This topic is locked from further discussion.
nope, your are allowed to use metacritic if you want. GS is only used for flops[QUOTE="EggHeadMan"]
[QUOTE="ABCarmine"]
We go by Gamespot scores here.
God Of War:9.3
God of War 2:9.2
God of war 3:9.0
Chains of whatever: 8.5
Ghosts of sparta:8
Halo 1:9.7
Halo 2: 9.4
Halo 3:9.5
Halo ODST: 9
Halo Reach:9.5
Saint Monica are great devs but Compared they are not more relevant than Bungie, which is what that guy was saying.
Plagueless
On Gamespot forums, Gamespot scores > Metacritic
Get it?
Edit: Also, Lol at the random Bleach conversation. Good series but such a random topic for this thread.
nope. Metacritic is more credible since it's mulitiple reviewers[QUOTE="ABCarmine"]
[QUOTE="VensInferno"] Yes. BTW, what happened to your other sig. Its was funny yet cool at the same time :D
XVision84
You don't like the Colbert Dance??????
It's nice, but your old sig was better (and more funny) IMO :)
Which one are you talking about, I've had 4 other sigs.
[QUOTE="kalipekona"]
[QUOTE="VensInferno"] Your statement starts fighting like that. OMg I can't stand people like you. Why are you acting like its such a big deal that I like games you dislike? Thats so stupid in many ways. Get over it dude. There video games, if someone likes COD, and you don't like COD, don't have a fit.
VensInferno
It's obvious the point of my comment went right over your head.
You made an antagonistic statement about Bungie not being very good, but then get all bent out of shape when people say that Resistance isn't that good. We were trying to make a point.
It's funny that you don't see that your comment that Bungie is "not that good" might start fights.
No, you guys basically called me retarted and claimed that I don't have the right to talk due to my taste in games.Nope. Go back and re-read the dialogue exchange. You said Bungie isn't that good and in response I said Resistance isn't that good (in so many words). Then you got your panties all in a bunch. Apparently you think you have a right to be antagonistic and come into a thread and state as a matter of fact that Bungie isn't that good (which is obviously a slap in the face to any of us that do think they are good) and then act all indignant when somebody is antagonistic back.
good for you. Likewise, there are millions of Halo fans and im sure bungie will do fine without YOUR support.Many of us have played halo. If I liked what I played, I would own an xbox. I don't though.
goblaa
Oops I meant 334 :P I have Ulqiourra vs Ichigo and Tia Harribel vs Toshiro on my PSP. 2 of the greatest fight scenes :D[QUOTE="VensInferno"]
[QUOTE="XVision84"]
Nope, episode 334 :) 335 isn't out yet :P
XVision84
Ulquiorra vs Ichigo ftw! So much better than Grimmjow vs Ichigo :P
I mean come on, Orihime cries, then Ichigo suddenly becomes superman and stops Grimmjow's attack? I don't like sudden power boosts :) at least a Vasto Lorde mode makes more sense.
Bleach is alright, what really irks me somethings though is the massive power inconsistensy.on topic: Bungie = one of the top devs in the industry, to say otherwise makes you a baised fanboy.
I may not like other devs games, but I will certainly admit to the quality if it deserves it.
No, you guys basically called me retarted and claimed that I don't have the right to talk due to my taste in games.[QUOTE="VensInferno"]
[QUOTE="kalipekona"]
It's obvious the point of my comment went right over your head.
You made an antagonistic statement about Bungie not being very good, but then get all bent out of shape when people say that Resistance isn't that good. We were trying to make a point.
It's funny that you don't see that your comment that Bungie is "not that good" might start fights.
kalipekona
Nope. Go back and re-read the dialogue exchange. You said Bungie isn't that good and in response I said Resistance isn't that good (in so many words). Then you got your panties all in a bunch. Apparently you think you have a right to be antagonistic and come into a thread and state as a matter of fact that Bungie isn't that good (which is obviously a slap in the face to any of us that do think they are good) and then act all indignant when somebody is antagonistic back.
Calm down, its just video games[QUOTE="Plagueless"]
[QUOTE="EggHeadMan"] nope, your are allowed to use metacritic if you want. GS is only used for flops
On Gamespot forums, Gamespot scores > Metacritic
Get it?
Edit: Also, Lol at the random Bleach conversation. Good series but such a random topic for this thread.
nope. Metacritic is more credible since it's mulitiple reviewers multiple reviewers =/= credibility. Gamespot reviews hold more weight on System wars, because it is a Gamespot forum. Taking into account all those random reviewers besides GS, IGN, and the other big names is prone to bias.[QUOTE="EggHeadMan"]nope. Metacritic is more credible since it's mulitiple reviewers multiple reviewers =/= credibility. Gamespot reviews hold more weight on System wars, because it is a Gamespot forum. Taking into account all those random reviewers besides GS, IGN, and the other big names is prone to bias. Fine, then that means MGS4 is better than every 360 exclusive ;)[QUOTE="Plagueless"]
On Gamespot forums, Gamespot scores > Metacritic
Get it?
Edit: Also, Lol at the random Bleach conversation. Good series but such a random topic for this thread.
Plagueless
[QUOTE="Plagueless"]
On Gamespot forums, Gamespot scores > Metacritic
Get it?
Edit: Also, Lol at the random Bleach conversation. Good series but such a random topic for this thread.
nope. Metacritic is more credible since it's mulitiple reviewers multiple reviewers =/= credibility. Gamespot reviews hold more weight on System wars, because it is a Gamespot forum. Taking into account all those random reviewers besides GS, IGN, and the other big names is prone to bias. Lol wat? Surely it's the other way round, say a GS review has a bias then using Metacritic will balance this out with the other non-biased reviews. Unless the majority has a bias for some reason then Meta > GS.[QUOTE="kalipekona"]
[QUOTE="VensInferno"] No, you guys basically called me retarted and claimed that I don't have the right to talk due to my taste in games.
EggHeadMan
Nope. Go back and re-read the dialogue exchange. You said Bungie isn't that good and in response I said Resistance isn't that good (in so many words). Then you got your panties all in a bunch. Apparently you think you have a right to be antagonistic and come into a thread and state as a matter of fact that Bungie isn't that good (which is obviously a slap in the face to any of us that do think they are good) and then act all indignant when somebody is antagonistic back.
Calm down, its just video gamesPresenting a line of reasoning does not mean that I am not calm. If you could see me right now you would see that I am perfectly calm.
No, you guys basically called me retarted and claimed that I don't have the right to talk due to my taste in games.[QUOTE="VensInferno"]
[QUOTE="kalipekona"]
It's obvious the point of my comment went right over your head.
You made an antagonistic statement about Bungie not being very good, but then get all bent out of shape when people say that Resistance isn't that good. We were trying to make a point.
It's funny that you don't see that your comment that Bungie is "not that good" might start fights.
kalipekona
Nope. Go back and re-read the dialogue exchange. You said Bungie isn't that good and in response I said Resistance isn't that good (in so many words). Then you got your panties all in a bunch. Apparently you think you have a right to be antagonistic and come into a thread and state as a matter of fact that Bungie isn't that good (which is obviously a slap in the face to any of us that do think they are good) and then act all indignant when somebody is antagonistic back.
Actually...go back and read the Other comment... Then come back to me.[QUOTE="kalipekona"]
[QUOTE="VensInferno"] No, you guys basically called me retarted and claimed that I don't have the right to talk due to my taste in games.
EggHeadMan
Nope. Go back and re-read the dialogue exchange. You said Bungie isn't that good and in response I said Resistance isn't that good (in so many words). Then you got your panties all in a bunch. Apparently you think you have a right to be antagonistic and come into a thread and state as a matter of fact that Bungie isn't that good (which is obviously a slap in the face to any of us that do think they are good) and then act all indignant when somebody is antagonistic back.
Calm down, its just video games Exactly! Its just freaking video games, but some people are taking it seriously like its a war on religion...[QUOTE="XVision84"]
[QUOTE="ABCarmine"]
You don't like the Colbert Dance??????
ABCarmine
It's nice, but your old sig was better (and more funny) IMO :)
Which one are you talking about, I've had 4 other sigs.
The one where you explain the meaning of each emoticon.
[QUOTE="ABCarmine"]
[QUOTE="XVision84"]
It's nice, but your old sig was better (and more funny) IMO :)
XVision84
Which one are you talking about, I've had 4 other sigs.
The one where you explain the meaning of each emoticon.
Ah yes that was my most highly praised one, but I still like to change sigs a lot to keep up wit teh times. :P
[QUOTE="kalipekona"]
[QUOTE="VensInferno"] No, you guys basically called me retarted and claimed that I don't have the right to talk due to my taste in games.
VensInferno
Nope. Go back and re-read the dialogue exchange. You said Bungie isn't that good and in response I said Resistance isn't that good (in so many words). Then you got your panties all in a bunch. Apparently you think you have a right to be antagonistic and come into a thread and state as a matter of fact that Bungie isn't that good (which is obviously a slap in the face to any of us that do think they are good) and then act all indignant when somebody is antagonistic back.
Actually...go back and read the Other comment... Then come back to me.What other comment? I've read all the comments, but I am not responsible for what anybody else writes.
I don't want to go on and on about this. You made an antagonistic comment about Bungie not being that good. You stated it as if it were a fact. Everything else I said after that was to show you the absurdity of your indignation in having negative opinions expressed about games you love all the while you are slamming a developer that many other people love.
[QUOTE="Plagueless"]
[QUOTE="EggHeadMan"] nope, your are allowed to use metacritic if you want. GS is only used for flops
EggHeadMan
On Gamespot forums, Gamespot scores > Metacritic
Get it?
Edit: Also, Lol at the random Bleach conversation. Good series but such a random topic for this thread.
nope. Metacritic is more credible since it's mulitiple reviewers gaming review industry........:lol:Actually...go back and read the Other comment... Then come back to me.[QUOTE="VensInferno"]
[QUOTE="kalipekona"]
Nope. Go back and re-read the dialogue exchange. You said Bungie isn't that good and in response I said Resistance isn't that good (in so many words). Then you got your panties all in a bunch. Apparently you think you have a right to be antagonistic and come into a thread and state as a matter of fact that Bungie isn't that good (which is obviously a slap in the face to any of us that do think they are good) and then act all indignant when somebody is antagonistic back.
kalipekona
What other comment? I've read all the comments, but I am not responsible for what anybody else writes.
I don't want to go on and on about this. You made an antagonistic comment about Bungie not being that good. You stated it as if it were a fact. Everything else I said after that was to show you the absurdity of your indignation in having negative opinions expressed about games you love all the while you are slamming a developer that many other people love.
You know what.. forget it... I have work soon and I don't want to be pissed off and have a migraine while I go deliver ... end of discussion... good day..They are great without a doubt... but the last Halos games were so meh to me, maybe I am fed up with those :PGiancarWell then your'e in luck as their next game is new ip.
[QUOTE="kalipekona"]
[QUOTE="VensInferno"]Actually...go back and read the Other comment... Then come back to me.
VensInferno
What other comment? I've read all the comments, but I am not responsible for what anybody else writes.
I don't want to go on and on about this. You made an antagonistic comment about Bungie not being that good. You stated it as if it were a fact. Everything else I said after that was to show you the absurdity of your indignation in having negative opinions expressed about games you love all the while you are slamming a developer that many other people love.
You know what.. forget it... I have work soon and I don't want to be pissed off and have a migraine while I go deliver ... end of discussion... good day..I suspected you would never understand. But I'm done talking about it too.
Meh Cows will eventually see Bungies greatness in their next title
Which will be a "game changer" ;) Acording to Bungie.
I never see Bungie as a great Developer....compare to Naughty Dog, Sucker Punch, Ubosoft, Capcom, santa monica, atlus, Namco, Square, Sega or Nintendo for that matter...... Bungie is barely heard of.... people may say Halo (not outside North America) and bungie jumping.hippiesantaLol what!! :lol:
When did you play Halo:CE? probably in 2005? :PThey are great to their fans, but I found what's widely considered their greatest title from the past ten years - Halo CE - just average so Bungie will have to seriously impress with their next game.
Slashkice
Lol what!! :lol:[QUOTE="hippiesanta"]I never see Bungie as a great Developer....compare to Naughty Dog, Sucker Punch, Ubosoft, Capcom, santa monica, atlus, Namco, Square, Sega or Nintendo for that matter...... Bungie is barely heard of.... people may say Halo (not outside North America) and bungie jumping.walkingdream
believe me, when i was still in Asia, i didn't know what Halo was, everyone did not know what the hell Halo was. in Asia PCs and Playstations and Nintendos rule the land. simple as that. US =/= the world.
Lol what!! :lol:[QUOTE="walkingdream"]
[QUOTE="hippiesanta"]I never see Bungie as a great Developer....compare to Naughty Dog, Sucker Punch, Ubosoft, Capcom, santa monica, atlus, Namco, Square, Sega or Nintendo for that matter...... Bungie is barely heard of.... people may say Halo (not outside North America) and bungie jumping.rumbalumba
believe me, when i was still in Asia, i didn't know what Halo was, everyone did not know what the hell Halo was. in Asia PCs and Playstations and Nintendos rule the land. simple as that. US =/= the world.
So your saying Asia = Rest of the world?Becuase i'm pretty sure down here in Australia and the rest of europe know what Halo is :|
[QUOTE="walkingdream"]
When did you play Halo:CE? probably in 2005? :P
Slashkice
I first played the MP around then, probably earlier. The campaign though I didn't get to until last year.
Ahh well that explains it :PI played Half Life 1 in about 2004 and although i thought it was good i wasn't sure it was the godsend. I'm sure it would be different if i played it in 1997 ;)
Don't hold your breath. It'll be just like how the mgs collection is coming to 360. They are getting a piece of the pie, but at least vocally, whether true or not, they wont go back on the words they have stuck with forever. Or maybe I dont know what Im saying and ps3 fans will enjoy bungie games, and 360 fans will enjoy the mgs games.
Sigh....Now that Bungie don't have to milk Halo anymore I hope they'll finally make a good game.
Orchid87
Indeed as I expect this first evah PC/360/PS3 shooter from Bungie to pretty much blow almost all others outta the water - can't wait to see & hear a ton more about it. :D
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment