New Modern Warfare 2 Multiplayer video!!

Interesting tactic with the shield guy moving in first, getting the attention of the enemy while his buddy took them out.

I hope friendly fire is standard this time around.

So it looks like 50 points per kill is indeed the new standard. :?

The game looks amazing and will be a day 1 purchase for just about everyone. The bologna everybody has been talking here about Activision will be gone and we will once again be fraggin eachother non stop online.

I don't see what's so amazing about it, but it looks good and better than COD4.

easy day 1 for me. cant wait. i love the host migration. and throwing knives. SOOO AWESOME!!!!

[QUOTE="h575309"]

That guy was owning.

Or the game is very easy, although it's quite hard to tell without playing it.

Looks amazing, throwing knives FTW!

web966

First sticky grenades, then dual wielding, now throwing knives. What has Call of Duty become :( IW might as well rename this to "Halo Warfare".

Pdiddy105

Since when were you able to throw knives in Halo? Oh right, never.

I don't know what people are expecting…..I thought it looked fun……It's a day one buy for me…

masiisam

Yea no kidding, I thought it looked fun and a nice improvement over COD4....I'll be picking it up day one also.

[QUOTE="web966"]

Looks amazing, throwing knives FTW!

smokedagoodyo

[QUOTE="smokedagoodyo"][QUOTE="web966"]

Looks amazing, throwing knives FTW!

web966

At 1:54 it says pick up "SCAR-H Bling".

Golden SCAR-H? Hot.

Since someone brought up ranks and is probably goign to cause a 5 page discussion on it, I'll get this out the way.

Every rank system fails except Battlefield 2. (console version as I never played the PC version) In order to rank up, you needed a certain number of PPH, points per hour. Not only did you need a certain PPH, you also needed to achieve goals during games. Some would require something like blowing up 5 enemy vehicles with C4 without dying.

If you saw someone with a high rank, you usually knew they were good. Very rarely, if ever, would you see someone with one of the top ranks and suck. If you weren't good you usually just stayed a private, or whatever the other ranks were.

Nowadays it's justbased on playtime. Maybe in December 2007 a Gold Cross in COD meant something, now it's hilarious hearing people say "omg you dont have a gold cross!" as if it means something. Whoever wanted one most likely has it by now, unless you only play 1 hour per week or something.

Since someone brought up ranks and is probably goign to cause a 5 page discussion on it, I'll get this out the way.

Every rank system fails except Battlefield 2. (console version as I never played the PC version) In order to rank up, you needed a certain number of PPH, points per hour. Not only did you need a certain PPH, you also needed to achieve goals during games. Some would require something like blowing up 5 enemy vehicles with C4 without dying.

If you saw someone with a high rank, you usually knew they were good. Very rarely, if ever, would you see someone with one of the top ranks and suck. If you weren't good you usually just stayed a private, or whatever the other ranks were.

Nowadays it's justbased on playtime. Maybe in December 2007 a Gold Cross in COD meant something, now it's hilarious hearing people say "omg you dont have a gold cross!" as if it means something. Whoever wanted one most likely has it by now, unless you only play 1 hour per week or something.

ThePistolGod

I'm buying this on launch day no questions about it! Looks like you get more XP per kill and such too which is good. I can't wait to get this game! AAA confirmed

awesome video. do want!

No thanks, I don't need another run and gun FPS.

ooo Bullet proof shields yay

Led_poison

I hope that they are not as bad as cs1.6 and Vegas 2. The last thing we need is 32 people running around with riot shields spamming pistols and not being able to be killed.

[QUOTE="Pdiddy105"]

First sticky grenades, then dual wielding, now throwing knives. What has Call of Duty become :( IW might as well rename this to "Halo Warfare".

ThePistolGod

Since when were you able to throw knives in Halo? Oh right, never.

Umm, he means that COD has gone away from a realistic and gritty setting to this over-the-top arcade-action that Halo is known for.

[QUOTE="ThePistolGod"]

Since someone brought up ranks and is probably goign to cause a 5 page discussion on it, I'll get this out the way.

Every rank system fails except Battlefield 2. (console version as I never played the PC version) In order to rank up, you needed a certain number of PPH, points per hour. Not only did you need a certain PPH, you also needed to achieve goals during games. Some would require something like blowing up 5 enemy vehicles with C4 without dying.

If you saw someone with a high rank, you usually knew they were good. Very rarely, if ever, would you see someone with one of the top ranks and suck. If you weren't good you usually just stayed a private, or whatever the other ranks were.

Nowadays it's justbased on playtime. Maybe in December 2007 a Gold Cross in COD meant something, now it's hilarious hearing people say "omg you dont have a gold cross!" as if it means something. Whoever wanted one most likely has it by now, unless you only play 1 hour per week or something.

Next-Gen-Tec

There was only one or two things that required you to go out of your way. Any team player would've gotten them. You're trying to play like Rambo? Hey, you can be like my friend who had like 110PPH but was one of the lowest ranks because he never cared about winning or playing as a team and always did his own thing,

Not impressive, I'd have to try the demo, or rent it first. Even then I probably won't buy it because the last thing we need is yet another generic FPS.

Damn that guy was really good!

Anyways, game looks fantastic!!!

[QUOTE="ThePistolGod"]

[QUOTE="Pdiddy105"]

First sticky grenades, then dual wielding, now throwing knives. What has Call of Duty become :( IW might as well rename this to "Halo Warfare".

Cyberfairy

Since when were you able to throw knives in Halo? Oh right, never.

Umm, he means that COD has gone away from a realistic and gritty setting to this over-the-top arcade-action that Halo is known for.

It accomplished that with COD4. Why are people just starting to realize it now?

[QUOTE="Cyberfairy"]

[QUOTE="ThePistolGod"]

Since when were you able to throw knives in Halo? Oh right, never.

ThePistolGod

Umm, he means that COD has gone away from a realistic and gritty setting to this over-the-top arcade-action that Halo is known for.

It accomplished that with COD4. Why are people just starting to realize it now?

I'm serious too, some people do think it is.

That guy was owning.

h575309

[QUOTE="Pdiddy105"]

First sticky grenades, then dual wielding, now throwing knives. What has Call of Duty become :( IW might as well rename this to "Halo Warfare".

Nero_Paladin

Interesting because so many people have been saying It wouldn't be doing enough new things to make it different from the last one.

It looked like he was playing a bunch of headless chickens, not once did any of the enemies even attempt to shoot at him, but of course, it's all planned out for the "wow" factor.

This game looks fun, I'll probably buy it, play it until BF BC 2 comes, and then play that.

[QUOTE="h575309"]

That guy was owning.

Revolution316

:lol:

So it was CoD 4 with new graphics and sheilds? Small level, very linear, lots of explosions that were pointless, loose combat........

:(