Nintendo is doing it again 3DS will be the best selling console ever

  • 98 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Mario1331
Mario1331

8929

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#51 Mario1331
Member since 2005 • 8929 Posts

[QUOTE="WiiMan21"]

Didn't the PS2 sell the most for a system?

ThePlothole

Yeah, PS2 still leads by about 24 million units. Though it's also been on the market for considerably longer.

if were talking about the ds the ps2 does not lead the ds by 24 million units they lead it by about 9-12

Avatar image for Mario1331
Mario1331

8929

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#52 Mario1331
Member since 2005 • 8929 Posts

[QUOTE="tomarlyn"]

[QUOTE="HelloMoto56"]

it's a double standard!

madsnakehhh

Its a flip flop!

Its the SW way.

WTH dont yall want graphics from nintendo but now its not what yall want?

especially you tomarlyn you want a wii2 bad so i dont get it they are doing exactly what you "hardcore" fans love so much.graphics

Avatar image for Mario1331
Mario1331

8929

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#53 Mario1331
Member since 2005 • 8929 Posts

[QUOTE="nintendoman562"][QUOTE="tomarlyn"] Its a revolution!tomarlyn
It sort of is, it's 3D on a handheld without glasses. Can you name another device that does such a thing? It's like how the DS was the first mainstream handheld device with a touch screen. Now everything has a touch screen.

But 3D is pure eye candy and nothing else, sheep slammed the 360 and PS3 for adding nothing this gen but ''teh bettar grafix''. 3DS is just a more powerful DS with an analogue stick. Even though I can't wait for 3DS and will be a day one buyer, its only fair to call out those Wii fanboys on principle.

whats the prinicple 3d without glasses?

if they stayed a gen behind yall would slam it but now they bring it to the table yall slamming it again?this is worst then the psp-3ds debate about ports (which really doesnt make no sense)

Avatar image for Timstuff
Timstuff

26840

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#54 Timstuff
Member since 2002 • 26840 Posts

[QUOTE="Timstuff"]2 things I would be concerned about with the 3DS:

1) Is it true or not that 3D gaming causes headaches for a lot of people after 30 minutes

2) Will the 3D fad still be popular throughout the 3DS's life cycle? For movies, we're already looking at a repeat of the 80's with tons of poor quality gimmick movies with "3D" in the title over saturating cinemas, and if history repeats itself (which it will), the days of 3D movies are numbered, and thank God. Most movies only use it to make more money from renting the glasses, but after a few high profile 3D flops I think we'll start seeing less and less of it.

That doesn't mean that 3DS will die out with the 3D fad, but 3D as a selling point is going to become less and less relevant over the next year or two. The market is oversaturated and 3D will no longer have the novelty factor it had when Avatar came out. Even crap like Step Up 3 and Resident Evil Afterlife is getting released in 3D now, and eventually people will stop paying extra for it because the gimmick won't be worth it. Will the 3DS be immune to people starting to look at 3D as old hat? Only time will tell.rcafan

1. something i agree with here. to many flims are also getting into the 3d thing and that bugs the crap out of me.

2. what about the so called fad for the wii remote? oh wait... look at the move and kicnet.... 3d fad should of die already but since many movies are using now its going to stay. now since tvs are having it its going to stay.

3D is a fad, though. It always has been and that does not look like it's going to change this time around. The revenues from movies in 3D are already decreasing from the initial boom and it seems proportional to how many movies are tacking it on as a gimmick to increase ticket prices.

http://gizmodo.com/5592956/is-3d-already-dying

This is the exact same thing that happens every 20 years or so-- 3D comes out and for a new generation, the gimmick is a must-see. Then, every movie starts using it as a gimmick to get attention, and suddenly no-one cares anymore. The existence of 3D TVs doesn't mean jack squat, because there are only 25,000 in existence and there is NO content for them except for a few PS3 games. They sold 3D video tapes in the 80's too, but that did not save the gimmick from going out back then, and TVs that cost $3000 plus an additional $1500 in glasses are not going to save 3D from going out this time either. Getting 3D at home is not financially plausible at this point, and the fact that there is no content means there's no reason at all to invest in it. HD is just now overtaking standard definition, so don't expect to see 3D hit the airwaves any time soon-- if ever.

Avatar image for SakusEnvoy
SakusEnvoy

4764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 SakusEnvoy
Member since 2009 • 4764 Posts

[QUOTE="rcafan"][QUOTE="Timstuff"]2 things I would be concerned about with the 3DS:

1) Is it true or not that 3D gaming causes headaches for a lot of people after 30 minutes

2) Will the 3D fad still be popular throughout the 3DS's life cycle? For movies, we're already looking at a repeat of the 80's with tons of poor quality gimmick movies with "3D" in the title over saturating cinemas, and if history repeats itself (which it will), the days of 3D movies are numbered, and thank God. Most movies only use it to make more money from renting the glasses, but after a few high profile 3D flops I think we'll start seeing less and less of it.

That doesn't mean that 3DS will die out with the 3D fad, but 3D as a selling point is going to become less and less relevant over the next year or two. The market is oversaturated and 3D will no longer have the novelty factor it had when Avatar came out. Even crap like Step Up 3 and Resident Evil Afterlife is getting released in 3D now, and eventually people will stop paying extra for it because the gimmick won't be worth it. Will the 3DS be immune to people starting to look at 3D as old hat? Only time will tell.Timstuff

1. something i agree with here. to many flims are also getting into the 3d thing and that bugs the crap out of me.

2. what about the so called fad for the wii remote? oh wait... look at the move and kicnet.... 3d fad should of die already but since many movies are using now its going to stay. now since tvs are having it its going to stay.

3D is a fad, though. It always has been and that does not look like it's going to change this time around. The revenues from movies in 3D are already decreasing from the initial boom and it seems proportional to how many movies are tacking it on as a gimmick to increase ticket prices.

http://gizmodo.com/5592956/is-3d-already-dying

This is the exact same thing that happens every 20 years or so-- 3D comes out and for a new generation, the gimmick is a must-see. Then, every movie starts using it as a gimmick to get attention, and suddenly no-one cares anymore. The existence of 3D TVs doesn't mean jack squat, because there are only 25,000 in existence and there is NO content for them except for a few PS3 games. They sold 3D video tapes in the 80's too, but that did not save the gimmick from going out back then, and TVs that cost $3000 plus an additional $1500 in glasses are not going to save 3D from going out this time either. Getting 3D at home is not financially plausible at this point, and the fact that there is no content means there's no reason at all to invest in it. HD is just now overtaking standard definition, so don't expect to see 3D hit the airwaves any time soon-- if ever.

Even if 3D in movies are a fad, does that necessarily have any relevance for the 3DS? The real question we should be concerned with is what role, if any, does 3D have for the future of gaming. The basics behind the parallax barrier display are so simple and elegant that it may add as little as $15 to the overall production costs of the system.(link). It will come embedded with every 3DS sold, which means developers don't need to worry about market segmentation, and consumers aren't paying anything extra for it after they buy the system.

So far, the impressions have been enthusiastic about the 3D effect. Deus Ex creator Warren Spector even went so far as to say that the 3DS "changed his life" and that he was " [C]ompletely wrong about 3D. Not a fad. Not going away. Here for good - and that's a good thing. Nintendo deserves to sell a gazillion of these things." Granted, that's only the opinion of a single game developer; but the impressions from most people who tried out the system have been very positive. The technology has obvious limitations which means we probably won't see it on many PC monitors or TVs, but it may have found a good home on the 3DS.

About the future of 3DTVs -- I can only say this much, 120Hz and 240Hz TVs are becoming the de-facto standard. The only thing a new TV really needs to do, to be capable of being considered "3D Ready", is decode and display an HDMI 1.4 signal. So I don't see these things going the way of the dinosaur... I just don't see it. Once the communication protocols between the glasses and TVs are standardized (allowing for the creation of "universal glasses"), there's no reason why all major TVs in the future shouldn't be 3D Ready, whether or not the consumer chooses to use its 3D capabilities.

Avatar image for Urworstnhtmare
Urworstnhtmare

2630

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#56 Urworstnhtmare
Member since 2008 • 2630 Posts

[QUOTE="WiiMan21"]

Didn't the PS2 sell the most for a system?

ThePlothole

Yeah, PS2 still leads by about 24 million units. Though it's also been on the market for considerably longer.

Yes. But also the DS has been through many more revisions than the PS2...

Avatar image for tomarlyn
tomarlyn

20148

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#57 tomarlyn
Member since 2005 • 20148 Posts
[QUOTE="Mario1331"]

[QUOTE="madsnakehhh"]

[QUOTE="tomarlyn"]

Its a flip flop!

Its the SW way.

WTH dont yall want graphics from nintendo but now its not what yall want?

especially you tomarlyn you want a wii2 bad so i dont get it they are doing exactly what you "hardcore" fans love so much.graphics

Exactly! its awesome. It would be nice for those fanboys to admit power can be a good thing, instead of considering it detrimental to gameplay.
Avatar image for Silverbond
Silverbond

16130

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 Silverbond
Member since 2008 • 16130 Posts

I don't really care about how it will sell.

Avatar image for tomarlyn
tomarlyn

20148

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#59 tomarlyn
Member since 2005 • 20148 Posts

[QUOTE="tomarlyn"][QUOTE="nintendoman562"] It sort of is, it's 3D on a handheld without glasses. Can you name another device that does such a thing? It's like how the DS was the first mainstream handheld device with a touch screen. Now everything has a touch screen.Mario1331

But 3D is pure eye candy and nothing else, sheep slammed the 360 and PS3 for adding nothing this gen but ''teh bettar grafix''. 3DS is just a more powerful DS with an analogue stick. Even though I can't wait for 3DS and will be a day one buyer, its only fair to call out those Wii fanboys on principle.

whats the prinicple 3d without glasses?

if they stayed a gen behind yall would slam it but now they bring it to the table yall slamming it again?this is worst then the psp-3ds debate about ports (which really doesnt make no sense)

I'm not slamming it, I can't wait for it. I'm slamming fanboys at the start of this gen :D Ya'll! :P
Avatar image for Timstuff
Timstuff

26840

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#60 Timstuff
Member since 2002 • 26840 Posts
[QUOTE="SakusEnvoy"] [QUOTE="Timstuff"] [QUOTE="rcafan"] 1. something i agree with here. to many flims are also getting into the 3d thing and that bugs the crap out of me. 2. what about the so called fad for the wii remote? oh wait... look at the move and kicnet.... 3d fad should of die already but since many movies are using now its going to stay. now since tvs are having it its going to stay.

3D is a fad, though. It always has been and that does not look like it's going to change this time around. The revenues from movies in 3D are already decreasing from the initial boom and it seems proportional to how many movies are tacking it on as a gimmick to increase ticket prices. http://gizmodo.com/5592956/is-3d-already-dying This is the exact same thing that happens every 20 years or so-- 3D comes out and for a new generation, the gimmick is a must-see. Then, every movie starts using it as a gimmick to get attention, and suddenly no-one cares anymore. The existence of 3D TVs doesn't mean jack squat, because there are only 25,000 in existence and there is NO content for them except for a few PS3 games. They sold 3D video tapes in the 80's too, but that did not save the gimmick from going out back then, and TVs that cost $3000 plus an additional $1500 in glasses are not going to save 3D from going out this time either. Getting 3D at home is not financially plausible at this point, and the fact that there is no content means there's no reason at all to invest in it. HD is just now overtaking standard definition, so don't expect to see 3D hit the airwaves any time soon-- if ever.

Even if 3D in movies are a fad, does that necessarily have any relevance for the 3DS? The real question we should be concerned with is what role, if any, does 3D have for the future of gaming. The basics behind the parallax barrier display are so simple and elegant that it may add as little as $15 to the overall production costs of the system.(link). It will come embedded with every 3DS sold, which means developers don't need to worry about market segmentation, and consumers aren't paying anything extra for it after they buy the system. So far, the impressions have been enthusiastic about the 3D effect. Deus Ex creator Warren Spector even went so far as to say that the 3DS "changed his life" and that he was " [C]ompletely wrong about 3D. Not a fad. Not going away. Here for good - and that's a good thing. Nintendo deserves to sell a gazillion of these things." Granted, that's only the opinion of a single game developer; but the impressions from most people who tried out the system have been very positive. The technology has obvious limitations which means we probably won't see it on many PC monitors or TVs, but it may have found a good home on the 3DS. About the future of 3DTVs -- I can only say this much, 120Hz and 240Hz TVs are becoming the de-facto standard. The only thing a new TV really needs to do, to be capable of being considered "3D Ready", is decode and display an HDMI 1.4 signal. So I don't see these things going the way of the dinosaur... I just don't see it. Once the communication protocols between the glasses and TVs are standardized (allowing for the creation of "universal glasses"), there's no reason why all major TVs in the future shouldn't be 3D Ready, whether or not the consumer chooses to use its 3D capabilities.

The problem is that even if they come up with universal glasses, they're still going to cost $200 a pair. That's obscene. I don't care how expensive they are to manufacture, I am not going to buy glasses for an entire room full of people who are over to watch a new movie unless they cost $10 or less. I mean, if they made a car that ran on water, but it cost $5,000,000, would anyone buy it? And this is not ever something as important as a car with renewable fuel-- this is about re-creating a movie theater gimmick at home that people are already getting bored of anyway. And again, there is NO CONTENT. Name me one thing you can do with a 3D TV other than play a few PS3 games in 3D. No TV broadcasts, and no Blu-Ray movies (the the latter are supposed to come eventually, but not for a while). Given how friggin' slow the adoption of 3D TV is compared to HD, I don't see it catching on. I'm not saying that the end of the 3D fad will necessarily be tied to the DS's success-- after all, the 3DS costs about the same regardless of the 3D on it, since there are no glasses to buy. However, I am not sure if people are still going to be excited about 3D when the 3DS is readily available. If the games are good, people will buy it, but I am not sure how much affect the 3D will ultimately have on sales amongst casuals if they're over 3D by the time it comes out. Nintendo had better make sure that the games have a lot of appeal, because I don't think it's safe to assume that the 3D gimmick will be enough to draw people in. The fad is already pooping out for movies, and the game industry has just barely gotten started with their push for it.
Avatar image for Mario1331
Mario1331

8929

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#61 Mario1331
Member since 2005 • 8929 Posts

[QUOTE="Mario1331"]

[QUOTE="tomarlyn"] But 3D is pure eye candy and nothing else, sheep slammed the 360 and PS3 for adding nothing this gen but ''teh bettar grafix''. 3DS is just a more powerful DS with an analogue stick. Even though I can't wait for 3DS and will be a day one buyer, its only fair to call out those Wii fanboys on principle.tomarlyn

whats the prinicple 3d without glasses?

if they stayed a gen behind yall would slam it but now they bring it to the table yall slamming it again?this is worst then the psp-3ds debate about ports (which really doesnt make no sense)

I'm not slamming it, I can't wait for it. I'm slamming fanboys at the start of this gen :D Ya'll! :P

oh yea thats true and sorry about the bad grammar i just woke up from a nap before then(dont judge me):)

Avatar image for bsgpro
bsgpro

40

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#62 bsgpro
Member since 2010 • 40 Posts

[QUOTE="Slimmin360"]They truly are the innovative and marketing geniuses of the video gaming world...ya' gotta' admit they dominated E3 with there 3DS showing, i don't even own a portable right now but i am chomping at the bit with impatience, i cannot wait to buy this portable and i'll happily pay $250.00 or more if thats what it costs. They not only added a better thumbstick control than the PSP's nub stick, but they also upped the processor and rest of the hardware for even better graphics, and they showed the world that 3D gaming and movie watching is possible without the need for 3D glasses. I am sold....I will be a total supporter of not only Nintendo's upcoming portable but there next gen console too, what ever it may be.Coolyfett

Slimmin360? 3DS being the best ever? How can you say this? Sony has not released any infomation. You are a Nintendo supporter butCoolyfett iscurious about your SN, your account level and motive behind this type of post. Never seen a level 2 member have this sort of confidence. I take it you had another account on Gamespot? The usage of the PSP is something Coolyfett does everyday, everyday for almost 3 years strait. As a matter of fact Coolyfett was just playing Rayman lastnight on his PSP. You may want to give the PSP a try its an enjoyable system. It can hold you down will you wait for the next series from the Nintendo firm.

just because they are lv 2 dont mean they are new to gaming.

i played the psp and well got bored with it the first 5 minutes not the same with ds

Avatar image for gamebreakerz__
gamebreakerz__

5120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#63 gamebreakerz__
Member since 2010 • 5120 Posts
PSP2 will blow the 3DS away.
Avatar image for King_Dodongo
King_Dodongo

3759

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#64 King_Dodongo
Member since 2006 • 3759 Posts
PSP2 will blow the 3DS away.gamebreakerz__
Is that a joke?
Avatar image for gamebreakerz__
gamebreakerz__

5120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#65 gamebreakerz__
Member since 2010 • 5120 Posts
[QUOTE="gamebreakerz__"]PSP2 will blow the 3DS away.King_Dodongo
Is that a joke?

I'm talking about in terms of power and it's quite obvious that the PSP2 will be far more powerful than the 3DS.
Avatar image for coltsfan4ever
coltsfan4ever

2628

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 coltsfan4ever
Member since 2006 • 2628 Posts

They truly are the innovative and marketing geniuses of the video gaming world...ya' gotta' admit they dominated E3 with there 3DS showing, i don't even own a portable right now but i am chomping at the bit with impatience, i cannot wait to buy this portable and i'll happily pay $250.00 or more if thats what it costs. They not only added a better thumbstick control than the PSP's nub stick, but they also upped the processor and rest of the hardware for even better graphics, and they showed the world that 3D gaming and movie watching is possible without the need for 3D glasses. I am sold....I will be a total supporter of not only Nintendo's upcoming portable but there next gen console too, what ever it may be.Slimmin360
Wait until the thing releases before making predictions like this. The 3DS is cool but Im worried about how much this thing will cost. Anything over $250 is pushing it. Hope Nintendo is smart with the pricing strategy because i really want one.

