New Ratchet and Clank pics!

[QUOTE="jfkunrendered"][QUOTE="lespaul1919"]

simply how mature it is. the content of game.

 

playing as a little elf boy doing complete harmless thins isnt exactly mature. i know 5 year olds that play zelda.

lespaul1919

Guess you never played Halo 2 on XBL then huh? Its full of children.

im playing right now. any kids on here shouldn't be on here. thats the bottom line. i can't control that they are.

i think you should be 18 to be online in halo 2.

The visuals look good, but they dont appeal to me. Blue Dragon looks way better BTW.

simply how mature it is. the content of game.

playing as a little elf boy doing complete harmless thins isnt exactly mature. i know 5 year olds that play zelda.

lespaul1919

its cartoonish so it must be kidding

i want "m rated games :roll:

ok im done :P

wait, so those images are amazing, yet a game like perfect dark zero is considered to look "plasticy"?

wait, so those images are amazing, yet a game like perfect dark zero is considered to look "plasticy"?

 

gamer620

thats the difference between portraying reality and fantasy...just because it fits into one catagory doesnt mean it fits into the other (design and gfx speaking ofcourse)

The visuals look good, but they dont appeal to me. Blue Dragon looks way better IMO.

Pro_wrestler

FIXED.

and I happen to disagree.  Ratchet and Clank looks better than Blue Dragon, IMO.

Downgrade confirmed. It went from Happy Feet to Toy Story 2.Socrates88

This pic looks so amazing.

nextgengaming18

Looks much better then Kameo.

Kills Twilight by over 9,000. 

Downgrade confirmed. It went from Happy Feet to Toy Story 2.Socrates88

Damn. Toy Story 2 looks so bad.

Looks great.

Don't like platformers though.

I played Gladiator co-op with a friend. I don't know how you guys can like the game. It's Crash Bandicoot no matter how you dress it up. 

[QUOTE="Dahaka-UK"]been there done that.. kansasdude2009

Agreed....

Something about the character desingns and the graphics bother me... like they are not natural, or out of place. Technically it looks great, but realistically, I dont like the look. But, I love R&C so I will give it a chance.

Since when has a platform game been realistic? 

i dont play that either. im a strong advocate of having free aim.lespaul1919

[QUOTE="gamer620"]

wait, so those images are amazing, yet a game like perfect dark zero is considered to look "plasticy"?

 

hyperboy152000

thats the difference between portraying reality and fantasy...just because it fits into one catagory doesnt mean it fits into the other (design and gfx speaking ofcourse)

 Sorry, but if Insomniac wanted to make this game more "fantastical" they would have opted for a more colorful art palette, instead, they went with a gritty realistic color palette, the same palette of which PDZ falls under.  The game may not be as "realistic" as PDZ, but that doesn't take away from the fact that the "plasticy" look of this game is NO different than the "plasticy" look of PDZ.  The PS2 titles were cartoony and stylized, this game is not stylized in the same cartoony way, therefore imo falls under the same graphical category of PDZ.

[QUOTE="Haziqonfire"]

[QUOTE="lespaul1919"]ehhh, looks ok. not my taste. but im pretty sure this game isn't aimed at 25 year olds.lespaul1919

who cares who its "aimed" towards, its still going to rock.

i would bet my life i wont think it rocks. those games are for kids. lock-on aiming? are you KIDDING ME?

Your argument is officially retarded.  There is no lock-on aiming, and the R&C games have consistently sold gang-busters and have consistently received rave reviews.