Nintendo Should Purchase Silicon Knights, Factor 5, and Free Radical

  • 78 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for kansasdude2009
kansasdude2009

11802

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#1 kansasdude2009
Member since 2006 • 11802 Posts

http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/metalgear/images/thumb/1/13/Silicon_Knights_logo.gif/250px-Silicon_Knights_logo.gif

Nintendo 64
Eternal Darkness N64 (pushed to Gamecube)

GameCube
Eternal Darkness: Sanity's Requiem | Average Rating: 90%
Metal Gear Solid: The Twin Snakes | Average Rating: 85%
Too Human (pushed to Xbox 360)

Xbox 360
Too Human | Average Rating: 69% (worst game)

http://www.thatvideogameblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/factor5logo.jpg

Nintendo 64
Indiana Jones and the Infernal Machine | Average Rating: 71%
Star Wars: Battle for Naboo | Average Rating: 82%
Star Wars: Rogue Squadron | Average Rating: 85%

GameCube
Star Wars Rogue Squadron II: Rogue Leader | Average Rating: 90%
Star Wars Rogue Squadron III: Rebel Strike | Average Rating: 77%

PlayStation 3
Lair | Average Rating: 56% (worst game)

http://resources.ubi.com/resources/65/65745-logo_freeradical.gif

Formerly RARE

Mulitplatform

Second Sight | Average Rating: 81% on Gamecube, below 80% for other consoles. link
TimeSplitters 2 | Average Rating: 90%
TimeSplitters: Future Perfect | Average Rating: 85%

PlayStation 3
Haze | Average Rating: 57% (worst game)

----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

As you can see, all 3 developers have worked very closely with Nintendo in the past. Silicon Knights and Factor 5 were once 2nd party developers, and when Free Radical was with Rare, they too were second party. If Nintendo is smart, they will collect the goods while these development teams are down and reap the future rewards.

Avatar image for Nintendo_Ownes7
Nintendo_Ownes7

30973

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#2 Nintendo_Ownes7
Member since 2005 • 30973 Posts

I agree Nintendo works with the developers to make the games better.

Factor 5 was going to make a few Wii games one with Nintendo and one 3rd Party so it sucks that they are dead.

Silicon Knights is making a Multiplatform Title I also think they were going to make a Wii game with Nintendo.

Free Radical made great games aswell until this gen.

Avatar image for SMR-Venom
SMR-Venom

6500

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#3 SMR-Venom
Member since 2007 • 6500 Posts
Yes, Factor 5 was also rumored to be making Kid Icarus. This will also allow Timesplitters 4 to come on Wii :D
Avatar image for deactivated-5b1e62582e305
deactivated-5b1e62582e305

30778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#4 deactivated-5b1e62582e305
Member since 2004 • 30778 Posts

If they want terrible developers on their staff then I don't see why not.

:lol: at Silicon Knights.

Avatar image for Vaasman
Vaasman

15874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#5 Vaasman
Member since 2008 • 15874 Posts
Why would Nintendo buy horrible developers?
Avatar image for kansasdude2009
kansasdude2009

11802

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#6 kansasdude2009
Member since 2006 • 11802 Posts
Why would Nintendo buy horrible developers?Vaasman
None of them are horrible, their worst games were on the PS3, a system that is difficult to develop for, and extremely expensive. Money is exactly what there developers do not have, and under Nintendo, they have all proven to be great developers. Plus, in the case of Lair, the controls are what made it is abysmal, and Nintendo always helps their developers with that.
Avatar image for Nintendo_Ownes7
Nintendo_Ownes7

30973

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#7 Nintendo_Ownes7
Member since 2005 • 30973 Posts
Why would Nintendo buy horrible developers?Vaasman
Because they were great developers before their contracts with Nintendo ran out except Free Radical because their contract didn't run out they left Rare.
Avatar image for BioShockOwnz
BioShockOwnz

52901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#8 BioShockOwnz
Member since 2006 • 52901 Posts

If they want terrible developers on their staff then I don't see why not.