Avatar image for ThePlothole
ThePlothole

11515

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 ThePlothole
Member since 2007 • 11515 Posts

Yes. But also the DS has been through many more revisions than the PS2...

Urworstnhtmare

Not really. What we first got in the west was a revision which added in the expansion bay (the original Japanese model used an external hard drive), built-in DVD playback (originally it needed software loaded to a memory card), and little rubber feet on the side to help it stand up vertically without aid. Later Sony made another significant revision which added a built-in IR receiver (originally the DVD remote came with an accessory that plugged into a controller port), playback of DVD-Rs, progressive scan support for DVDs, removed the FireWire port, and incorporated a much quieter fan. Then they introduced the PS2 slim, and more recently revised this with an internal power supply. And then there was the PSX.

Avatar image for InfinityMugen
InfinityMugen

3905

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#68 InfinityMugen
Member since 2007 • 3905 Posts

[QUOTE="King_Dodongo"][QUOTE="gamebreakerz__"]PSP2 will blow the 3DS away.gamebreakerz__
Is that a joke?

I'm talking about in terms of power and it's quite obvious that the PSP2 will be far more powerful than the 3DS.

Yeah. Because that sure helped it beat the DS...woops.

Avatar image for Aboogie5
Aboogie5

1118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 Aboogie5
Member since 2008 • 1118 Posts

When a hand held can reach the the graphics of a console of the same gen... i may consider a handheld... untill then.. screw that

Avatar image for Aboogie5
Aboogie5

1118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 Aboogie5
Member since 2008 • 1118 Posts

[QUOTE="gamebreakerz__"][QUOTE="King_Dodongo"] Is that a joke?InfinityMugen

I'm talking about in terms of power and it's quite obvious that the PSP2 will be far more powerful than the 3DS.

Yeah. Because that sure helped it beat the DS...woops.

No because the psp was more powerful than the ds :P

Avatar image for gamebreakerz__
gamebreakerz__

5120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#71 gamebreakerz__
Member since 2010 • 5120 Posts

[QUOTE="gamebreakerz__"][QUOTE="King_Dodongo"] Is that a joke?InfinityMugen

I'm talking about in terms of power and it's quite obvious that the PSP2 will be far more powerful than the 3DS.

Yeah. Because that sure helped it beat the DS...woops.

Since when were sales the most important thing? That's like saying the wii is the best console, it makes no sense.
Avatar image for renger6002
renger6002

4481

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#72 renger6002
Member since 2004 • 4481 Posts

[QUOTE="Slimmin360"]They truly are the innovative and marketing geniuses of the video gaming world...ya' gotta' admit they dominated E3 with there 3DS showing, i don't even own a portable right now but i am chomping at the bit with impatience, i cannot wait to buy this portable and i'll happily pay $250.00 or more if thats what it costs. They not only added a better thumbstick control than the PSP's nub stick, but they also upped the processor and rest of the hardware for even better graphics, and they showed the world that 3D gaming and movie watching is possible without the need for 3D glasses. I am sold....I will be a total supporter of not only Nintendo's upcoming portable but there next gen console too, what ever it may be.Coolyfett

Slimmin360? 3DS being the best ever? How can you say this? Sony has not released any infomation. You are a Nintendo supporter butCoolyfett iscurious about your SN, your account level and motive behind this type of post. Never seen a level 2 member have this sort of confidence. I take it you had another account on Gamespot? The usage of the PSP is something Coolyfett does everyday, everyday for almost 3 years strait. As a matter of fact Coolyfett was just playing Rayman lastnight on his PSP. You may want to give the PSP a try its an enjoyable system. It can hold you down will you wait for the next series from the Nintendo firm.

I don't see why someone's level should affect their opinion
Avatar image for ThePlothole
ThePlothole

11515

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 ThePlothole
Member since 2007 • 11515 Posts

When a hand held can reach the the graphics of a console of the same gen... i may consider a handheld... untill then.. ***** ****.

