still look pretty good (River Rush, for example)

Wait, it offers NO hardware features? I was under the impression that it worked with the 360, no? Extra RAM, etc. Why would MS, given this opportunity to beef up the hardware, not take it? The system needs all the help it can get, if it wants to compete with the immensely superior PS3--at least graphically, that is.

PS3 is not technically superior to 360. Let alone the ìmmensely`:|

[QUOTE="Heirren"]

[QUOTE="siddhu33"]

What?

Kinect does not enhance graphics at all.

Rather, it ruins it, by taking away approximately 10% of the Xbox's power.

However, the games which use Kinect still look pretty good (River Rush, for example)

PAL360

Wait, it offers NO hardware features? I was under the impression that it worked with the 360, no? Extra RAM, etc. Why would MS, given this opportunity to beef up the hardware, not take it? The system needs all the help it can get, if it wants to compete with the immensely superior PS3--at least graphically, that is.

PS3 is not technically superior to 360. Let alot the ìmmensely`:|

The bulk of my game time is Halo online these days. I just got a ps3 within the last year. It wasn't until I played a few of the games on it that I really felt like this was the next gen, from an audio and visual perspective. Show me a game, in motion, that rivals Uncharted2 or God of War. Not only that, show me a 360 game that has 5.1(or even 7.1)LPCM sound.

[QUOTE="PAL360"]

[QUOTE="Heirren"]

Wait, it offers NO hardware features? I was under the impression that it worked with the 360, no? Extra RAM, etc. Why would MS, given this opportunity to beef up the hardware, not take it? The system needs all the help it can get, if it wants to compete with the immensely superior PS3--at least graphically, that is.

Heirren

PS3 is not technically superior to 360. Let alot the ìmmensely`:|

The bulk of my game time is Halo online these days. I just got a ps3 within the last year. It wasn't until I played a few of the games on it that I really felt like this was the next gen, from an audio and visual perspective. Show me a game, in motion, that rivals Uncharted2 or God of War. Not only that, show me a 360 game that has 5.1(or even 7.1)LPCM sound.

[QUOTE="PAL360"]

[QUOTE="Heirren"]

Wait, it offers NO hardware features? I was under the impression that it worked with the 360, no? Extra RAM, etc. Why would MS, given this opportunity to beef up the hardware, not take it? The system needs all the help it can get, if it wants to compete with the immensely superior PS3--at least graphically, that is.

Heirren

PS3 is not technically superior to 360. Let alot the ìmmensely`:|

The bulk of my game time is Halo online these days. I just got a ps3 within the last year. It wasn't until I played a few of the games on it that I really felt like this was the next gen, from an audio and visual perspective. Show me a game, in motion, that rivals Uncharted2 or God of War. Not only that, show me a 360 game that has 5.1(or even 7.1)LPCM sound.

I was talking about graphics, not sound. well, graphics wise RDR is up there with those games. Gears2 and alan wake look close. veeery close ;)

[QUOTE="Heirren"]

[QUOTE="PAL360"]wow dude!!! Where have you been?

PS3 is not technically superior to 360. Let alot the ìmmensely`:|

PAL360

The bulk of my game time is Halo online these days. I just got a ps3 within the last year. It wasn't until I played a few of the games on it that I really felt like this was the next gen, from an audio and visual perspective. Show me a game, in motion, that rivals Uncharted2 or God of War. Not only that, show me a 360 game that has 5.1(or even 7.1)LPCM sound.

I was talking about graphics, not sound. well, graphics wise RDR is up there with those games. Gears2 and alan wake look close. veeery close ;)

[QUOTE="Heirren"]

[QUOTE="PAL360"]wow dude!!! Where have you been?

PS3 is not technically superior to 360. Let alot the ìmmensely`:|

PAL360

The bulk of my game time is Halo online these days. I just got a ps3 within the last year. It wasn't until I played a few of the games on it that I really felt like this was the next gen, from an audio and visual perspective. Show me a game, in motion, that rivals Uncharted2 or God of War. Not only that, show me a 360 game that has 5.1(or even 7.1)LPCM sound.

I was talking about graphics, not sound. well, graphics wise RDR is up there with those games. Gears2 and alan wake look close. veeery close ;)

I disagree. The animation in those games is incredible. And I said "technically" superior, which you then disagreed with. So lets look at it this way: The PS3 has produced the best looking games this gen, plays blu rays, AND provides FAAAAAAR superior sound. I'd say that equals "technically superior."

[QUOTE="PAL360"]

[QUOTE="Heirren"]

The bulk of my game time is Halo online these days. I just got a ps3 within the last year. It wasn't until I played a few of the games on it that I really felt like this was the next gen, from an audio and visual perspective. Show me a game, in motion, that rivals Uncharted2 or God of War. Not only that, show me a 360 game that has 5.1(or even 7.1)LPCM sound.

Heirren

I was talking about graphics, not sound. well, graphics wise RDR is up there with those games. Gears2 and alan wake look close. veeery close ;)

I disagree. The animation in those games is incredible. And I said "technically" superior, which you then disagreed with. So lets look at it this way: The PS3 has produced the best looking games this gen, plays blu rays, AND provides FAAAAAAR superior sound. I'd say that equals "technically superior."

[QUOTE="Heirren"]

[QUOTE="PAL360"]

I was talking about graphics, not sound. well, graphics wise RDR is up there with those games. Gears2 and alan wake look close. veeery close ;)

PAL360

I disagree. The animation in those games is incredible. And I said "technically" superior, which you then disagreed with. So lets look at it this way: The PS3 has produced the best looking games this gen, plays blu rays, AND provides FAAAAAAR superior sound. I'd say that equals "technically superior."

[QUOTE="PAL360"]

[QUOTE="Heirren"]

I disagree. The animation in those games is incredible. And I said "technically" superior, which you then disagreed with. So lets look at it this way: The PS3 has produced the best looking games this gen, plays blu rays, AND provides FAAAAAAR superior sound. I'd say that equals "technically superior."

TintedEyes

Which devs have been saying that? First-party devs?

The lighting and textures stand out quite a bit for me, I like the look. Looking forward to this game.