I played the beta, and to be honest i really didnt like it, the maps are big which i like, but everything else was meh to me . It seemed just like BBFC 1
This topic is locked from further discussion.
I played the beta, and to be honest i really didnt like it, the maps are big which i like, but everything else was meh to me . It seemed just like BBFC 1
[QUOTE="jerkface96"]
I played the beta, and to be honest i really didnt like it, the maps are big which i like, but everything else was meh to me . It seemed just like BBFC 1
BodyElite
Yep same here. The gameplay is too clunky if you know what i mean
no i know exactly what you mean, its one thing to make the game feel waited like KZ2, but this one gets it wrong.[QUOTE="i_am_interested"]of course its the "graphics king," - theyre using pc footage, every PC game is "teh graphics king" same with medal of honor and how they were saying "in game" - its not hard to believe those were in game when theyre using pc footageTessellation1:13 minutes you can clearly see the ''B'' button from the xbox 360 controller. Windows Vista and 7 directly supports Xbox 360 controllers.
[QUOTE="BodyElite"][QUOTE="jerkface96"]
I played the beta, and to be honest i really didnt like it, the maps are big which i like, but everything else was meh to me . It seemed just like BBFC 1
jerkface96
Yep same here. The gameplay is too clunky if you know what i mean
no i know exactly what you mean, its one thing to make the game feel waited like KZ2, but this one gets it wrong.It gets it perfectly right. It's not supposed to be as noobey and arcadey as Call of Duty 4 is.
[QUOTE="Tessellation"][QUOTE="i_am_interested"]of course its the "graphics king," - theyre using pc footage, every PC game is "teh graphics king" same with medal of honor and how they were saying "in game" - its not hard to believe those were in game when theyre using pc footagei_am_interested1:13 minutes you can clearly see the ''B'' button from the xbox 360 controller. we already went over this, its most likely PC version with the 360 controller
Any prove of this?
we already went over this, its most likely PC version with the 360 controller[QUOTE="i_am_interested"][QUOTE="Tessellation"] 1:13 minutes you can clearly see the ''B'' button from the xbox 360 controller.PAL360
Any prove of this?
There's no actual proof of this but like someone said before, the PS3 beta doesn't look nearly as good as this. So unless the 360 will have much better graphics than the 360 counterpart, this video was probably on PC.
[QUOTE="PAL360"]
[QUOTE="i_am_interested"] we already went over this, its most likely PC version with the 360 controllerEggimannd
Any prove of this?
There's no actual proof of this but like someone said before, the PS3 beta doesn't look nearly as good as this. So unless the 360 will have much better graphics than the 360 counterpart, this video was probably on PC.
Well, better to wait for its release to see how it actually looks.
Still what annoys me is the fact ppl keep underhyping 360´s graphics alot. If its has good graphics and its on PS3 its a graphics king. If it has good graphics and is on 360, its probably the PC version.......Fanboys :?
Might well be the PC version with a 360 gamepad. Although it seems they forgot to enable VSync, seeing as the screen tearing is really noticeable at times. You'd think that if they wanted to showcase the superior version they might want to make it look as good as possible and certainly not overlook such a vital option.
On a side note, as a reply to a previous post (Tessellation), there are plenty of PC games that show the appropriate 360 gamepad buttons on screen, provided one is connected. Most, if not all games that support it do this as of today.
Maybe it is because I don't play these sort of games, but it didn't look graphically impressive to me.
The textures look horrid and there were jaggies everywhere, partical effects were alright though.
Freaken awesome lookin and also looks so damn fun it might give Halo 3 a run for it's money in the fun factor department. This is another one of those ohhhh 12 must buy games for 2010. :D
[QUOTE="PAL360"]
[QUOTE="i_am_interested"] we already went over this, its most likely PC version with the 360 controllerEggimannd
Any prove of this?
There's no actual proof of this but like someone said before, the PS3 beta doesn't look nearly as good as this. So unless the 360 will have much better graphics than the 360 counterpart, this video was probably on PC.
