Downloaded the hq gamersyde footage and it looks pretty fucking great. Don't know what there is to bitch about these guys are doing this for 3 platforms and the fact the PS4 can get 1080p/30fps at higher settings is good news. Looks smexy:
edit: wow mustard race is so butthurt they flagged me haha, flagging the truth is going to make witcher look any better. keep that in mind lmao
@R4gn4r0k@FoxbatAlpha ass creed unity looks better, so does mgs5
as u can tell by the title of the vid they are showing the pc version and *spoilers* it looks like shit.
bu-bu-bu its x1 version!!! haha ms marketing partnership!!!
in case turd race forget here is what it used to look like
Loading Video...
''In the duel console PlayStation 4, meanwhile, has clearly ahead of the graph. Although the textures are a bit more blurred than "high" PC details that falls within the normal TV-distance but hardly noticeable. In addition, the witcher adventure runs on the PS4 in 1080p - but only at 30 frames per second, which did not bother us.
On the Xbox One Geralt goes also with 30 fps on monster hunt, but only in 900p, the textures also seen slightly more washed out than on the PS4. However, polishes CD Projekt own words yet on the Xbox version, maybe you can still screw up to 1080p, but you would not promise anything. Stand now is the PS4 image the sharper and stronger color.''
It's still gonna obliterate every single PS4 exclusive (and X1 for that matter), so what's your fucking point? And it's gonna own MGS5 as well, but of course MGS due to being bigger franchise is gonna get dick-rided to hell and back.
Even maxed out on PC, MGSV is still just a dolled up PS3 game.
Well that just isn't true. MGS5 looks great by any standard. A dolled up PS3 game is TLOU Remastered or GTA V; MGS5 looks current-gen.
Well of course it looks great. Kojimas team is boss. They have some very talented artists and a damn nice engine.
It's still a cross gen game that started as a PS3 title and is still using assets built with the PS360 in mind. If they had cut out the last gen versions and used the Xbone as the lowest common denominator, we'd be seeing a MUCH better looking game.
Funny that you mention TLOU and GTAV, because it's the same deal really. Taking last gen assets and rendering them at a higher resolution with a higher frame rate and some post effects.
Really man, next time you boot up GZ, go have a look at the foliage, or the noticeably faceted geometry, or the flat ass textures. Kojima may be a Nintendo-level wizard when it comes to working with limitations, but the limitations are still very much evident.
The delusion in this thread is strong. I'm not a fan of the series but even judging by a compressed video it's a great looking game, particularly considering the scale. The trees and foliage are very impressive, the npc detail is much higher than current open world graphics king, AC Unity, and there's some nice high-res textures going on.
Cows like you@ghostwarrior786: Oh my FUCKING GOD, the XB1 version looks like a PS1 title next to my beloved PS4! I can't even look at the the XB1 version!!!!
Cows gonna cow...
That goes on every where. If it isn't in the eye of the poster, then its absolute shit. But in truth, this is all bullshit. Just play the game and have fun doing it. The only place one cant is on a WiiU
You really shouldn't be pre-ordering games, what with the Master Bug Collection and Ass Creed parity.
I know, but I couldn't resist that epic statue :P On top of that I really enjoyed Unity and got my first platinum with it and will plat Dead Kings soon enough!
Doesn't that video show the xb1 version? Walks up to an NPC and it says to press a green A button to speak... pretty sure just one console has a green A button.
Doesn't that video show the xb1 version? Walks up to an NPC and it says to press a green A button to speak... pretty sure just one console has a green A button.
PC version is using Xbox controller. It has been confirmed. It's PC version running on high settings with 2 GTX 980s. Console version doesn't have hair on sideways of Geralt due to lack of nVIDIA hair tech (in the build shown at booth at least). The game looks amazing, check out link to uncompressed footage, few posts above.
It's PC version running on high settings with 2 gtx 980s.
2 980's and still high? 4k?
Devs always use top of line PCs at booths, because you can't expect them to let hundreds of people and journalists that came from different parts of the world, experience unoptimized game on a midrange PC. They must have used High settings only to not let it look way different than console versions. Sites are already reporting medium textures on PS4 and even lower on Xbox One (PC textures were on high and PS4 textures were worse than that while X1 textures were even more blurry). Either that or they tried to keep frame rates stable because the code is unoptimized at this point.
Doesn't that video show the xb1 version? Walks up to an NPC and it says to press a green A button to speak... pretty sure just one console has a green A button.
PC version is using Xbox controller. It has been confirmed. It's PC version running on high settings with 2 GTX 980s. Console version doesn't have hair on sideways of Geralt due to lack of nVIDIA hair tech (in the build shown at booth at least). The game looks amazing, check out link to uncompressed footage, few posts above.
Games on the PS3 had hair physics. Does the hair not move at all on consoles? I really hate Nvidia as they always do this petty shit. Tress FX 2.0 ran on consoles and looked great with little performance hit.
Games on the PS3 had hair physics. Does the hair not move at all on consoles? I really hate Nvidia as they always do this petty shit. Tress FX 2.0 ran on consoles and looked great with little performance hit.
The hair will move just not as detailed/fluid Current build is not being used. You realize that PS3's Cell had processors meant for parallel workloads which allowed some developers to add in more advanced physics vs the normal cpu based physics. The PS4 and X1 also do use part of Nvidia's hairworks in Farcry 4, the consoles just dont do the simulated hair because they just dont have the gpu processing power to run the game and do real time advanced physics without compromising too much. Version 2.0 of tressfx had things toned down compared to the full blown 1.0 version on PC. However TressFX 2.0 was more optimized allowing most of the features to run on them without too much of a performance hit.
Nvidia isnt doing anything with the lack of advanced physics/ hairworks. Its the fact these consoles just dont have enough grunt to simulate detailed physics while doing everything else. Having weak cpu's does not help in feeding gpu the data it needs for the extra work.
lol why even bother using a PS4 exclusive, besides desperate hermit stupidity simply agreeing with each other because they feel the need to do so, if you look with your eyes it clear that MGS5 (yes the cross gen game) looks better and FFXV curb stops it.
Herms continuing to be desperate. Is this simply because console devs are generally are much more talented than PC wankers herms hype to the moon? Or is it some deeper racist superiority complex shared by the group western PC fans to downplay Japanese accomplishments?
God forbid if Kojima has actually made MGS5 only for current gen. TW3 is shown here running SLI, what crap both MGS5 and Final Fantasy xv crap on it graphically (also both open world), herms need to be thankful console devs are even considering PC so they have something impressive to use their graphics cards for.
The Witcher looks like a plastic barbie doll for gods sake, what the hell herms looking at when they say that shit looks better compared to..
Herms would like you to believe that TW3 is doing something technically that these Japanese developed open world games aren't to make you give TW3 a pass for not looking as impressive, but they don't have anything to prove those arguments; all they have is an idiotic fanboy belief that PC devs somehow make games "on a higher level"...that's it.
This "technical" argument for TW3 is no different than any PC game that gets released that doesn't have the best graphics, but they won't and can't actually defend it because they pulled it from their ass. The fact that all these games are open world is the one major factor herms have always leaned on to scream that "technical" rebuttal that has now been taken away.
Besides resolution and AA please tell me what the hell is supposed to be impressive about TW3 graphically?
The Witcher and every character in TW3 looks like plastic lifeless last gen dolls on par with maybe MGS "4" so it doesn't even matter if it isn't aren't even talented enough to make the characters look like anything but barbie and ken dolls .
Bu but the Witcher 3 detail, teh open world? The argument might have flown it was getting compared to small linear games but this is the reality...
lol, left side of pic. Check out the detail on the cloth along with the geometry and shadows on the sholder, I only need 2 980's to reach this benchmark you say?...very impressive
I feel sorry for the console owners they do not even understand pc has multiple settings for graphics. Here is a clue for all you people who only game on consoles, PC owners have more options for graphics then brightness options. How about your think about this while grazing in the pastures cows.
Witcher is a PC game why would console ppl play it? Thats like playing diablo 3 on console doesn't make any sense whatsoever, leave this game to PC gamers and walk away.next they will want starcraft 2 and league of legends
Diablo 3 actually plays better on game consoles. Even PC gamers has praised the controls of the console version over the PC. The Witcher 2 played great on the XBox 360. You may want to keep you comments to yourself next time so you don't get embarrassed.
Witcher is a PC game why would console ppl play it? Thats like playing diablo 3 on console doesn't make any sense whatsoever, leave this game to PC gamers and walk away.next they will want starcraft 2 and league of legends
Diablo 3 actually plays better on game consoles.
Which is why it has less players, lower scores, and can't have ladders/seasons. lol.
It plays better according to who? The controller doesn't even allow high level Greater Rifts...
lol why even bother using a PS4 exclusive, besides desperate hermit stupidity simply agreeing with each other because they feel the need to do so, if you look with your eyes it clear that MGS5 (yes the cross gen game) looks better and FFXV curb stops it.
Herms continuing to be desperate. Is this simply because console devs are generally are much more talented than PC wankers herms hype to the moon? Or is it some deeper racist superiority complex shared by the group western PC fans to downplay Japanese accomplishments?
The butthurt is strong with this one.
And really, you're going to call an entire group of people racists over computer graphics?
Log in to comment