OMG new Halo 3 screen from the FINAL VERSION (56 k)

[QUOTE="smokeydabear076"][QUOTE="Bansheesdie"]

[QUOTE="Mardil"]CGI._en1gma_

in-engine actually

they were able to control and walk master chief around

[QUOTE="proof11102"][QUOTE="-Beowulf"]

[QUOTE="mrboo15"]REMEMBER THE HALO 2 TRAILER? AND THE FIRST GAMEPLAY FOOTAGE OF IT SHOWN AT E3? THE FINAL HALO 2 LOOKED ALOT WORSE THEN THE TRAILER AND THE FOOTAGE.SpruceCaboose

Ignoring your very obnoxious font...

No, Halo 2 did not look worse than the trailer.

REally? Wonder what game I was playing then? Because it sure wasn't this. If Halo 3 is lucky it'll end up looking just as good as Halo 2 was supposed to look.

    And like I said, minus the reflections in the visor (technical limitations made them remove it), Halo 2 is really close to that in real gameplay. 

Only the cut seens are, everything else is no where near it. Unless the cutseens count as gameplay in your world then no.

here is the deal though, gears of war basically had no physics compared to what halo 3 will have, and the amount of objects on screen, amount of computer controlled players in the story, amount of players online. and not to mention the vehicles of all different types, and physics for those vehicles too. the reason gears looks so good is cus of the unified architecture which can be a bad thing as well as good, they were able to dedicate more MB to GPU and take away from CPU, thats why gears looks so great but has very vew enemies and objects, kinda dumb AI, and basically no physics.-Daddy-

    Uh, Gears has great physics thanks to the Unreal 3 engine, the enemy AI is superb, especially in harder difficulties in finding cover and flanking, and the enemies are placed in a way that would benefit the cover mechanic. If you had enemies swarming from every side in droves, what point would a cover system have? There are plenty of enemies in Gears. Might I suggest playing it before you make comments about it? 

:lol: bu but teh alpha shots are tehreel shots and teh trailer iz teh CGI!!!1!11Rob2223

Why would the Trailer look better then teh Alpha shots? It came first apparently...  

[QUOTE="-Daddy-"] here is the deal though, gears of war basically had no physics compared to what halo 3 will have, and the amount of objects on screen, amount of computer controlled players in the story, amount of players online. and not to mention the vehicles of all different types, and physics for those vehicles too. the reason gears looks so good is cus of the unified architecture which can be a bad thing as well as good, they were able to dedicate more MB to GPU and take away from CPU, thats why gears looks so great but has very vew enemies and objects, kinda dumb AI, and basically no physics.SpruceCaboose

    Uh, Gears has great physics thanks to the Unreal 3 engine, the enemy AI is superb, especially in harder difficulties in finding cover and flanking, and the enemies are placed in a way that would benefit the cover mechanic. If you had enemies swarming from every side in droves, what point would a cover system have? There are plenty of enemies in Gears. Might I suggest playing it before you make comments about it? 

[QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"]

And like I said, minus the reflections in the visor (technical limitations made them remove it), Halo 2 is really close to that in real gameplay.

proof11102

Only the cut seens are, everything else is no where near it. Unless the cutseens count as gameplay in your world then no.

     A scene set in game (not gameplay, but setup just like a trailer shot would be, using real gameplay footage)

Halo 2 gameplay in FP

[QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"][QUOTE="proof11102"][QUOTE="-Beowulf"]

[QUOTE="mrboo15"]REMEMBER THE HALO 2 TRAILER? AND THE FIRST GAMEPLAY FOOTAGE OF IT SHOWN AT E3? THE FINAL HALO 2 LOOKED ALOT WORSE THEN THE TRAILER AND THE FOOTAGE.proof11102

Ignoring your very obnoxious font...

No, Halo 2 did not look worse than the trailer.

REally? Wonder what game I was playing then? Because it sure wasn't this. If Halo 3 is lucky it'll end up looking just as good as Halo 2 was supposed to look.

    And like I said, minus the reflections in the visor (technical limitations made them remove it), Halo 2 is really close to that in real gameplay. 

Only the cut seens are, everything else is no where near it. Unless the cutseens count as gameplay in your world then no.

[QUOTE="Rob2223"]:lol: bu but teh alpha shots are tehreel shots and teh trailer iz teh CGI!!!1!11GundamGuy0

Why would the Trailer look better then teh Alpha shots? It came first apparently...  

[QUOTE="mrboo15"]REMEMBER THE HALO 2 TRAILER? AND THE FIRST GAMEPLAY FOOTAGE OF IT SHOWN AT E3? THE FINAL HALO 2 LOOKED ALOT WORSE THEN THE TRAILER AND THE FOOTAGE.-Beowulf

 Ignoring your very obnoxious font...

No, Halo 2 did not look worse than the trailer. 

First Halo 2 DEBUT IN TRAILER FORM, Look how high the resolution the textures and bump mapping is on Master Cheif

Halo 2 FIRST gameplay shots ( but still from a cut scene ) Slightly lower texture and bump mapping resolution

Halo 2 FINAL RELEASE, What a complete DOWNGRADE

Looks like your wrong :| 

[QUOTE="-Beowulf"]

[QUOTE="mrboo15"]REMEMBER THE HALO 2 TRAILER? AND THE FIRST GAMEPLAY FOOTAGE OF IT SHOWN AT E3? THE FINAL HALO 2 LOOKED ALOT WORSE THEN THE TRAILER AND THE FOOTAGE.mrboo15

 Ignoring your very obnoxious font...

No, Halo 2 did not look worse than the trailer. 

First Halo 2 DEBUT IN TRAILER FORM, Look how high the resolution the textures and bump mapping is on Master Cheif

Halo 2 FIRST gameplay shots ( but still from a cut scene ) Slightly lower texture and bump mapping resolution

Halo 2 FINAL RELEASE, What a complete DOWNGRADE

Looks like your wrong :| 

[QUOTE="mrboo15"][QUOTE="-Beowulf"]

[QUOTE="mrboo15"]REMEMBER THE HALO 2 TRAILER? AND THE FIRST GAMEPLAY FOOTAGE OF IT SHOWN AT E3? THE FINAL HALO 2 LOOKED ALOT WORSE THEN THE TRAILER AND THE FOOTAGE.Rob2223

 Ignoring your very obnoxious font...

No, Halo 2 did not look worse than the trailer. 

First Halo 2 DEBUT IN TRAILER FORM, Look how high the resolution the textures and bump mapping is on Master Cheif

Halo 2 FIRST gameplay shots ( but still from a cut scene ) Slightly lower texture and bump mapping resolution

Halo 2 FINAL RELEASE, What a complete DOWNGRADE

Looks like your wrong :| 

There ALL from cut-scenes, how could i show gameplay scenes from the trailer? :roll: 

If you want gameplay screens then, it concludes that Halo 3 sucks graphical ass because we cant use the trailer shots as its not gameplay 

[QUOTE="Rob2223"][QUOTE="mrboo15"][QUOTE="-Beowulf"]

[QUOTE="mrboo15"]REMEMBER THE HALO 2 TRAILER? AND THE FIRST GAMEPLAY FOOTAGE OF IT SHOWN AT E3? THE FINAL HALO 2 LOOKED ALOT WORSE THEN THE TRAILER AND THE FOOTAGE.mrboo15

 Ignoring your very obnoxious font...

No, Halo 2 did not look worse than the trailer. 

First Halo 2 DEBUT IN TRAILER FORM, Look how high the resolution the textures and bump mapping is on Master Cheif

Halo 2 FIRST gameplay shots ( but still from a cut scene ) Slightly lower texture and bump mapping resolution

Halo 2 FINAL RELEASE, What a complete DOWNGRADE

Looks like your wrong :| 

There ALL from cut-scenes, how could i show gameplay scenes from the trailer? :roll: 

If you want gameplay screens then, it concludes that Halo 3 sucks graphical ass because we cant use the trailer shots as its not gameplay 

[QUOTE="mrboo15"][QUOTE="Rob2223"][QUOTE="mrboo15"][QUOTE="-Beowulf"]

[QUOTE="mrboo15"]REMEMBER THE HALO 2 TRAILER? AND THE FIRST GAMEPLAY FOOTAGE OF IT SHOWN AT E3? THE FINAL HALO 2 LOOKED ALOT WORSE THEN THE TRAILER AND THE FOOTAGE.Rob2223

Ignoring your very obnoxious font...

No, Halo 2 did not look worse than the trailer.

First Halo 2 DEBUT IN TRAILER FORM, Look how high the resolution the textures and bump mapping is on Master Cheif

Halo 2 FIRST gameplay shots ( but still from a cut scene ) Slightly lower texture and bump mapping resolution

Halo 2 FINAL RELEASE, What a complete DOWNGRADE

Looks like your wrong :|

There ALL from cut-scenes, how could i show gameplay scenes from the trailer? :roll:

If you want gameplay screens then, it concludes that Halo 3 sucks graphical ass because we cant use the trailer shots as its not gameplay

dont worry.  halo 3 will own more than both halo 1 and halo 2 did combined lol

[QUOTE="proof11102"][QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"][QUOTE="proof11102"][QUOTE="-Beowulf"]

[QUOTE="mrboo15"]REMEMBER THE HALO 2 TRAILER? AND THE FIRST GAMEPLAY FOOTAGE OF IT SHOWN AT E3? THE FINAL HALO 2 LOOKED ALOT WORSE THEN THE TRAILER AND THE FOOTAGE.Rob2223

Ignoring your very obnoxious font...

No, Halo 2 did not look worse than the trailer.

REally? Wonder what game I was playing then? Because it sure wasn't this. If Halo 3 is lucky it'll end up looking just as good as Halo 2 was supposed to look.

    And like I said, minus the reflections in the visor (technical limitations made them remove it), Halo 2 is really close to that in real gameplay. 

Only the cut seens are, everything else is no where near it. Unless the cutseens count as gameplay in your world then no.

here I've made a better comparison,  sorry but you're wasting your time with this argument.  I've played the game, and so have alot of other people and it looks no where near the promo that was released before the game came out. 

[QUOTE="-Daddy-"] here is the deal though, gears of war basically had no physics compared to what halo 3 will have, and the amount of objects on screen, amount of computer controlled players in the story, amount of players online. and not to mention the vehicles of all different types, and physics for those vehicles too. the reason gears looks so good is cus of the unified architecture which can be a bad thing as well as good, they were able to dedicate more MB to GPU and take away from CPU, thats why gears looks so great but has very vew enemies and objects, kinda dumb AI, and basically no physics.SpruceCaboose

    Uh, Gears has great physics thanks to the Unreal 3 engine, the enemy AI is superb, especially in harder difficulties in finding cover and flanking, and the enemies are placed in a way that would benefit the cover mechanic. If you had enemies swarming from every side in droves, what point would a cover system have? There are plenty of enemies in Gears. Might I suggest playing it before you make comments about it? 

[QUOTE="proof11102"][QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"]

And like I said, minus the reflections in the visor (technical limitations made them remove it), Halo 2 is really close to that in real gameplay.

SpruceCaboose

Only the cut seens are, everything else is no where near it. Unless the cutseens count as gameplay in your world then no.

     A scene set in game (not gameplay, but setup just like a trailer shot would be, using real gameplay footage)

Halo 2 gameplay in FP

You do know that that last pic comes form the BS presentation that Bill gates put on at CES befor the game came out that ended up being nothing like the final game right?  And you also know posting that is selfownage?

real Halo 2 ingame graphics

seriously. stop posting Alpha pics and claiming ownage

the final game will look like the above pictureRob2223

hahahahaahahahahahahahahah at u thinking thats what the finel game will look like with 16 players on the screen at ounce, ahhaahahahahahah

CGI.Mardil

then how come Gears of War looks better ? 

[QUOTE="-Daddy-"][QUOTE="callmewaffle"]

[QUOTE="danneswegman"]no it will not look like that.SpruceCaboose

Too late, it already does.

And why can't people realize that Alpha builds are not anywhere near release form?

dude they're completely ignoring that is an Alpha build because they dont want to belive the game will end up looking great. just wait untill the beta release and they will stop ..it was the same with gears of war 

I'll agree with you that the Video showing Halo 3 in its alpha stages of development is not what the final game's graphics will look like, but in NO way will it look like that CGI screen shot you posted.dark_templar_99

I'll agree with you that the Video showing Halo 3 in its alpha stages of development is not what the final game's graphics will look like, but in NO way will it look like that CGI screen shot you posted.dark_templar_99

thats not CGI.. 

CGI.Mardil

In-game. :) You didn't see the gamespot story where they demoed it and MC was controllable? 

CGI.Mardil

 That's the actual game they showed it was in-game footage of the single player campaign, that is not pre-alpha footage however. Anyways, let's let all people be fooled thinking it looks like the pre-alpha pics, once it comes out there will be quite a surprise I'm sure.

confirmed Realtime.Rob2223

thats not CGI.. lawlessx

In-game. :) You didn't see the gamespot story where they demoed it and MC was controllable? Ninja-Vox

[QUOTE="Rob2223"]

confirmed Realtime.-Daddy-

thats not CGI.. lawlessx

[QUOTE="Rob2223"]
confirmed Realtime.-Daddy-

thats not CGI.. lawlessx

In-game. :) You didn't see the gamespot story where they demoed it and MC was controllable? Ninja-Vox

 When the MC is controllable.. yes it is gameplay, how can you control a character in a video game not in-game? This is not Square-Enix here, these guys don't rely in trailers that much and they use the actual game engine for cut-scnenes.

[QUOTE="Rob2223"]
confirmed Realtime.-Daddy-

thats not CGI.. lawlessx

In-game. :) You didn't see the gamespot story where they demoed it and MC was controllable? Ninja-Vox

first off,when did i say realtime= gameplay?..oh wait..i didnt. and is there a reason why haters such as yourself ignore the fact that bungie has only release pre-alpha videos of halo3? i always see people brushing that fact away as if it doesnt mean anything when it means everything...cows seem to belive bungie are showing off what they have for halo3 right now..witch was already proven false countless times by bungie and microsoft..

If you think games are going to look like CGI trailers then why aren't you hyping Killzone2 over Halo3? I mean that CGI trailer was far more impressive. Halo3 looks exactly like what we've seen from the alpha. They're obviously going to polish animations and add some more detail, but that is the basic look...... and there is hardly a difference between it and Halo2, period.Lazy_Boy88

halo3 has only been shown in its alpha and pre-alpha version...which arent that much of a jump like from alpha to beta :| 

CGI.Mardil

No, that was an in-engine trailer. I suppose next you're going to tell me that Bungie paid every one of those gaming websites to report that they saw it controlable.

[QUOTE="-Daddy-"][QUOTE="Rob2223"]
confirmed Realtime.themyth01

thats not CGI.. lawlessx

In-game. :) You didn't see the gamespot story where they demoed it and MC was controllable? Ninja-Vox

 When the MC is controllable.. yes it is gameplay, how can you control a character in a video game not in-game? This is not Square-Enix here, these guys don't rely in trailers that much and they use the actual game engine for cut-scnenes.

