New RE:UC video (awesomeness inside, well maybe not :( )

[QUOTE="Hoobinator"][QUOTE="wavebrid"][QUOTE="Hoobinator"][QUOTE="wavebrid"][QUOTE="Hoobinator"][QUOTE="wavebrid"][QUOTE="Hoobinator"][QUOTE="wavebrid"][QUOTE="Hoobinator"]

Looks like RE1:Remake for the GC, only completely on rails, not particularly frightening and not exactly a frenetic shooter either. :|

Shame.

Edit: Just looked at some RE1 GC screens, this doesn't even match those....

DSgamer64

go troll somewher else it looks better in motion than regular pictures go freakign trolls act so bad :|

I'm not a troll and I hate IGN. Go spout your troll rubbish on NeoGaf, they like to do that kind of crap.

how did i troll i didnt bad mouth anything :| good job

that right there is called trolling

I didn't call you a troll, I said you remind me of NeoGaf members who like to shout "TROLL!!!" at anyone and anything.

Also watch the smiley change as I start to give a crap about you calling me a troll. :|

:lol: really you might want to rewrite that again. you said something thats is far from the truth and hence = trolling

I should have changed that to go shout your troll shouting rubbish elsewhere.

STOP ******* REPLYING. I have destroyed this thread, job done.

no you havent and who made you the boss of the thread. your WRONG AND YOU DAMM WELL KNOW IT DEAL WITH IT

RE:UC can't even compare visually to it's GC brethren, is an on the rails shooter and looks neither frightening nor action packed. Dirty flop is what it is.

Job Done.

Fanboys are sad now because they arent getting an exclusive Resident Evil game on the PS3 or 360 and instead wind up with a multiplat :lol:

:|  I'd rather have a quality multiplat than a craptastic exclusive. You know what sheep I hope this stays exclusive to the Wii.

[QUOTE="loco145"][QUOTE="Hoobinator"]

[QUOTE="loco145"]Wow, very close to REmake, which is impresive considering REmake uses pre-rendered enviroments... realtime and now are destructible!Hoobinator

And yet not so close when there happens to be barely anything going on minimal action on screen at any one time, and is an on the rails shooter , with mostly small rooms and corridors being generated by the GPU.

I never said it wasn't, but the hardware is (supposedly) a generation ahead.

Take a look at RE1 for the playstation and the massive upgrade in graphics when it came out on the GC, and it was basically a port with a few gameplay changes. 

The graphics shown really are not impressive at all. 

[QUOTE="Hoobinator"][QUOTE="loco145"][QUOTE="Hoobinator"]

[QUOTE="loco145"]Wow, very close to REmake, which is impresive considering REmake uses pre-rendered enviroments... realtime and now are destructible!loco145

And yet not so close when there happens to be barely anything going on minimal action on screen at any one time, and is an on the rails shooter , with mostly small rooms and corridors being generated by the GPU.

I never said it wasn't, but the hardware is (supposedly) a generation ahead.

Take a look at RE1 for the playstation and the massive upgrade in graphics when it came out on the GC, and it was basically a port with a few gameplay changes.

The graphics shown really are not impressive at all.

Have you actually seen the graphics... they look last gen, that's exactly what I'm saying. This game doesn't even look as good as RE1 for the GC. I'm sure they could have had a few destructible elements in RE1 for GC if they downgraded the visuals like they've done here. If this is Wii's next gen for $250 then it's the biggest rip off of all 3 nect gen consoles in terms of graphics. Of course to Sheep the controllers worth it anyway.

Having a few destructible elements in the game does not make it a fully destructible environment. 

I ised RE1 because it looks exactly like a rehash of it, but on teh rails... the imagnation.

:lol: Those were pre-rendered, now they are in real time and destructible. Thats a pretty big diference. If only Had you used Re4 instead...loco145

You talk as if the Wii could actually match the pre-rendered graphics of RE-make.  Just because they kinda look the same in  scaled-down video, it doesn't mean they'll actually look the same.

Looks pretty damn good. I don't really see why it being a rail shooter is being held against it. I've found those a lot of times to be really fun. Control of characters at times gets in way when you just want to shoot things and see the story process. I remember having a ton of fun playing arcade shooters like Area 51 and having a great time. There is enough room for different types of games. I don't feel or understand why every Resident Evil game has to be more of the same. It's the same reason why I'm looking forward to Dragon Quest Swords. Different types of games in familiar settings is always welcome I feel. Just how having Mario games being different from the last is always welcome. Metroid Prime is a great game and I'm glad it was so differnet from Super Metroid and past games. Just how I was glad to see Command &  Conquer Renegade come out. The C&C world was and is great but finally having a FPS set in it was really welcome I felt and hope they do another one.

I honestly think people overlook the benefits of a rail shooter type game. People talk about cinematic
games but that can really be done with a rail type of game as you can have tons of scripted sequences to really
sell the games story. This is just a movie but I can see how this could be played up well in terms of horror once the game
comes out. No different I think then entering a room and something happening. The only thing is that it takes out the
exploring and really in some games exploring isn't really needed all the time and just slows certain games down when
story is really important. 

I wasn't really sure if I was going to pick this up as I've never been crazy about Resident Evil, always hated
the controls until they were done in the GameCube versions but did enjoy the story in the games. I think I'll pick this up. 

[QUOTE="DSgamer64"][QUOTE="Hoobinator"][QUOTE="wavebrid"][QUOTE="Hoobinator"][QUOTE="wavebrid"][QUOTE="Hoobinator"][QUOTE="wavebrid"][QUOTE="Hoobinator"][QUOTE="wavebrid"][QUOTE="Hoobinator"]

Looks like RE1:Remake for the GC, only completely on rails, not particularly frightening and not exactly a frenetic shooter either. :|

Shame.

Edit: Just looked at some RE1 GC screens, this doesn't even match those....

Hoobinator

go troll somewher else it looks better in motion than regular pictures go freakign trolls act so bad :|

I'm not a troll and I hate IGN. Go spout your troll rubbish on NeoGaf, they like to do that kind of crap.

how did i troll i didnt bad mouth anything :| good job

that right there is called trolling

I didn't call you a troll, I said you remind me of NeoGaf members who like to shout "TROLL!!!" at anyone and anything.

Also watch the smiley change as I start to give a crap about you calling me a troll. :|

:lol: really you might want to rewrite that again. you said something thats is far from the truth and hence = trolling

I should have changed that to go shout your troll shouting rubbish elsewhere.

STOP ******* REPLYING. I have destroyed this thread, job done.

no you havent and who made you the boss of the thread. your WRONG AND YOU DAMM WELL KNOW IT DEAL WITH IT

RE:UC can't even compare visually to it's GC brethren, is an on the rails shooter and looks neither frightening nor action packed. Dirty flop is what it is.

Job Done.

Fanboys are sad now because they arent getting an exclusive Resident Evil game on the PS3 or 360 and instead wind up with a multiplat :lol:

:| I'd rather have a quality multiplat than a craptastic exclusive. You know what sheep I hope this stays exclusive to the Wii.

You haven't yet played the game and you already claim a game a crap base only on the pics and vids?? Most of Wii-bashers like you tend to claim most 3rd party games of Wii CRAP even though haven't played it. just shows how desperate you people bash the Wii

[QUOTE="loco145"][QUOTE="Hoobinator"][QUOTE="loco145"][QUOTE="Hoobinator"]

[QUOTE="loco145"]Wow, very close to REmake, which is impresive considering REmake uses pre-rendered enviroments... realtime and now are destructible!Hoobinator

And yet not so close when there happens to be barely anything going on minimal action on screen at any one time, and is an on the rails shooter , with mostly small rooms and corridors being generated by the GPU.

I never said it wasn't, but the hardware is (supposedly) a generation ahead.

Take a look at RE1 for the playstation and the massive upgrade in graphics when it came out on the GC, and it was basically a port with a few gameplay changes.

The graphics shown really are not impressive at all.

Have you actually seen the graphics... they look last gen, that's exactly what I'm saying. This game doesn't even look as good as RE1 for the GC. I'm sure they could have had a few destructible elements in RE1 for GC if they downgraded the visuals like they've done here. If this is Wii's next gen for $250 then it's the biggest rip off of all 3 nect gen consoles in terms of graphics. Of course to Sheep the controllers worth it anyway.

Having a few destructible elements in the game does not make it a fully destructible environment. 

I ised RE1 because it looks exactly like a rehash of it, but on teh rails... the imagnation.

Just post some Resident Evil 4 pics that enviroment that looks better than UC's enviroment....

Looks extremely rough around the edges. For instance, the maps looked like they had no lighting at all. It was fullbright sept for the thunder. Secondly, the mansion does not have proper colisions, very often zombies would fly through thigns they shouldn't, and would land on surfaces wehre they should have fallen. If it is to be a light gun game, they should modernize it with ragdolls and such... not this crap...

My hype is a 7 at best.

[QUOTE="loco145"][QUOTE="Hoobinator"][QUOTE="loco145"][QUOTE="Hoobinator"]

[QUOTE="loco145"]Wow, very close to REmake, which is impresive considering REmake uses pre-rendered enviroments... realtime and now are destructible!Hoobinator

And yet not so close when there happens to be barely anything going on minimal action on screen at any one time, and is an on the rails shooter , with mostly small rooms and corridors being generated by the GPU.

I never said it wasn't, but the hardware is (supposedly) a generation ahead.

Take a look at RE1 for the playstation and the massive upgrade in graphics when it came out on the GC, and it was basically a port with a few gameplay changes.

The graphics shown really are not impressive at all.

Have you actually seen the graphics... they look last gen, that's exactly what I'm saying. This game doesn't even look as good as RE1 for the GC. I'm sure they could have had a few destructible elements in RE1 for GC if they downgraded the visuals like they've done here. If this is Wii's next gen for $250 then it's the biggest rip off of all 3 nect gen consoles in terms of graphics. Of course to Sheep the controllers worth it anyway.

Having a few destructible elements in the game does not make it a fully destructible environment. 

I ised RE1 because it looks exactly like a rehash of it, but on teh rails... the imagnation.

[QUOTE="Hoobinator"][QUOTE="loco145"][QUOTE="Hoobinator"][QUOTE="loco145"][QUOTE="Hoobinator"]

[QUOTE="loco145"]Wow, very close to REmake, which is impresive considering REmake uses pre-rendered enviroments... realtime and now are destructible!tocool340

And yet not so close when there happens to be barely anything going on minimal action on screen at any one time, and is an on the rails shooter , with mostly small rooms and corridors being generated by the GPU.

I never said it wasn't, but the hardware is (supposedly) a generation ahead.

Take a look at RE1 for the playstation and the massive upgrade in graphics when it came out on the GC, and it was basically a port with a few gameplay changes.

The graphics shown really are not impressive at all.

Have you actually seen the graphics... they look last gen, that's exactly what I'm saying. This game doesn't even look as good as RE1 for the GC. I'm sure they could have had a few destructible elements in RE1 for GC if they downgraded the visuals like they've done here. If this is Wii's next gen for $250 then it's the biggest rip off of all 3 nect gen consoles in terms of graphics. Of course to Sheep the controllers worth it anyway.

Having a few destructible elements in the game does not make it a fully destructible environment.

I ised RE1 because it looks exactly like a rehash of it, but on teh rails... the imagnation.

Just post some Resident Evil 4 pics that enviroment that looks better than UC's enviroment....

There isn't any, but that's because the wii is the nect gen (supposedly) anyway.

Does anyone here actually KNOW what the Wii is capable of? As in like, hands on experience? Seems pretty silly to say "oh, the Wii isn't capable of that" when you don't really know what it is capable of. Ultimate_Peon

Based on the memory alone you can make plenty of assertions, the rest comes from pieced together info and common sense.

Looks pretty damn good. I don't really see why it being a rail shooter is being held against it. I've found those a lot of times to be really fun. Control of characters at times gets in way when you just want to shoot things and see the story process. I remember having a ton of fun playing arcade shooters like Area 51 and having a great time. There is enough room for different types of games. I don't feel or understand why every Resident Evil game has to be more of the same. It's the same reason why I'm looking forward to Dragon Quest Swords. Different types of games in familiar settings is always welcome I feel. Just how having Mario games being different from the last is always welcome. Metroid Prime is a great game and I'm glad it was so differnet from Super Metroid and past games. Just how I was glad to see Command &  Conquer Renegade come out. The C&C world was and is great but finally having a FPS set in it was really welcome I felt and hope they do another one.

 

I honestly think people overlook the benefits of a rail shooter type game. People talk about cinematic
games but that can really be done with a rail type of game as you can have tons of scripted sequences to really
sell the games story. This is just a movie but I can see how this could be played up well in terms of horror once the game
comes out. No different I think then entering a room and something happening. The only thing is that it takes out the
exploring and really in some games exploring isn't really needed all the time and just slows certain games down when
story is really important. 

I wasn't really sure if I was going to pick this up as I've never been crazy about Resident Evil, always hated
the controls until they were done in the GameCube versions but did enjoy the story in the games. I think I'll pick this up. 

NeoStar9

wonderfuly said, and thats the exact same reason i'm excited for this game. you can also really tell who the trolls and the anti wii fanboys are, its getting sad now :|

Does anyone here actually KNOW what the Wii is capable of? As in like, hands on experience? Seems pretty silly to say "oh, the Wii isn't capable of that" when you don't really know what it is capable of. Ultimate_Peon

Just look at Ninja Gaiden, or Riddick on the Xbox.

The Wii is theoretically capable of that and alittle more. 

[QUOTE="Hoobinator"][QUOTE="loco145"][QUOTE="Hoobinator"][QUOTE="loco145"][QUOTE="Hoobinator"]

[QUOTE="loco145"]Wow, very close to REmake, which is impresive considering REmake uses pre-rendered enviroments... realtime and now are destructible!Koolsen

And yet not so close when there happens to be barely anything going on minimal action on screen at any one time, and is an on the rails shooter , with mostly small rooms and corridors being generated by the GPU.

I never said it wasn't, but the hardware is (supposedly) a generation ahead.

Take a look at RE1 for the playstation and the massive upgrade in graphics when it came out on the GC, and it was basically a port with a few gameplay changes.

The graphics shown really are not impressive at all.

Have you actually seen the graphics... they look last gen, that's exactly what I'm saying. This game doesn't even look as good as RE1 for the GC. I'm sure they could have had a few destructible elements in RE1 for GC if they downgraded the visuals like they've done here. If this is Wii's next gen for $250 then it's the biggest rip off of all 3 nect gen consoles in terms of graphics. Of course to Sheep the controllers worth it anyway.

Having a few destructible elements in the game does not make it a fully destructible environment. 

I ised RE1 because it looks exactly like a rehash of it, but on teh rails... the imagnation.

HE avoided that fact time and time again. I don't thnk he will ever get it...

[QUOTE="Ultimate_Peon"]Does anyone here actually KNOW what the Wii is capable of? As in like, hands on experience? Seems pretty silly to say "oh, the Wii isn't capable of that" when you don't really know what it is capable of. Teufelhuhn

Based on the memory alone you can make plenty of assertions, the rest comes from pieced together info and common sense.

Ok then, please enlighten me.  Exactly what is the Wii capable of. And cite your experience working with the console.

Looks extremely rough around the edges. For instance, the maps looked like they had no lighting at all. It was fullbright sept for the thunder. Secondly, the mansion does not have proper colisions, very often zombies would fly through thigns they shouldn't, and would land on surfaces wehre they should have fallen. If it is to be a light gun game, they should modernize it with ragdolls and such... not this crap...

My hype is a 7 at best.

kittykatz5k

Um...the game isn't done you know right? And you would put this game at a 7 just cause there was some unrealistic zombie deaths?

[QUOTE="Hoobinator"][QUOTE="loco145"][QUOTE="Hoobinator"][QUOTE="loco145"][QUOTE="Hoobinator"]

[QUOTE="loco145"]Wow, very close to REmake, which is impresive considering REmake uses pre-rendered enviroments... realtime and now are destructible!Koolsen

And yet not so close when there happens to be barely anything going on minimal action on screen at any one time, and is an on the rails shooter , with mostly small rooms and corridors being generated by the GPU.

I never said it wasn't, but the hardware is (supposedly) a generation ahead.

Take a look at RE1 for the playstation and the massive upgrade in graphics when it came out on the GC, and it was basically a port with a few gameplay changes.

The graphics shown really are not impressive at all.

Have you actually seen the graphics... they look last gen, that's exactly what I'm saying. This game doesn't even look as good as RE1 for the GC. I'm sure they could have had a few destructible elements in RE1 for GC if they downgraded the visuals like they've done here. If this is Wii's next gen for $250 then it's the biggest rip off of all 3 nect gen consoles in terms of graphics. Of course to Sheep the controllers worth it anyway.

Having a few destructible elements in the game does not make it a fully destructible environment.

I ised RE1 because it looks exactly like a rehash of it, but on teh rails... the imagnation.

And how is that supposed to impress me, remind me again didn't 3D begin back in the mid 90's? 

The fact that it doesn't even live up to a 5 year old, technically graphically outdated game say it all. Pre-rendered or not.  

[QUOTE="Koolsen"][QUOTE="Hoobinator"][QUOTE="loco145"][QUOTE="Hoobinator"][QUOTE="loco145"][QUOTE="Hoobinator"]

[QUOTE="loco145"]Wow, very close to REmake, which is impresive considering REmake uses pre-rendered enviroments... realtime and now are destructible!tocool340

And yet not so close when there happens to be barely anything going on minimal action on screen at any one time, and is an on the rails shooter , with mostly small rooms and corridors being generated by the GPU.

I never said it wasn't, but the hardware is (supposedly) a generation ahead.

Take a look at RE1 for the playstation and the massive upgrade in graphics when it came out on the GC, and it was basically a port with a few gameplay changes.

The graphics shown really are not impressive at all.

Have you actually seen the graphics... they look last gen, that's exactly what I'm saying. This game doesn't even look as good as RE1 for the GC. I'm sure they could have had a few destructible elements in RE1 for GC if they downgraded the visuals like they've done here. If this is Wii's next gen for $250 then it's the biggest rip off of all 3 nect gen consoles in terms of graphics. Of course to Sheep the controllers worth it anyway.

Having a few destructible elements in the game does not make it a fully destructible environment.

I ised RE1 because it looks exactly like a rehash of it, but on teh rails... the imagnation.

HE avoided that fact time and time again. I don't thnk he will ever get it...

I've stated it again and again, this game cannot compete even with an outdated game pre-rendered or not. 360 and PS3 games blow RE1 Remake to oblivion whilst the Wii can't even beat it. Enough for you? 

[QUOTE="kittykatz5k"]

Looks extremely rough around the edges. For instance, the maps looked like they had no lighting at all. It was fullbright sept for the thunder. Secondly, the mansion does not have proper colisions, very often zombies would fly through thigns they shouldn't, and would land on surfaces wehre they should have fallen. If it is to be a light gun game, they should modernize it with ragdolls and such... not this crap...

My hype is a 7 at best.

88Ghost89

Um...the game isn't done you know right? And you would put this game at a 7 just cause there was some unrealistic zombie deaths?

Yes I would. I put it at decent but nothing fantastic, which describes that video. It was full of glitches, generic enemies, and dull, VERY dull enviorments. It looks like they actually TRIED to flush color out of everything.

[QUOTE="Ultimate_Peon"]Does anyone here actually KNOW what the Wii is capable of? As in like, hands on experience? Seems pretty silly to say "oh, the Wii isn't capable of that" when you don't really know what it is capable of. purplemidgets

Just look at Ninja Gaiden, or Riddick on the Xbox.

The Wii is theoretically capable of that and alittle more. 

That doesn't seem very specific.  Certainly not enough for people to go around declaring they know what the Wii is and is not capable of. 

[QUOTE="tocool340"][QUOTE="Hoobinator"][QUOTE="loco145"][QUOTE="Hoobinator"][QUOTE="loco145"][QUOTE="Hoobinator"]

[QUOTE="loco145"]Wow, very close to REmake, which is impresive considering REmake uses pre-rendered enviroments... realtime and now are destructible!Hoobinator

And yet not so close when there happens to be barely anything going on minimal action on screen at any one time, and is an on the rails shooter , with mostly small rooms and corridors being generated by the GPU.

I never said it wasn't, but the hardware is (supposedly) a generation ahead.

Take a look at RE1 for the playstation and the massive upgrade in graphics when it came out on the GC, and it was basically a port with a few gameplay changes.

The graphics shown really are not impressive at all.

Have you actually seen the graphics... they look last gen, that's exactly what I'm saying. This game doesn't even look as good as RE1 for the GC. I'm sure they could have had a few destructible elements in RE1 for GC if they downgraded the visuals like they've done here. If this is Wii's next gen for $250 then it's the biggest rip off of all 3 nect gen consoles in terms of graphics. Of course to Sheep the controllers worth it anyway.

Having a few destructible elements in the game does not make it a fully destructible environment.

I ised RE1 because it looks exactly like a rehash of it, but on teh rails... the imagnation.

Just post some Resident Evil 4 pics that enviroment that looks better than UC's enviroment....

There isn't any, but that's because the wii is the nect gen (supposedly) anyway.

Thanks for saying that. You just admitted that Resident evil 4 (A fully 3-D game on the GC) looks worser than RE: UC. Stop comparing a Pre-rendered background game to a fully 3-D game. By your logic, REmake looks better than some 360 titles...

[QUOTE="Hoobinator"][QUOTE="tocool340"][QUOTE="Hoobinator"][QUOTE="loco145"][QUOTE="Hoobinator"][QUOTE="loco145"][QUOTE="Hoobinator"]

[QUOTE="loco145"]Wow, very close to REmake, which is impresive considering REmake uses pre-rendered enviroments... realtime and now are destructible!tocool340

And yet not so close when there happens to be barely anything going on minimal action on screen at any one time, and is an on the rails shooter , with mostly small rooms and corridors being generated by the GPU.

I never said it wasn't, but the hardware is (supposedly) a generation ahead.

Take a look at RE1 for the playstation and the massive upgrade in graphics when it came out on the GC, and it was basically a port with a few gameplay changes.

The graphics shown really are not impressive at all.

Have you actually seen the graphics... they look last gen, that's exactly what I'm saying. This game doesn't even look as good as RE1 for the GC. I'm sure they could have had a few destructible elements in RE1 for GC if they downgraded the visuals like they've done here. If this is Wii's next gen for $250 then it's the biggest rip off of all 3 nect gen consoles in terms of graphics. Of course to Sheep the controllers worth it anyway.

Having a few destructible elements in the game does not make it a fully destructible environment.

I ised RE1 because it looks exactly like a rehash of it, but on teh rails... the imagnation.

Just post some Resident Evil 4 pics that enviroment that looks better than UC's enviroment....

There isn't any, but that's because the wii is the nect gen (supposedly) anyway.

Thanks for saying that. You just admitted that Resident evil 4 (A fully 3-D game on the GC) looks worser than RE: UC. Stop comparing a Pre-rendered background game to a fully 3-D game. By your logic, REmake looks better than some 360 titles...

Only the games that are absolutely craptastic, and took 2 months to port over to the 360 version.

The game looks crap by next gen standards and yet you guys are saying it's impressive because it's teh 3D, the dawn of a new age of man...

Look here, 360 and PS3 games blow chunks out of RE1 Remake and Wii can't even beat it... says it all.

[QUOTE="Koolsen"][QUOTE="Hoobinator"][QUOTE="loco145"][QUOTE="Hoobinator"][QUOTE="loco145"][QUOTE="Hoobinator"]

[QUOTE="loco145"]Wow, very close to REmake, which is impresive considering REmake uses pre-rendered enviroments... realtime and now are destructible!Hoobinator

And yet not so close when there happens to be barely anything going on minimal action on screen at any one time, and is an on the rails shooter , with mostly small rooms and corridors being generated by the GPU.

I never said it wasn't, but the hardware is (supposedly) a generation ahead.

Take a look at RE1 for the playstation and the massive upgrade in graphics when it came out on the GC, and it was basically a port with a few gameplay changes.

The graphics shown really are not impressive at all.

Have you actually seen the graphics... they look last gen, that's exactly what I'm saying. This game doesn't even look as good as RE1 for the GC. I'm sure they could have had a few destructible elements in RE1 for GC if they downgraded the visuals like they've done here. If this is Wii's next gen for $250 then it's the biggest rip off of all 3 nect gen consoles in terms of graphics. Of course to Sheep the controllers worth it anyway.

Having a few destructible elements in the game does not make it a fully destructible environment.

I ised RE1 because it looks exactly like a rehash of it, but on teh rails... the imagnation.

And how is that supposed to impress me, remind me again didn't 3D begin back in the mid 90's? 

The fact that it doesn't even live up to a 5 year old, technically graphically outdated game say it all. Pre-rendered or not.  

The difference is the game WAS orginally made for pre-rendered background, it was never fully 3-D. Why do you keep trying to compare a Wii game to the consoles specifically made for graphics in mind? For all the Wii game released thus far, it looks great......

Stop comparing a game built on Pre-rendered backgrounds to a game that has fully 3-D backgrounds...

[QUOTE="88Ghost89"][QUOTE="kittykatz5k"]

Looks extremely rough around the edges. For instance, the maps looked like they had no lighting at all. It was fullbright sept for the thunder. Secondly, the mansion does not have proper colisions, very often zombies would fly through thigns they shouldn't, and would land on surfaces wehre they should have fallen. If it is to be a light gun game, they should modernize it with ragdolls and such... not this crap...

My hype is a 7 at best.

kittykatz5k

Um...the game isn't done you know right? And you would put this game at a 7 just cause there was some unrealistic zombie deaths?

Yes I would. I put it at decent but nothing fantastic, which describes that video. It was full of glitches, generic enemies, and dull, VERY dull enviorments. It looks like they actually TRIED to flush color out of everything.

I can't fathom why sheep are so excited to rebuy REmake & RE4 just for Wii-mote controls:|

But whatever... you guys have fun replaying the games youve already played to death on GC, while im playing Resident Evil 5...:?

[QUOTE="kittykatz5k"][QUOTE="88Ghost89"][QUOTE="kittykatz5k"]

Looks extremely rough around the edges. For instance, the maps looked like they had no lighting at all. It was fullbright sept for the thunder. Secondly, the mansion does not have proper colisions, very often zombies would fly through thigns they shouldn't, and would land on surfaces wehre they should have fallen. If it is to be a light gun game, they should modernize it with ragdolls and such... not this crap...

My hype is a 7 at best.

Koolsen

Um...the game isn't done you know right? And you would put this game at a 7 just cause there was some unrealistic zombie deaths?

Yes I would. I put it at decent but nothing fantastic, which describes that video. It was full of glitches, generic enemies, and dull, VERY dull enviorments. It looks like they actually TRIED to flush color out of everything.

Excuses, excuses, they undid every inch of color in teh game and it's textures are suffering massivly. This game looks 3 kinds of ugly and anyone who knows me knows I am actually a sheep. This is not a fanboyist veiw, this is an honest opinion. they undid all art in the game graphically, killed the lighting, and ignored collision boxes completely.

[QUOTE="Hoobinator"][QUOTE="Koolsen"][QUOTE="Hoobinator"][QUOTE="loco145"][QUOTE="Hoobinator"][QUOTE="loco145"][QUOTE="Hoobinator"]

[QUOTE="loco145"]Wow, very close to REmake, which is impresive considering REmake uses pre-rendered enviroments... realtime and now are destructible!tocool340

And yet not so close when there happens to be barely anything going on minimal action on screen at any one time, and is an on the rails shooter , with mostly small rooms and corridors being generated by the GPU.

I never said it wasn't, but the hardware is (supposedly) a generation ahead.

Take a look at RE1 for the playstation and the massive upgrade in graphics when it came out on the GC, and it was basically a port with a few gameplay changes.

The graphics shown really are not impressive at all.

Have you actually seen the graphics... they look last gen, that's exactly what I'm saying. This game doesn't even look as good as RE1 for the GC. I'm sure they could have had a few destructible elements in RE1 for GC if they downgraded the visuals like they've done here. If this is Wii's next gen for $250 then it's the biggest rip off of all 3 nect gen consoles in terms of graphics. Of course to Sheep the controllers worth it anyway.

Having a few destructible elements in the game does not make it a fully destructible environment.

I ised RE1 because it looks exactly like a rehash of it, but on teh rails... the imagnation.

And how is that supposed to impress me, remind me again didn't 3D begin back in the mid 90's?

The fact that it doesn't even live up to a 5 year old, technically graphically outdated game say it all. Pre-rendered or not.

The difference is the game WAS orginally made for pre-rendered background, it was never fully 3-D. Why do you keep trying to compare a Wii game to the consoles specifically made for graphics in mind? For all the Wii game released thus far, it looks great......

Stop comparing a game built on Pre-rendered backgrounds to a game that has fully 3-D backgrounds...

If RE:UC is good by Wii standards then don't expect many if any games at all to surpass the graphics seen in last gen games and they're charging you $250 for a controller :(

Just for the record here's the best RE1:Remake screen I could find, gameplay screen and the Wii can't beat it and you say some 360 and PS3 games struggle to beat this.... NO.

BTW I've seen the 360 replicate whole worlds i.e. Oblivion in teh fully 3D far far far far far better than the above graphics. Oh and the above area in the game was really, really small with only a shark and water.

[QUOTE="tocool340"][QUOTE="Hoobinator"][QUOTE="tocool340"][QUOTE="Hoobinator"][QUOTE="loco145"][QUOTE="Hoobinator"][QUOTE="loco145"][QUOTE="Hoobinator"]

[QUOTE="loco145"]Wow, very close to REmake, which is impresive considering REmake uses pre-rendered enviroments... realtime and now are destructible!Hoobinator

And yet not so close when there happens to be barely anything going on minimal action on screen at any one time, and is an on the rails shooter , with mostly small rooms and corridors being generated by the GPU.

I never said it wasn't, but the hardware is (supposedly) a generation ahead.

Take a look at RE1 for the playstation and the massive upgrade in graphics when it came out on the GC, and it was basically a port with a few gameplay changes.

The graphics shown really are not impressive at all.

Have you actually seen the graphics... they look last gen, that's exactly what I'm saying. This game doesn't even look as good as RE1 for the GC. I'm sure they could have had a few destructible elements in RE1 for GC if they downgraded the visuals like they've done here. If this is Wii's next gen for $250 then it's the biggest rip off of all 3 nect gen consoles in terms of graphics. Of course to Sheep the controllers worth it anyway.

Having a few destructible elements in the game does not make it a fully destructible environment.

I ised RE1 because it looks exactly like a rehash of it, but on teh rails... the imagnation.

Just post some Resident Evil 4 pics that enviroment that looks better than UC's enviroment....

There isn't any, but that's because the wii is the nect gen (supposedly) anyway.

Thanks for saying that. You just admitted that Resident evil 4 (A fully 3-D game on the GC) looks worser than RE: UC. Stop comparing a Pre-rendered background game to a fully 3-D game. By your logic, REmake looks better than some 360 titles...

Only the games that are absolutely craptastic, and took 2 months to port over to the 360 version.

The game looks crap by next gen standards and yet you guys are saying it's impressive because it's teh 3D, the dawn of a new age of man...

Look here, 360 and PS3 games blow chunks out of RE1 Remake and Wii can't even beat it... says it all.

I was using your logic. You were saying that, since REmake is a better looking game than RE: UC because it has pre-rendered backgrounds, that would make it better looking than some of the 360 and PS3 games than since REmake feature  animated Pre-rendered background (Such as months flying to the light, water dripping on puddles using Pre-rendered animations, ETC.), it would mostly equal some of the 360 PS3 games, minus the blooming effect though...

[QUOTE="Hoobinator"][QUOTE="tocool340"][QUOTE="Hoobinator"][QUOTE="tocool340"][QUOTE="Hoobinator"][QUOTE="loco145"][QUOTE="Hoobinator"][QUOTE="loco145"][QUOTE="Hoobinator"]

[QUOTE="loco145"]Wow, very close to REmake, which is impresive considering REmake uses pre-rendered enviroments... realtime and now are destructible!tocool340

And yet not so close when there happens to be barely anything going on minimal action on screen at any one time, and is an on the rails shooter , with mostly small rooms and corridors being generated by the GPU.

I never said it wasn't, but the hardware is (supposedly) a generation ahead.

Take a look at RE1 for the playstation and the massive upgrade in graphics when it came out on the GC, and it was basically a port with a few gameplay changes.

The graphics shown really are not impressive at all.

Have you actually seen the graphics... they look last gen, that's exactly what I'm saying. This game doesn't even look as good as RE1 for the GC. I'm sure they could have had a few destructible elements in RE1 for GC if they downgraded the visuals like they've done here. If this is Wii's next gen for $250 then it's the biggest rip off of all 3 nect gen consoles in terms of graphics. Of course to Sheep the controllers worth it anyway.

Having a few destructible elements in the game does not make it a fully destructible environment.

I ised RE1 because it looks exactly like a rehash of it, but on teh rails... the imagnation.

Just post some Resident Evil 4 pics that enviroment that looks better than UC's enviroment....

There isn't any, but that's because the wii is the nect gen (supposedly) anyway.

Thanks for saying that. You just admitted that Resident evil 4 (A fully 3-D game on the GC) looks worser than RE: UC. Stop comparing a Pre-rendered background game to a fully 3-D game. By your logic, REmake looks better than some 360 titles...

Only the games that are absolutely craptastic, and took 2 months to port over to the 360 version.

The game looks crap by next gen standards and yet you guys are saying it's impressive because it's teh 3D, the dawn of a new age of man...

Look here, 360 and PS3 games blow chunks out of RE1 Remake and Wii can't even beat it... says it all.

I was using your logic. You were saying that, since REmake is a better looking game than RE: UC because it has pre-rendered backgrounds, that would make it better looking than some of the 360 and PS3 games than since REmake feature animated Pre-rendered background (Such as months flying to the light, water dripping on puddles using Pre-rendered animations, ETC.), it would mostly equal some of the 360 PS3 games, minus the blooming effect though...

Oh my gosh NO. Post these amazing screens of RE1 Remake which beat out the 360 and PS3 games. You're talking rubbish now, stop it. RE1 looks like a last gen game that doesn't hold a candle to next gen games. See my previous post for clarification

Puts next gen games to shame :o 

Hmm on-rails confirmed then. While its not what I was expecting its not that bad either, I always loved those types of games not to mention that they usually provide an interesting challenge.

Still, I was expecting more coming from this tittle but at the same time I really wasn't dying for it either. The graphics are great and the environments of the game at least are proved to not be Pre-rendered wich actually impressed me. Also, that pointer is horrible, there better be an available option to turn it off.

http://media.wii.ign.com/media/827/827187/vid_1961465.html

 

 

sexy_luigi

How is this awesome? It's terrible! It looks like you can just sit back and use only the Wiimote and kill stuff duck hunt sty.le.  No brains, no strategy. Just kill what moves. This game is an abomination. I'm beginning to wonder if the Wii really is just for non-gamers :(

[QUOTE="sexy_luigi"]

http://media.wii.ign.com/media/827/827187/vid_1961465.html

 

 

OceanLeet

How is this awesome? It's terrible! It looks like you can just sit back and use only the Wiimote and kill stuff duck hunt sty.le. No brains, no strategy. Just kill what moves. This game is an abomination. I'm beginning to wonder if the Wii really is just for non-gamers :(

lol what did you expect its an arcade shooter and yet I still have to agree with you. Still, just because CAPCOM decides to make any certain game on the Wii does not mean you should jump into rushed conclusions.

Yeah, I was kind of expecting this. Didn't care for UC too much.

I love light gun games and this looks to be utter trash, it doesn't even seem like they are takeing advantage of the fact that its a light gun game. well back to the house of the dead 2 and crisis zone.Cassius128

I actually have to agree with that. Still, we have only seen very little of the game. I do hope developers start bringing these types of games to the Wii. 

Y-U-C-K!!!!!!!! :lol:

Been there done that with House of the Dead on DC.

That's a shame, I thought Capcom and Nintendo were heading in the right direction.

SHEEP = "Bu....buh....but teh 3erd Parteez well cum on da Wii beecuz da Wii iz teh Roxxorz ryt now! En da Wii iz Selleng more den da PeeEss Triple and da TRee 6 Tee" 

:lol:

Y-U-C-K!!!!!!!! :lol:

Been there done that with House of the Dead on DC.

That's a shame, I thought Capcom and Nintendo were heading in the right direction.

SHEEP = "Bu....buh....but teh 3erd Parteez well cum on da Wii beecuz da Wii iz teh Roxxorz ryt now! En da Wii iz Selleng more den da PeeEss Triple and da TRee 6 Tee" 

:lol:

KingsofQueens

Uh oh, he's foaming at the mouth...

Looks like RE1:Remake for the GC, only completely on rails, not particularly frightening and not exactly a frenetic shooter either. :|

Shame.

Edit: Just looked at some RE1 GC screens, this doesn't even match those.... 

Hoobinator

OMG! i just lost all interest in this game, rail shooters are lame, is this suppose to compete with house of  the dead or somethng?

wow what crap, one of the very few games that i was looking forwad to on the Wii.

Atleast in resident evil survivor seres you can freely move around.....