:lol: at Silicon Knights.

Aljosa23

Looks like someone hasn't played Eternal Darkness. Go buy a Gamecube and a copy now!

Avatar image for Vaasman
Vaasman

15874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#9 Vaasman
Member since 2008 • 15874 Posts
[QUOTE="Vaasman"]Why would Nintendo buy horrible developers?kansasdude2009
None of them are horrible, their worst games were on the PS3, a system that is difficult to develop for, and extremely expensive. Money is exactly what there developers do not have, and under Nintendo, they have all proven to be great developers. Plus, in the case of Lair, the controls are what made it is abysmal, and Nintendo always helps their developers with that.

A companies reputation rests on it's recent games, you can't have made good games once upon a time in neverland, and that makes you good forever.
Avatar image for masterdante
masterdante

1497

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 masterdante
Member since 2007 • 1497 Posts
why do they need to.. they are doing fine with out wasting their money on them
Avatar image for kansasdude2009
kansasdude2009

11802

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#11 kansasdude2009
Member since 2006 • 11802 Posts
[QUOTE="kansasdude2009"][QUOTE="Vaasman"]Why would Nintendo buy horrible developers?Vaasman
None of them are horrible, their worst games were on the PS3, a system that is difficult to develop for, and extremely expensive. Money is exactly what there developers do not have, and under Nintendo, they have all proven to be great developers. Plus, in the case of Lair, the controls are what made it is abysmal, and Nintendo always helps their developers with that.

A companies reputation rests on it's recent games, you can't have made good games once upon a time in neverland, and that makes you good forever.

The opposite is also true. Just because a developer makes 1 amazing game doesn't mean that their past is gone forever. Different conditions need to be applied such as funding, which console they are developing for, the difficulties of development, ect. All of those could be helped under Nintendo. Good forever has nothing to do with it, but rather, the potential of being amazing. All 3 of those developers have the potential to be amazing but never will forever under their own funding (at least, the way it is looking right now for all 3 development teams).
Avatar image for 67gt500
67gt500

4627

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#12 67gt500
Member since 2003 • 4627 Posts
Ironically, if those devs had stuck to making sequels instead of new IP's they might have been a lot better off... I only bought one Wii game this year - one, but I would have bought Eternal Darkness II and a new Rogue Squadron for Wii had they made them...
Avatar image for kansasdude2009
kansasdude2009

11802

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#13 kansasdude2009
Member since 2006 • 11802 Posts
why do they need to.. they are doing fine with out wasting their money on themmasterdante
So you would rather see them waste money on more games like Wii Fit, Wii Play, and Wii Sports? Nintendo has the money, and we all want hardcore 1st party titles... these development teams can GIVE us those titles and Nintendo can help make them good.
Avatar image for deactivated-5b1e62582e305
deactivated-5b1e62582e305

30778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#14 deactivated-5b1e62582e305
Member since 2004 • 30778 Posts
[QUOTE="Aljosa23"]

If they want terrible developers on their staff then I don't see why not.

:lol: at Silicon Knights.

BioShockOwnz

Looks like someone hasn't played Eternal Darkness. Go buy a Gamecube and a copy now!

Oh I played Eternal Darkness. Which was 6 years ago, correct?

Doesn't change the fact that Denis Dyack and Co. are horrible.

Avatar image for kansasdude2009
kansasdude2009

11802

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#15 kansasdude2009
Member since 2006 • 11802 Posts
[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="Aljosa23"]

If they want terrible developers on their staff then I don't see why not.

:lol: at Silicon Knights.

Aljosa23

Looks like someone hasn't played Eternal Darkness. Go buy a Gamecube and a copy now!

Oh I played Eternal Darkness. Which was 6 years ago, correct?

Doesn't change the fact that Denis Dyack and Co. are horrible.

0_0 Too Human has been in development since, I think before Eternal Darkness. The title just suffered from crazy development problems. Too Human had some cool ideas in it, but it ultimately failed because of a really shaky development process. Nintendo could make them a lot more efficient and they could go back to making kick ass games like Eternal Darkness only for the Wii.
Avatar image for BioShockOwnz
BioShockOwnz

52901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#16 BioShockOwnz
Member since 2006 • 52901 Posts
[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="Aljosa23"]

If they want terrible developers on their staff then I don't see why not.

:lol: at Silicon Knights.

Aljosa23

Looks like someone hasn't played Eternal Darkness. Go buy a Gamecube and a copy now!

Oh I played Eternal Darkness. Which was 6 years ago, correct?

Doesn't change the fact that Denis Dyack and Co. are horrible.

That's not a fact. They developed one game that was critically and commercially unsuccessful. You're getting opinions and facts messed up.

Avatar image for Salt_The_Fries
Salt_The_Fries

12480

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#17 Salt_The_Fries
Member since 2008 • 12480 Posts

http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/metalgear/images/thumb/1/13/Silicon_Knights_logo.gif/250px-Silicon_Knights_logo.gif

Nintendo 64
Eternal Darkness N64 (pushed to Gamecube)

GameCube
Eternal Darkness: Sanity's Requiem | Average Rating: 90%
Metal Gear Solid: The Twin Snakes | Average Rating: 85%
Too Human (pushed to Xbox 360)

Xbox 360
Too Human | Average Rating: 69% (worst game)

kansasdude2009

+ PlayStation / PC: Blood Omen: Legacy of Kain - Average Rating - 83.2% (according to Gamerankings)

Looks like someone hasn't played Eternal Darkness. Go buy a Gamecube and a copy now!BioShockOwnz

That's what I need to do.

Avatar image for -Mad_Rhetoric-
-Mad_Rhetoric-

1765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 -Mad_Rhetoric-
Member since 2008 • 1765 Posts
nintendo would waste their abilities and talent
Avatar image for Heydanbud92
Heydanbud92

4464

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19 Heydanbud92
Member since 2007 • 4464 Posts

[QUOTE="Vaasman"]Why would Nintendo buy horrible developers?kansasdude2009
None of them are horrible, their worst games were on the PS3, a system that is difficult to develop for, and extremely expensive. Money is exactly what there developers do not have, and under Nintendo, they have all proven to be great developers. Plus, in the case of Lair, the controls are what made it is abysmal, and Nintendo always helps their developers with that.

:lol:

first of all, too human was on 360.

second of all, LAIR was updated with a patch to allow you to play with regular controls, the game was still horrible, trust me (I have the game).

thirdly, HAZE barely took advantage of ps3s unique hardware so you can hardly blame ps3's dev. difficulties... and that's a weak excuse anyways... what about MGS4? what about all the other great games on ps3? how did konami pull it off? Oh, that's right because they don't suck.

also, since they last worked with nintendo the game has changed, heck their staff may have changed alot (especially with FR)... Nintendo would make them better, but those aren't the best choices for ninty to buy... they need to set their sights WAY higher... they have how many billions saved up?

they should buy level-5 not factor 5... they should buy oh i don't know SQUARE ENIX...ya im serious

Avatar image for fabz_95
fabz_95

15425

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#20 fabz_95
Member since 2006 • 15425 Posts
Why would Nintendo buy horrible developers?Vaasman
Horrible developers? The only horrible games there are the ones made on the PS3. What does that tell you? And nearly all the games up there created for a nintendo console scored 80% or above. Man all those developers suck!
Avatar image for InfinityMugen
InfinityMugen

3905

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#21 InfinityMugen
Member since 2007 • 3905 Posts
They could, but most likely wont. This is the same Nintendo that let Rare go.
Avatar image for gunswordfist
gunswordfist

20262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 gunswordfist
Member since 2006 • 20262 Posts
Yes, Factor 5 was also rumored to be making Kid Icarus. This will also allow Timesplitters 4 to come on Wii :DSMR-Venom
OH **** NO!! That's like the worst rumor I've ever heard. Also TS4 doesn't need to see an extremely watered down version on the Wii.
Avatar image for gunswordfist
gunswordfist

20262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 gunswordfist
Member since 2006 • 20262 Posts
They could, but most likely wont. This is the same Nintendo that let Rare go.InfinityMugen
One of the dumbest mistakes Nintendo has ever made. Nintendo: Hey let's get rid of the best developer of all time.
Avatar image for kansasdude2009
kansasdude2009

11802

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#24 kansasdude2009
Member since 2006 • 11802 Posts

[QUOTE="kansasdude2009"][QUOTE="Vaasman"]Why would Nintendo buy horrible developers?Heydanbud92

None of them are horrible, their worst games were on the PS3, a system that is difficult to develop for, and extremely expensive. Money is exactly what there developers do not have, and under Nintendo, they have all proven to be great developers. Plus, in the case of Lair, the controls are what made it is abysmal, and Nintendo always helps their developers with that.

:lol:

first of all, too human was on 360.

second of all, LAIR was updated with a patch to allow you to play with regular controls, the game was still horrible, trust me (I have the game).

thirdly, HAZE barely took advantage of ps3s unique hardware so you can hardly blame ps3's dev. difficulties... and that's a weak excuse anyways... what about MGS4? what about all the other great games on ps3? how did konami pull it off? Oh, that's right because they don't suck.

also, since they last worked with nintendo the game has changed, heck their staff may have changed alot (especially with FR)... Nintendo would make them better, but those aren't the best choices for ninty to buy... they need to set their sights WAY higher... they have how many billions saved up?

they should buy level-5 not factor 5... they should buy oh i don't know SQUARE ENIX...ya im serious

Those goals are completely unrealistic because Nintendo has NEVER gone after PUBLISHING COMPANIES before, only smaller development teams, such as Retro Studios and Monolith. Also, Konami was able to make a great game because they are a publishing company with A LOT of money while Free Radical is an independent developing company with little money. I'm sure Sony helped them a lot because it was an exclusive title. Konami and Sony must have made some sort of deal. Your assumptions are more ridiculous than mine. The PS3 is known for having a difficult and expensive development process, not because of the special features it offers, but because of the actual development. In addition, Too Human had a ridiculously rocky development cycle. Blaming it 100% on the development team is wrong because there are hundreds of other factors that should be analyzed.
Avatar image for kansasdude2009
kansasdude2009

11802

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#25 kansasdude2009
Member since 2006 • 11802 Posts
[QUOTE="InfinityMugen"]They could, but most likely wont. This is the same Nintendo that let Rare go.gunswordfist
One of the dumbest mistakes Nintendo has ever made. Nintendo: Hey let's get rid of the best developer of all time.

if anything, it was the worst decision Microsoft has ever made. Rare makes so little money for Microsoft, it's ridiculous. Poor Rare.
Avatar image for gunswordfist
gunswordfist

20262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 gunswordfist
Member since 2006 • 20262 Posts
[QUOTE="gunswordfist"][QUOTE="InfinityMugen"]They could, but most likely wont. This is the same Nintendo that let Rare go.kansasdude2009
One of the dumbest mistakes Nintendo has ever made. Nintendo: Hey let's get rid of the best developer of all time.

if anything, it was the worst decision Microsoft has ever made. Rare makes so little money for Microsoft, it's ridiculous. Poor Rare.

lol I would have emptied out my pockets the second I heard 'Rare for sale' so I can't blame them.
Avatar image for kansasdude2009
kansasdude2009

11802

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#27 kansasdude2009
Member since 2006 • 11802 Posts
[QUOTE="kansasdude2009"][QUOTE="gunswordfist"] One of the dumbest mistakes Nintendo has ever made. Nintendo: Hey let's get rid of the best developer of all time.gunswordfist
if anything, it was the worst decision Microsoft has ever made. Rare makes so little money for Microsoft, it's ridiculous. Poor Rare.

lol I would have emptied out my pockets the second I heard 'Rare for sale' so I can't blame them.

that is true... lol
Avatar image for Nintendo_Ownes7
Nintendo_Ownes7

30973

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#28 Nintendo_Ownes7
Member since 2005 • 30973 Posts
[QUOTE="kansasdude2009"][QUOTE="gunswordfist"] One of the dumbest mistakes Nintendo has ever made. Nintendo: Hey let's get rid of the best developer of all time.gunswordfist
if anything, it was the worst decision Microsoft has ever made. Rare makes so little money for Microsoft, it's ridiculous. Poor Rare.

lol I would have emptied out my pockets the second I heard 'Rare for sale' so I can't blame them.

