You made the assertion that their home console is currently profitable. You go find the proof.
I only made a prediction about the future.
Damn, you got me. Nintendo's doomed.
I'm rummaging through their financials and I can't find any indication of their home console's profit. I have revenue numbers, but nada on profits.
It's not you could read all that properly anyway
I'm reading it fine.
I see $1.8 billion in home consoles (Combining all console hardware and software revenues). Handhelds brought in similar amounts.
Nintendo had ~$4.5 revenue and made a $300 million profit for the last FY. That shows a $4.2 billion operating cost + taxes for Nintendo.
Imagine both the NX and next handheld flopping worse than ever before. Revenues could be brought down to only $2 billion total for both console and handheld, bringing Nintendo's annual profit down to a glorious -$2.2 billion/year. They'll be gone within 4-5 years.
I'm rummaging through their financials and I can't find any indication of their home console's profit. I have revenue numbers, but nada on profits.
It's not you could read all that properly anyway
I'm reading it fine.
I see $1.8 billion in home consoles (Combining all console hardware and software revenues). Handhelds brought in similar amounts.
Nintendo had ~$4.5 revenue and made a $300 million profit for the last FY. That shows a $4.2 billion operating cost + taxes for Nintendo.
Imagine both the NX and next handheld flopping worse than ever before. Revenues could be brought down to only $2 billion total for both console and handheld, bringing Nintendo's annual profit down to a glorious -$2.5 billion/year. They'll be gone within 4 years.
So much for "NINTENDO HAS BILLIONS OF DOLLARS!!!"
Cry more, sheep.
That's not how it works but okay. See you in 4 years.
You made the assertion that their home console is currently profitable. You go find the proof.
I only made a prediction about the future.
Damn, you got me. Nintendo's doomed.
I'm rummaging through their financials and I can't find any indication of their home console's profit. I have revenue numbers, but nada on profits.
From 2014: https://twitter.com/gibbogame/status/464217206100738048?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
He got that from the financials posted that day. FY2014 also happened to be when Nintendo returned to profitability.
No loss on hardware does not mean overall profitability. It only means that each unit's selling rate is higher than its assembly + packing rate.
Every company has a fixed operating cost (Employee salary, rent, utility bills, R&D, etc). For a company like Nintendo, they use billions of dollars each year to maintain their business. Only selling 1 unit for a $100 profit does not mean the entire company overall will be profitable.
You made the assertion that their home console is currently profitable. You go find the proof.
I only made a prediction about the future.
Damn, you got me. Nintendo's doomed.
I'm rummaging through their financials and I can't find any indication of their home console's profit. I have revenue numbers, but nada on profits.
It's not you could read all that properly anyway
I'm reading it fine.
I see $1.8 billion in home consoles (Combining all console hardware and software revenues). Handhelds brought in similar amounts.
Nintendo had ~$4.5 revenue and made a $300 million profit for the last FY. That shows a $4.2 billion operating cost + taxes for Nintendo.
Imagine both the NX and next handheld flopping worse than ever before. Revenues could be brought down to only $2 billion total for both console and handheld, bringing Nintendo's annual profit down to a glorious -$2.2 billion/year. They'll be gone within 4-5 years.
You made the assertion that their home console is currently profitable. You go find the proof.
I only made a prediction about the future.
Damn, you got me. Nintendo's doomed.
I'm rummaging through their financials and I can't find any indication of their home console's profit. I have revenue numbers, but nada on profits.
From 2014: https://twitter.com/gibbogame/status/464217206100738048?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
He got that from the financials posted that day. FY2014 also happened to be when Nintendo returned to profitability.
No loss on hardware does not mean overall profitability. It only means that each unit's selling rate is higher than its assembly + packing rate.
Every company has a fixed operating cost (Employee salary, rent, utility bills, R&D, etc). For a company like Nintendo, they use billions of dollars each year to maintain their business. Only selling 1 unit for a $100 profit does not mean the entire company overall will be profitable.
Yeah, I'm a business major, I know. Assuming that they'll be in the red with NX for sure based on nothing, however, is... Well, it's something that you would do. We'll just see how that pans out. I know that you're just a character, so I'm not really up for putting effort into this.
