Nvidia finally adopts FreeSync support!

Avatar image for ShadowDeathX
ShadowDeathX

11699

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#1  Edited By ShadowDeathX
Member since 2006 • 11699 Posts

Nvidia will soon be rolling out driver updates that add G-Sync support to existing FreeSync/Adaptive Sync monitors.

FINALLY!!

Source: https://www.dsogaming.com/news/nvidia-will-enable-g-sync-to-specific-freesync-pc-monitors-first-compatible-models-announced/

UPDATE: Nvidia will allow you to turn VRR on ANY FreeSync/Adaptive Sync monitor.

Nvidia is only calling it G-Sync on monitors that pass their strict requirements.

Example: Nvidia validates that the monitor can operate in VRR at any game frame rate by supporting a VRR range of at least 2.4:1 (e.g. 60Hz-144Hz). There are a ton of monitors that have a smaller VRR window but work just fine.

https://www.dsogaming.com/news/nvidia-will-enable-g-sync-to-specific-freesync-pc-monitors-first-compatible-models-announced/

Avatar image for Juub1990
Juub1990

12622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Juub1990
Member since 2013 • 12622 Posts

About time. Now if they could only do that for all FreeSync monitors.

Avatar image for BassMan
BassMan

18724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 232

User Lists: 0

#3  Edited By BassMan
Member since 2002 • 18724 Posts

This is good news. However, I am more interested in Nvidia's support of HDMI 2.1 and the VRR associated with it. I want to make full use of my future TV when outputting from an Nvidia card. They are still pushing BFGD displays and that is not encouraging.

Avatar image for Basinboy
Basinboy

14558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#4 Basinboy
Member since 2003 • 14558 Posts

As someone who owns three G-SYNC monitors:

Avatar image for jun_aka_pekto
jun_aka_pekto

25255

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 jun_aka_pekto
Member since 2010 • 25255 Posts

Good. I just bought a Freesync IPS monitor for my kid. I'll have to steal it away from her. ;)

Avatar image for npiet1
npiet1

3576

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#6  Edited By npiet1
Member since 2018 • 3576 Posts

Thank god. Ive been looking at buy a decent 4k Monitor/Tv for a future graphic card. I've got 6gb 1060 but my misses always steals my PC to play the Sims. So I wanna give it to her. I cant afford g-sync but at least I can get free sync now.

Avatar image for neutrinoworks
NeutrinoWorks

75

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#7 NeutrinoWorks
Member since 2018 • 75 Posts

@BassMan said:

This is good news. However, I am more interested in Nvidia's support of HDMI 2.1 and the VRR associated with it. I want to make full use of my future TV when outputting from an Nvidia card. They are still pushing BFGD displays and that is not encouraging.

It'll most likely be supported.

HDMI 2.1 with VRR has pretty much forced Nvidia to play nice with Freesync/VRR

Avatar image for deactivated-5f4e2292197f1
deactivated-5f4e2292197f1

1374

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 deactivated-5f4e2292197f1
Member since 2015 • 1374 Posts

Sweet, they just got theirselves a new customer.

I bought a 1440/144hz monitor with freesync for a 390x. I've been waiting for an AMD graphics card that I would pick over Nvidia simply cause of the Freesync, but now, I'll just go ahead and buy that 2060.

Avatar image for deactivated-5e081d8b4abb0
deactivated-5e081d8b4abb0

1499

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#9 deactivated-5e081d8b4abb0
Member since 2017 • 1499 Posts

This is a good start but I'm looking more towards the new line of LG OLED's that will be coming with HDMI 2.1. Gives me a reason to upgrade my 55" E7 model in the room.

Avatar image for djoffer
djoffer

1856

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 djoffer
Member since 2007 • 1856 Posts

Arghhhh just bought a g-sync monitor a month ago:/

Avatar image for DragonfireXZ95
DragonfireXZ95

26712

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 DragonfireXZ95
Member since 2005 • 26712 Posts

Nice! Wanted to get a G-sync, but always thought the price just wasn't worth it. This justifies the 700 I did spend on a 34" Samsung QLED.

Avatar image for ShadowDeathX
ShadowDeathX

11699

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#12 ShadowDeathX
Member since 2006 • 11699 Posts

@Juub1990:

From Nvidia's press release

You can turn on "G-Sync" on all monitors that support FreeSync/Adaptive Sync via DisplayPort. The thing is that Nvidia is calling it G-Sync for the 14 monitors that passed their whatever tests. The other ones are VRR.

Avatar image for AdobeArtist
AdobeArtist

25184

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 AdobeArtist  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 25184 Posts

Damn. Not my BenQ monitor. Yet.

Avatar image for R4gn4r0k
R4gn4r0k

48939

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 R4gn4r0k
Member since 2004 • 48939 Posts
@Basinboy said:

As someone who owns three G-SYNC monitors:

G-sync is still better than freesync though. It's more expensive sure, but it's better.

Avatar image for neutrinoworks
NeutrinoWorks

75

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#15  Edited By NeutrinoWorks
Member since 2018 • 75 Posts

@R4gn4r0k said:
@Basinboy said:

As someone who owns three G-SYNC monitors:

G-sync is still better than freesync though. It's more expensive sure, but it's better.

Might not be after HDMI 2.1 Displays are out. And I think CES starts today, i bet there's lots of HDMI 2.1 Displays at the show

Avatar image for techhog89
Techhog89

5430

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Techhog89
Member since 2015 • 5430 Posts

I figured Nvidia would be forced to do this after Intel did.

Avatar image for Pedro
Pedro

73848

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

#17 Pedro
Member since 2002 • 73848 Posts

Great for the industry as a whole.

Avatar image for R4gn4r0k
R4gn4r0k

48939

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 R4gn4r0k
Member since 2004 • 48939 Posts

@neutrinoworks said:

Might not be after HDMI 2.1 Displays are out. And I think CES starts today, i bet there's lots of HDMI 2.1 Displays at the show

I'm looking forward to the new Ryzen chips at CES.

Avatar image for osan0
osan0

18241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19 osan0
Member since 2004 • 18241 Posts

brilliant news. good guys nvidia. hopefully they can extend that support further back to the 900 series at least also. as far as i know there isnt a reason why those cards cant do it either.

Avatar image for HalcyonScarlet
HalcyonScarlet

13838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#20 HalcyonScarlet
Member since 2011 • 13838 Posts

AHHHH I got excited because my Ultra Wide LG monitor has free sync. Then I read in link 'a select range of free sync monitors'.

Avatar image for Jag85
Jag85

20618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 219

User Lists: 0

#21 Jag85
Member since 2005 • 20618 Posts

I don't see LG or Samsung monitors listed.

Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23857

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#22  Edited By 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23857 Posts

Nice I have an ASUS ROG Strix XG27V, So it should work

Avatar image for kali-b1rd
Kali-B1rd

2241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#23 Kali-B1rd
Member since 2018 • 2241 Posts

Welp, I've wasted money then, ah well!

Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23857

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#24 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23857 Posts

@kali-b1rd said:

Welp, I've wasted money then, ah well!

not really, G-sync provides better monitor to gpu communication "syncing" and your still using it and if your happy with it still no problem then.

Avatar image for techhog89
Techhog89

5430

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 Techhog89
Member since 2015 • 5430 Posts
@04dcarraher said:
@kali-b1rd said:

Welp, I've wasted money then, ah well!

not really, G-sync provides better monitor to gpu communication "syncing" and your still using it and if your happy with it still no problem then.

Bullshit

Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23857

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#26  Edited By 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23857 Posts

@techhog89 said:
@04dcarraher said:
@kali-b1rd said:

Welp, I've wasted money then, ah well!

not really, G-sync provides better monitor to gpu communication "syncing" and your still using it and if your happy with it still no problem then.

Bullshit

Actually the Gsync module in the monitor handles most the grunt work. So there is less overhead for the gpu. Also Freesync requires you to have 48 fps or better while G-sync its 30 or better. So if 4k at 30 fps is the goal Freesync will not work for that situation.

Avatar image for Shewgenja
Shewgenja

21456

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#27 Shewgenja
Member since 2009 • 21456 Posts

Nice! Glad NVidia is getting their ducks in a row for HDMI 2.1, which I fully suspect is going to use AMDs implementation of frame syncing in some form or another. Everyone wins here, at least down the line just a bit.

Avatar image for ShadowDeathX
ShadowDeathX

11699

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#28 ShadowDeathX
Member since 2006 • 11699 Posts

@HalcyonScarlet said:

AHHHH I got excited because my Ultra Wide LG monitor has free sync. Then I read in link 'a select range of free sync monitors'.

You can still turn Variable Refresh Rate ON in the Nvidia Control Panel. Nvidia is supporting VRR on FreeSync monitors they are just being picky on which ones they call G-Sync for marketing purposes.

Avatar image for Addict187
Addict187

1128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 Addict187
Member since 2008 • 1128 Posts

@HalcyonScarlet said:

AHHHH I got excited because my Ultra Wide LG monitor has free sync. Then I read in link 'a select range of free sync monitors'.

LOL it says it will work with any free sync monitors the ones listed are what they recommend

Avatar image for Addict187
Addict187

1128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 Addict187
Member since 2008 • 1128 Posts

@Addict187 said:
@HalcyonScarlet said:

AHHHH I got excited because my Ultra Wide LG monitor has free sync. Then I read in link 'a select range of free sync monitors'.

LOL it says it will work with any free sync monitors the ones listed are what they recommend

NVIDIA will also give an option to everyone that owns a FreeSync monitor to enable VRR. However, you will need a GeForce RTX 20-series or a GTX 10-series in order to enable VRR.

Avatar image for Xabiss
Xabiss

4749

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 Xabiss
Member since 2012 • 4749 Posts
@04dcarraher said:
@techhog89 said:
@04dcarraher said:
@kali-b1rd said:

Welp, I've wasted money then, ah well!

not really, G-sync provides better monitor to gpu communication "syncing" and your still using it and if your happy with it still no problem then.

Bullshit

Actually the Gsync module in the monitor handles most the grunt work. So there is less overhead for the gpu. Also Freesync requires you to have 48 fps or better while G-sync its 30 or better. So if 4k at 30 fps is the goal Freesync will not work for that situation.

OMG the false shit you just said at the end. The BenQ EW370U 4K montior has Freesync from the range of 24hz-60hz. So quit with your false BS please. Seriously if you talk about tech make sure you know what you are talking about!

https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/benq-ew3270u-ultra-hd-hdr-monitor,5587.html

"You do get FreeSync support though, over an impressive 24-60Hz range. That enables low-frequency compensation (LFC), so you’ll never see a tear, even your framerates dip into very low territory."

Avatar image for jasonofa36
JasonOfA36

3725

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#32 JasonOfA36
Member since 2016 • 3725 Posts

Sucks for people who invested in a good GSync monitor. Nvidia basically robbed them.

Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23857

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#33  Edited By 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23857 Posts

@Xabiss said:
@04dcarraher said:
@techhog89 said:
@04dcarraher said:

not really, G-sync provides better monitor to gpu communication "syncing" and your still using it and if your happy with it still no problem then.

Bullshit

Actually the Gsync module in the monitor handles most the grunt work. So there is less overhead for the gpu. Also Freesync requires you to have 48 fps or better while G-sync its 30 or better. So if 4k at 30 fps is the goal Freesync will not work for that situation.

OMG the false shit you just said at the end. The BenQ EW370U 4K montior has Freesync from the range of 24hz-60hz. So quit with your false BS please. Seriously if you talk about tech make sure you know what you are talking about!

https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/benq-ew3270u-ultra-hd-hdr-monitor,5587.html

"You do get FreeSync support though, over an impressive 24-60Hz range. That enables low-frequency compensation (LFC), so you’ll never see a tear, even your framerates dip into very low territory."

Dont get into a fit now..... So there are newer and higher end freesync monitors now that can go as low a 24hz, that's nice. At least its better than the vast majority of freesync monitors are only able to do ie 48hz+.

Avatar image for Xabiss
Xabiss

4749

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34  Edited By Xabiss
Member since 2012 • 4749 Posts
@04dcarraher said:
@Xabiss said:
@04dcarraher said:
@techhog89 said:
@04dcarraher said:

not really, G-sync provides better monitor to gpu communication "syncing" and your still using it and if your happy with it still no problem then.

Bullshit

Actually the Gsync module in the monitor handles most the grunt work. So there is less overhead for the gpu. Also Freesync requires you to have 48 fps or better while G-sync its 30 or better. So if 4k at 30 fps is the goal Freesync will not work for that situation.

OMG the false shit you just said at the end. The BenQ EW370U 4K montior has Freesync from the range of 24hz-60hz. So quit with your false BS please. Seriously if you talk about tech make sure you know what you are talking about!

https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/benq-ew3270u-ultra-hd-hdr-monitor,5587.html

"You do get FreeSync support though, over an impressive 24-60Hz range. That enables low-frequency compensation (LFC), so you’ll never see a tear, even your framerates dip into very low territory."

Dont get into a fit now..... So there are newer and higher end freesync monitors now that can go as low a 24hz, that's nice. At least its better than the vast majority of freesync monitors are only able to do ie 48hz+.

That is not throwing a fit, that is fixing false ass information you were spewing!

Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23857

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#35  Edited By 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23857 Posts

@Xabiss said:
@04dcarraher said:
@Xabiss said:

That is not throwing a fit, that is fixing false ass information you were spewing!

The way you typed it read like a fit. that type of a response .... All you had to say was....... 48hz minimum for all freesync monitors is incorrect, there are newer and more expensive higher end freesync able monitors able to get to 24hz. with ie link and it would be just fine.