Technically Nintendo didn't sell Rare Nintendo just refused to buy all 100% of Rareware so the Stamper Bros. went to Microsoft to sell their 51% of shares to Microsoft and since Microsoft owned 51% of Rare and had the Xbox Nintendo couldn't own 49% of Rare if its competitor owned the other 51% so Nintendo had to sell its shares to Microsoft.
Avatar image for fabz_95
fabz_95

15425

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#29 fabz_95
Member since 2006 • 15425 Posts
[QUOTE="kansasdude2009"][QUOTE="gunswordfist"] One of the dumbest mistakes Nintendo has ever made. Nintendo: Hey let's get rid of the best developer of all time.gunswordfist
if anything, it was the worst decision Microsoft has ever made. Rare makes so little money for Microsoft, it's ridiculous. Poor Rare.

lol I would have emptied out my pockets the second I heard 'Rare for sale' so I can't blame them.

Haha true. It's just a shame Rare is doing so badly for MS :(
Avatar image for gunswordfist
gunswordfist

20262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 gunswordfist
Member since 2006 • 20262 Posts
[QUOTE="gunswordfist"][QUOTE="kansasdude2009"] if anything, it was the worst decision Microsoft has ever made. Rare makes so little money for Microsoft, it's ridiculous. Poor Rare.kansasdude2009
lol I would have emptied out my pockets the second I heard 'Rare for sale' so I can't blame them.

Technically Nintendo didn't sell Rare Nintendo just refused to buy all 100% of Rareware so the Stamper Bros. went to Microsoft to sell their 51% of shares to Microsoft and since Microsoft owned 51% of Rare and had the Xbox Nintendo couldn't own 49% of Rare if its competitor owned the other 51% so Nintendo had to sell its shares to Microsoft.

Well the 'Rare for sale' part was just a joke. Nintendo still messed up.
Avatar image for gunswordfist
gunswordfist

20262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 gunswordfist
Member since 2006 • 20262 Posts
[QUOTE="gunswordfist"][QUOTE="kansasdude2009"] if anything, it was the worst decision Microsoft has ever made. Rare makes so little money for Microsoft, it's ridiculous. Poor Rare.fabz_95
lol I would have emptied out my pockets the second I heard 'Rare for sale' so I can't blame them.

Haha true. It's just a shame Rare is doing so badly for MS :(

Yeah. If someone sat next to me and said 'Rare will be doing bad in a few years.' while I was playing my 24 hour run of Goldeneye (longest time I've ever played any game) I would have LAUGHED in their face. Flying spit and all. lol
Avatar image for masterdante
masterdante

1497

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 masterdante
Member since 2007 • 1497 Posts

[QUOTE="masterdante"]why do they need to.. they are doing fine with out wasting their money on themkansasdude2009
So you would rather see them waste money on more games like Wii Fit, Wii Play, and Wii Sports? Nintendo has the money, and we all want hardcore 1st party titles... these development teams can GIVE us those titles and Nintendo can help make them good.

im doing it from nintendos point of view. No i dont want to see more wii fit, i want to them buy out these guys yea, but they are not going to, because they dont need to, and thats all there is to it

Avatar image for gunswordfist
gunswordfist

20262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 gunswordfist
Member since 2006 • 20262 Posts

[QUOTE="kansasdude2009"][QUOTE="masterdante"]why do they need to.. they are doing fine with out wasting their money on themmasterdante

So you would rather see them waste money on more games like Wii Fit, Wii Play, and Wii Sports? Nintendo has the money, and we all want hardcore 1st party titles... these development teams can GIVE us those titles and Nintendo can help make them good.

im doing it from nintendos point of view. No i dont want to see more wii fit, i want to them buy out these guys yea, but they are not going to, because they dont need to, and thats all there is to it

Nintendo's point of view?! Did you put on those drunk goggles from The Simpsons. Hehe sorry I had to.
Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#34 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts
[QUOTE="gunswordfist"][QUOTE="kansasdude2009"] if anything, it was the worst decision Microsoft has ever made. Rare makes so little money for Microsoft, it's ridiculous. Poor Rare.Nintendo_Ownes7
lol I would have emptied out my pockets the second I heard 'Rare for sale' so I can't blame them.

Technically Nintendo didn't sell Rare Nintendo just refused to buy all 100% of Rareware so the Stamper Bros. went to Microsoft to sell their 51% of shares to Microsoft and since Microsoft owned 51% of Rare and had the Xbox Nintendo couldn't own 49% of Rare if its competitor owned the other 51% so Nintendo had to sell its shares to Microsoft.

I still wish it shouldn't had happened, imagine how they would be right now...
Avatar image for naruto7777
naruto7777

8059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#35 naruto7777
Member since 2007 • 8059 Posts
nintendo would waste their abilities and talent-Mad_Rhetoric-
i think that would also happen
Avatar image for kansasdude2009
kansasdude2009

11802

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#36 kansasdude2009
Member since 2006 • 11802 Posts
[QUOTE="-Mad_Rhetoric-"]nintendo would waste their abilities and talentnaruto7777
i think that would also happen

as if they are not already wasting their talent? uh... right.....
Avatar image for InfinityMugen
InfinityMugen

3905

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#37 InfinityMugen
Member since 2007 • 3905 Posts
[QUOTE="Nintendo_Ownes7"][QUOTE="gunswordfist"] lol I would have emptied out my pockets the second I heard 'Rare for sale' so I can't blame them.mitu123
Technically Nintendo didn't sell Rare Nintendo just refused to buy all 100% of Rareware so the Stamper Bros. went to Microsoft to sell their 51% of shares to Microsoft and since Microsoft owned 51% of Rare and had the Xbox Nintendo couldn't own 49% of Rare if its competitor owned the other 51% so Nintendo had to sell its shares to Microsoft.

I still wish it shouldn't had happened, imagine how they would be right now...

Perfect Dark 2, Banjo Threeie, Donkey Kong Racing, Kameo and possibly a Conker sequel all would've been released on the Gamecube. Also Rare characters would've been included in Brawl since it was hinted in melee.
Avatar image for locopatho
locopatho

24300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 locopatho
Member since 2003 • 24300 Posts
Why would you buy developers who just released crap games?
Avatar image for seldead
seldead

169

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 seldead
Member since 2006 • 169 Posts
[QUOTE="kansasdude2009"]

http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/metalgear/images/thumb/1/13/Silicon_Knights_logo.gif/250px-Silicon_Knights_logo.gif

Nintendo 64
Eternal Darkness N64 (pushed to Gamecube)

GameCube
Eternal Darkness: Sanity's Requiem | Average Rating: 90%
Metal Gear Solid: The Twin Snakes | Average Rating: 85%
Too Human (pushed to Xbox 360)

Xbox 360
Too Human | Average Rating: 69% (worst game)

Salt_The_Fries

+ PlayStation / PC: Blood Omen: Legacy of Kain - Average Rating - 83.2% (according to Gamerankings)

Looks like someone hasn't played Eternal Darkness. Go buy a Gamecube and a copy now!BioShockOwnz

That's what I need to do.

I respect a queens of the stone age fans opinion and yeah silicon knights had quite a few good games

Avatar image for tocool340
tocool340

21694

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#40 tocool340
Member since 2004 • 21694 Posts
Yeah. I'd actually love to see them buy companies that are going out of business too. Isn't Atari on its way out? Midway? Those the companies I'd like to see nintendo give a shot...
Avatar image for DontBeHatin1983
DontBeHatin1983

1044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 DontBeHatin1983
Member since 2008 • 1044 Posts
it dosent matter who they work for they still will make poop games.
Avatar image for KungfuKitten
KungfuKitten

27389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#42 KungfuKitten
Member since 2006 • 27389 Posts
:| I'm shocked how people can call them bad developers.
If blizzard messes up Starcraft 2, they better quit as well?
Avatar image for Lemmywinks_360
Lemmywinks_360

1996

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 Lemmywinks_360
Member since 2007 • 1996 Posts

:| I'm shocked how people can call them bad developers.
If blizzard messes up Starcraft 2, they better quit as well?
KungfuKitten

I'm pretty sure Blizzard wouldn't need to quit seeing as Korea would declare war on them.

On topic- Ninty doesnt care about hardcore games, theyre making to much money off of play, music, fit, and sports.

Avatar image for gunswordfist
gunswordfist

20262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 gunswordfist
Member since 2006 • 20262 Posts
[QUOTE="Nintendo_Ownes7"][QUOTE="gunswordfist"]I still wish it shouldn't had happened, imagine how they would be right now...mitu123
Perfect Dark 2, Banjo Threeie, Donkey Kong Racing, Kameo and possibly a Conker sequel all would've been released on the Gamecube. Also Rare characters would've been included in Brawl since it was hinted in melee.

..the RARE characters would have been in SSBB *head explodes* And let's not forget about Killer Instinct 3 and Jet Force Gemini 2.
Why would you buy developers who just released crap games? locopatho
Just look at Wii's library and say that again.
Avatar image for MarloStanfield
MarloStanfield

2409

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 MarloStanfield
Member since 2008 • 2409 Posts
no and there's no way Factor 5 were making Kid Icarus. It's impossible to go out of business if Nintendo is funding you they're dipping more chips and getting more cream than anyone else
Avatar image for nervmeister
nervmeister

15377

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 nervmeister
Member since 2005 • 15377 Posts

If they want terrible developers on their staff then I don't see why not.

:lol: at Silicon Knights.

Aljosa23
Yes. One botched title makes them terrible. :roll:
Avatar image for KungfuKitten
KungfuKitten

27389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#47 KungfuKitten
Member since 2006 • 27389 Posts
I don't see them do it anyway. They didn't tell 3rd party about motion+...
I really hope they can gather some of the talent, it would be a headline they could really really use right now for the core market, but i don't see it happen.
Avatar image for OhSnapitz
OhSnapitz

19282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 OhSnapitz
Member since 2002 • 19282 Posts
[QUOTE="Aljosa23"]

If they want terrible developers on their staff then I don't see why not.

:lol: at Silicon Knights.

nervmeister
Yes. One botched title makes them terrible. :roll:

Then what's the point of this thread.. :| If one terrible game doesn't condemn a dev house then why did the TC feel the need to bring scores into the equation? Lair, Haze and Too Human flopping doesn't mean the devs are done for.. Their next 360/PS3 project might be a blockbuster hit..
Avatar image for Gamingcucumber
Gamingcucumber

5612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#49 Gamingcucumber
Member since 2004 • 5612 Posts
I think Microsoft would benefit more from them. It all boils down to Nintendo's next move. Since no one knows it unsure exactly how much use those guys would make to them. Take Retro studios for instance, no wonder they are being choked by the Wii system specs and target audience.
Avatar image for nervmeister
nervmeister

15377

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 nervmeister
Member since 2005 • 15377 Posts
[QUOTE="nervmeister"][QUOTE="Aljosa23"]

If they want terrible developers on their staff then I don't see why not.

:lol: at Silicon Knights.

OhSnapitz
Yes. One botched title makes them terrible. :roll:

Then what's the point of this thread.. :| If one terrible game doesn't condemn a dev house then why did the TC feel the need to bring scores into the equation? Lair, Haze and Too Human flopping doesn't mean the devs are done for.. Their next 360/PS3 project might be a blockbuster hit..

I was being being sarcastic (hence the smiley).