Aboogie5

Well TurboExpress was literally a TurboGrafx, and the 3DS might just be similarly capable to the Wii. Now if you mean compared to the high end of the spectrum... it will never happen. The parts are just too big, they need too much power, and generate too much heat. And with all three being increasingly true with newer systems it's going to be a lot longer before handhelds can even come close to this level of performance.

But to dismiss handhelds simply because they lack high end graphical capabilities is really missing the point. Handhelds can be played many more places than a home console. They can be thrown in a backpack, purse, or briefcase and pulled out whenever there is a free moment.

Since when were sales the most important thing? That's like saying the wii is the best console, it makes no sense.gamebreakerz__

I remember when heavy emphasis was placed on the PS1 and PS2 sales.

Avatar image for King_Dodongo
King_Dodongo

3759

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#74 King_Dodongo
Member since 2006 • 3759 Posts
[QUOTE="King_Dodongo"][QUOTE="gamebreakerz__"]PSP2 will blow the 3DS away.gamebreakerz__
Is that a joke?

I'm talking about in terms of power and it's quite obvious that the PSP2 will be far more powerful than the 3DS.

Game lineups speak at the end of the day. and there are big franchises already confirmed (and more to come lol).
Avatar image for VendettaRed07
VendettaRed07

14012

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#75 VendettaRed07
Member since 2007 • 14012 Posts

[QUOTE="King_Dodongo"][QUOTE="gamebreakerz__"]PSP2 will blow the 3DS away.gamebreakerz__
Is that a joke?

I'm talking about in terms of power and it's quite obvious that the PSP2 will be far more powerful than the 3DS.

I really hope its not... I want a good batterlife and a handheld thatll actually fit comfortably in my hand

Avatar image for AmayaPapaya
AmayaPapaya

9029

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#76 AmayaPapaya
Member since 2008 • 9029 Posts

[QUOTE="gamebreakerz__"][QUOTE="King_Dodongo"] Is that a joke?VendettaRed07

I'm talking about in terms of power and it's quite obvious that the PSP2 will be far more powerful than the 3DS.

I really hope its not... I want a good batterlife and a handheld thatll actually fit comfortably in my hand

Please man, a tank-like exterior and 2 hour battery life will compliment the system :P

Avatar image for gamebreakerz__
gamebreakerz__

5120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#77 gamebreakerz__
Member since 2010 • 5120 Posts
Since when were sales the most important thing? That's like saying the wii is the best console, it makes no sense.gamebreakerz__

I remember when heavy emphasis was placed on the PS1 and PS2 sales.

Yes but those were also the most or equally powerful system at the time.
Avatar image for AmayaPapaya
AmayaPapaya

9029

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#78 AmayaPapaya
Member since 2008 • 9029 Posts

Yes but those were also the most or equally powerful system at the time.gamebreakerz__

The N64 was more powerful, and GCN and X box destroyed the PS2.

Avatar image for gamebreakerz__
gamebreakerz__

5120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#79 gamebreakerz__
Member since 2010 • 5120 Posts
[QUOTE="AmayaPapaya"]

[QUOTE="VendettaRed07"]

I'm talking about in terms of power and it's quite obvious that the PSP2 will be far more powerful than the 3DS.gamebreakerz__

I really hope its not... I want a good batterlife and a handheld thatll actually fit comfortably in my hand

Please man, a tank-like exterior and 2 hour battery life will compliment the system :P

My PSP 1000 gets about 5 hours life still on its ancient battery and to say the PSP is a tank and the DS isn't is a bit weird because niether of them are particularly nifty. And BTW, the DS weighs more than the PSP.
Avatar image for AmayaPapaya
AmayaPapaya

9029

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#80 AmayaPapaya
Member since 2008 • 9029 Posts

[QUOTE="AmayaPapaya"]

[QUOTE="VendettaRed07"]

I really hope its not... I want a good batterlife and a handheld thatll actually fit comfortably in my hand

gamebreakerz__

Please man, a tank-like exterior and 2 hour battery life will compliment the system :P

My PSP 1000 gets about 5 hours life still on its ancient battery and to say the PSP is a tank and the DS isn't is a bit weird because niether of them are particularly nifty. And BTW, the DS weighs more than the PSP.

I was just messin'. The 3DS is apparently pretty powerful and it will probably have a 9 hour battery life and it isn't too bulky. PSP2 will probably be like the original PSP. 5 hour battery life, and kind of big.

I know it is weird to consider the DS not a tank. The original would look like one if you put the gun, and wheels on it.

Avatar image for jedikevin2
jedikevin2

5263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#81 jedikevin2
Member since 2004 • 5263 Posts
3ds looks nice but that price seems a bit sketchy. Add to that the big push into handheld phone gaming these days and I don't feel it will come close to the numbers the iterations of the DS has done.
Avatar image for SapSacPrime
SapSacPrime

8925

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#82 SapSacPrime
Member since 2004 • 8925 Posts

[QUOTE="gamebreakerz__"]Since when were sales the most important thing? That's like saying the wii is the best console, it makes no sense.gamebreakerz__

I remember when heavy emphasis was placed on the PS1 and PS2 sales.

Yes but those were also the most or equally powerful system at the time.

:lol: no :|

This is the first gen Sony have had the most powerful console on the market, unless you include the couple of months before the xbox and gamecube launched. The N64 was far more impressive than the PS1 from a perspective of raw power alone, and both the other consoles were vastly superior to the PS2 last gen.

Im sure you will argue which is even funnier since you constantly highlight the PS3's slight edge when the N64/xbox and PS1/PS2 gap was far larger and actually impacted things like game environment sizes.

Avatar image for lbjkurono23
lbjkurono23

12544

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#83 lbjkurono23
Member since 2007 • 12544 Posts

[QUOTE="gamebreakerz__"][QUOTE="King_Dodongo"] Is that a joke?King_Dodongo
I'm talking about in terms of power and it's quite obvious that the PSP2 will be far more powerful than the 3DS.

Yeah. Because that sure helped it beat the DS...woops.

You need to read that again lol.

Avatar image for ThePlothole
ThePlothole

11515

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 ThePlothole
Member since 2007 • 11515 Posts
Yes but those were also the most or equally powerful system at the time.gamebreakerz__

PS1 was way behind the N64 in overall graphical power. The only thing that made up for that was disc space, which made storing textures and prerendered backgrounds more practical. PS2 was noticeably weaker than the GCN and Xbox.

My PSP 1000 gets about 5 hours life still on its ancient battery and to say the PSP is a tank and the DS isn't is a bit weird because niether of them are particularly nifty. And BTW, the DS weighs more than the PSP.gamebreakerz__

I just weighed my PSP-1000 (with standard battery) and DS Lite. Both with a game inserted. The former came in at 10.3 oz, while the latter only at 7.8oz.

More important though is the width of the units. A DS Lite is roughly an inch shorter than a PSP. This makes all the difference when stowing the handheld in a pocket.

Avatar image for gamebreakerz__
gamebreakerz__

5120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#85 gamebreakerz__
Member since 2010 • 5120 Posts
[QUOTE="gamebreakerz__"]Yes but those were also the most or equally powerful system at the time.ThePlothole

PS1 was way behind the N64 in overall graphical power. The only thing that made up for that was disc space, which made storing textures and prerendered backgrounds more practical. PS2 was noticeably weaker than the GCN and Xbox.

My PSP 1000 gets about 5 hours life still on its ancient battery and to say the PSP is a tank and the DS isn't is a bit weird because niether of them are particularly nifty. And BTW, the DS weighs more than the PSP.gamebreakerz__

I just weighed my PSP-1000 (with standard battery) and DS Lite. Both with a game inserted. The former came in at 10.3 oz, while the latter only at 7.8oz.

Yes but thats a DS Lite and PSP 1000, try a PSP slim and DS lite. The original DS was heavier than the the original PSP as well.
Avatar image for ThePlothole
ThePlothole

11515

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 ThePlothole
Member since 2007 • 11515 Posts
Yes but thats a DS Lite and PSP 1000, try a PSP slim and DS lite. The original DS was heavier than the the original PSP as well.gamebreakerz__

Well I don't have an original DS, but the official specs list it as 9.7oz.

Also note that I said standard battery. In order to get anywhere near the DS in battery life, you really need an extended battery for the PSP.

Avatar image for InfinityMugen
InfinityMugen

3905

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#87 InfinityMugen
Member since 2007 • 3905 Posts

[QUOTE="InfinityMugen"]

[QUOTE="gamebreakerz__"] I'm talking about in terms of power and it's quite obvious that the PSP2 will be far more powerful than the 3DS.gamebreakerz__

Yeah. Because that sure helped it beat the DS...woops.

Since when were sales the most important thing? That's like saying the wii is the best console, it makes no sense.

Since the video games business was about making money?. Like the PS2, the DS had huge marketshare which was the deciding factor for 3rd party support. How does it not make sense? Sales is very important.

Avatar image for gamebreakerz__
gamebreakerz__

5120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#88 gamebreakerz__
Member since 2010 • 5120 Posts
[QUOTE="InfinityMugen"]

[QUOTE="gamebreakerz__"][QUOTE="InfinityMugen"] Yeah. Because that sure helped it beat the DS...woops.

Since when were sales the most important thing? That's like saying the wii is the best console, it makes no sense.

Since the video games business was about making money?. Like the PS2, the DS had huge marketshare which was the deciding factor for 3rd party support. How does it not make sense? Sales is very important.

Okay then, have fun playing sales.
Avatar image for Rockman999
Rockman999

7507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 Rockman999
Member since 2005 • 7507 Posts
Again? They haven't even outsold the PS2 yet. :|
Avatar image for ZarbonX
ZarbonX

356

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 ZarbonX
Member since 2010 • 356 Posts

The 3DS isn't a console its a portable system that ad's very little to the hand held market

it tries to cash in on the recent 3d hype for movies an finally upgrades its graphics card past the n64 which is a plus but its not going to change the way we game i bet this system sells less then the DS imo

Avatar image for ThePlothole
ThePlothole

11515

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 ThePlothole
Member since 2007 • 11515 Posts

The 3DS isn't a console its a portable system that ad's very little to the hand held market

it tries to cash in on the recent 3d hype for movies an finally upgrades its graphics card past the n64 which is a plus but its not going to change the way we game i bet this system sells less then the DS imo

ZarbonX

It is a handheld console.

You know Sony is cashing in on that exact same "3D hype" by producing 3DTVs, adding 3DTV support to the PS3 and patching several PSN titles to take advantage of it.

Avatar image for g0ddyX
g0ddyX

3914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 g0ddyX
Member since 2005 • 3914 Posts

It may sell like pancakesbut that doesnt mean its the best or greatest.

Besides, its all down to the games.
PSP gets shunned most of the time whilstit has games that put the DS to shame when we all know, spec wise, PSP is the best.

Anyway, didnt Microsoft plan to cash into the handheld market as well?

Avatar image for MoonMarvel
MoonMarvel

8249

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 MoonMarvel
Member since 2008 • 8249 Posts

Oh yeah because the N64 and Gamecube just lit up the sales charts. This is their first gen after two unsuccessful ones where they are back on top. To call them marketing kings then Sony must also be included.

Ragnarok1051
You do know they never stopped being kings of the handhelds right? The gameboy line has always lit it up.
Avatar image for Zune_HD
Zune_HD

1144

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 Zune_HD
Member since 2010 • 1144 Posts

It'll be a high seller for sure, but there's no doubt Apple took some of that casual market away. I doubt it'll topple the original DS in sales.

Avatar image for TacticalDesire
TacticalDesire

10713

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#95 TacticalDesire
Member since 2010 • 10713 Posts

wait the 3ds is a console? is it a portable console?

TheShadowLord07

Those were my thoughts isn't the 3DS a handheld not a console? Also as far as innovation goes Sony is putting 3D on a real console not a portable console. Just throwing that out there, and I'm not even a big fan of 3D.

Avatar image for TacticalDesire
TacticalDesire

10713

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 TacticalDesire
Member since 2010 • 10713 Posts

Again? They haven't even outsold the PS2 yet. :|Rockman999

I have my doubts that they ever will, quite frankly they're what about half way there? Wii sales, around 75 million units? My guess is the Wii lifetime will be about 2 more years before the new Wii, of course sales will continue for the next two years and beyond even once the new Wii is released, but there are already significant signs of a dropoff. It all comes down to how well the Wii does over the next few holiday seasons and imo almost everyone who wants a Wii has one. It will pick up a few sales around holiday times and when the next Zelda game is released other than that no reason for Wii sales to go anywhere but down.

Avatar image for ThePlothole
ThePlothole

11515

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 ThePlothole
Member since 2007 • 11515 Posts

[QUOTE="TheShadowLord07"]

wait the 3ds is a console? is it a portable console?

TacticalDesire

Those were my thoughts isn't the 3DS a handheld not a console? Also as far as innovation goes Sony is putting 3D on a real console not a portable console. Just throwing that out there, and I'm not even a big fan of 3D.

There are two types of consoles: "handheld game console" and "home game console". The former is usually just shortened to handheld. But they both fall under the general term "console".

Avatar image for RoOodriGowW
RoOodriGowW

3309

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 RoOodriGowW
Member since 2008 • 3309 Posts

They are pretty insanely succesful this gen... I don't even care about portables and I'm pretty excited to play the 3DS...locopatho
That makes two of us , I have a psp but I really don't care much about it , and I'm really pumped for 3DS.