Avatar image for cdragon_88
cdragon_88

1848

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#37 cdragon_88
Member since 2003 • 1848 Posts

Gysnc is overrated as hell. Getting the damn thing to work as intended is a headache of its own because it depends on the game. Wished they would have done this sooner so I could've bought a cheaper Free-Sync Monitor. Wished I would've just gotten a 144hz monitor instead and called it a day.

Avatar image for ten_pints
Ten_Pints

4072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#38  Edited By Ten_Pints
Member since 2014 • 4072 Posts

I'm pretty sure Freesync performance depends on the display not the standard itself, different monitors/TVs support different frame rate ranges. Then again I could be talking shit as I don't own one.

Avatar image for HalcyonScarlet
HalcyonScarlet

13838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#39 HalcyonScarlet
Member since 2011 • 13838 Posts

@Addict187 said:
@HalcyonScarlet said:

AHHHH I got excited because my Ultra Wide LG monitor has free sync. Then I read in link 'a select range of free sync monitors'.

LOL it says it will work with any free sync monitors the ones listed are what they recommend

Yeah I saw that, also: "So Nvidia says it has gone to the trouble of testing 400 different Adaptive-Sync monitors to see which ones are worthy of being certified as "G-Sync Compatible."

Of those 400 tests, Nvidia says only 12 monitors have met its standards so far. They are:"

@Addict187 said:

NVIDIA will also give an option to everyone that owns a FreeSync monitor to enable VRR. However, you will need a GeForce RTX 20-series or a GTX 10-series in order to enable VRR.

@ShadowDeathX said:

You can still turn Variable Refresh Rate ON in the Nvidia Control Panel. Nvidia is supporting VRR on FreeSync monitors they are just being picky on which ones they call G-Sync for marketing purposes.

Yeah, thanks, hopefully that'll do it.

Avatar image for davillain
DaVillain

58589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#40 DaVillain  Moderator  Online
Member since 2014 • 58589 Posts

@R4gn4r0k said:
@Basinboy said:

As someone who owns three G-SYNC monitors:

G-sync is still better than freesync though. It's more expensive sure, but it's better.

G-sync is absolutely amazing. Just spend the extra, it is worth it. I've had it since November and it wows me every time, it is a treat for the eyes. Yes, the extra cost sucks, but it beats the alternative of having a weak GPU AMD and a cost effective monitor. (freesync)

@Yams1980 said:

Nice to hear this. This is one of the main negative points i put against nvidia all the time.

I would never had bought a gsync monitor so its nice i can finally use freesync with my nvidia card.

Kinda exposes Nvidia though, all along they could have add it with their drivers.... and now they put this out here just before AMD has their new GPUs come out... crafty buggers.

I even mentioned several times before i was gonna get an AMD card next time for freesync, but this kills any reason to do that now... well played nvidia...

Tough call but G-sync is a phenomenal tech but unfortunately for us that like the higher tier cards, we are stuck. AMD doesn't even have anything in the pipeline for us from what I understand. So that being said, no, we have no choice but to accept the value and to be honest, G-sync is such amazing tech that I don't mind paying that Nvidia tax. (And I still don't like Ngreedia, the way it's meant to be paid)

Avatar image for R4gn4r0k
R4gn4r0k

48939

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 R4gn4r0k
Member since 2004 • 48939 Posts
@davillain- said:

G-sync is absolutely amazing. Just spend the extra, it is worth it. I've had it since November and it wows me every time, it is a treat for the eyes. Yes, the extra cost sucks, but it beats the alternative of having a weak GPU AMD and a cost effective monitor. (freesync)

Now that I have a 3440x1440 120Hz monitor I just want to push every game to that resolution and framerate, it's amazing.

Really, the result amazes me, even in older games.

In newer games it's not always easy to get that performance at that res, but I tend to drop a lot of settings just to get that result.

Difference between 60FPS and 120FPS is night and day, just like 30FPS to 60FPS.

Avatar image for X_CAPCOM_X
X_CAPCOM_X

9625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#42 X_CAPCOM_X
Member since 2004 • 9625 Posts

Good news! I may get an nvidia card if they continue making pro consumer choices like this.

@R4gn4r0k said:
@Basinboy said:

As someone who owns three G-SYNC monitors:

G-sync is still better than freesync though. It's more expensive sure, but it's better.

Not really. No one has actually demonstrated anything superior other than the ranges that they operated when they were first introduced years ago. Now, Freesync (or what it really is, standard VESA adaptive sync) is pretty much the same thing as g sync minus the nvidia proprietary hardware.

Avatar image for ten_pints
Ten_Pints

4072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#43 Ten_Pints
Member since 2014 • 4072 Posts

Now they just need to dump Nvidia Shitworks