NX not to be sold at a loss. Nintendoomed or Smart?

  • 136 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for notafanboy
NotAFanboy

573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#101 NotAFanboy
Member since 2015 • 573 Posts

@techhog89 said:
@notafanboy said:
@techhog89 said:
@notafanboy said:
@techhog89 said:

Wii U isn't costing them money anymore either.

Proof?

You first.

You made the assertion that their home console is currently profitable. You go find the proof.

I only made a prediction about the future.

Damn, you got me. Nintendo's doomed.

I'm rummaging through their financials and I can't find any indication of their home console's profit. I have revenue numbers, but nada on profits.

Avatar image for MonsieurX
MonsieurX

39858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#102  Edited By MonsieurX
Member since 2008 • 39858 Posts
@notafanboy said:
@techhog89 said:
@notafanboy said:
@techhog89 said:
@notafanboy said:

Proof?

You first.

You made the assertion that their home console is currently profitable. You go find the proof.

I only made a prediction about the future.

Damn, you got me. Nintendo's doomed.

I'm rummaging through their financials and I can't find any indication of their home console's profit. I have revenue numbers, but nada on profits.

It's not you could read all that properly anyway

Avatar image for notafanboy
NotAFanboy

573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#103  Edited By NotAFanboy
Member since 2015 • 573 Posts

@MonsieurX said:
@notafanboy said:
@techhog89 said:
@notafanboy said:

You made the assertion that their home console is currently profitable. You go find the proof.

I only made a prediction about the future.

Damn, you got me. Nintendo's doomed.

I'm rummaging through their financials and I can't find any indication of their home console's profit. I have revenue numbers, but nada on profits.

It's not you could read all that properly anyway

I'm reading it fine.

I see $1.8 billion in home consoles (Combining all console hardware and software revenues). Handhelds brought in similar amounts.

Nintendo had ~$4.5 revenue and made a $300 million profit for the last FY. That shows a $4.2 billion operating cost + taxes for Nintendo.

Imagine both the NX and next handheld flopping worse than ever before. Revenues could be brought down to only $2 billion total for both console and handheld, bringing Nintendo's annual profit down to a glorious -$2.2 billion/year. They'll be gone within 4-5 years.

So much for "NINTENDO HAS BILLIONS OF DOLLARS!!!"

Cry more, sheep.

Avatar image for techhog89
Techhog89

5430

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#104 Techhog89
Member since 2015 • 5430 Posts

@notafanboy said:
@techhog89 said:
@notafanboy said:
@techhog89 said:

You first.

You made the assertion that their home console is currently profitable. You go find the proof.

I only made a prediction about the future.

Damn, you got me. Nintendo's doomed.

I'm rummaging through their financials and I can't find any indication of their home console's profit. I have revenue numbers, but nada on profits.

From 2014: https://twitter.com/gibbogame/status/464217206100738048?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

He got that from the financials posted that day. FY2014 also happened to be when Nintendo returned to profitability.

Avatar image for techhog89
Techhog89

5430

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#105 Techhog89
Member since 2015 • 5430 Posts

@notafanboy said:
@MonsieurX said:
@notafanboy said:
@techhog89 said:

Damn, you got me. Nintendo's doomed.

I'm rummaging through their financials and I can't find any indication of their home console's profit. I have revenue numbers, but nada on profits.

It's not you could read all that properly anyway

I'm reading it fine.

I see $1.8 billion in home consoles (Combining all console hardware and software revenues). Handhelds brought in similar amounts.

Nintendo had ~$4.5 revenue and made a $300 million profit for the last FY. That shows a $4.2 billion operating cost + taxes for Nintendo.

Imagine both the NX and next handheld flopping worse than ever before. Revenues could be brought down to only $2 billion total for both console and handheld, bringing Nintendo's annual profit down to a glorious -$2.5 billion/year. They'll be gone within 4 years.

So much for "NINTENDO HAS BILLIONS OF DOLLARS!!!"

Cry more, sheep.

That's not how it works but okay. See you in 4 years.

Avatar image for notafanboy
NotAFanboy

573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#106  Edited By NotAFanboy
Member since 2015 • 573 Posts
@techhog89 said:
@notafanboy said:
@techhog89 said:
@notafanboy said:
@techhog89 said:

You first.

You made the assertion that their home console is currently profitable. You go find the proof.

I only made a prediction about the future.

Damn, you got me. Nintendo's doomed.

I'm rummaging through their financials and I can't find any indication of their home console's profit. I have revenue numbers, but nada on profits.

From 2014: https://twitter.com/gibbogame/status/464217206100738048?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

He got that from the financials posted that day. FY2014 also happened to be when Nintendo returned to profitability.

No loss on hardware does not mean overall profitability. It only means that each unit's selling rate is higher than its assembly + packing rate.

Every company has a fixed operating cost (Employee salary, rent, utility bills, R&D, etc). For a company like Nintendo, they use billions of dollars each year to maintain their business. Only selling 1 unit for a $100 profit does not mean the entire company overall will be profitable.

Avatar image for MonsieurX
MonsieurX

39858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#107 MonsieurX
Member since 2008 • 39858 Posts

@notafanboy said:
@MonsieurX said:
@notafanboy said:
@techhog89 said:
@notafanboy said:

You made the assertion that their home console is currently profitable. You go find the proof.

I only made a prediction about the future.

Damn, you got me. Nintendo's doomed.

I'm rummaging through their financials and I can't find any indication of their home console's profit. I have revenue numbers, but nada on profits.

It's not you could read all that properly anyway

I'm reading it fine.

I see $1.8 billion in home consoles (Combining all console hardware and software revenues). Handhelds brought in similar amounts.

Nintendo had ~$4.5 revenue and made a $300 million profit for the last FY. That shows a $4.2 billion operating cost + taxes for Nintendo.

Imagine both the NX and next handheld flopping worse than ever before. Revenues could be brought down to only $2 billion total for both console and handheld, bringing Nintendo's annual profit down to a glorious -$2.2 billion/year. They'll be gone within 4-5 years.

So much for "NINTENDO HAS BILLIONS OF DOLLARS!!!"

Cry more, sheep.

Yes,and about those 15 millions X1 sold

Avatar image for techhog89
Techhog89

5430

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#108 Techhog89
Member since 2015 • 5430 Posts

@notafanboy said:
@techhog89 said:
@notafanboy said:
@techhog89 said:
@notafanboy said:

You made the assertion that their home console is currently profitable. You go find the proof.

I only made a prediction about the future.

Damn, you got me. Nintendo's doomed.

I'm rummaging through their financials and I can't find any indication of their home console's profit. I have revenue numbers, but nada on profits.

From 2014: https://twitter.com/gibbogame/status/464217206100738048?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

He got that from the financials posted that day. FY2014 also happened to be when Nintendo returned to profitability.

No loss on hardware does not mean overall profitability. It only means that each unit's selling rate is higher than its assembly + packing rate.

Every company has a fixed operating cost (Employee salary, rent, utility bills, R&D, etc). For a company like Nintendo, they use billions of dollars each year to maintain their business. Only selling 1 unit for a $100 profit does not mean the entire company overall will be profitable.

Yeah, I'm a business major, I know. Assuming that they'll be in the red with NX for sure based on nothing, however, is... Well, it's something that you would do. We'll just see how that pans out. I know that you're just a character, so I'm not really up for putting effort into this.

Avatar image for notafanboy
NotAFanboy

573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#109 NotAFanboy
Member since 2015 • 573 Posts

@techhog89 said:
@notafanboy said:
@techhog89 said:
@notafanboy said:
@techhog89 said:

Damn, you got me. Nintendo's doomed.

I'm rummaging through their financials and I can't find any indication of their home console's profit. I have revenue numbers, but nada on profits.

From 2014: https://twitter.com/gibbogame/status/464217206100738048?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

He got that from the financials posted that day. FY2014 also happened to be when Nintendo returned to profitability.

No loss on hardware does not mean overall profitability. It only means that each unit's selling rate is higher than its assembly + packing rate.

Every company has a fixed operating cost (Employee salary, rent, utility bills, R&D, etc). For a company like Nintendo, they use billions of dollars each year to maintain their business. Only selling 1 unit for a $100 profit does not mean the entire company overall will be profitable.

Yeah, I'm a business major, I know. Assuming that they'll be in the red with NX for sure based on nothing, however, is... Well, it's something that you would do. We'll just see how that pans out. I know that you're just a character, so I'm not really up for putting effort into this.

Nintendo took a loss per unit for the Wii U despite its weaksauce specs.

Why? Because Nintendo does not have the economies of scale SONY has. Nintendo has to pay out of their ass to get specs half as decent as what SONY gets.

With Nintendo obviously not confident about the NX, they are probably placing a lot less orders from suppliers than they have for the Wii U, meaning suppliers can squeeze Nintendo pretty hard. Despite this huge disadvantage, Nintendo won't be taking a loss on the NX, meaning the NX will be weaksauce just like the Wii U.

So no, I'm not basing its upcoming failure on nothing.

Avatar image for techhog89
Techhog89

5430

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#110  Edited By Techhog89
Member since 2015 • 5430 Posts

@notafanboy said:
@techhog89 said:
@notafanboy said:
@techhog89 said:

From 2014: https://twitter.com/gibbogame/status/464217206100738048?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

He got that from the financials posted that day. FY2014 also happened to be when Nintendo returned to profitability.

No loss on hardware does not mean overall profitability. It only means that each unit's selling rate is higher than its assembly + packing rate.

Every company has a fixed operating cost (Employee salary, rent, utility bills, R&D, etc). For a company like Nintendo, they use billions of dollars each year to maintain their business. Only selling 1 unit for a $100 profit does not mean the entire company overall will be profitable.

Yeah, I'm a business major, I know. Assuming that they'll be in the red with NX for sure based on nothing, however, is... Well, it's something that you would do. We'll just see how that pans out. I know that you're just a character, so I'm not really up for putting effort into this.

Nintendo took a loss per unit for the Wii U despite its weaksauce specs.

Why? Because Nintendo does not have the economies of scale SONY has. Nintendo has to pay out of their ass to get specs half as decent as what SONY gets.

With Nintendo obviously not confident about the NX, they are probably placing a lot less orders from suppliers than they have for the Wii U, meaning suppliers can squeeze Nintendo pretty hard. Despite this huge disadvantage, Nintendo won't be taking a loss on the NX, meaning the NX will be weaksauce just like the Wii U.

So no, I'm not basing its upcoming failure on nothing.

Cool. So, how powerful can it be at $300, and how much would it need to cost to match PS4? Also, you feel that Nintendo won't try to do anything to stay alive and will simply declare bankruptcy in 2021?

Avatar image for notafanboy
NotAFanboy

573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#111  Edited By NotAFanboy
Member since 2015 • 573 Posts

@techhog89 said:
@notafanboy said:
@techhog89 said:
@notafanboy said:

No loss on hardware does not mean overall profitability. It only means that each unit's selling rate is higher than its assembly + packing rate.

Every company has a fixed operating cost (Employee salary, rent, utility bills, R&D, etc). For a company like Nintendo, they use billions of dollars each year to maintain their business. Only selling 1 unit for a $100 profit does not mean the entire company overall will be profitable.

Yeah, I'm a business major, I know. Assuming that they'll be in the red with NX for sure based on nothing, however, is... Well, it's something that you would do. We'll just see how that pans out. I know that you're just a character, so I'm not really up for putting effort into this.

Nintendo took a loss per unit for the Wii U despite its weaksauce specs.

Why? Because Nintendo does not have the economies of scale SONY has. Nintendo has to pay out of their ass to get specs half as decent as what SONY gets.

With Nintendo obviously not confident about the NX, they are probably placing a lot less orders from suppliers than they have for the Wii U, meaning suppliers can squeeze Nintendo pretty hard. Despite this huge disadvantage, Nintendo won't be taking a loss on the NX, meaning the NX will be weaksauce just like the Wii U.

So no, I'm not basing its upcoming failure on nothing.

Cool. So, how powerful can it be at $300, and how much would it need to cost to match PS4?

Weaker than the Xbone. Slightly stronger if Nintendo got lucky with deals.

With Nintendo's scale, I'd say the NX would need to cost $700 minimum to match the PS4.

Avatar image for techhog89
Techhog89

5430

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#112 Techhog89
Member since 2015 • 5430 Posts

@notafanboy said:
@techhog89 said:
@notafanboy said:
@techhog89 said:
@notafanboy said:

No loss on hardware does not mean overall profitability. It only means that each unit's selling rate is higher than its assembly + packing rate.

Every company has a fixed operating cost (Employee salary, rent, utility bills, R&D, etc). For a company like Nintendo, they use billions of dollars each year to maintain their business. Only selling 1 unit for a $100 profit does not mean the entire company overall will be profitable.

Yeah, I'm a business major, I know. Assuming that they'll be in the red with NX for sure based on nothing, however, is... Well, it's something that you would do. We'll just see how that pans out. I know that you're just a character, so I'm not really up for putting effort into this.

Nintendo took a loss per unit for the Wii U despite its weaksauce specs.

Why? Because Nintendo does not have the economies of scale SONY has. Nintendo has to pay out of their ass to get specs half as decent as what SONY gets.

With Nintendo obviously not confident about the NX, they are probably placing a lot less orders from suppliers than they have for the Wii U, meaning suppliers can squeeze Nintendo pretty hard. Despite this huge disadvantage, Nintendo won't be taking a loss on the NX, meaning the NX will be weaksauce just like the Wii U.

So no, I'm not basing its upcoming failure on nothing.

Cool. So, how powerful can it be at $300, and how much would it need to cost to match PS4?

Weaker than the Xbone.

Slightly stronger if Nintendo got lucky with deals.

Haha, okay. And how much to match PS4? Also, you feel that Nintendo won't try to do anything to stay alive and will simply declare bankruptcy in 2021?

Avatar image for notafanboy
NotAFanboy

573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#113 NotAFanboy
Member since 2015 • 573 Posts

@techhog89 said:
@notafanboy said:
@techhog89 said:
@notafanboy said:
@techhog89 said:

Yeah, I'm a business major, I know. Assuming that they'll be in the red with NX for sure based on nothing, however, is... Well, it's something that you would do. We'll just see how that pans out. I know that you're just a character, so I'm not really up for putting effort into this.

Nintendo took a loss per unit for the Wii U despite its weaksauce specs.

Why? Because Nintendo does not have the economies of scale SONY has. Nintendo has to pay out of their ass to get specs half as decent as what SONY gets.

With Nintendo obviously not confident about the NX, they are probably placing a lot less orders from suppliers than they have for the Wii U, meaning suppliers can squeeze Nintendo pretty hard. Despite this huge disadvantage, Nintendo won't be taking a loss on the NX, meaning the NX will be weaksauce just like the Wii U.

So no, I'm not basing its upcoming failure on nothing.

Cool. So, how powerful can it be at $300, and how much would it need to cost to match PS4?

Weaker than the Xbone.

Slightly stronger if Nintendo got lucky with deals.

Haha, okay. And how much to match PS4? Also, you feel that Nintendo won't try to do anything to stay alive and will simply declare bankruptcy in 2021?

They'll go third party.

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#114  Edited By ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

@notafanboy said:
@techhog89 said:
@notafanboy said:
@techhog89 said:

From 2014: https://twitter.com/gibbogame/status/464217206100738048?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

He got that from the financials posted that day. FY2014 also happened to be when Nintendo returned to profitability.

No loss on hardware does not mean overall profitability. It only means that each unit's selling rate is higher than its assembly + packing rate.

Every company has a fixed operating cost (Employee salary, rent, utility bills, R&D, etc). For a company like Nintendo, they use billions of dollars each year to maintain their business. Only selling 1 unit for a $100 profit does not mean the entire company overall will be profitable.

Yeah, I'm a business major, I know. Assuming that they'll be in the red with NX for sure based on nothing, however, is... Well, it's something that you would do. We'll just see how that pans out. I know that you're just a character, so I'm not really up for putting effort into this.

Nintendo took a loss per unit for the Wii U despite its weaksauce specs.

Why? Because Nintendo does not have the economies of scale SONY has. Nintendo has to pay out of their ass to get specs half as decent as what SONY gets.

With Nintendo obviously not confident about the NX, they are probably placing a lot less orders from suppliers than they have for the Wii U, meaning suppliers can squeeze Nintendo pretty hard. Despite this huge disadvantage, Nintendo won't be taking a loss on the NX, meaning the NX will be weaksauce just like the Wii U.

So no, I'm not basing its upcoming failure on nothing.

For X86 PC business, economies of scale is spread across multiple OEM vendors.

The main driver for AMD's semi-custom business unit is to leverage PC's economies of scale NOT another PowerPC BS. AMD is spreading it's cost across multiple OEM vendors. Removing IBM's CPU IP and Rambus XDR are big cost savers.

Both MS and Sony has nuked IBM's IP cost from their consoles.

Avatar image for techhog89
Techhog89

5430

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#115 Techhog89
Member since 2015 • 5430 Posts

@notafanboy said:
@techhog89 said:
@notafanboy said:
@techhog89 said:
@notafanboy said:

Nintendo took a loss per unit for the Wii U despite its weaksauce specs.

Why? Because Nintendo does not have the economies of scale SONY has. Nintendo has to pay out of their ass to get specs half as decent as what SONY gets.

With Nintendo obviously not confident about the NX, they are probably placing a lot less orders from suppliers than they have for the Wii U, meaning suppliers can squeeze Nintendo pretty hard. Despite this huge disadvantage, Nintendo won't be taking a loss on the NX, meaning the NX will be weaksauce just like the Wii U.

So no, I'm not basing its upcoming failure on nothing.

Cool. So, how powerful can it be at $300, and how much would it need to cost to match PS4?

Weaker than the Xbone.

Slightly stronger if Nintendo got lucky with deals.

Haha, okay. And how much to match PS4? Also, you feel that Nintendo won't try to do anything to stay alive and will simply declare bankruptcy in 2021?

They'll go third party.

They've said multiple times that they'll never do that.

Avatar image for techhog89
Techhog89

5430

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#116  Edited By Techhog89
Member since 2015 • 5430 Posts

@ronvalencia said:
@notafanboy said:
@techhog89 said:
@notafanboy said:

No loss on hardware does not mean overall profitability. It only means that each unit's selling rate is higher than its assembly + packing rate.

Every company has a fixed operating cost (Employee salary, rent, utility bills, R&D, etc). For a company like Nintendo, they use billions of dollars each year to maintain their business. Only selling 1 unit for a $100 profit does not mean the entire company overall will be profitable.

Yeah, I'm a business major, I know. Assuming that they'll be in the red with NX for sure based on nothing, however, is... Well, it's something that you would do. We'll just see how that pans out. I know that you're just a character, so I'm not really up for putting effort into this.

Nintendo took a loss per unit for the Wii U despite its weaksauce specs.

Why? Because Nintendo does not have the economies of scale SONY has. Nintendo has to pay out of their ass to get specs half as decent as what SONY gets.

With Nintendo obviously not confident about the NX, they are probably placing a lot less orders from suppliers than they have for the Wii U, meaning suppliers can squeeze Nintendo pretty hard. Despite this huge disadvantage, Nintendo won't be taking a loss on the NX, meaning the NX will be weaksauce just like the Wii U.

So no, I'm not basing its upcoming failure on nothing.

For X86 PC business, economies of scale is spread across multiple OEM vendors.

Shhhhh, you're going to spoil the fun. Also, NX will use an ARM CPU (though the same point applies, if not more so).

Avatar image for notafanboy
NotAFanboy

573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#117  Edited By NotAFanboy
Member since 2015 • 573 Posts

@ronvalencia said:
@notafanboy said:
@techhog89 said:
@notafanboy said:

No loss on hardware does not mean overall profitability. It only means that each unit's selling rate is higher than its assembly + packing rate.

Every company has a fixed operating cost (Employee salary, rent, utility bills, R&D, etc). For a company like Nintendo, they use billions of dollars each year to maintain their business. Only selling 1 unit for a $100 profit does not mean the entire company overall will be profitable.

Yeah, I'm a business major, I know. Assuming that they'll be in the red with NX for sure based on nothing, however, is... Well, it's something that you would do. We'll just see how that pans out. I know that you're just a character, so I'm not really up for putting effort into this.

Nintendo took a loss per unit for the Wii U despite its weaksauce specs.

Why? Because Nintendo does not have the economies of scale SONY has. Nintendo has to pay out of their ass to get specs half as decent as what SONY gets.

With Nintendo obviously not confident about the NX, they are probably placing a lot less orders from suppliers than they have for the Wii U, meaning suppliers can squeeze Nintendo pretty hard. Despite this huge disadvantage, Nintendo won't be taking a loss on the NX, meaning the NX will be weaksauce just like the Wii U.

So no, I'm not basing its upcoming failure on nothing.

For X86 PC business, economies of scale is spread across multiple OEM vendors.

Multiple vendors bring the average manufacturing price down, but it does not mean the supplier has to charge the same amount for every vendor.

A vendor who is a bigger seller will not tolerate getting the same rate as a lower seller. Furthermore, the average selling rate for the supplier is skewed by vendors with bigger scale (SONY), so the actual selling rate to lower scale clients like Nintendo will be much higher than the average.

Whatever Nintendo is getting, AMD will give SONY something 2x as better for half the price.

Avatar image for notafanboy
NotAFanboy

573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#118  Edited By NotAFanboy
Member since 2015 • 573 Posts

@techhog89 said:
@notafanboy said:
@techhog89 said:
@notafanboy said:

Weaker than the Xbone.

Slightly stronger if Nintendo got lucky with deals.

Haha, okay. And how much to match PS4? Also, you feel that Nintendo won't try to do anything to stay alive and will simply declare bankruptcy in 2021?

They'll go third party.

They've said multiple times that they'll never do that.

You really think a company still generating revenue from selling hardware will say they will go third party openly? They may not say anything about third party out in the open, but you can bet your sweet juicy ass that Nintendo execs are contemplating it behind closed doors. I thought you were a business major.

See, here's the thing. You may have your fancy business BA from Harvard or Wharton or whatever, but I actually own my own import/export, customs brokerage + actuarial firm netting $7 million per year. And all I have is a math, econ double major degree from a top 15 university.

You need common sense to succeed in business, not degrees or education.

Avatar image for techhog89
Techhog89

5430

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#119 Techhog89
Member since 2015 • 5430 Posts

@notafanboy said:
@techhog89 said:
@notafanboy said:
@techhog89 said:
@notafanboy said:

Weaker than the Xbone.

Slightly stronger if Nintendo got lucky with deals.

Haha, okay. And how much to match PS4? Also, you feel that Nintendo won't try to do anything to stay alive and will simply declare bankruptcy in 2021?

They'll go third party.

They've said multiple times that they'll never do that.

You really think a company still generating revenue from selling hardware will say they will go third party openly? They may not say anything about third party out in the open, but you can bet your sweet juicy ass that Nintendo execs are contemplating it behind closed doors. I thought you were a business major.

See, here's the thing. You may have your fancy business BA from Harvard of Wharton, but I actually own my own import/export, customs brokerage + actuarial firm netting $7 million per year. And all I have is a math, econ double major degree from a top 15 university.

You need common sense to succeed in business, not degrees or education.

Still doesn't mean that they'll go third-party. They'll just look for another business venture any maybe keep software limited to smartphones.

Also, you're the reason business owners hire accountants. Your $2.5 billion annual loss estimate was hilarious.

Avatar image for notafanboy
NotAFanboy

573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#120  Edited By NotAFanboy
Member since 2015 • 573 Posts

@techhog89 said:
@notafanboy said:
@techhog89 said:
@notafanboy said:

They'll go third party.

They've said multiple times that they'll never do that.

You really think a company still generating revenue from selling hardware will say they will go third party openly? They may not say anything about third party out in the open, but you can bet your sweet juicy ass that Nintendo execs are contemplating it behind closed doors. I thought you were a business major.

See, here's the thing. You may have your fancy business BA from Harvard of Wharton, but I actually own my own import/export, customs brokerage + actuarial firm netting $7 million per year. And all I have is a math, econ double major degree from a top 15 university.

You need common sense to succeed in business, not degrees or education.

Still doesn't mean that they'll go third-party. They'll just look for another business venture any maybe keep software limited to smartphones.

Also, you're the reason business owners hire accountants. Your $2.5 billion annual loss estimate was hilarious.

Nintendo doesn't know anything except gaming. If both their handheld and consoles are netting them tons of losses, they will go third party.

What else are they going to do? At least with mario on the Xbox and PlayStation, they have the name brand to get higher software sales than ever. Branching out to a new industry is very risky.

Avatar image for techhog89
Techhog89

5430

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#121 Techhog89
Member since 2015 • 5430 Posts

@notafanboy said:
@techhog89 said:
@notafanboy said:
@techhog89 said:
@notafanboy said:

They'll go third party.

They've said multiple times that they'll never do that.

You really think a company still generating revenue from selling hardware will say they will go third party openly? They may not say anything about third party out in the open, but you can bet your sweet juicy ass that Nintendo execs are contemplating it behind closed doors. I thought you were a business major.

See, here's the thing. You may have your fancy business BA from Harvard of Wharton, but I actually own my own import/export, customs brokerage + actuarial firm netting $7 million per year. And all I have is a math, econ double major degree from a top 15 university.

You need common sense to succeed in business, not degrees or education.

Still doesn't mean that they'll go third-party. They'll just look for another business venture any maybe keep software limited to smartphones.

Also, you're the reason business owners hire accountants. Your $2.5 billion annual loss estimate was hilarious.

Nintendo doesn't know anything except gaming. If both their handheld and consoles are netting them tons of losses, they will go third party.

What else are they going to do? At least with mario on the Xbox and PlayStation, they have the name brand to get higher software sales than ever. Branching out to a new industry is very risky.

You're right. They've been making video games for nearly 130 years, after all.

Avatar image for notafanboy
NotAFanboy

573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#122 NotAFanboy
Member since 2015 • 573 Posts

@techhog89 said:
@notafanboy said:
@techhog89 said:
@notafanboy said:
@techhog89 said:

They've said multiple times that they'll never do that.

You really think a company still generating revenue from selling hardware will say they will go third party openly? They may not say anything about third party out in the open, but you can bet your sweet juicy ass that Nintendo execs are contemplating it behind closed doors. I thought you were a business major.

See, here's the thing. You may have your fancy business BA from Harvard of Wharton, but I actually own my own import/export, customs brokerage + actuarial firm netting $7 million per year. And all I have is a math, econ double major degree from a top 15 university.

You need common sense to succeed in business, not degrees or education.

Still doesn't mean that they'll go third-party. They'll just look for another business venture any maybe keep software limited to smartphones.

Also, you're the reason business owners hire accountants. Your $2.5 billion annual loss estimate was hilarious.

Nintendo doesn't know anything except gaming. If both their handheld and consoles are netting them tons of losses, they will go third party.

What else are they going to do? At least with mario on the Xbox and PlayStation, they have the name brand to get higher software sales than ever. Branching out to a new industry is very risky.

You're right. They've been making video games for nearly 130 years, after all.

Yeah, why doesn't Nintendo just bring back playing cards again. I'm sure that'll bring in billions of dollars in revenue like gaming consoles. LOL...

Avatar image for iandizion713
iandizion713

16025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#123  Edited By iandizion713
Member since 2005 • 16025 Posts

@notafanboy: They do have one of the top playing card games in Pokemon. The new sets coming soon.

Avatar image for techhog89
Techhog89

5430

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#124 Techhog89
Member since 2015 • 5430 Posts

@notafanboy said:
@techhog89 said:
@notafanboy said:
@techhog89 said:
@notafanboy said:

You really think a company still generating revenue from selling hardware will say they will go third party openly? They may not say anything about third party out in the open, but you can bet your sweet juicy ass that Nintendo execs are contemplating it behind closed doors. I thought you were a business major.

See, here's the thing. You may have your fancy business BA from Harvard of Wharton, but I actually own my own import/export, customs brokerage + actuarial firm netting $7 million per year. And all I have is a math, econ double major degree from a top 15 university.

You need common sense to succeed in business, not degrees or education.

Still doesn't mean that they'll go third-party. They'll just look for another business venture any maybe keep software limited to smartphones.

Also, you're the reason business owners hire accountants. Your $2.5 billion annual loss estimate was hilarious.

Nintendo doesn't know anything except gaming. If both their handheld and consoles are netting them tons of losses, they will go third party.

What else are they going to do? At least with mario on the Xbox and PlayStation, they have the name brand to get higher software sales than ever. Branching out to a new industry is very risky.

You're right. They've been making video games for nearly 130 years, after all.

Yeah, why doesn't Nintendo just bring back playing cards again. I'm sure that'll bring in billions of dollars in revenue like gaming consoles. LOL...

So, when do you predict Nintendo will go third-party? 2018?

Avatar image for notafanboy
NotAFanboy

573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#125 NotAFanboy
Member since 2015 • 573 Posts

@techhog89 said:
@notafanboy said:
@techhog89 said:
@notafanboy said:
@techhog89 said:

Still doesn't mean that they'll go third-party. They'll just look for another business venture any maybe keep software limited to smartphones.

Also, you're the reason business owners hire accountants. Your $2.5 billion annual loss estimate was hilarious.

Nintendo doesn't know anything except gaming. If both their handheld and consoles are netting them tons of losses, they will go third party.

What else are they going to do? At least with mario on the Xbox and PlayStation, they have the name brand to get higher software sales than ever. Branching out to a new industry is very risky.

You're right. They've been making video games for nearly 130 years, after all.

Yeah, why doesn't Nintendo just bring back playing cards again. I'm sure that'll bring in billions of dollars in revenue like gaming consoles. LOL...

So, when do you predict Nintendo will go third-party? 2018?

2019 -2021.

Avatar image for techhog89
Techhog89

5430

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#126  Edited By Techhog89
Member since 2015 • 5430 Posts

@notafanboy said:
@techhog89 said:
@notafanboy said:
@techhog89 said:

You're right. They've been making video games for nearly 130 years, after all.

Yeah, why doesn't Nintendo just bring back playing cards again. I'm sure that'll bring in billions of dollars in revenue like gaming consoles. LOL...

So, when do you predict Nintendo will go third-party? 2018?

2019 -2021.

And this is a certainty? There's nothing they can do about it?

Also, when do you expect the first $2.5 billion loss to be posted?

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#127  Edited By ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

@notafanboy said:

Multiple vendors bring the average manufacturing price down, but it does not mean the supplier has to charge the same amount for every vendor.

A vendor who is a bigger seller will not tolerate getting the same rate as a lower seller. Furthermore, the average selling rate for the supplier is skewed by vendors with bigger scale (SONY), so the actual selling rate to lower scale clients like Nintendo will be much higher than the average.

Whatever Nintendo is getting, AMD will give SONY something 2x as better for half the price.

Microsoft, Sony and Nintendo licenses AMD's IP and the cost for the silicon chip is paid by OEM customer themselves i.e. Microsoft may have issues with TSMC but they don't have IP license price issue with AMD.

Example of AMD's licensing cost for low volume high performance semi-custom SoC solution for Chinese server market.

http://www.extremetech.com/computing/227059-amd-announces-new-293-million-joint-venture-to-build-servers-for-the-chinese-market

AMD handles PC' business's TSMC, Global Foundry and Samsung foundry issues.

AMD IP licensing cost is relatively cheap e.g. both MS and Sony has remove IBM IP cost.

AMD will make sure NVIDIA or IBM doesn't have a chance in games console hardware business i.e. "race to the bottom" and maintain "bang per buck" leadership.

IP cost is cheaper than NVIDIA and IBM in PS3.

Intel is planning to switch towards AMD GPU patents/IP hence replacing NVIDIA. http://www.extremetech.com/computing/224964-report-claims-intel-amd-discussing-gpu-patent-licensing

Presently, Intel has a patent licensing deal with Nvidia with a total value of $1.5 billion and an expiration date of March 17, 2017. That deal has earned Nvidia roughly $67 million per quarter, and while that’s not much compared to the company’s yearly revenue of $5 billion for fiscal year 2016 (calendar year 2015), it works out to about 5% of its revenue and a significant chunk of Nvidia’s $614 million net income. Companies like IP and patent licensing precisely because these multi-year agreements can bring in continuing funds for work already completed without being a further drain on the bottom line.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

PC spec targeting PS4's $399 price from PC parts retail prices.

PCPartPicker part list: http://pcpartpicker.com/p/vpgRpg

Price breakdown by merchant: http://pcpartpicker.com/p/vpgRpg/by_merchant/

CPU: AMD FX-4300 3.8GHz Quad-Core Processor ($69.99 @ Newegg)

Motherboard: MSI 760GM-P23 (FX) Micro ATX AM3+ Motherboard ($43.25 @ OutletPC)

Memory: Klevv Neo 8GB (2 x 4GB) DDR3-2133 Memory ($32.99 @ Newegg)

Storage: Seagate Pipeline HD 500GB 3.5" 5900RPM Internal Hard Drive ($36.95 @ Newegg)

Video Card: Asus Radeon R7 370 2GB Video Card ($124.99 @ Micro Center) with 1.05 Ghz

Case: Azza Cosmas ATX Mid Tower Case ($14.99 @ Newegg)

Power Supply: Thermaltake 450W 80+ Bronze Certified ATX Power Supply ($21.40 @ Newegg)

Optical Drive: Pioneer BDC-207DBK Blu-Ray Reader, DVD/CD Writer ($35.00 @ Other World Computing)

Total: $379.56

Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available

Generated by PCPartPicker 2016-05-03 22:17 EDT-0400

Nintendo's configured NX box should not be worst than the above configured PC.

Avatar image for techhog89
Techhog89

5430

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#128 Techhog89
Member since 2015 • 5430 Posts

@ronvalencia: NX won't be $400.

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#129  Edited By ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

@techhog89 said:

@ronvalencia: NX won't be $400.

http://gamingbolt.com/how-much-should-the-ps4k-neo-and-nintendo-nx-cost

$349 for NX.

PCPartPicker part list: http://pcpartpicker.com/p/RhywwP

Price breakdown by merchant: http://pcpartpicker.com/p/RhywwP/by_merchant/

CPU: AMD FX-4300 3.8GHz Quad-Core Processor ($69.99 @ Newegg)

Motherboard: MSI 760GM-P23 (FX) Micro ATX AM3+ Motherboard ($43.25 @ OutletPC)

Memory: Crucial 8GB (1 x 8GB) DDR3-1600 Memory ($24.99 @ SuperBiiz)

Storage: Seagate Pipeline HD 500GB 3.5" 5900RPM Internal Hard Drive ($36.95 @ Newegg)

Video Card: MSI Radeon R7 265 2GB Video Card ($103.98 @ Newegg)

Case: Azza Cosmas ATX Mid Tower Case ($14.99 @ Newegg)

Power Supply: Thermaltake 450W 80+ Bronze Certified ATX Power Supply ($21.40 @ Newegg)

Optical Drive: Pioneer BDC-207DBK Blu-Ray Reader, DVD/CD Writer ($35.00 @ Other World Computing)

Total: $350.55

Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available

Generated by PCPartPicker 2016-05-03 22:31 EDT-0400

http://www.vooks.net/keen-on-the-nintendo-nx-you-can-preorder-it-at-eb-games-already/

EB Games Australia is selling NX for $999 AUD (lol, place holder).

Avatar image for techhog89
Techhog89

5430

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#130 Techhog89
Member since 2015 • 5430 Posts

@ronvalencia said:
@techhog89 said:

@ronvalencia: NX won't be $400.

http://gamingbolt.com/how-much-should-the-ps4k-neo-and-nintendo-nx-cost

$349 for NX.

PCPartPicker part list: http://pcpartpicker.com/p/RhywwP

Price breakdown by merchant: http://pcpartpicker.com/p/RhywwP/by_merchant/

CPU: AMD FX-4300 3.8GHz Quad-Core Processor ($69.99 @ Newegg)

Motherboard: MSI 760GM-P23 (FX) Micro ATX AM3+ Motherboard ($43.25 @ OutletPC)

Memory: Crucial 8GB (1 x 8GB) DDR3-1600 Memory ($24.99 @ SuperBiiz)

Storage: Seagate Pipeline HD 500GB 3.5" 5900RPM Internal Hard Drive ($36.95 @ Newegg)

Video Card: MSI Radeon R7 265 2GB Video Card ($103.98 @ Newegg)

Case: Azza Cosmas ATX Mid Tower Case ($14.99 @ Newegg)

Power Supply: Thermaltake 450W 80+ Bronze Certified ATX Power Supply ($21.40 @ Newegg)

Optical Drive: Pioneer BDC-207DBK Blu-Ray Reader, DVD/CD Writer ($35.00 @ Other World Computing)

Total: $350.55

Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available

Generated by PCPartPicker 2016-05-03 22:31 EDT-0400

http://www.vooks.net/keen-on-the-nintendo-nx-you-can-preorder-it-at-eb-games-already/

EB Games Australia is selling NX for $999 AUD (lol, place holder).

Miyamoto said that $350 is too much. It'll be $300, sold without a loss.

Avatar image for deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
deactivated-57ad0e5285d73

21398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#131 deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
Member since 2009 • 21398 Posts

@techhog89:

Loss shmoss. Truth is that we dont know the contractual agreement between Nintendo and the other parties involved. For example, Nintendo could be getting a newer part for far cheaper if the length of the contract is longer and includes cost/per in finer detail.

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#132  Edited By ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

@techhog89 said:
@ronvalencia said:
@techhog89 said:

@ronvalencia: NX won't be $400.

http://gamingbolt.com/how-much-should-the-ps4k-neo-and-nintendo-nx-cost

$349 for NX.

PCPartPicker part list: http://pcpartpicker.com/p/RhywwP

Price breakdown by merchant: http://pcpartpicker.com/p/RhywwP/by_merchant/

CPU: AMD FX-4300 3.8GHz Quad-Core Processor ($69.99 @ Newegg)

Motherboard: MSI 760GM-P23 (FX) Micro ATX AM3+ Motherboard ($43.25 @ OutletPC)

Memory: Crucial 8GB (1 x 8GB) DDR3-1600 Memory ($24.99 @ SuperBiiz)

Storage: Seagate Pipeline HD 500GB 3.5" 5900RPM Internal Hard Drive ($36.95 @ Newegg)

Video Card: MSI Radeon R7 265 2GB Video Card ($103.98 @ Newegg)

Case: Azza Cosmas ATX Mid Tower Case ($14.99 @ Newegg)

Power Supply: Thermaltake 450W 80+ Bronze Certified ATX Power Supply ($21.40 @ Newegg)

Optical Drive: Pioneer BDC-207DBK Blu-Ray Reader, DVD/CD Writer ($35.00 @ Other World Computing)

Total: $350.55

Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available

Generated by PCPartPicker 2016-05-03 22:31 EDT-0400

http://www.vooks.net/keen-on-the-nintendo-nx-you-can-preorder-it-at-eb-games-already/

EB Games Australia is selling NX for $999 AUD (lol, place holder).

Miyamoto said that $350 is too much. It'll be $300, sold without a loss.

Emily Rogers also dismissed Polaris 11 and Polaris 10 can't go into $300 game console.

PCPartPicker part list: http://pcpartpicker.com/p/8bpqLk

Price breakdown by merchant: http://pcpartpicker.com/p/8bpqLk/by_merchant/

CPU: AMD 5350 2.05Ghz Quad-Core Processor ($36.99 @ SuperBiiz)

Motherboard: ECS KAM1-I(1.0) Mini ITX AM1 Motherboard ($22.99 @ Amazon)

Memory: Crucial 8GB (1 x 8GB) DDR3-1600 Memory ($24.99 @ SuperBiiz)

Storage: Seagate Pipeline HD 500GB 3.5" 5900RPM Internal Hard Drive ($36.95 @ Newegg)

Video Card: MSI Radeon R7 265 2GB Video Card ($103.98 @ Newegg)

Case: Azza Cosmas ATX Mid Tower Case ($14.99 @ Newegg)

Power Supply: Thermaltake 450W 80+ Bronze Certified ATX Power Supply ($21.40 @ Newegg)

Optical Drive: Pioneer BDC-207DBK Blu-Ray Reader, DVD/CD Writer ($35.00 @ Other World Computing)

Total: $297.29

Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available

Generated by PCPartPicker 2016-05-03 23:29 EDT-0400

The next step down is XBO''s APU type hardware with Bonaire IGP.

Avatar image for techhog89
Techhog89

5430

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#133  Edited By Techhog89
Member since 2015 • 5430 Posts

@ronvalencia said:
@techhog89 said:
@ronvalencia said:
@techhog89 said:

@ronvalencia: NX won't be $400.

http://gamingbolt.com/how-much-should-the-ps4k-neo-and-nintendo-nx-cost

$349 for NX.

PCPartPicker part list: http://pcpartpicker.com/p/RhywwP

Price breakdown by merchant: http://pcpartpicker.com/p/RhywwP/by_merchant/

CPU: AMD FX-4300 3.8GHz Quad-Core Processor ($69.99 @ Newegg)

Motherboard: MSI 760GM-P23 (FX) Micro ATX AM3+ Motherboard ($43.25 @ OutletPC)

Memory: Crucial 8GB (1 x 8GB) DDR3-1600 Memory ($24.99 @ SuperBiiz)

Storage: Seagate Pipeline HD 500GB 3.5" 5900RPM Internal Hard Drive ($36.95 @ Newegg)

Video Card: MSI Radeon R7 265 2GB Video Card ($103.98 @ Newegg)

Case: Azza Cosmas ATX Mid Tower Case ($14.99 @ Newegg)

Power Supply: Thermaltake 450W 80+ Bronze Certified ATX Power Supply ($21.40 @ Newegg)

Optical Drive: Pioneer BDC-207DBK Blu-Ray Reader, DVD/CD Writer ($35.00 @ Other World Computing)

Total: $350.55

Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available

Generated by PCPartPicker 2016-05-03 22:31 EDT-0400

http://www.vooks.net/keen-on-the-nintendo-nx-you-can-preorder-it-at-eb-games-already/

EB Games Australia is selling NX for $999 AUD (lol, place holder).

Miyamoto said that $350 is too much. It'll be $300, sold without a loss.

Emily Rogers also dismissed Polaris 11 and Polaris 10 can't go into $300 game console.

PCPartPicker part list: http://pcpartpicker.com/p/8bpqLk

Price breakdown by merchant: http://pcpartpicker.com/p/8bpqLk/by_merchant/

CPU: AMD 5350 2.05Ghz Quad-Core Processor ($36.99 @ SuperBiiz)

Motherboard: ECS KAM1-I(1.0) Mini ITX AM1 Motherboard ($22.99 @ Amazon)

Memory: Crucial 8GB (1 x 8GB) DDR3-1600 Memory ($24.99 @ SuperBiiz)

Storage: Seagate Pipeline HD 500GB 3.5" 5900RPM Internal Hard Drive ($36.95 @ Newegg)

Video Card: MSI Radeon R7 265 2GB Video Card ($103.98 @ Newegg)

Case: Azza Cosmas ATX Mid Tower Case ($14.99 @ Newegg)

Power Supply: Thermaltake 450W 80+ Bronze Certified ATX Power Supply ($21.40 @ Newegg)

Optical Drive: Pioneer BDC-207DBK Blu-Ray Reader, DVD/CD Writer ($35.00 @ Other World Computing)

Total: $297.29

Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available

Generated by PCPartPicker 2016-05-03 23:29 EDT-0400

Rumors point to there being no optical drive. Also, she didn't dismiss Polaris 11 specifically.

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#134  Edited By ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

@techhog89 said:
@ronvalencia said:

Emily Rogers also dismissed Polaris 11 and Polaris 10 can't go into $300 game console.

PCPartPicker part list: http://pcpartpicker.com/p/8bpqLk

Price breakdown by merchant: http://pcpartpicker.com/p/8bpqLk/by_merchant/

CPU: AMD 5350 2.05Ghz Quad-Core Processor ($36.99 @ SuperBiiz)

Motherboard: ECS KAM1-I(1.0) Mini ITX AM1 Motherboard ($22.99 @ Amazon)

Memory: Crucial 8GB (1 x 8GB) DDR3-1600 Memory ($24.99 @ SuperBiiz)

Storage: Seagate Pipeline HD 500GB 3.5" 5900RPM Internal Hard Drive ($36.95 @ Newegg)

Video Card: MSI Radeon R7 265 2GB Video Card ($103.98 @ Newegg)

Case: Azza Cosmas ATX Mid Tower Case ($14.99 @ Newegg)

Power Supply: Thermaltake 450W 80+ Bronze Certified ATX Power Supply ($21.40 @ Newegg)

Optical Drive: Pioneer BDC-207DBK Blu-Ray Reader, DVD/CD Writer ($35.00 @ Other World Computing)

Total: $297.29

Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available

Generated by PCPartPicker 2016-05-03 23:29 EDT-0400

Rumors point to there being no optical drive. Also, she didn't dismiss Polaris 11 specifically.

2.5 TFLOPS Polaris points to Polaris 11 (20 CU).

ER has stated "Power level is wrong" and "GPU is wrong" hence no Polaris for NX.

I'm not even considering Polaris 10/11 for NX.

I'm looking at FX-8800's IGP (8 CU with Tonga's updates), Bonaire (14 CU), Pitcairn (20 CU) with Hawaii's updates (i.e. PS4's Liverpool),

Avatar image for techhog89
Techhog89

5430

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#135  Edited By Techhog89
Member since 2015 • 5430 Posts

@ronvalencia said:
@techhog89 said:
@ronvalencia said:

Emily Rogers also dismissed Polaris 11 and Polaris 10 can't go into $300 game console.

PCPartPicker part list: http://pcpartpicker.com/p/8bpqLk

Price breakdown by merchant: http://pcpartpicker.com/p/8bpqLk/by_merchant/

CPU: AMD 5350 2.05Ghz Quad-Core Processor ($36.99 @ SuperBiiz)

Motherboard: ECS KAM1-I(1.0) Mini ITX AM1 Motherboard ($22.99 @ Amazon)

Memory: Crucial 8GB (1 x 8GB) DDR3-1600 Memory ($24.99 @ SuperBiiz)

Storage: Seagate Pipeline HD 500GB 3.5" 5900RPM Internal Hard Drive ($36.95 @ Newegg)

Video Card: MSI Radeon R7 265 2GB Video Card ($103.98 @ Newegg)

Case: Azza Cosmas ATX Mid Tower Case ($14.99 @ Newegg)

Power Supply: Thermaltake 450W 80+ Bronze Certified ATX Power Supply ($21.40 @ Newegg)

Optical Drive: Pioneer BDC-207DBK Blu-Ray Reader, DVD/CD Writer ($35.00 @ Other World Computing)

Total: $297.29

Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available

Generated by PCPartPicker 2016-05-03 23:29 EDT-0400

Rumors point to there being no optical drive. Also, she didn't dismiss Polaris 11 specifically.

2.5 TFLOPS Polaris points to Polaris 11 (20 CU).

ER has stated "Power level is wrong" and "GPU is wrong" hence no Polaris for NX.

I'm not even considering Polaris 10/11 for NX.

But what if she's wrong? Without 14nm, NX will be super weak because Nintendo will want to keep the power consumption under 50W. Also, where did you get 2.5 TFLOPs from?

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#136  Edited By ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

@techhog89 said:
@ronvalencia said:
@techhog89 said:
@ronvalencia said:

Emily Rogers also dismissed Polaris 11 and Polaris 10 can't go into $300 game console.

PCPartPicker part list: http://pcpartpicker.com/p/8bpqLk

Price breakdown by merchant: http://pcpartpicker.com/p/8bpqLk/by_merchant/

CPU: AMD 5350 2.05Ghz Quad-Core Processor ($36.99 @ SuperBiiz)

Motherboard: ECS KAM1-I(1.0) Mini ITX AM1 Motherboard ($22.99 @ Amazon)

Memory: Crucial 8GB (1 x 8GB) DDR3-1600 Memory ($24.99 @ SuperBiiz)

Storage: Seagate Pipeline HD 500GB 3.5" 5900RPM Internal Hard Drive ($36.95 @ Newegg)

Video Card: MSI Radeon R7 265 2GB Video Card ($103.98 @ Newegg)

Case: Azza Cosmas ATX Mid Tower Case ($14.99 @ Newegg)

Power Supply: Thermaltake 450W 80+ Bronze Certified ATX Power Supply ($21.40 @ Newegg)

Optical Drive: Pioneer BDC-207DBK Blu-Ray Reader, DVD/CD Writer ($35.00 @ Other World Computing)

Total: $297.29

Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available

Generated by PCPartPicker 2016-05-03 23:29 EDT-0400

Rumors point to there being no optical drive. Also, she didn't dismiss Polaris 11 specifically.

2.5 TFLOPS Polaris points to Polaris 11 (20 CU).

ER has stated "Power level is wrong" and "GPU is wrong" hence no Polaris for NX.

I'm not even considering Polaris 10/11 for NX.

But what if she's wrong? Without 14nm, NX will be super weak because Nintendo will want to keep the power consumption under 50W.

Let's see, there's a FinFET Jaguar update which is better than 2nd gen 28nm Puma+.

FinFET Bonaire (14 CU, ~80 mm^2) could replace 28 nm Oland Pro (6 CU) SKUs i.e. 77 mm^2 size chip market segment.

Chip size replacements

Pitcairn/Liverpool (20 CU, 212 mm^2) ---> Polaris 10 (40 CU, ~232mm^2) e.g. PS4 NEO, iMac 2016, R9-480X/480

Cape Verde (10 CU, 123 mm^2) ---> Polaris 11 (20 CU, ~108 mm^2). 15 inch slim laptops e.g. MacBook Pro 15 inch 2016. R9-470X/470

Oland Pro (6 CU), 77 mm^2 ---> FinFET Bonaire (14 CU, ~80 mm^2) with Polaris improvements. This is the missing Polaris GCN for 13 inch ultrabooks.

Proposed NX

CPU: FinFET Jaguar 2.1 Ghz Quad Core.

GPU: FinFET Bonaire (14 CU, ~80 mm^2), 12 CU active with clock speeds of >1Ghz. May include Polaris updates e.g. geometry engine improvements. .1200Mhz yields 1.843 TFLOPS

ALL under 50 watts.

With FinFET, AMD could double FX-8800p(15 watts to 34 watts)'s 8 CU IGP into 16 CU IGP... 1050Mhz yields 2.1 TFLOPS.

AMD is currently missing a few FinFET GPUs in the low end/low power/low price segments e.g. renamed current Oland Pro into low end Rx-M4x0 series.

40 watt Polaris 11 is too high for 50 watts system.

Avatar image for killonsight
KillOnSight

458

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 145

User Lists: 0

#137 KillOnSight
Member since 2015 • 458 Posts

Power is a moot point right now, theres nothing on PC that makes me think otherwise and the PS4K is a sign that Sony isnt done with the 8th gen, the PS4 is their golden goose no way are they going to replace it.

A profitable low spec, efficient and affordable Nintendo machine is the way to go! It could be the Wii of the 9th generation, they just need to market it a little differently so the macho kids can enjoy it too without getting all insecure.

If Microsofts new Xbox computer is a hige success it might force Sonys hand, but who has the time and resources to make games that look and play better than real life? EA, Activision and Ubisoft might have a stab at it but their creatively bankrupt and i dont see them taking a risk on something like that.