NEW Killzone 2 screens! (56K NOOES!1)

[QUOTE="daveg1"][QUOTE="Armored_cell"][QUOTE="daveg1"]it looks great,i wonder if it will look that good when its released..rember this is from e3 and sony!TrueReligion_

N'Gai Croal, editor at Newsweek, played it. He's the only person other than Guerrilla that's played it IIRC.

yep and behind close doors they took off the gray tint and had it in the morning showcasing that is just artstyle they were going for.

[QUOTE="MegaPigeon"][QUOTE="jujutheking"][QUOTE="-Spock-"]

Wow.. :shock:

I'm a little skeptical about the gameplay after watching IGN's extended cut, but I think the incredible apocalyptic atmosphere will help cover up its shortcomings. It's like really being in a war zone.

Kalias

The 1 min gameplay vid??U can't judgee a gm by that.When more details and were closer to launch u could make say something.

Hasn't stopped people from hyping it to the moon, or should I say the sun....:P

actually much more then 1min. he played through an entire mission right infront of alllll the journalists. there is a youtube video up of the dev actually holding the ps controller while the level progressed.

5 minutes is hardly a substantialy higher lengh than 1 minute. And I don;t see why everyone seems to feel it's necessary to tell everyone how the dev had a controller....I think I gathered that when they first shown it to the public.

looks oksilverjiken

wow....just okay huh?

[QUOTE="-Spock-"]

Wow.. :shock:

I'm a little skeptical about the gameplay after watching IGN's extended cut, but I think the incredible apocalyptic atmosphere will help cover up its shortcomings. It's like really being in a war zone.

jujutheking

The 1 min gameplay vid??U can't judgee a gm by that.When more details and were closer to launch u could make say something.

It wasn't one minute. The E3 trailer itself was about four minutes, and IGN have a two minute gameplay video uploaded on the site. The game seems kinda dull to play despite looking awesome..

[QUOTE="jujutheking"][QUOTE="E_x_i_l_e"]

On the Playstation Underground forums in the Killzone Mess Hall there was a topic called "Ask the dev" and I asked about the textures.

Motherh clearly stated that -- the textures are actually quite good, it's the blur that is making them seem shoddy. It's just a bug.

Armored_cell

Yep he told me that too.U could clealy se better textures in IGn extended video.I have alot of better pics people have posted.I also talk to motherh about the pre pre alpha thing.He said there in pre alpha stages.

hm

[QUOTE="jujutheking"][QUOTE="-Spock-"]

Wow.. :shock:

I'm a little skeptical about the gameplay after watching IGN's extended cut, but I think the incredible apocalyptic atmosphere will help cover up its shortcomings. It's like really being in a war zone.

-Spock-

The 1 min gameplay vid??U can't judgee a gm by that.When more details and were closer to launch u could make say something.

It wasn't one minute. The E3 trailer itself was about four minutes, and IGN have a two minute gameplay video uploaded on the site. The game seems kinda dull to play despite looking awesome..

The e3 video was 2 mins of flying in an dropship and cuting parts by parts.The IGN vid is the only gameplay that has someone playing it.

[QUOTE="Kalias"][QUOTE="MegaPigeon"][QUOTE="jujutheking"][QUOTE="-Spock-"]

Wow.. :shock:

I'm a little skeptical about the gameplay after watching IGN's extended cut, but I think the incredible apocalyptic atmosphere will help cover up its shortcomings. It's like really being in a war zone.

MegaPigeon

The 1 min gameplay vid??U can't judgee a gm by that.When more details and were closer to launch u could make say something.

Hasn't stopped people from hyping it to the moon, or should I say the sun....:P

actually much more then 1min. he played through an entire mission right infront of alllll the journalists. there is a youtube video up of the dev actually holding the ps controller while the level progressed.

5 minutes is hardly a substantialy higher lengh than 1 minute. And I don;t see why everyone seems to feel it's necessary to tell everyone how the dev had a controller....I think I gathered that when they first shown it to the public.

wth. 5 minutes is 5x as much as 1min lol. thats good enough. and considering they had a 2 and 1/2 hour presentation for the game to show detail by detail analysis of the level. i know what your saying is that we need to see more then the demo level to judge the game. but that is basically for EVERY game we preview and hype. the same goes to mass effect, halo, bioshock, and every other hyped game. until we get the final version for any of these hyped games we cant make a final call.

[QUOTE="Kalias"][QUOTE="MegaPigeon"][QUOTE="jujutheking"][QUOTE="-Spock-"]

Wow.. :shock:

I'm a little skeptical about the gameplay after watching IGN's extended cut, but I think the incredible apocalyptic atmosphere will help cover up its shortcomings. It's like really being in a war zone.

MegaPigeon

The 1 min gameplay vid??U can't judgee a gm by that.When more details and were closer to launch u could make say something.

Hasn't stopped people from hyping it to the moon, or should I say the sun....:P

actually much more then 1min. he played through an entire mission right infront of alllll the journalists. there is a youtube video up of the dev actually holding the ps controller while the level progressed.

5 minutes is hardly a substantialy higher lengh than 1 minute. And I don;t see why everyone seems to feel it's necessary to tell everyone how the dev had a controller....I think I gathered that when they first shown it to the public.

The video on youtube doesn't show the entire level.LOL it just stops when he was walking up the stairs.We didn't even see him fighting that mini boss who was owning all the journalist when they played it.

[

The video on youtube doesn't show the entire level.LOL it just stops when he was walking up the stairs.We didn't even see him fighting that mini boss who was owning all the journalist when they played it.

jujutheking

Well apparently there's a video of them palying through the whole level, or so the last person to quote me said. I don't care if journalists seen it, I havn't seen the whole level yet and I don't base my opinions on the opinions of others.

[QUOTE="MegaPigeon"][QUOTE="Kalias"][QUOTE="MegaPigeon"][QUOTE="jujutheking"][QUOTE="-Spock-"]

Wow.. :shock:

I'm a little skeptical about the gameplay after watching IGN's extended cut, but I think the incredible apocalyptic atmosphere will help cover up its shortcomings. It's like really being in a war zone.

Kalias

The 1 min gameplay vid??U can't judgee a gm by that.When more details and were closer to launch u could make say something.

Hasn't stopped people from hyping it to the moon, or should I say the sun....:P

actually much more then 1min. he played through an entire mission right infront of alllll the journalists. there is a youtube video up of the dev actually holding the ps controller while the level progressed.

5 minutes is hardly a substantialy higher lengh than 1 minute. And I don;t see why everyone seems to feel it's necessary to tell everyone how the dev had a controller....I think I gathered that when they first shown it to the public.

wth. 5 minutes is 5x as much as 1min lol. thats good enough. and considering they had a 2 and 1/2 hour presentation for the game to show detail by detail analysis of the level. i know what your saying is that we need to see more then the demo level to judge the game. but that is basically for EVERY game we preview and hype. the same goes to mass effect, halo, bioshock, and every other hyped game. until we get the final version for any of these hyped games we cant make a final call.

When you look at it that way, yes. In reality, 4 mintues isn't very long. And the fact that all of the games you've mentioned are yet to be released hasn't stopped swarms of fanboys nitpicking them in every way possible and raving about how they suck and have been TEH DOWNGRAEDEDEDEDED. It seems ever since Killzone 2 has been shown, games have to be in their final stages to be properlly judged even though people are already hyping this like mad and continue to rip the crap out of anything not on the PS3.

Looks very generic.

Too bad now that we know the game will not look as good as the trailer. :(

[QUOTE="Armored_cell"][QUOTE="daveg1"]it looks great,i wonder if it will look that good when its released..rember this is from e3 and sony!daveg1

[QUOTE="jujutheking"][

The video on youtube doesn't show the entire level.LOL it just stops when he was walking up the stairs.We didn't even see him fighting that mini boss who was owning all the journalist when they played it.

MegaPigeon

Well apparently there's a video of them palying through the whole level, or so the last person to quote me said. I don't care if journalists seen it, I havn't seen the whole level yet and I don't base my opinions on the opinions of others.

[QUOTE="MegaPigeon"][QUOTE="Kalias"][QUOTE="MegaPigeon"][QUOTE="jujutheking"][QUOTE="-Spock-"]

Wow.. :shock:

I'm a little skeptical about the gameplay after watching IGN's extended cut, but I think the incredible apocalyptic atmosphere will help cover up its shortcomings. It's like really being in a war zone.

Kalias

The 1 min gameplay vid??U can't judgee a gm by that.When more details and were closer to launch u could make say something.

Hasn't stopped people from hyping it to the moon, or should I say the sun....:P

actually much more then 1min. he played through an entire mission right infront of alllll the journalists. there is a youtube video up of the dev actually holding the ps controller while the level progressed.

5 minutes is hardly a substantialy higher lengh than 1 minute. And I don;t see why everyone seems to feel it's necessary to tell everyone how the dev had a controller....I think I gathered that when they first shown it to the public.

wth. 5 minutes is 5x as much as 1min lol. thats good enough. and considering they had a 2 and 1/2 hour presentation for the game to show detail by detail analysis of the level. i know what your saying is that we need to see more then the demo level to judge the game. but that is basically for EVERY game we preview and hype. the same goes to mass effect, halo, bioshock, and every other hyped game. until we get the final version for any of these hyped games we cant make a final call.

When you look at it that way, yes. In reality, 4 mintues isn't very long. And the fact that all of the games you've mentioned are yet to be released hasn't stopped swarms of fanboys nitpicking them in every way possible and raving about how they suck and have been TEH DOWNGRAEDEDEDEDED. It seems ever since Killzone 2 has been shown, games have to be in their final stages to be properlly judged even though people are already hyping this like mad and continue to rip the crap out of anything not on the PS3.

The guy is lying there isn't any video of the entire video and i was agreeing with u.I am not pre judging anything.

it looks great,i wonder if it will look that good when its released..rember this is from e3 and sony!daveg1

Yes, but this was running on actual PS3 hardware this time... big difference ;-)

is it just me... or does this game look just above average? Technically its outstanding... but something is amuck. It looks so... average! :(

I dont want to hate on it, but this is my honest opinion.

I mean... who hasn't seen this picture in an FPS before? ARG... im sorry guys. Ill just stop there...

Looks very generic.

Too bad now that we know the game will not look as good as the trailer. :(

Willy105

it's far from finished and it's clear that it will ba a great experience with those extremely great character animations and chaos all around.

There better be a beta. 2008 *sigh*. This is waiting.

is it just me... or does this game look just above average? Technically its outstanding... but something is amuck. It looks so... average! :(

I dont want to hate on it, but this is my honest opinion.

I mean... who hasn't seen this picture in an FPS before? ARG... im sorry guys. Ill just stop there...

kansasdude2009

I know, it's just so unimpressive.

It's nothing like the Killzone trailer.

There's no reason left to hype this game.

is it just me... or does this game look just above average? Technically its outstanding... but something is amuck. It looks so... average! :(

I dont want to hate on it, but this is my honest opinion.

I mean... who hasn't seen this picture in an FPS before? ARG... im sorry guys. Ill just stop there...

kansasdude2009

With those character models?Not me.

[QUOTE="kansasdude2009"]

is it just me... or does this game look just above average? Technically its outstanding... but something is amuck. It looks so... average! :(

I dont want to hate on it, but this is my honest opinion.

I mean... who hasn't seen this picture in an FPS before? ARG... im sorry guys. Ill just stop there...

jujutheking

With those character models?Not me.

Exactly. The character models are very ugly too, and they are a little bit low-poly. I was expecting something better for a PS3.

[QUOTE="kansasdude2009"]

is it just me... or does this game look just above average? Technically its outstanding... but something is amuck. It looks so... average! :(

I dont want to hate on it, but this is my honest opinion.

I mean... who hasn't seen this picture in an FPS before? ARG... im sorry guys. Ill just stop there...

Willy105

I know, it's just so unimpressive.

It's nothing like the Killzone trailer.

There's no reason left to hype this game.

stop trolling diddy. by saying you can't see ANYTHING good about this game or BIOSHOCK, you lost ALL credibility. ALL.

[QUOTE="kansasdude2009"]

is it just me... or does this game look just above average? Technically its outstanding... but something is amuck. It looks so... average! :(

I dont want to hate on it, but this is my honest opinion.

I mean... who hasn't seen this picture in an FPS before? ARG... im sorry guys. Ill just stop there...

Willy105

I know, it's just so unimpressive.

It's nothing like the Killzone trailer.

There's no reason left to hype this game.

You have no reason to speak about unimpressive graphics Diddy Kong.

It's obvious you guys are trolls, just leave. Everyone and their mothers that's not a troll agree that the graphics are impressive. The professionals too, you should read up on it.

[QUOTE="jujutheking"][QUOTE="kansasdude2009"]

is it just me... or does this game look just above average? Technically its outstanding... but something is amuck. It looks so... average! :(

I dont want to hate on it, but this is my honest opinion.

I mean... who hasn't seen this picture in an FPS before? ARG... im sorry guys. Ill just stop there...

Willy105

With those character models?Not me.

Exactly. The character models are very ugly too, and they are a little bit low-poly. I was expecting something better for a PS3.

:( :lol: do u need glasses?

[QUOTE="jujutheking"][QUOTE="kansasdude2009"]

is it just me... or does this game look just above average? Technically its outstanding... but something is amuck. It looks so... average! :(

I dont want to hate on it, but this is my honest opinion.

I mean... who hasn't seen this picture in an FPS before? ARG... im sorry guys. Ill just stop there...

Willy105

With those character models?Not me.

Exactly. The character models are very ugly too, and they are a little bit low-poly. I was expecting something better for a PS3.

Low-poly? Each character model uses the same amount of polygons as an entire level in Killzone 1. :|

Looks very generic.

Too bad now that we know the game will not look as good as the trailer. :(

Willy105

The gameplay looked better than the trailer from E3 '05... I can't wait for this game! And I have the HD trailers of both this and COD4. COD4 does look awesome... and since it'll be out this year, I'll definitely get it. But KZ2 does look much better with much more detail AND action taking place onscreen at one time. The character models in KZ2 are also much more detailed andthe lighting is MUCH more impressive in KZ2.

Meh looks good, but cows really overhype it

Textures even in those pictures(the best ones you could fine) still look medicore

[QUOTE="MegaPigeon"]

Like a cross between Gears and Blacksite. Very nice.

And for the love of god don't even think of trying to hype it as the Halo killer....again. Really now, come on, REALLY.

jack_russel

want to bet an IP ban on it?

looks amazing. wtf at that last part.jack_russel

Looks very generic.

Too bad now that we know the game will not look as good as the trailer. :(

Willy105

We know this huh? We may know that for any and every Wii game, but we don't know that for this. :roll:

This and GT5 had the best console graphics at E3. COD4 also looked amazing.

....Halo 3 lol

You fanboys are blind, those charectar models are no were neer as good as halo 3. looks like killzone 1.5 HD with black added to the grey. halo 3 renders.

Hellgahst look like black blobs compared to this.

Looks pretty damn good but looks aren't everything... the 1st game sucked..OhSnapitz

[QUOTE="OhSnapitz"]Looks pretty damn good but looks aren't everything... the 1st game sucked..Armored_cell

Key word... And the company itself doesn't exactly have the best track record... They better atleast bring something besides graphics to the table in order to compete with the big boys... Hey look at what happened to resistance.

You fanboys are blind, those charectar models are no were neer as good as halo 3. looks like killzone 1.5 HD with black added to the grey. halo 3 renders.

Hellgahst look like black blobs compared to this.

OpticalCanine

Was that a joke?

You fanboys are blind, those charectar models are no were neer as good as halo 3. looks like killzone 1.5 HD with black added to the grey. halo 3 renders.

Hellgahst look like black blobs compared to this.

OpticalCanine

KILLZOWNED

[QUOTE="OpticalCanine"]

You fanboys are blind, those charectar models are no were neer as good as halo 3. looks like killzone 1.5 HD with black added to the grey. halo 3 renders.

Hellgahst look like black blobs compared to this.

Armored_cell

KILLZOWNED

:?

Those few who did get a change to play the KZ2 demo were impressed.bleehum

how was it?

[QUOTE="Armored_cell"][QUOTE="OhSnapitz"]Looks pretty damn good but looks aren't everything... the 1st game sucked..OhSnapitz

Key word... And the company itself doesn't exactly have the best track record... They better atleast bring something besides graphics to the table in order to compete with the big boys... Hey look at what happened to resistance.

KZ2 is easily more superior to halo 3 Graphically...gameplay wise that can't really be debated yet.

seriously though those of you who think halo 3 looks better...stop kidding yourselves look at the first page of screens again.

halo looks cartoony but impressive

/thread