thats got to be anoying that a 4 month old system looks so much better then a year old system.
http://www.n4g.com/News-31402.aspx
This topic is locked from further discussion.
thats got to be anoying that a 4 month old system looks so much better then a year old system.
http://www.n4g.com/News-31402.aspx
You know, I ain't no fancy website news writer or nothin', but generally isn't it a good idea to go for as close to the same shot as you can get when making a comparison? FYI, year and four months me boyo. 360 has been out for a year and four months. Give Bethesda the chance to update the 360 graphics and I'm fairly certain they'd look better, it's what happens when you rewrite software with new techniques; things generally tend to look prettier. -Johnthats got to be anoying that a 4 month old system looks so much better then a year old system.
http://www.n4g.com/News-31402.aspx
deadpool51
That dosen't even make sense. :| With more development time, of course the PS3 version will look better - though, not by much.thats got to be anoying that a 4 month old system looks so much better then a year old system.
http://www.n4g.com/News-31402.aspx
deadpool51
of course it looks better..lemming cant deny it..because their is truths to it..elementz28Uh, yeah, and we explained about something called 'development time' and 'new graphical techniques'. It's what happens when a game is ported long after it was originally created. Do try to keep up. -John
[QUOTE="deadpool51"]You know, I ain't no fancy website news writer or nothin', but generally isn't it a good idea to go for as close to the same shot as you can get when making a comparison? FYI, year and four months me boyo. 360 has been out for a year and four months. Give Bethesda the chance to update the 360 graphics and I'm fairly certain they'd look better, it's what happens when you rewrite software with new techniques; things generally tend to look prettier. -John yeah then they can go back and update the graphics on the PS3 cause they will understand its architecture better and it will again look better on the PS3.thats got to be anoying that a 4 month old system looks so much better then a year old system.
http://www.n4g.com/News-31402.aspx
tovarischs
[QUOTE="tovarischs"][QUOTE="deadpool51"]You know, I ain't no fancy website news writer or nothin', but generally isn't it a good idea to go for as close to the same shot as you can get when making a comparison? FYI, year and four months me boyo. 360 has been out for a year and four months. Give Bethesda the chance to update the 360 graphics and I'm fairly certain they'd look better, it's what happens when you rewrite software with new techniques; things generally tend to look prettier. -John yeah then they can go back and update the graphics on the PS3 cause they will understand its architecture better and it will again look better on the PS3. Do you read what you post? Or what other people post? I mean seriously, are you as dense as you seem to be, or is this an elaborate charade? WITH MORE DEVELOPMENT TIME COMES BETTER GRAPHICS. It's almost a freaking scientific law. Yeesh. -Johnthats got to be anoying that a 4 month old system looks so much better then a year old system.
http://www.n4g.com/News-31402.aspx
deadpool51
[QUOTE="deadpool51"]That dosen't even make sense. :| With more development time, of course the PS3 version will look better - though, not by much.thats got to be anoying that a 4 month old system looks so much better then a year old system.
http://www.n4g.com/News-31402.aspx
HeedleGlavin
[QUOTE="deadpool51"]That dosen't even make sense. :| With more development time, of course the PS3 version will look better - though, not by much. lolthats got to be anoying that a 4 month old system looks so much better then a year old system.
http://www.n4g.com/News-31402.aspx
HeedleGlavin
lmfalolmfao this is so sad, no wonder why most games on teh 360 have to be darkened, so it can hide the poor textures, looks like they didn't hide it too well in the 360 that it looks like **** compared to the ps3ddldavePffft no wonder why all multiplats realesed at the same time look better on the xbox360 and in my opinion the ps3 version shadows look like crap.
thats got to be anoying that a 4 month old system looks so much better then a year old system.
http://www.n4g.com/News-31402.aspx
deadpool51
Huh!?!? You do know that the game was reprogrammed and improved right? The developers spent an additional 8-10months improving the game for the PS3. They could have did the same thing for the XBox 360 version and it would look better on the XBox 360. :roll: The game is suppose to look better, because they spent more time improving a lot of things in the game that they didn't have time to do witht he XBox 360 version. :P
No one really cares anyways. The game is old. Most people are looking forward to the expansion now.
Just updated my 360 Oblivion version, the difference with the updated shaders is noticable, particually on the landscape.
They should do a comparison with the new update in the 360 screens.
[QUOTE="deadpool51"]barley noticable? haha the emporer looks like a blob face in the 360 versionblackace
Not on my HDTV is doesn't. Not sure where you got the shots from, but it's not from a HDTV. If it is, they got ripped off.
Yea, the screen capture for both versions of the screenshots is pretty terrible.
Emperor looks better on PS3, more facial structure and detail. More detail in his costume. And the wall behind the emperor has better textures on PS3.KeyWii$600 spent on prettier looking walls and a slightly better looking face. PS3 rules.
[QUOTE="deadpool51"]thats got to be anoying that a 4 month old system looks so much better then a year old system.
http://www.n4g.com/News-31402.aspx
blackace
Huh!?!? You do know that the game was reprogrammed and improved right? The developers spent an additional 8-10months improving the game for the PS3. They could have did the same thing for the XBox 360 version and it would look better on the XBox 360. :roll: The game is suppose to look better, because they spent more time improving a lot of things in the game that they didn't have time to do witht he XBox 360 version. :P
No one really cares anyways. The game is old. Most people are looking forward to the expansion now.
Yeah and i wondering if that video comparison is using the new patch for the xbox360 version :roll:[QUOTE="blackace"][QUOTE="deadpool51"]thats got to be anoying that a 4 month old system looks so much better then a year old system.
http://www.n4g.com/News-31402.aspx
venture00
Huh!?!? You do know that the game was reprogrammed and improved right? The developers spent an additional 8-10months improving the game for the PS3. They could have did the same thing for the XBox 360 version and it would look better on the XBox 360. :roll: The game is suppose to look better, because they spent more time improving a lot of things in the game that they didn't have time to do witht he XBox 360 version. :P
No one really cares anyways. The game is old. Most people are looking forward to the expansion now.
Yeah and i wondering if that video comparison is using the new patch for the xbox360 version :roll: It was.thats got to be anoying that a 4 month old system looks so much better then a year old system.
http://www.n4g.com/News-31402.aspx
deadpool51
It looks and plays best on the PC, much better than either of the consoles. Console sheep are fighting for 2nd place. Good luck!!
[QUOTE="ddldave"]THE PS3 OWNS THE 360 IN GRAPHICS, HOLY CRAP! LMFAO!! WOW!!! i'm so happy i got my ps3!!!-KinGz-This is sad...
Let them go, It make them feel better. They need to justify the extra money it cost them to play a game that most 360 owners have had for close to a year and now has "slight" graphical improvements.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment