Nvidia releases a few infographics about PC Gaming.

[QUOTE="Nanomage"] You don´t need a Titan,you can build a system that is far superior to a console for less than the price of the Titan. And my system is over 4 and a half years old and it runs Bioshock Infinite max,why are you bringing up the most expensive card in the market when there´s cards in the $200(and lower) range that run everything at high settings but more importantly,much better than any console can,or even less if you don´t care about graphics,wich is exactly what you were saying.II_Seraphim_II

[QUOTE="I_can_haz"]More Nvidia butthurtkipsta77

Ahahah O Lord! Love seeing mindless consolites think that because they have AMD it is suddenly the best!

Really does make my day reading these types of posts :D

I am a fan of neither AMD or Nvidia.

I prefer both to be doing their best to beat each other as it helps the consumer.

I do purchase more from Nvidia though becuase I like the features more with Nvidia Inspector, Physx and usually more reliable driver support.

Nvidia tends to be more expensive but I am willing to pay slightly more for those features and support.

According to Crytek, targeting consoles would gain 5 to 10 percent over the PC counterparts. ronvalencia

A small overclock will allieviate that problem.

They have been butthurt ever since Sony didn't use them to make their GPU. TheWalkingGhost

As I said earlier in the thread, the margins on console CPU/GPU are vanishingly small. AMD isn't getting rich off of making console hardware. nVidia still controls 2/3 of the market on the PC. Also AMD's market share has been DROPPING the last few years, not rising. I would tend to agree with nVidia's comment that it would have been more trouble than it is worth this gen.

[QUOTE="kipsta77"]

[QUOTE="I_can_haz"]More Nvidia butthurtRyviusARC

Ahahah O Lord! Love seeing mindless consolites think that because they have AMD it is suddenly the best!

Really does make my day reading these types of posts :D

I am a fan of neither AMD or Nvidia.

I prefer both to be doing their best to beat each other as it helps the consumer.

I do purchase more from Nvidia though becuase I like the features more with Nvidia Inspector, Physx and usually more reliable driver support.

Nvidia tends to be more expensive but I am willing to pay slightly more for those features and support.

Nvidia drivers good? HA yeah right.  Page 1 of computer hardware discussion, "nvidia latest drivers bricking graphics cards".  With that said, AMD has YET to release any driver that actually bricks a card, while nvidia has a few.  They might not be as fast as nvidia releasing drivers, but when AMD does release their drivers, they are always top quality.  I'll take quality over quantity any day of the week.  Nvidia can stick that where the sun don't shine.

[QUOTE="RyviusARC"]

[QUOTE="kipsta77"]

Ahahah O Lord! Love seeing mindless consolites think that because they have AMD it is suddenly the best!

Really does make my day reading these types of posts :D

blaznwiipspman1

I am a fan of neither AMD or Nvidia.

I prefer both to be doing their best to beat each other as it helps the consumer.

I do purchase more from Nvidia though becuase I like the features more with Nvidia Inspector, Physx and usually more reliable driver support.

Nvidia tends to be more expensive but I am willing to pay slightly more for those features and support.

Nvidia drivers good? HA yeah right.  Page 1 of computer hardware discussion, "nvidia latest drivers bricking graphics cards".  With that said, AMD has YET to release any driver that actually bricks a card, while nvidia has a few.  They might not be as fast as nvidia releasing drivers, but when AMD does release their drivers, they are always top quality.  I'll take quality over quantity any day of the week.  Nvidia can stick that where the sun don't shine.

yay, fanboy goggles

[QUOTE="TheWalkingGhost"] They have been butthurt ever since Sony didn't use them to make their GPU. SerOlmy

As I said earlier in the thread, the margins on console CPU/GPU are vanishingly small. AMD isn't getting rich off of making console hardware. nVidia still controls 2/3 of the market on the PC. Also AMD's market share has been DROPPING the last few years, not rising. I would tend to agree with nVidia's comment that it would have been more trouble than it is worth this gen.

2/3 ?  Its closer to 60/40 split right now, and this always fluctuates with new releases.  Nvidia does have a lead over AMD, that is true, but it doesn't mean anything to the average consumer.  Console manufacturers use AMD, since they offer better value, reliability and good support.  Nvidia is much too greedy and always keeps one hand in the cookie jar.  MS, Sony and Nintendo don't like that.

[QUOTE="jim1174"]PC games will always have something consoles never will and that's mods. lilnazar

Shouldn't the master race have good exclusive games like us?

Davekeeh

Seeing as Reus scored as much as the Last of Us, we do, all the time :cool:

Kinthalis

This should shut up a lot of ignorant people on these forums.

"bu bu... developers don't care about PC"

"bu  bu... 3 systems combined have more games coming out than PC"

:lol:

poor Wii U :cry:

If I had to chose, I would take a good PC over any of the consoles. Good thing that I choose to not make such dumb choices.

Nvidia should start making some PC exclusive games instead of showing us these charts

Nvidia should start making some PC exclusive games instead of showing us these charts

HaloinventedFPS

no they shouldn't. Because they would be assholes about it and make them only work on Nvidia cards