Nvidia Fermi and DX11 shots emerge

Too bad it's just standard tech-demo BS. Besides, Fermi is probably going to be expensive as ****.

PBSnipes

thanks, exactly this. as long as i don't see ingame footage of a game showing off something like this i won't be excited at all.

David Beckham?

shutdown_202

I got that exact vibe from the second pic ...

I hope this comes to pass. what i like about PC devs is when they show a tech demo or something, you at least know they WILL achieve those visuals

I may get into PC gaming down the line :)

IT would be nice if games would run like that. Now the real question, how much would something like that cost?zbdyx

In the Year 2011, i'd estimate about $100 if tech inceases at the current rates.

[QUOTE="XenogearsMaster"]PC gaming won't reach this kind of graphics until maybe 2011. But I think consoles would reach this detail for next generation.Ribnarak

U mean:

Console gamingwon't reach this kind of graphics until maybe 2011. But I thinkPC gamingwould reach this detail for next monday.

So next week every other PC games will reach that kind of graphics? Maybe next year with one game...

XenogearsMaster

I think someone needs to get their sarcasm detector checked.

Honesty though there is some downplay in this thread, if this was a tech demo for a new console people would be peeing themselves with excitement and declaring the death of PC gaming...

[QUOTE="LordQuorthon"]

[QUOTE="wolverine4262"]why are they wasting time on scruffy men?! Where are the hot computer generated chicks?!?gamer620

I'll second that.

yeah you can get more detail too like , scars, hair follicles, beards, cuts, mustaches and wrinkles.

It's all in the detail

Interesting tech demo. I'll be interested to see how DX11 does in PC gaming. I'm hoping for the best :D

[QUOTE="shutdown_202"]

David Beckham?

Stats_

I myself will be getting Nvidia's budget DX11 cards. :3 Hopefully they wont be too much more than ATi's 5750/70, >:[ and I hope DX11 will be worth the wait!

[QUOTE="samuraiguns"][QUOTE="PPresentFortune"]

UNBELIEVABLE! I think this is a glimpse of what we can expect from next generation consoles.

SquatsAreAwesom

[QUOTE="XenogearsMaster"]So next week every other PC games will reach that kind of graphics? Maybe next year with one game...

AnnoyedDragon

I think someone needs to get their sarcasm detector checked.

Honesty though there is some downplay in this thread, if this was a tech demo for a new console people would be peeing themselves with excitement and declaring the death of PC gaming...

[QUOTE="LordQuorthon"]

[QUOTE="wolverine4262"]why are they wasting time on scruffy men?! Where are the hot computer generated chicks?!?gamer620

I'll second that.

Wow.....a ray traced pre-rendered bullshot, proved nothing.

With Ray tracing you can make anything look good given enough rendering time. People were making decent pics on 486 with ray-tracers. Intel have tried and so far failed to make a "real time" ray tracer.

[QUOTE="gamer620"][QUOTE="LordQuorthon"]

I'll second that.

wolverine4262

ROFL. Ye Megan Fox redminds me of SIMONE, from the film of the same name, she prolly only exists on some hard drive within Fox news.

UNBELIEVABLE! I think this is a glimpse of what we can expect from next generation consoles.

PPresentFortune

:shock: wow thats incredible first pic looks like a photo.johnny27

It is a photo.

Still waiting for the Cows to say that "teh cell" is more powerful than fermi...........

siddhu33

It's kind of funny how it is other fanboys that bring up "teh cell" more often than Cows do.

Meh, who cares... Show that kind of graphics to me in a real, upcoming game, then I'll be excited.

meh tech demo shots always look good. if an actual game looks like that then ill be impressed

OH man now all we need is some next gen acne! SAGE_OF_FIRE

Oh my god!! These pictures looks exactly like real. Are you really sure they are computerised!?

[QUOTE="SAGE_OF_FIRE"]OH man now all we need is some next gen acne! beast667

wow :shock:

The difference is, those pictures are technical demos of rendering of a single head. If we exhaust our GPUs on one head or face alone, we wouldn't leave anything for the textures of the walls, floors and outdoors. It's not that current GPUs are that far off from being able to render at that level, but it's just that a typical application of GPUs for games involves more than just rendering one singleface, and more often than not, it's a compromise to intentionally sacrifice detail of faces at that level so that the environment doesn't just look outclassed by the faces in comparison.

[QUOTE="tagyhag"]I LOVE the last pic, it looks like a house in Japan. *Sigh* If ONLY games could be made like this without being at 0.0001 fps. :P I hope it's only 10-15 years away for this to be a reality. :( FalcoLX

The difference is, those pictures are technical demos of rendering of a single head. If we exhaust our GPUs on one head or face alone, we wouldn't leave anything for the textures of the walls, floors and outdoors. It's not that current GPUs are that far off from being able to render at that level, but it's just that a typical application of GPUs for games involves more than just rendering one singleface, and more often than not, it's a compromise to intentionally sacrifice detail of faces at that level so that the environment doesn't just look outclassed by the faces in comparison.

jhcho2

look too real, i'll actually spend a lot of money on a pc to run a game that'll look that

Don't get carried away it's just a pre-rendered tech demo. Anyone remember the Ruby tech demos that ATI had for the HD 2900s? Not even Crysis looked anywhere near that good, and the cards struggled a lot with that game. And remember that Fermi is for supercomputers, it's not really a gamers GPU. So people need to take a deep breath and realize that these are the equivalents of bullshots on steroids.

[QUOTE="FalcoLX"]

[QUOTE="tagyhag"]I LOVE the last pic, it looks like a house in Japan. *Sigh* If ONLY games could be made like this without being at 0.0001 fps. :P I hope it's only 10-15 years away for this to be a reality. :( fail_baby

I =_= what you did there...

Don't get carried away it's just a pre-rendered tech demo. Anyone remember the Ruby tech demos that ATI had for the HD 2900s? Not even Crysis looked anywhere near that good, and the cards struggled a lot with that game. And remember that Fermi is for supercomputers, it's not really a gamers GPU. So people need to take a deep breath and realize that these are the equivalents of bullshots on steroids.

shakmaster13

you do realize that that was realtime though. the reason games dont run that smooth is because of optimization. if a developer spent years optimizing their game for the card they would look like the tech demos.

hate to reive a dead thread but you've all been owned.

that was NOT a fermi/GT300 tech demo. they were stilsl from a video made for the Playground Festival (a digital video film festival). someone obviously doctored the photos with the nvidia logo. here's proof.

link

link 2

if you actually believed the images were real, you deserved to get burned. the whole supercomputer in a card thing? ATI tried that with the 4800 series.

also, the realtime ray-tracing should have been a dead give away that this was BS.

I don't know what to say. That is way past awesome.

Oh my goodness.
That's mind blowing.

*Brains are on the floor*

guys, it's fake. it's not a tech demo. it's not even from nvidia. it's a video from a film festival.

guys, it's fake. it's not a tech demo. it's not even from nvidia. it's a video from a film festival.

cowgriller

Makes sense.

http://bbs.pczilla.net/thread-5002-1-1.htmlSquatsAreAwesom

Er... I am pretty sure those are fake. nVidia has NOT released anything new since they revealed Fermi existed a month ago.

Er... I am pretty sure those are fake. nVidia has NOT released anything new since they revealed Fermi existed a month ago.

Wartzay

it is fake. check my first post a few posts above yours.

Looks great but games wont come close to that. Simply rendering a face is much easier then rendering an entire game scene.

EDIT: guess its fake nm then.

My face just melted onto my shirt.

yeah i knew this was fake. the only way that that could be real CG was if it was prerendered much like avatar. Realtime rendering of something that photorealistic is impossible with current hardware. Mental Ray in realtime? come on that renderer isnt even that good & second it is highly unoptomized