The problem with the beta was that the lighting was too bright which made the graphics look washed out. The lighting on this map has been tweaked which makes a big difference.
[QUOTE="jerkface96"][QUOTE="BodyElite"] we already went over this, its most likely PC version with the 360 controllerEggimannd
Any prove of this?
There's no actual proof of this but like someone said before, the PS3 beta doesn't look nearly as good as this. So unless the 360 will have much better graphics than the 360 counterpart, this video was probably on PC.
One of the reasons they gave PS3 a beta was because the game does not run as well on the PS3. I would assume the 360 version looks better than the PS3 version.I enjoyed the hell out of the beta, quite a bit more than I did BF2 on PC. Scaling back air power does wonders for this game, and the staggered objectives make the 24-player limit a non-issue. I hear that the humor of the first game's single-player campaign is gone, but I'm trying to reserve judgment on that until I've actually played it.
My only current complaint is that spawn camping is so ridiculously effective that, so long as you hold back enough defenders to secure the objectives, you'd be an idiot to choose any other tactic.
[QUOTE="Pdiddy105"][QUOTE="Rikusaki"]
Looks like a Modern Warfare clone..
Rikusaki
besides the fact that Battlefield has been around before CoD even existed...
Did all of the Battlefield games look like this? Is Modern Warfare really a clone of Battlefield?The first Battlefield that took place in modern times came out in the summer of 2005, which was even before CoD2.
and yeah its a clone in a lot of ways. The whole ranking up/reward system was started by Battlefield 2.
I don't see any reason why that can't be X360 footage. BC1 looked amazing for 360, and I can only assume that BC2 would look better. On the other hand I expect the PC graphics to look far superior than that video.
I don't see any reason why that can't be X360 footage. BC1 looked amazing for 360, and I can only assume that BC2 would look better. On the other hand I expect the PC graphics to look far superior than that video.
2scoopsofempty
Exactly, lots of PC gamers just underestimate consoles therefore keep saying it's probably PC version running with teh 360 controller!!!:lol: seriously get over it, it's x360 version.
Another note, why would anybody keep saying it looks better than the ps3 version when only the BETA is avaliable?
[QUOTE="Eggimannd"]
[QUOTE="PAL360"]
Any prove of this?
Pdiddy105
There's no actual proof of this but like someone said before, the PS3 beta doesn't look nearly as good as this. So unless the 360 will have much better graphics than the 360 counterpart, this video was probably on PC.
The problem with the beta was that the lighting was too bright which made the graphics look washed out. The lighting on this map has been tweaked which makes a big difference.
Yeah I agree, i found Arica map in the beta way too bright, i had to toned down the brightness.
I have the beta. It sucks. Bad Company 1.1 FTL. Yeah, I said 1.1. That's basically what it is.Messiahbolical-Except, you know, BC1 was awesome. And you're among the very few posters on this board to ever say that BC2 is exactly like BC1. And there's a reason why no one else says that.
[QUOTE="Eggimannd"][QUOTE="jerkface96"]
Any prove of this?
lm2f
There's no actual proof of this but like someone said before, the PS3 beta doesn't look nearly as good as this. So unless the 360 will have much better graphics than the 360 counterpart, this video was probably on PC.
One of the reasons they gave PS3 a beta was because the game does not run as well on the PS3. I would assume the 360 version looks better than the PS3 version.how in the hell could you possibly know that??no i know exactly what you mean, its one thing to make the game feel waited like KZ2, but this one gets it wrong.[QUOTE="jerkface96"][QUOTE="BodyElite"]
Yep same here. The gameplay is too clunky if you know what i mean
Eggimannd
It gets it perfectly right. It's not supposed to be as noobey and arcadey as Call of Duty 4 is.
No i understand that, but i liked the weightiness in KZ2 more, and the running was def less clunky in that game, I dont know, i just didnt like BFBC2 that much... i think all it needs is the ability to customize weapons, with out having a perk to do so, and a prone button and its good to go .Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment