@SolidTy said:
@misterpmedia said:
@FastRobby said:
You really think I'm checking facts every time? Just for a comment on a forum? I don't have a problem with being wrong, so I really don't care about checking facts, when I think I'm right... :D
damn, you got shot down on that pretty hard. lol. Lil hint, read the links you post next time, bub ;)
lol.
@scottpsfan14 said:
No matter how many software updates the XB1 gets. It will always have a peak performance of 1.3 TF. No amount of software will change that. PS4 is 50% more powerful. That gap will never close given that Sony also improve their SDK's over the years (which they will). There is no gap closing here.
The hardware is static, dang. I thought with enough updates it was going to go into beast mode, but I forgot they used cheaper and weaker parts and charged more for the machine.
The only thing cheaper and weaker is the GPU and core ram ddr5 vs ddr3. Hopefully the esram can close that gap. I'll believe it when I see it though.
Every other hardware feature is better or a push on X1.
CPU: push
WiFi controller: hands down X1
Sound chip: Hands down x1
Blu-Ray player: push
HDMI ports: X1
USB 3.0 ports: x1
Number of controllers that can be connected at once: X1
OS: X1 FACT
Controller: push, depends on what you prefer.
To say they added cheap shit and threw it in a box, when going head to head with Sony's cheap shit is kind of hyperbole.
The graphics card choice was a major fold on Microsoft's part. Considering this is a gaming console.
32 megs of esram seems rather near sighted also.
If they're going to talk this shit about power. They need to implement it into one of their exclusives. Hit the target mark they first showed for Forza. Then I might take this BS seriously.
Log in to comment