I'm rummaging through their financials and I can't find any indication of their home console's profit. I have revenue numbers, but nada on profits.
From 2014: https://twitter.com/gibbogame/status/464217206100738048?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
He got that from the financials posted that day. FY2014 also happened to be when Nintendo returned to profitability.
No loss on hardware does not mean overall profitability. It only means that each unit's selling rate is higher than its assembly + packing rate.
Every company has a fixed operating cost (Employee salary, rent, utility bills, R&D, etc). For a company like Nintendo, they use billions of dollars each year to maintain their business. Only selling 1 unit for a $100 profit does not mean the entire company overall will be profitable.
Yeah, I'm a business major, I know. Assuming that they'll be in the red with NX for sure based on nothing, however, is... Well, it's something that you would do. We'll just see how that pans out. I know that you're just a character, so I'm not really up for putting effort into this.
Nintendo took a loss per unit for the Wii U despite its weaksauce specs.
Why? Because Nintendo does not have the economies of scale SONY has. Nintendo has to pay out of their ass to get specs half as decent as what SONY gets.
With Nintendo obviously not confident about the NX, they are probably placing a lot less orders from suppliers than they have for the Wii U, meaning suppliers can squeeze Nintendo pretty hard. Despite this huge disadvantage, Nintendo won't be taking a loss on the NX, meaning the NX will be weaksauce just like the Wii U.
So no, I'm not basing its upcoming failure on nothing.
From 2014: https://twitter.com/gibbogame/status/464217206100738048?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
He got that from the financials posted that day. FY2014 also happened to be when Nintendo returned to profitability.
No loss on hardware does not mean overall profitability. It only means that each unit's selling rate is higher than its assembly + packing rate.
Every company has a fixed operating cost (Employee salary, rent, utility bills, R&D, etc). For a company like Nintendo, they use billions of dollars each year to maintain their business. Only selling 1 unit for a $100 profit does not mean the entire company overall will be profitable.
Yeah, I'm a business major, I know. Assuming that they'll be in the red with NX for sure based on nothing, however, is... Well, it's something that you would do. We'll just see how that pans out. I know that you're just a character, so I'm not really up for putting effort into this.
Nintendo took a loss per unit for the Wii U despite its weaksauce specs.
Why? Because Nintendo does not have the economies of scale SONY has. Nintendo has to pay out of their ass to get specs half as decent as what SONY gets.
With Nintendo obviously not confident about the NX, they are probably placing a lot less orders from suppliers than they have for the Wii U, meaning suppliers can squeeze Nintendo pretty hard. Despite this huge disadvantage, Nintendo won't be taking a loss on the NX, meaning the NX will be weaksauce just like the Wii U.
So no, I'm not basing its upcoming failure on nothing.
Cool. So, how powerful can it be at $300, and how much would it need to cost to match PS4? Also, you feel that Nintendo won't try to do anything to stay alive and will simply declare bankruptcy in 2021?
No loss on hardware does not mean overall profitability. It only means that each unit's selling rate is higher than its assembly + packing rate.
Every company has a fixed operating cost (Employee salary, rent, utility bills, R&D, etc). For a company like Nintendo, they use billions of dollars each year to maintain their business. Only selling 1 unit for a $100 profit does not mean the entire company overall will be profitable.
Yeah, I'm a business major, I know. Assuming that they'll be in the red with NX for sure based on nothing, however, is... Well, it's something that you would do. We'll just see how that pans out. I know that you're just a character, so I'm not really up for putting effort into this.
Nintendo took a loss per unit for the Wii U despite its weaksauce specs.
Why? Because Nintendo does not have the economies of scale SONY has. Nintendo has to pay out of their ass to get specs half as decent as what SONY gets.
With Nintendo obviously not confident about the NX, they are probably placing a lot less orders from suppliers than they have for the Wii U, meaning suppliers can squeeze Nintendo pretty hard. Despite this huge disadvantage, Nintendo won't be taking a loss on the NX, meaning the NX will be weaksauce just like the Wii U.
So no, I'm not basing its upcoming failure on nothing.
Cool. So, how powerful can it be at $300, and how much would it need to cost to match PS4?
Weaker than the Xbone. Slightly stronger if Nintendo got lucky with deals.
With Nintendo's scale, I'd say the NX would need to cost $700 minimum to match the PS4.
No loss on hardware does not mean overall profitability. It only means that each unit's selling rate is higher than its assembly + packing rate.
Every company has a fixed operating cost (Employee salary, rent, utility bills, R&D, etc). For a company like Nintendo, they use billions of dollars each year to maintain their business. Only selling 1 unit for a $100 profit does not mean the entire company overall will be profitable.
Yeah, I'm a business major, I know. Assuming that they'll be in the red with NX for sure based on nothing, however, is... Well, it's something that you would do. We'll just see how that pans out. I know that you're just a character, so I'm not really up for putting effort into this.
Nintendo took a loss per unit for the Wii U despite its weaksauce specs.
Why? Because Nintendo does not have the economies of scale SONY has. Nintendo has to pay out of their ass to get specs half as decent as what SONY gets.
With Nintendo obviously not confident about the NX, they are probably placing a lot less orders from suppliers than they have for the Wii U, meaning suppliers can squeeze Nintendo pretty hard. Despite this huge disadvantage, Nintendo won't be taking a loss on the NX, meaning the NX will be weaksauce just like the Wii U.
So no, I'm not basing its upcoming failure on nothing.
Cool. So, how powerful can it be at $300, and how much would it need to cost to match PS4?
Weaker than the Xbone.
Slightly stronger if Nintendo got lucky with deals.
Haha, okay. And how much to match PS4? Also, you feel that Nintendo won't try to do anything to stay alive and will simply declare bankruptcy in 2021?
Yeah, I'm a business major, I know. Assuming that they'll be in the red with NX for sure based on nothing, however, is... Well, it's something that you would do. We'll just see how that pans out. I know that you're just a character, so I'm not really up for putting effort into this.
Nintendo took a loss per unit for the Wii U despite its weaksauce specs.
Why? Because Nintendo does not have the economies of scale SONY has. Nintendo has to pay out of their ass to get specs half as decent as what SONY gets.
With Nintendo obviously not confident about the NX, they are probably placing a lot less orders from suppliers than they have for the Wii U, meaning suppliers can squeeze Nintendo pretty hard. Despite this huge disadvantage, Nintendo won't be taking a loss on the NX, meaning the NX will be weaksauce just like the Wii U.
So no, I'm not basing its upcoming failure on nothing.
Cool. So, how powerful can it be at $300, and how much would it need to cost to match PS4?
Weaker than the Xbone.
Slightly stronger if Nintendo got lucky with deals.
Haha, okay. And how much to match PS4? Also, you feel that Nintendo won't try to do anything to stay alive and will simply declare bankruptcy in 2021?
From 2014: https://twitter.com/gibbogame/status/464217206100738048?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
He got that from the financials posted that day. FY2014 also happened to be when Nintendo returned to profitability.
No loss on hardware does not mean overall profitability. It only means that each unit's selling rate is higher than its assembly + packing rate.
Every company has a fixed operating cost (Employee salary, rent, utility bills, R&D, etc). For a company like Nintendo, they use billions of dollars each year to maintain their business. Only selling 1 unit for a $100 profit does not mean the entire company overall will be profitable.
Yeah, I'm a business major, I know. Assuming that they'll be in the red with NX for sure based on nothing, however, is... Well, it's something that you would do. We'll just see how that pans out. I know that you're just a character, so I'm not really up for putting effort into this.
Nintendo took a loss per unit for the Wii U despite its weaksauce specs.
Why? Because Nintendo does not have the economies of scale SONY has. Nintendo has to pay out of their ass to get specs half as decent as what SONY gets.
With Nintendo obviously not confident about the NX, they are probably placing a lot less orders from suppliers than they have for the Wii U, meaning suppliers can squeeze Nintendo pretty hard. Despite this huge disadvantage, Nintendo won't be taking a loss on the NX, meaning the NX will be weaksauce just like the Wii U.
So no, I'm not basing its upcoming failure on nothing.
For X86 PC business, economies of scale is spread across multiple OEM vendors.
The main driver for AMD's semi-custom business unit is to leverage PC's economies of scale NOT another PowerPC BS. AMD is spreading it's cost across multiple OEM vendors. Removing IBM's CPU IP and Rambus XDR are big cost savers.
Both MS and Sony has nuked IBM's IP cost from their consoles.
Nintendo took a loss per unit for the Wii U despite its weaksauce specs.
Why? Because Nintendo does not have the economies of scale SONY has. Nintendo has to pay out of their ass to get specs half as decent as what SONY gets.
With Nintendo obviously not confident about the NX, they are probably placing a lot less orders from suppliers than they have for the Wii U, meaning suppliers can squeeze Nintendo pretty hard. Despite this huge disadvantage, Nintendo won't be taking a loss on the NX, meaning the NX will be weaksauce just like the Wii U.
So no, I'm not basing its upcoming failure on nothing.
Cool. So, how powerful can it be at $300, and how much would it need to cost to match PS4?
Weaker than the Xbone.
Slightly stronger if Nintendo got lucky with deals.
Haha, okay. And how much to match PS4? Also, you feel that Nintendo won't try to do anything to stay alive and will simply declare bankruptcy in 2021?
They'll go third party.
They've said multiple times that they'll never do that.
No loss on hardware does not mean overall profitability. It only means that each unit's selling rate is higher than its assembly + packing rate.
Every company has a fixed operating cost (Employee salary, rent, utility bills, R&D, etc). For a company like Nintendo, they use billions of dollars each year to maintain their business. Only selling 1 unit for a $100 profit does not mean the entire company overall will be profitable.
Yeah, I'm a business major, I know. Assuming that they'll be in the red with NX for sure based on nothing, however, is... Well, it's something that you would do. We'll just see how that pans out. I know that you're just a character, so I'm not really up for putting effort into this.
Nintendo took a loss per unit for the Wii U despite its weaksauce specs.
Why? Because Nintendo does not have the economies of scale SONY has. Nintendo has to pay out of their ass to get specs half as decent as what SONY gets.
With Nintendo obviously not confident about the NX, they are probably placing a lot less orders from suppliers than they have for the Wii U, meaning suppliers can squeeze Nintendo pretty hard. Despite this huge disadvantage, Nintendo won't be taking a loss on the NX, meaning the NX will be weaksauce just like the Wii U.
So no, I'm not basing its upcoming failure on nothing.
For X86 PC business, economies of scale is spread across multiple OEM vendors.
Shhhhh, you're going to spoil the fun. Also, NX will use an ARM CPU (though the same point applies, if not more so).
No loss on hardware does not mean overall profitability. It only means that each unit's selling rate is higher than its assembly + packing rate.
Every company has a fixed operating cost (Employee salary, rent, utility bills, R&D, etc). For a company like Nintendo, they use billions of dollars each year to maintain their business. Only selling 1 unit for a $100 profit does not mean the entire company overall will be profitable.
Yeah, I'm a business major, I know. Assuming that they'll be in the red with NX for sure based on nothing, however, is... Well, it's something that you would do. We'll just see how that pans out. I know that you're just a character, so I'm not really up for putting effort into this.
Nintendo took a loss per unit for the Wii U despite its weaksauce specs.
Why? Because Nintendo does not have the economies of scale SONY has. Nintendo has to pay out of their ass to get specs half as decent as what SONY gets.
With Nintendo obviously not confident about the NX, they are probably placing a lot less orders from suppliers than they have for the Wii U, meaning suppliers can squeeze Nintendo pretty hard. Despite this huge disadvantage, Nintendo won't be taking a loss on the NX, meaning the NX will be weaksauce just like the Wii U.
So no, I'm not basing its upcoming failure on nothing.
For X86 PC business, economies of scale is spread across multiple OEM vendors.
Multiple vendors bring the average manufacturing price down, but it does not mean the supplier has to charge the same amount for every vendor.
A vendor who is a bigger seller will not tolerate getting the same rate as a lower seller. Furthermore, the average selling rate for the supplier is skewed by vendors with bigger scale (SONY), so the actual selling rate to lower scale clients like Nintendo will be much higher than the average.
Whatever Nintendo is getting, AMD will give SONY something 2x as better for half the price.
Slightly stronger if Nintendo got lucky with deals.
Haha, okay. And how much to match PS4? Also, you feel that Nintendo won't try to do anything to stay alive and will simply declare bankruptcy in 2021?
They'll go third party.
They've said multiple times that they'll never do that.
You really think a company still generating revenue from selling hardware will say they will go third party openly? They may not say anything about third party out in the open, but you can bet your sweet juicy ass that Nintendo execs are contemplating it behind closed doors. I thought you were a business major.
See, here's the thing. You may have your fancy business BA from Harvard or Wharton or whatever, but I actually own my own import/export, customs brokerage + actuarial firm netting $7 million per year. And all I have is a math, econ double major degree from a top 15 university.
You need common sense to succeed in business, not degrees or education.
Slightly stronger if Nintendo got lucky with deals.
Haha, okay. And how much to match PS4? Also, you feel that Nintendo won't try to do anything to stay alive and will simply declare bankruptcy in 2021?
They'll go third party.
They've said multiple times that they'll never do that.
You really think a company still generating revenue from selling hardware will say they will go third party openly? They may not say anything about third party out in the open, but you can bet your sweet juicy ass that Nintendo execs are contemplating it behind closed doors. I thought you were a business major.
See, here's the thing. You may have your fancy business BA from Harvard of Wharton, but I actually own my own import/export, customs brokerage + actuarial firm netting $7 million per year. And all I have is a math, econ double major degree from a top 15 university.
You need common sense to succeed in business, not degrees or education.
Still doesn't mean that they'll go third-party. They'll just look for another business venture any maybe keep software limited to smartphones.
Also, you're the reason business owners hire accountants. Your $2.5 billion annual loss estimate was hilarious.
They've said multiple times that they'll never do that.
You really think a company still generating revenue from selling hardware will say they will go third party openly? They may not say anything about third party out in the open, but you can bet your sweet juicy ass that Nintendo execs are contemplating it behind closed doors. I thought you were a business major.
See, here's the thing. You may have your fancy business BA from Harvard of Wharton, but I actually own my own import/export, customs brokerage + actuarial firm netting $7 million per year. And all I have is a math, econ double major degree from a top 15 university.
You need common sense to succeed in business, not degrees or education.
Still doesn't mean that they'll go third-party. They'll just look for another business venture any maybe keep software limited to smartphones.
Also, you're the reason business owners hire accountants. Your $2.5 billion annual loss estimate was hilarious.
Nintendo doesn't know anything except gaming. If both their handheld and consoles are netting them tons of losses, they will go third party.
What else are they going to do? At least with mario on the Xbox and PlayStation, they have the name brand to get higher software sales than ever. Branching out to a new industry is very risky.
They've said multiple times that they'll never do that.
You really think a company still generating revenue from selling hardware will say they will go third party openly? They may not say anything about third party out in the open, but you can bet your sweet juicy ass that Nintendo execs are contemplating it behind closed doors. I thought you were a business major.
See, here's the thing. You may have your fancy business BA from Harvard of Wharton, but I actually own my own import/export, customs brokerage + actuarial firm netting $7 million per year. And all I have is a math, econ double major degree from a top 15 university.
You need common sense to succeed in business, not degrees or education.
Still doesn't mean that they'll go third-party. They'll just look for another business venture any maybe keep software limited to smartphones.
Also, you're the reason business owners hire accountants. Your $2.5 billion annual loss estimate was hilarious.
Nintendo doesn't know anything except gaming. If both their handheld and consoles are netting them tons of losses, they will go third party.
What else are they going to do? At least with mario on the Xbox and PlayStation, they have the name brand to get higher software sales than ever. Branching out to a new industry is very risky.
You're right. They've been making video games for nearly 130 years, after all.
They've said multiple times that they'll never do that.
You really think a company still generating revenue from selling hardware will say they will go third party openly? They may not say anything about third party out in the open, but you can bet your sweet juicy ass that Nintendo execs are contemplating it behind closed doors. I thought you were a business major.
See, here's the thing. You may have your fancy business BA from Harvard of Wharton, but I actually own my own import/export, customs brokerage + actuarial firm netting $7 million per year. And all I have is a math, econ double major degree from a top 15 university.
You need common sense to succeed in business, not degrees or education.
Still doesn't mean that they'll go third-party. They'll just look for another business venture any maybe keep software limited to smartphones.
Also, you're the reason business owners hire accountants. Your $2.5 billion annual loss estimate was hilarious.
Nintendo doesn't know anything except gaming. If both their handheld and consoles are netting them tons of losses, they will go third party.
What else are they going to do? At least with mario on the Xbox and PlayStation, they have the name brand to get higher software sales than ever. Branching out to a new industry is very risky.
You're right. They've been making video games for nearly 130 years, after all.
Yeah, why doesn't Nintendo just bring back playing cards again. I'm sure that'll bring in billions of dollars in revenue like gaming consoles. LOL...
You really think a company still generating revenue from selling hardware will say they will go third party openly? They may not say anything about third party out in the open, but you can bet your sweet juicy ass that Nintendo execs are contemplating it behind closed doors. I thought you were a business major.
See, here's the thing. You may have your fancy business BA from Harvard of Wharton, but I actually own my own import/export, customs brokerage + actuarial firm netting $7 million per year. And all I have is a math, econ double major degree from a top 15 university.
You need common sense to succeed in business, not degrees or education.
Still doesn't mean that they'll go third-party. They'll just look for another business venture any maybe keep software limited to smartphones.
Also, you're the reason business owners hire accountants. Your $2.5 billion annual loss estimate was hilarious.
Nintendo doesn't know anything except gaming. If both their handheld and consoles are netting them tons of losses, they will go third party.
What else are they going to do? At least with mario on the Xbox and PlayStation, they have the name brand to get higher software sales than ever. Branching out to a new industry is very risky.
You're right. They've been making video games for nearly 130 years, after all.
Yeah, why doesn't Nintendo just bring back playing cards again. I'm sure that'll bring in billions of dollars in revenue like gaming consoles. LOL...
So, when do you predict Nintendo will go third-party? 2018?
Still doesn't mean that they'll go third-party. They'll just look for another business venture any maybe keep software limited to smartphones.
Also, you're the reason business owners hire accountants. Your $2.5 billion annual loss estimate was hilarious.
Nintendo doesn't know anything except gaming. If both their handheld and consoles are netting them tons of losses, they will go third party.
What else are they going to do? At least with mario on the Xbox and PlayStation, they have the name brand to get higher software sales than ever. Branching out to a new industry is very risky.
You're right. They've been making video games for nearly 130 years, after all.
Yeah, why doesn't Nintendo just bring back playing cards again. I'm sure that'll bring in billions of dollars in revenue like gaming consoles. LOL...
So, when do you predict Nintendo will go third-party? 2018?
Multiple vendors bring the average manufacturing price down, but it does not mean the supplier has to charge the same amount for every vendor.
A vendor who is a bigger seller will not tolerate getting the same rate as a lower seller. Furthermore, the average selling rate for the supplier is skewed by vendors with bigger scale (SONY), so the actual selling rate to lower scale clients like Nintendo will be much higher than the average.
Whatever Nintendo is getting, AMD will give SONY something 2x as better for half the price.
Microsoft, Sony and Nintendo licenses AMD's IP and the cost for the silicon chip is paid by OEM customer themselves i.e. Microsoft may have issues with TSMC but they don't have IP license price issue with AMD.
Example of AMD's licensing cost for low volume high performance semi-custom SoC solution for Chinese server market.
AMD handles PC' business's TSMC, Global Foundry and Samsung foundry issues.
AMD IP licensing cost is relatively cheap e.g. both MS and Sony has remove IBM IP cost.
AMD will make sure NVIDIA or IBM doesn't have a chance in games console hardware business i.e. "race to the bottom" and maintain "bang per buck" leadership.
IP cost is cheaper than NVIDIA and IBM in PS3.
Intel is planning to switch towards AMD GPU patents/IP hence replacing NVIDIA. http://www.extremetech.com/computing/224964-report-claims-intel-amd-discussing-gpu-patent-licensing
Presently, Intel has a patent licensing deal with Nvidia with a total value of $1.5 billion and an expiration date of March 17, 2017. That deal has earned Nvidia roughly $67 million per quarter, and while that’s not much compared to the company’s yearly revenue of $5 billion for fiscal year 2016 (calendar year 2015), it works out to about 5% of its revenue and a significant chunk of Nvidia’s $614 million net income. Companies like IP and patent licensing precisely because these multi-year agreements can bring in continuing funds for work already completed without being a further drain on the bottom line.
Loss shmoss. Truth is that we dont know the contractual agreement between Nintendo and the other parties involved. For example, Nintendo could be getting a newer part for far cheaper if the length of the contract is longer and includes cost/per in finer detail.
Storage: Seagate Pipeline HD 500GB 3.5" 5900RPM Internal Hard Drive ($36.95 @ Newegg)
Video Card: MSI Radeon R7 265 2GB Video Card ($103.98 @ Newegg)
Case: Azza Cosmas ATX Mid Tower Case ($14.99 @ Newegg)
Power Supply: Thermaltake 450W 80+ Bronze Certified ATX Power Supply ($21.40 @ Newegg)
Optical Drive: Pioneer BDC-207DBK Blu-Ray Reader, DVD/CD Writer ($35.00 @ Other World Computing)
Total: $297.29
Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available
Generated by PCPartPicker 2016-05-03 23:29 EDT-0400
Rumors point to there being no optical drive. Also, she didn't dismiss Polaris 11 specifically.
2.5 TFLOPS Polaris points to Polaris 11 (20 CU).
ER has stated "Power level is wrong" and "GPU is wrong" hence no Polaris for NX.
I'm not even considering Polaris 10/11 for NX.
But what if she's wrong? Without 14nm, NX will be super weak because Nintendo will want to keep the power consumption under 50W. Also, where did you get 2.5 TFLOPs from?
Cape Verde (10 CU, 123 mm^2) ---> Polaris 11 (20 CU, ~108 mm^2). 15 inch slim laptops e.g. MacBook Pro 15 inch 2016. R9-470X/470
Oland Pro (6 CU), 77 mm^2 ---> FinFET Bonaire (14 CU, ~80 mm^2) with Polaris improvements. This is the missing Polaris GCN for 13 inch ultrabooks.
Proposed NX
CPU: FinFET Jaguar 2.1 Ghz Quad Core.
GPU: FinFET Bonaire (14 CU, ~80 mm^2), 12 CU active with clock speeds of >1Ghz. May include Polaris updates e.g. geometry engine improvements. .1200Mhz yields 1.843 TFLOPS
ALL under 50 watts.
With FinFET, AMD could double FX-8800p(15 watts to 34 watts)'s 8 CU IGP into 16 CU IGP... 1050Mhz yields 2.1 TFLOPS.
AMD is currently missing a few FinFET GPUs in the low end/low power/low price segments e.g. renamed current Oland Pro into low end Rx-M4x0 series.
40 watt Polaris 11 is too high for 50 watts system.
Power is a moot point right now, theres nothing on PC that makes me think otherwise and the PS4K is a sign that Sony isnt done with the 8th gen, the PS4 is their golden goose no way are they going to replace it.
A profitable low spec, efficient and affordable Nintendo machine is the way to go! It could be the Wii of the 9th generation, they just need to market it a little differently so the macho kids can enjoy it too without getting all insecure.
If Microsofts new Xbox computer is a hige success it might force Sonys hand, but who has the time and resources to make games that look and play better than real life? EA, Activision and Ubisoft might have a stab at it but their creatively bankrupt and i dont see them taking a risk on something like that.
Log in to comment