[QUOTE="themyth01"]

[QUOTE="-Daddy-"][QUOTE="Rob2223"]
confirmed Realtime.-Daddy-

thats not CGI.. lawlessx

In-game. :) You didn't see the gamespot story where they demoed it and MC was controllable? Ninja-Vox

When the MC is controllable.. yes it is gameplay, how can you control a character in a video game not in-game? This is not Square-Enix here, these guys don't rely in trailers that much and they use the actual game engine for cut-scnenes.

.......what on earth are you talking about..do you even know what selfowange is? 

[QUOTE="-Daddy-"][QUOTE="Rob2223"]
confirmed Realtime.lawlessx

thats not CGI.. lawlessx

In-game. :) You didn't see the gamespot story where they demoed it and MC was controllable? Ninja-Vox

first off,when did i say realtime= gameplay?..oh wait..i didnt. and is there a reason why haters such as yourself ignore the fact that bungie has only release pre-alpha videos of halo3? i always see people brushing that fact away as if it doesnt mean anything when it means everything...cows seem to belive bungie are showing off what they have for halo3 right now..witch was already proven false countless times by bungie and microsoft..

[QUOTE="-Daddy-"][QUOTE="themyth01"]

[QUOTE="-Daddy-"][QUOTE="Rob2223"]
confirmed Realtime.lawlessx

thats not CGI.. lawlessx

In-game. :) You didn't see the gamespot story where they demoed it and MC was controllable? Ninja-Vox

When the MC is controllable.. yes it is gameplay, how can you control a character in a video game not in-game? This is not Square-Enix here, these guys don't rely in trailers that much and they use the actual game engine for cut-scnenes.

.......what on earth are you talking about..do you even know what selfowange is? 

HAH. Someone obviously didn't see the making if video.

CGI.Mardil

[QUOTE="lawlessx"][QUOTE="-Daddy-"][QUOTE="themyth01"]

[QUOTE="-Daddy-"][QUOTE="Rob2223"]
confirmed Realtime.-Daddy-

thats not CGI.. lawlessx

In-game. :) You didn't see the gamespot story where they demoed it and MC was controllable? Ninja-Vox

When the MC is controllable.. yes it is gameplay, how can you control a character in a video game not in-game? This is not Square-Enix here, these guys don't rely in trailers that much and they use the actual game engine for cut-scnenes.

.......what on earth are you talking about..do you even know what selfowange is?

his post doesnt fall under selfownage..that was my point..i never agreed with this post saying MC was controlled in the video because i saw the video myself and only the camera around the MC was being controlled proving the trailer wasnt CGI.. next time try not assume things so quickly

:lol: bu but teh alpha shots are tehreel shots and teh trailer iz teh CGI!!!1!11Rob2223

There is a lot of hate focused on one game. I don't see this much Killzone hate from the lems, unless the cows bring up "teh downgrade!" of Halo 3.

These arguments are rather fruitless untill we see the beta.

[QUOTE="-Daddy-"][QUOTE="lawlessx"][QUOTE="-Daddy-"][QUOTE="themyth01"] When the MC is controllable.. yes it is gameplay, how can you control a character in a video game not in-game? This is not Square-Enix here, these guys don't rely in trailers that much and they use the actual game engine for cut-scnenes.

lawlessx

.......what on earth are you talking about..do you even know what selfowange is?

his post doesnt fall under selfownage..that was my point..i never agreed with this post saying MC was controlled in the video because i saw the video myself and only the camera around the MC was being controlled proving the trailer wasnt CGI.. next time try not assume things so quickly

[QUOTE="lawlessx"] first off,when did i say realtime= gameplay?..oh wait..i didnt. and is there a reason why haters such as yourself ignore the fact that bungie has only release pre-alpha videos of halo3? i always see people brushing that fact away as if it doesnt mean anything when it means everything...cows seem to belive bungie are showing off what they have for halo3 right now..witch was already proven false countless times by bungie and microsoft..-Daddy-