This topic is locked from further discussion.
Yeah what a load of BS. VF5 is a fighter in a small area and doesn't even look all that great. Tack on a little anti-aliasing 6 months later and the lemmings are "owning" the cows. We all know you didn't care about this game to begin with so just stfu. Lazy_Boy88amen bro
[QUOTE="mikasa"]Wow a game designed for the PS3 as the lead platform looks better on the 360! I'd say I'm shocked but I'd expect all games to look better on the 360 no matter what since it has the better GPU.gogeta242You may expect 360 games to look better, but I wouldn't bet on it. You seem to be forgetting that the Cell can help the RSX since its has GPU like functions. Killzone 2 is supposedly the first game to make use of this function. I can't wait for e3. [/QUOT
if some games have difficulties to run on ps3 with its cell where do you think killflop developers are going to pull out that power to make cell do some of the gpus work. or is killzone going to play 10 frames per second. mayby they find and use its "hidden powa"
[QUOTE="afmsquid"][QUOTE="akuma303x"][QUOTE="asdasd"][QUOTE="resistancemang"]Both versions are native 720p...wow, I think this defines ownage.everyone knows the graphics quality is better in 1080p then 720p why is that different here? 360 version still isnt 1080p
Timstuff
Ownage approved.
Wrongo. My crappy old HDTV does not support 720p, so games like Oblivion only play in 480p. However, it does support 1080i, and Virtua Fighter 5 runs in 1080i and looks gorgeous. How is that possible if the game does not play at 1080p native? Maybe you should actually do some homework before coming across as a ninny and saying things that aren't true just to claim ownage.
VF5 is 720P native, your TV upscales it to 1080i. Maybe YOU should do your homework.
[QUOTE="Timstuff"][QUOTE="afmsquid"][QUOTE="akuma303x"][QUOTE="asdasd"][QUOTE="resistancemang"]Both versions are native 720p...wow, I think this defines ownage.everyone knows the graphics quality is better in 1080p then 720p why is that different here? 360 version still isnt 1080p
afmsquid
Ownage approved.
Wrongo. My crappy old HDTV does not support 720p, so games like Oblivion only play in 480p. However, it does support 1080i, and Virtua Fighter 5 runs in 1080i and looks gorgeous. How is that possible if the game does not play at 1080p native? Maybe you should actually do some homework before coming across as a ninny and saying things that aren't true just to claim ownage.
Exactly! I hope he goes back to page 5 & reads how i broke it down for him. Not only that but i want to know why he's playing Oblivion in 480p? d00d your TV does 1080i native, set the PS3 to do 1080i on ALL games! You'really missing out & it doesn't seem like you know what you're doing over there :|VF5 is 720P native, your TV upscales it to 1080i. Maybe YOU should do your homework.
It's Nvidia vs ATI image quality comparison all over again, except console version.the difference3s are too small..
but for fanboys they are not............:roll:
daveg1
a game like VF5 or Doa benefit from capabilities like AA. The 360 can do great AA. with little or no hit to the hardware.akuma303x
Yeah, Forza 2 had great AA :roll:
Need to say more?Oblivion looks better on PS3 because of more dev time only
VF5 looks better on 360 because 360 is a better console?
Ragashahs
[QUOTE="akuma303x"] a game like VF5 or Doa benefit from capabilities like AA. The 360 can do great AA. with little or no hit to the hardware.Mass_Effect
Yeah, Forza 2 had great AA :roll:
Thats because it is where there is heavy lighting, they simply didnt have enough time to smoothen out the lighting model, i mean it looks like pure crap, the obscures the cars, even Forza 1 lighting is betterthere barely any difference... same with armored core, fight night etc...
Theseconsoleshave the same shader models and effects on their GPUs, its like comparing ATI to Nvidia, Apart from different AA modes even graphicswhores will be hard pressed to tell the difference in screens. Why are you people so concerned with the success of the 360?
Because PS3 has teh Cell.there barely any difference... same with armored core, fight night etc...
Theseconsoleshave the same shader models and effects on their GPUs, its like comparing ATI to Nvidia, Apart from different AA modes even graphicswhores will be hard pressed to tell the difference in screens. Why are you people so concerned with the success of the 360?
ChinoJamesKeene
Youre very naive my friend, trust me, a year ago, Lemmings were getting bashed because Full Auto 2 didnt have framerate drops showing that Full Auto 1 was too much for 360. Thats why people hate Cows
And if you play the games, then yoiull really feel the difference. I feel compelled to play my XBOX 1 games again because they look so good on 360
[QUOTE="musicalmac"]Who said it was better?Taz720Gamesradar established this a LONG time ago
[QUOTE="afmsquid"][QUOTE="akuma303x"][QUOTE="asdasd"][QUOTE="resistancemang"]Both versions are native 720p...wow, I think this defines ownage.everyone knows the graphics quality is better in 1080p then 720p why is that different here? 360 version still isnt 1080p
Timstuff
Ownage approved.
Wrongo. My crappy old HDTV does not support 720p, so games like Oblivion only play in 480p. However, it does support 1080i, and Virtua Fighter 5 runs in 1080i and looks gorgeous. How is that possible if the game does not play at 1080p native? Maybe you should actually do some homework before coming across as a ninny and saying things that aren't true just to claim ownage.
LoL, Holy crap! Please tell me you're joking... :?
Oblivion looks better on PS3 because of more dev time only
VF5 looks better on 360 because 360 is a better console?
Ragashahs
I think his point was that Sony fanboys claimed the 360 couldn't look as good as the PS3 version at all. Because the 360 couldn't handle it according to them.
At least, I've seen some claims like that.
[QUOTE="Ragashahs"]Oblivion looks better on PS3 because of more dev time only
VF5 looks better on 360 because 360 is a better console?
RogueEdge
I think his point was that Sony fanboys claimed the 360 couldn't look as good as the PS3 version at all. Because the 360 couldn't handle it according to them.
At least, I've seen some claims like that.
MS downplayed the 360's specs and SONY bloated the PS3's specs, SONY was caught off guard on how powerfull the 360 ended up being.
[QUOTE="Taz720"][QUOTE="musicalmac"]Who said it was better?musicalmacGamesradar established this a LONG time ago
No bad blood. Either way, Cows still had trouble accepting it up to this point despite that article.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment