now the PS3 games are better, no reason for 360

Today we have the most stupid TC ever brought to the world wide web.

PS3= Reliability, Graphics, Blu-ray, fun (hehe).

360= Games!!!!! Multiplayer!!!!! Shooters!!!!! RPG's!!!!!! etc.

I was shocked at Sony ever since the beginning of 2007, I was an all time Sony fan until they dissapointed me with a number of things. At the moment, 360 is the console to get for every genre, perm. Until Sony gets off there backside and do something magical. I especially hate Sony for delaying GTA 4 because they wanted some "extra content". I'm upset now :o

why is ut3 ps3 exclusive, all the have to do to get the 360 version is downgrade the graphics and modify the controls for the 360's controller.mistervengeance

no downgraded graphics for 360 version...

[QUOTE="cramoisi"] unreal tournament a ps3 exclusive... Danm_999

.....

(I could continue for days)... cramoisi

Please don't, I was saving Hell for my afterlife.

Best reply ever! Im still laughing :D

Now, with uncharted, call of duty 4 looking better, unreal tournament a ps3 exclusive... (I could continue for days)... there is not even one single reason to buy a 360. Mass effect graphics are not fully next gen, Halo 3 multiplayer is just boring compared with the almighty WARHAWK..., and they had to remove strips on the side of the screen beacause the 360 is not powerful enough..I cannot help but laugh at my friends (well, politely) that now begin to regret the 360. Oh, and the ps3 (with free online) is cheaper than the 360. Oh, and in 3 year your warranty is void, so you just trash the 360 and buy a ps3. I could continue on for days... Oh, and in 4 years the 360 is abandonned by Microsoft because 1- It's not enough powerfull (Halo 3) and 2- It's too much expensive to replace the consoles for free all the time. And oh, the ps3 already beat gear of war graphocally with only 40% of it's power. And oh, and oh, and oh.cramoisi

you're so funny :)

Poorly constructed, poorly rationalized, just all together poor.

Go back, learn from your mistake, and try again later.

[QUOTE="cramoisi"]Now, with uncharted, call of duty 4 looking better, unreal tournament a ps3 exclusive... (I could continue for days)... there is not even one single reason to buy a 360. Mass effect graphics are not fully next gen, Halo 3 multiplayer is just boring compared with the almighty WARHAWK..., and they had to remove strips on the side of the screen beacause the 360 is not powerful enough..I cannot help but laugh at my friends (well, politely) that now begin to regret the 360. Oh, and the ps3 (with free online) is cheaper than the 360. Oh, and in 3 year your warranty is void, so you just trash the 360 and buy a ps3. I could continue on for days... Oh, and in 4 years the 360 is abandonned by Microsoft because 1- It's not enough powerfull (Halo 3) and 2- It's too much expensive to replace the consoles for free all the time. And oh, the ps3 already beat gear of war graphocally with only 40% of it's power. And oh, and oh, and oh.l3erserker

I'm a SONY fanboy andI amshocked by your immaturity. I have a PS3 and I love it since it's avery reliable system. The exclusives don't stand out to the typical FPS and third person gamers (aka xbox 360 fanboys), but that's their loss. Anyways, the point is that the 360 does not suck (NINJA GAIDEN II WOOOOOOOOOOOT!). I believe that you (as well as IMO, 90% of the whole gaming community) weigh their opinions on the purchase they made since these systems are so expensive.

[QUOTE="Pimpshigity21"]

R&C = AA

Uncharted = AA

Call of Duty 4 = Multiplatform (better on 360)

The PS3's games are better than the flops of the past few months, but they are still average fair. If you like mediocre things (with a premium price), by all means, get a PS3 and waste some money.

Sony_92

thats why the 360 only has 2 System sellers ; Gears and Halo

Xbox has been carried by Halo franchise and now Gears , Playstation has a line up of system sellers

That's two more system sellers than the PS3.

Your "system sellers":

HS - :|

RFOM - :?

Motorstorm - :roll:

Lair - :cry:

PS3 software sales - :lol:

Thats why the PS3 has outsold the Wii and 360 the last 2 weeks

Sony_92

Two Weeks? LMFAO

In Japan, and in Lala Land, yes...in the real world, who knows.

Were there ANY AAA games on 360 in 2007 that weren't FPS? Ok, Gears was a TPS, but that was last year. Bioshock, Halo 3, COD4 (multiplat, but regardless) and Mass Effect (A or AA really), which... is an RPG shooter. Assasins Creed is debatably AAA but that's multiplatform anyway. That leaves... um...somebody help me out here.Blue Dragon, the great 360 JRPG hope, scored... what... 6.0 on GS? GameRankings lists it at 77%.

I'm not trying to knock FPS, Icangetinto*maybe*1or2ayear. But I'd rather have AA variety on PS3 than more of the same on 360.

Now, with uncharted, call of duty 4 looking better, unreal tournament a ps3 exclusive... (I could continue for days)... there is not even one single reason to buy a 360. Mass effect graphics are not fully next gen, Halo 3 multiplayer is just boring compared with the almighty WARHAWK..., and they had to remove strips on the side of the screen beacause the 360 is not powerful enough..I cannot help but laugh at my friends (well, politely) that now begin to regret the 360. Oh, and the ps3 (with free online) is cheaper than the 360. Oh, and in 3 year your warranty is void, so you just trash the 360 and buy a ps3. I could continue on for days... Oh, and in 4 years the 360 is abandonned by Microsoft because 1- It's not enough powerfull (Halo 3) and 2- It's too much expensive to replace the consoles for free all the time. And oh, the ps3 already beat gear of war graphocally with only 40% of it's power. And oh, and oh, and oh.cramoisi

see, this is why cows get jumped on so much. one good game comes out...not even an AAA game, and we get posts like this. plus they're mis-informed and spit nonsense...COD4 better on ps3, haven't heard that before. he doesn't even know unreal tour. 3 isn't an exclusive...its out on the PC first, then ps3, then the 360. so he basically made a post to show off his ignorance. whats funny is he also bashes Mass Effect and it's AAA...oh, oh, oh, but Uncharted has better graphics...'yea but it's 8 hours long and does the same ole shii.' sweet kid....

Were there ANY AAA games on 360 in 2007 that weren't FPS? Ok, Gears was a TPS, but that was last year. Bioshock, Halo 3, COD4 (multiplat, but regardless) and Mass Effect (A or AA really), which... is an RPG shooter. Assasins Creed is debatably AAA but that's multiplatform anyway. That leaves... um...somebody help me out here.Blue Dragon, the great 360 JRPG hope, scored... what... 6.0 on GS? GameRankings lists it at 77%.

I'm not trying to knock FPS, Icangetinto*maybe*1or2ayear. But I'd rather have AA variety on PS3 than more of the same on 360.

stray720

A) you forgot Forza 2.

B) Why not compare AA v AA variety? It's true that the 360's AAAs are predominantly shooters... but what about the AA's? If you enjoy "AA variety" why aren't you taking Dead Rising, AC6, Viva Piñata, Dead or Alive, C&C3, Kameo, ES, and dozens more?

[QUOTE="cramoisi"]Now, with uncharted, call of duty 4 looking better, unreal tournament a ps3 exclusive... (I could continue for days)... there is not even one single reason to buy a 360. Mass effect graphics are not fully next gen, Halo 3 multiplayer is just boring compared with the almighty WARHAWK..., and they had to remove strips on the side of the screen beacause the 360 is not powerful enough..I cannot help but laugh at my friends (well, politely) that now begin to regret the 360. Oh, and the ps3 (with free online) is cheaper than the 360. Oh, and in 3 year your warranty is void, so you just trash the 360 and buy a ps3. I could continue on for days... Oh, and in 4 years the 360 is abandonned by Microsoft because 1- It's not enough powerfull (Halo 3) and 2- It's too much expensive to replace the consoles for free all the time. And oh, the ps3 already beat gear of war graphocally with only 40% of it's power. And oh, and oh, and oh.MaximumD

Majority of the top 360 games are on the PC too.

lol, someone is actually jumping to his defense...funny

Now, with uncharted, call of duty 4 looking better, unreal tournament a ps3 exclusive... (I could continue for days)... there is not even one single reason to buy a 360. Mass effect graphics are not fully next gen, Halo 3 multiplayer is just boring compared with the almighty WARHAWK..., and they had to remove strips on the side of the screen beacause the 360 is not powerful enough..I cannot help but laugh at my friends (well, politely) that now begin to regret the 360. Oh, and the ps3 (with free online) is cheaper than the 360. Oh, and in 3 year your warranty is void, so you just trash the 360 and buy a ps3. I could continue on for days... Oh, and in 4 years the 360 is abandonned by Microsoft because 1- It's not enough powerfull (Halo 3) and 2- It's too much expensive to replace the consoles for free all the time. And oh, the ps3 already beat gear of war graphocally with only 40% of it's power. And oh, and oh, and oh.cramoisi

Anyone want weak-sauce for their thanksgiving dinner? There's plenty here for everyone.

UT3 isn't exclusive...

Where do you get this crap (to TC). If you look at the release list you'll clearly see UT3 as being released on the 360 early next year. I'm getting it on the PS3 but, seriously, don't make up stuff for your own false cause.

As for games being better on the PS3? Not according to Gamespot or any site really. They've gotten ALOT better but still not there. I'm enjoying my PS3 regardless.

It's fanboys like the TC that make the PS3 look bad though. He's literally lying about 99% of the stuff he says. Truly sad.

:lol: thanks for the laugh TC

Were there ANY AAA games on 360 in 2007 that weren't FPS? Ok, Gears was a TPS, but that was last year. Bioshock, Halo 3, COD4 (multiplat, but regardless) and Mass Effect (A or AA really), which... is an RPG shooter. Assasins Creed is debatably AAA but that's multiplatform anyway. That leaves... um...somebody help me out here.Blue Dragon, the great 360 JRPG hope, scored... what... 6.0 on GS? GameRankings lists it at 77%.

I'm not trying to knock FPS, Icangetinto*maybe*1or2ayear. But I'd rather have AA variety on PS3 than more of the same on 360.

stray720

Now this is where you lose me. You bring up the 360 AAAs, lump them all in as shooter (including Mass Effect which is just wrong), then you compare it to the "variety" you get with the PS3 AAs. But, if AAs are in the conversation, wouldn't you have to bring up the AAs for the 360 too, which are not all shooters and cancel out the "variety" factor? I guess that would've been inconvenient to your argument, right?

and they had to remove strips on the side of the screen beacause the 360 is not powerful enoughcramoisi

As for Warhawk being more fun than Halo 3 - that's subjective, but I'm going with NO. Warhawk's fun, but I haven't played a single match since Halo 3 came out.

Man, fanboys never cease to amaze me. :lol:

[QUOTE="stray720"]

Were there ANY AAA games on 360 in 2007 that weren't FPS? Ok, Gears was a TPS, but that was last year. Bioshock, Halo 3, COD4 (multiplat, but regardless) and Mass Effect (A or AA really), which... is an RPG shooter. Assasins Creed is debatably AAA but that's multiplatform anyway. That leaves... um...somebody help me out here.Blue Dragon, the great 360 JRPG hope, scored... what... 6.0 on GS? GameRankings lists it at 77%.

I'm not trying to knock FPS, Icangetinto*maybe*1or2ayear. But I'd rather have AA variety on PS3 than more of the same on 360.

dsmccracken

Now this is where you lose me. You bring up the 360 AAAs, lump them all in as shooter (including Mass Effect which is just wrong), then you compare it to the "variety" you get with the PS3 AAs. But, if AAs are in the conversation, wouldn't you have to bring up the AAs for the 360 too, which are not all shooters and cancel out the "variety" factor? I guess that would've been inconvenient to your argument, right?

Like... GRAW 2? or the Darkness? Both shooters *and* multiplats for that matter.How about F.E.A.R.? Or Splinter Cell? Ok, there's Forza and PGR4. But aside from the multiplatform sports games and Guitar Hero/RockBand, 360's A and AA lineup is just more and more me-too shooters. If I'm missing something, please, enlighten me. For that matter, I'd love to know how Mass Effect isn't a shooter, aside from the RPG elements.

this topic is like a paraplegic trying to prove he can really walk...

utter failure

[QUOTE="dsmccracken"][QUOTE="stray720"]

Were there ANY AAA games on 360 in 2007 that weren't FPS? Ok, Gears was a TPS, but that was last year. Bioshock, Halo 3, COD4 (multiplat, but regardless) and Mass Effect (A or AA really), which... is an RPG shooter. Assasins Creed is debatably AAA but that's multiplatform anyway. That leaves... um...somebody help me out here.Blue Dragon, the great 360 JRPG hope, scored... what... 6.0 on GS? GameRankings lists it at 77%.

I'm not trying to knock FPS, Icangetinto*maybe*1or2ayear. But I'd rather have AA variety on PS3 than more of the same on 360.

stray720

Now this is where you lose me. You bring up the 360 AAAs, lump them all in as shooter (including Mass Effect which is just wrong), then you compare it to the "variety" you get with the PS3 AAs. But, if AAs are in the conversation, wouldn't you have to bring up the AAs for the 360 too, which are not all shooters and cancel out the "variety" factor? I guess that would've been inconvenient to your argument, right?

Like... GRAW 2? or the Darkness? Both shooters *and* multiplats for that matter.How about F.E.A.R.? Or Splinter Cell? Ok, there's Forza and PGR4. But aside from the multiplatform sports games and Guitar Hero/RockBand, 360's A and AA lineup is just more and more me-too shooters. If I'm missing something, please, enlighten me. For that matter, I'd love to know how Mass Effect isn't a shooter, aside from the RPG elements.

I'm not even going to bother with the rest of the post but...

Mass Effect is an RPG with shooting elements, not the other way around.

[QUOTE="dsmccracken"][QUOTE="stray720"]

Were there ANY AAA games on 360 in 2007 that weren't FPS? Ok, Gears was a TPS, but that was last year. Bioshock, Halo 3, COD4 (multiplat, but regardless) and Mass Effect (A or AA really), which... is an RPG shooter. Assasins Creed is debatably AAA but that's multiplatform anyway. That leaves... um...somebody help me out here.Blue Dragon, the great 360 JRPG hope, scored... what... 6.0 on GS? GameRankings lists it at 77%.

I'm not trying to knock FPS, Icangetinto*maybe*1or2ayear. But I'd rather have AA variety on PS3 than more of the same on 360.

stray720

Now this is where you lose me. You bring up the 360 AAAs, lump them all in as shooter (including Mass Effect which is just wrong), then you compare it to the "variety" you get with the PS3 AAs. But, if AAs are in the conversation, wouldn't you have to bring up the AAs for the 360 too, which are not all shooters and cancel out the "variety" factor? I guess that would've been inconvenient to your argument, right?

Like... GRAW 2? or the Darkness? Both shooters *and* multiplats for that matter.How about F.E.A.R.? Or Splinter Cell? Ok, there's Forza and PGR4. But aside from the multiplatform sports games and Guitar Hero/RockBand, 360's A and AA lineup is just more and more me-too shooters. If I'm missing something, please, enlighten me. For that matter, I'd love to know how Mass Effect isn't a shooter, aside from the RPG elements.

You are indeed missing something. Missing Eternal Sonata, Viva Pinata, Dead Rising, Kameo, DOA4, and others. Mass Effect combat LOOKS like a shooter, but it is not, no quick twitching involved. Try it.

[QUOTE="stray720"][QUOTE="dsmccracken"][QUOTE="stray720"]

Were there ANY AAA games on 360 in 2007 that weren't FPS? Ok, Gears was a TPS, but that was last year. Bioshock, Halo 3, COD4 (multiplat, but regardless) and Mass Effect (A or AA really), which... is an RPG shooter. Assasins Creed is debatably AAA but that's multiplatform anyway. That leaves... um...somebody help me out here.Blue Dragon, the great 360 JRPG hope, scored... what... 6.0 on GS? GameRankings lists it at 77%.

I'm not trying to knock FPS, Icangetinto*maybe*1or2ayear. But I'd rather have AA variety on PS3 than more of the same on 360.

dsmccracken

Were there ANY AAA games on 360 in 2007 that weren't FPS? Ok, Gears was a TPS, but that was last year. Bioshock, Halo 3, COD4 (multiplat, but regardless) and Mass Effect (A or AA really), which... is an RPG shooter. Assasins Creed is debatably AAA but that's multiplatform anyway. That leaves... um...somebody help me out here.Blue Dragon, the great 360 JRPG hope, scored... what... 6.0 on GS? GameRankings lists it at 77%.

I'm not trying to knock FPS, Icangetinto*maybe*1or2ayear. But I'd rather have AA variety on PS3 than more of the same on 360.

stray720

Mass Effect is a shooter ? It is also one of the MOST addicetive, deep RPG's ever created, with the very best story and graphics i have ever seen, it is a monument to gaming for me as nothing before it

So, Mass Effect alone makes 2007 360 lineup just the best it could ever be on any platform IMO, and 360 the only system so far that i MUST own, it is like zelda OOT on N64 or FF7 on PS1

Well, actually vastly better than both those since it is a next gen experience