New Mario Galaxy intro vid. Best graphics so far on Wii!

  • 71 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for tbone29
tbone29

5552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 tbone29
Member since 2004 • 5552 Posts
IMO, the Conker vs. Mario discussions are too close for it to even be significant...
Avatar image for DriftRS
DriftRS

3491

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#52 DriftRS
Member since 2004 • 3491 Posts

people are still going to complain that I picked bad screens though, thus i bring you "more screen shots" (tm) these pics come from a google image search btw, I'm not picking anything specifically

http://image.gamespotcdn.com/gamespot/images/2005/170/reviews/914940_20050620_screen002.jpg

Avatar image for -PS360-
-PS360-

817

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#53 -PS360-
Member since 2007 • 817 Posts
the in game graphics dont look as good as the video graphics, looks meh way to cartooney and childish for me tho
Avatar image for haziqonfire
haziqonfire

36392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#54 haziqonfire
Member since 2005 • 36392 Posts
@ akai_reaver -- yeah its a cinematic but if i remember correctly from the N64 game, the cinematics werent different looking than the gameplay.

yeah, i think its almost even, except Artisitcally, SMG looks better imo .It seems more stylized to me. Both are great games (i didnt really enjoy live and reloadeds multiplayer though, from what i played, which was about 3 years ago..... so i might have just played something different).
Avatar image for TyrantDragon55
TyrantDragon55

6851

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#55 TyrantDragon55
Member since 2004 • 6851 Posts

no we didn't, but it seems the XBox crowd did. Here's some conker screens for you

That there is the game you guys are saying makes the XBox look better then the Wii. You lot need your eye's checked.

I believe Wii just trounced the "best looking game on Xbox"

DriftRS

First of all, nice job cherry picking screenshots. Second, we're not saying it looks better, we're saying it looks about even.

Avatar image for DriftRS
DriftRS

3491

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#56 DriftRS
Member since 2004 • 3491 Posts
[QUOTE="DriftRS"]

no we didn't, but it seems the XBox crowd did. Here's some conker screens for you

That there is the game you guys are saying makes the XBox look better then the Wii. You lot need your eye's checked.

I believe Wii just trounced the "best looking game on Xbox"

TyrantDragon55

First of all, nice job cherry picking screenshots. Second, we're not saying it looks better, we're saying it looks about even.

I didn't cherry pick screenshots, I did a google search and chose the first two, the fact you think those are "cherry picked" means you agree those graphcis arn't any good, thing is, those are standard conker graphics... check my other pics above too, you just think the graphics are better cause you played the game years ago.

Avatar image for akai_reaver
akai_reaver

7754

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#57 akai_reaver
Member since 2004 • 7754 Posts

@ akai_reaver -- yeah its a cinematic but if i remember correctly from the N64 game, the cinematics werent different looking than the gameplay.

yeah, i think its almost even, except Artisitcally, SMG looks better imo .It seems more stylized to me. Both are great games (i didnt really enjoy live and reloadeds multiplayer though, from what i played, which was about 3 years ago..... so i might have just played something different).
Haziqonfire

Yeah, I know. I had a feeling people were gonna b tch about it comparing a cinimatic screen and such to a gameplay screen. I guessed wrong though.

And of course. Lol. :P Coulda changed though in the Xbox version.

Avatar image for ParkCarsHere
ParkCarsHere

3556

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#58 ParkCarsHere
Member since 2004 • 3556 Posts

Ok, to those of you who are Wii owners: Stop trying to defend the graphics on the Wii. "But...but... they said teh Xbox is teh supreme!" Who cares? The Wii is the best console this generation for GAMEPLAY, and last time I checked, isn't that what games are about? The great looking art style in SMG is just a plus.

This ridiculous argument that has formed about Conker vs. Mario is stupid.

Avatar image for ZanuffC
ZanuffC

614

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 ZanuffC
Member since 2007 • 614 Posts
This "It might be able to be done on XBOX but art style bawww bawww" its not like XBOX coulden't do the art style too v_v
Avatar image for -PS360-
-PS360-

817

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#60 -PS360-
Member since 2007 • 817 Posts

Ok, to those of you who are Wii owners: Stop trying to defend the graphics on the Wii. "But...but... they said teh Xbox is teh supreme!" Who cares? The Wii is the best console this generation for GAMEPLAY, and last time I checked, isn't that what games are about? The great looking art style in SMG is just a plus.

This ridiculous argument that has formed about Conker vs. Mario is stupid.

ParkCarsHere

1. the argument goes on because lots of ppl think xbox 1 has better graphics than wii... mostly the dumb fanboy's.

2. would u call swinging a weird shaped controller one direction to do a sort of action with last gen physics/graphics etc greatest gameplay system so far?

Avatar image for TyrantDragon55
TyrantDragon55

6851

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#61 TyrantDragon55
Member since 2004 • 6851 Posts

I didn't cherry pick screenshots, I did a google search and chose the first two, the fact you think those are "cherry picked" means you agree those graphcis arn't any good, thing is, those are standard conker graphics... check my other pics above too, you just think the graphics are better cause you played the game years ago.

DriftRS

Or because the game really looks like this:

Avatar image for solidsnakeo
solidsnakeo

1559

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#62 solidsnakeo
Member since 2003 • 1559 Posts

idont think that that is the best it doesn't look that great it looks good but i think mp3 looked better

Avatar image for OhSnapitz
OhSnapitz

19282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 OhSnapitz
Member since 2002 • 19282 Posts

people are still going to complain that I picked bad screens though, thus i bring you "more screen shots" (tm) these pics come from a google image search btw, I'm not picking anything specifically

http://image.gamespotcdn.com/gamespot/images/2005/170/reviews/914940_20050620_screen002.jpg

DriftRS

:|

Avatar image for akai_reaver
akai_reaver

7754

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#64 akai_reaver
Member since 2004 • 7754 Posts
[QUOTE="ParkCarsHere"]

Ok, to those of you who are Wii owners: Stop trying to defend the graphics on the Wii. "But...but... they said teh Xbox is teh supreme!" Who cares? The Wii is the best console this generation for GAMEPLAY, and last time I checked, isn't that what games are about? The great looking art style in SMG is just a plus.

This ridiculous argument that has formed about Conker vs. Mario is stupid.

-PS360-

1. the argument goes on because lots of ppl think xbox 1 has better graphics than wii... mostly the dumb fanboy's.

2. would u call swinging a weird shaped controller one direction to do a sort of action with last gen physics/graphics etc greatest gameplay system so far?

There are a few games that have made full use of the controller. And it ended up working very, very well. I will admit that.

Avatar image for OhSnapitz
OhSnapitz

19282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 OhSnapitz
Member since 2002 • 19282 Posts

Ok, to those of you who are Wii owners: Stop trying to defend the graphics on the Wii. "But...but... they said teh Xbox is teh supreme!" Who cares? The Wii is the best console this generation for GAMEPLAY, and last time I checked, isn't that what games are about? The great looking art style in SMG is just a plus.

This ridiculous argument that has formed about Conker vs. Mario is stupid.

ParkCarsHere

Um... the 360 has about 3x as many Good/Great games as the wii... Gameplay ain't it's strong point buddy.. :?

Avatar image for kman3002
kman3002

1440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 kman3002
Member since 2006 • 1440 Posts
:O That looked almost like a 360 game.:o
Avatar image for TyrantDragon55
TyrantDragon55

6851

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#67 TyrantDragon55
Member since 2004 • 6851 Posts
[QUOTE="ParkCarsHere"]

Ok, to those of you who are Wii owners: Stop trying to defend the graphics on the Wii. "But...but... they said teh Xbox is teh supreme!" Who cares? The Wii is the best console this generation for GAMEPLAY, and last time I checked, isn't that what games are about? The great looking art style in SMG is just a plus.

This ridiculous argument that has formed about Conker vs. Mario is stupid.

OhSnapitz

Um... the 360 has about 3x as many Good/Great games as the wii... Gameplay ain't it's strong point buddy.. :?

Exactly, right now the Wii's strong points are mass appeal and affordability.

Avatar image for Chipp
Chipp

1897

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 Chipp
Member since 2003 • 1897 Posts
[QUOTE="DriftRS"]

no we didn't, but it seems the XBox crowd did. Here's some conker screens for you

That there is the game you guys are saying makes the XBox look better then the Wii. You lot need your eye's checked.

I believe Wii just trounced the "best looking game on Xbox"

TyrantDragon55

First of all, nice job cherry picking screenshots. Second, we're not saying it looks better, we're saying it looks about even.

Not even close to being even.

One looks graphically superior while running at 60fps. One looks inferior while running at 30fps. There is a big difference there.

Avatar image for TyrantDragon55
TyrantDragon55

6851

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#69 TyrantDragon55
Member since 2004 • 6851 Posts

Not even close to being even.

One looks graphically superior while running at 60fps. One looks inferior while running at 30fps. There is a big difference there.

Ramadear

Go look at the real Conker screens, there really isn't much of a difference between them at all.

Avatar image for Chipp
Chipp

1897

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 Chipp
Member since 2003 • 1897 Posts
[QUOTE="Ramadear"]

Not even close to being even.

One looks graphically superior while running at 60fps. One looks inferior while running at 30fps. There is a big difference there.

TyrantDragon55

Go look at the real Conker screens, there really isn't much of a difference between them at all.

You're telling me those aren't real? And did you read? One runs at 30fps and the other 60fps. Which one is superior is quite obvious.

Avatar image for Luigi_Vincetana
Luigi_Vincetana

7389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 Luigi_Vincetana
Member since 2004 • 7389 Posts

If you really think that looks way beyond what the XBox was capable of, than you must not have played Conker: Live and Reloaded.

TyrantDragon55
Conker Live & Reloaded's graphics are over-rated. It's barely a step up from the N64 version (the only noticeable improvements are to the textures and shaders).