Wario Land Shake it!
Tutorial Level
This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="SER69"]Wario Land Shake it!
Tutorial Level
Wanderer5
Was that Captain Syrup at the beginning of that video? It good to see that she back in this game.
Yup.In Wario Land Shake, Captain Syrup observes the crisis of the Shake Dimension inside the Ancient Globe and finds out the existence of the Bottomless Coin Sack, possessed by the evil Shake King. Desiring the treasure but not wanting to get it herself, she steals the Ancient Globe and gives it to Wario, who travels to the dimension to get the sack for himself. Captain Syrup's role in the game is to sell Wario maps of continents after he defeats a boss. Since Wario and Captain Syrup both desire the Bottomless Coin Sack, it appears they will have a conflict late in the game.
for the me the fact that they ddnt mention fatal frame at E3 is reasuring, the arguemnt that they didnt want to show their core games is backed by the fact there was no news on wario and fatal frame. Plus this shows that nintendo is willing to release information and trialers for their games without using a games conventionineedmoney555Exactly, yet they all still sayd "Nintendo is teh abandoning us!".
One Piece Unlimited Cruise
Info
- Luffy and friends are attacked by a mysterious structure coming from the ocean - new designs are being supervised by the original artist - stages begin with a ship landing point - collect items/fight enemies - start missions by feeding Gaburi items - some enemies fall from trees as nuts, then form into giant bosses. Beat the boss, get the nuts, feed them to Gaburi, and receive treasure - feeding Gaburi is very important - option to replay stages once completed - use a human slingshot or cannon to quickly travel to locations
This thread just taught me that the psp > wii in graphics. JimJackJose
This post has taught me you haven't played a PSP.
Geeze so many completely failing haters, the best though are the "LOL only lik 1 gud game on dere!"
[QUOTE="JimJackJose"]This thread just taught me that the psp > wii in graphics. bobbetybob
This post has taught me you haven't played a PSP.
Geeze so many completely failing haters, the best though are the "LOL only lik 1 gud game on dere!"
Interesting you say that, I'm playing spectral souls on my psp right now. It's by far my most used system.
[QUOTE="bobbetybob"][QUOTE="JimJackJose"]This thread just taught me that the psp > wii in graphics. JimJackJose
This post has taught me you haven't played a PSP.
Geeze so many completely failing haters, the best though are the "LOL only lik 1 gud game on dere!"
Interesting you say that, I'm playing spectral souls on my psp right now. It's by far my most used system.
So. I have a PSP too, Chains of Olympus and Crisis Core are the two best looking games, I've played both and about 90% of the games in this thread look better, the other 10% are either stuff like Warioland, which is 2d or are bad PS2 ports, I'm looking at you EA sports games...
[QUOTE="JimJackJose"]This thread just taught me that the psp > wii in graphics. bobbetybob
This post has taught me you haven't played a PSP.
Geeze so many completely failing haters, the best though are the "LOL only lik 1 gud game on dere!"
He actually meant Xbox > Wii in terms of visuals. Good luck trying to refute that, laddy. Sort of funny when you think about it, technology released in 2001 actually outshines technology released in 2006.[QUOTE="bobbetybob"][QUOTE="JimJackJose"]This thread just taught me that the psp > wii in graphics. Stevo_the_gamer
This post has taught me you haven't played a PSP.
Geeze so many completely failing haters, the best though are the "LOL only lik 1 gud game on dere!"
He actually meant Xbox > Wii in terms of visuals. Good luck trying to refute that, laddy. Sort of funny when you think about it, technology released in 2001 actually outshines technology released in 2006. SMG > most games on the original xbox in terms of visuals.And it runs at 60 FPS
Didn't expect you to back him up. :PSMG > most games on the original xbox in terms of visuals.
And it runs at 60 FPS
Shinobishyguy
I do agree that SMG does out due a lot of Xbox games, but not all of them. Besides, once more than one game can be brought into the equation - then the argument might have a foundation. It's a start though.
[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"][QUOTE="bobbetybob"][QUOTE="JimJackJose"]This thread just taught me that the psp > wii in graphics. Shinobishyguy
This post has taught me you haven't played a PSP.
Geeze so many completely failing haters, the best though are the "LOL only lik 1 gud game on dere!"
He actually meant Xbox > Wii in terms of visuals. Good luck trying to refute that, laddy. Sort of funny when you think about it, technology released in 2001 actually outshines technology released in 2006. SMG > most games on the original xbox in terms of visuals.And it runs at 60 FPS
No SMG looks better than all Xbox games. The best looking Xbox games are NG and Chronicles of Riddick and IMO SMG looks a lot better than them. I think the main thing the Wii misses out on visually is the lighting. Literally the only thing that makes 360 and PS3 games look so much more amazing is the lighting. And because 99% of Wii games don't use the amazing lighting that Galaxy used that's why they look like Xbox games. If you look at a lot of games this gen, without their fancy lighting they'd all look like Xbox games too.
Ok you looking forward for these games...
BUT , how many of these will be bad and how many will be good... Noone really knows.
This list , isnt a "gold" one at all. Noone can predict how many of these will be a 5 to 7 range games or worse..
If thats what games we gonan see on Wii 09-10 then... QQ... I think Wii isnt for me afterall...
Ok you looking forward for these games...
BUT , how many of these will be bad and how many will be good... Noone really knows.
This list , isnt a "gold" one at all. Noone can predict how many of these will be a 5 to 7 range games or worse..
If thats what games we gonan see on Wii 09-10 then... QQ... I think Wii isnt for me afterall...
AzatiS
Most of the games are for 08 and early 09, there are 2 or 3 like MH3 that are going to be out late 09. Plus to be honest, a lot of the platforms don't have 'gold' coming up. If you look at the 360 and PS3 the only reason they get so much attention is the "MEGATON" games coming out like Killzone 2, Gears 2, Resistance 2, Fable 2, Banjo, and Little Big Planet. If you look at their overall lists they only really have 8-10 big games coming out, the rest are in the same boat as Wii's, could be anywhere between 5 and 7, hell some of the "big" games could still score badly. They are mainly hyped because they are sequels and in System Wars people seem to think a sequel to a game will score the exact same as the previous one, it's impossible for a game to be better or worse than the previous installment.
But notice a lot of the Wii games. Lots of new IP's that's why many of them don't get megahyped and thus people think of them as inferior games.
Believe what you will, lad. I also believe there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, though many disagree when I tell them the Russians moved them into Syria. Again, believe what you want - but SMG does not look better than all Xbox games, it's simply just isn't true to say that SMG does. You're more than well entitled to your opinion, but let's not try to pass it off as a fact now, eh lad?No SMG looks better than all Xbox games. The best looking Xbox games are NG and Chronicles of Riddick and IMO SMG looks a lot better than them. I think the main thing the Wii misses out on visually is the lighting. Literally the only thing that makes 360 and PS3 games look so much more amazing is the lighting. And because 99% of Wii games don't use the amazing lighting that Galaxy used that's why they look like Xbox games. If you look at a lot of games this gen, without their fancy lighting they'd all look like Xbox games too.
bobbetybob
[QUOTE="bobbetybob"]Believe what you will, lad. I also believe there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, though many disagree when I tell them the Russians moved them into Syria. Again, believe what you want - but SMG does not look better than all Xbox games, it's simply just isn't true to say that SMG does. You're more than well entitled to your opinion, but let's not try to pass it off as a fact now, eh lad?No SMG looks better than all Xbox games. The best looking Xbox games are NG and Chronicles of Riddick and IMO SMG looks a lot better than them. I think the main thing the Wii misses out on visually is the lighting. Literally the only thing that makes 360 and PS3 games look so much more amazing is the lighting. And because 99% of Wii games don't use the amazing lighting that Galaxy used that's why they look like Xbox games. If you look at a lot of games this gen, without their fancy lighting they'd all look like Xbox games too.
Stevo_the_gamer
Fine, I'll rephrase, the lighting in SMG is far superior to that of the Xbox's games, And as I stated lighting is one of the prevalent graphical qualities this generation. Had all game lighting stayed as it was last gen, most games this gen would not look like a big step up from last gen.
[QUOTE="AzatiS"]Ok you looking forward for these games...
BUT , how many of these will be bad and how many will be good... Noone really knows.
This list , isnt a "gold" one at all. Noone can predict how many of these will be a 5 to 7 range games or worse..
If thats what games we gonan see on Wii 09-10 then... QQ... I think Wii isnt for me afterall...
bobbetybob
Most of the games are for 08 and early 09, there are 2 or 3 like MH3 that are going to be out late 09. Plus to be honest, a lot of the platforms don't have 'gold' coming up. If you look at the 360 and PS3 the only reason they get so much attention is the "MEGATON" games coming out like Killzone 2, Gears 2, Resistance 2, Fable 2, Banjo, and Little Big Planet. If you look at their overall lists they only really have 8-10 big games coming out, the rest are in the same boat as Wii's, could be anywhere between 5 and 7, hell some of the "big" games could still score badly. They are mainly hyped because they are sequels and in System Wars people seem to think a sequel to a game will score the exact same as the previous one, it's impossible for a game to be better or worse than the previous installment.
But notice a lot of the Wii games. Lots of new IP's that's why many of them don't get megahyped and thus people think of them as inferior games.
[QUOTE="bobbetybob"][QUOTE="AzatiS"]I really doubt , if i make a list of about 10-20 games that gonna release into 08-09 on PS3 , will be the same quality as Wii ones... Not even close. So isnt only about hype around them , is actually the quality. I mean , many hyped games that floped and many didnt praise games that scored well. Thats fact.. But is also fact that if i make a same list for X360-PS3 games , will be one step further , more quality ones so higher scored ofc.
SER69, your better that a game magazine. In fact I found out about more Wii game thanks to you and not from magazines.;D Keep up the good work!;)lancea34People still read magazines? I've stopped oh so many years ago. Money better spent on games, and fresh gaming news coming in daily online instead.
Wow feels good to be a wii owner doesn't it? :( Well at least my 360 controller is coming back in less than 2 weeks.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment