[QUOTE="NextGenNow"][QUOTE="istreakforfood"][QUOTE="NextGenNow"] [QUOTE="greg_splicer"]Haze will look best on 360 anyway, so what is the deal ? Even games that are released same time lok best on 360, imagine if they delay it too !!! Will look 2x better than PS3 versionistreakforfood
You're in for a ruuuude awakening lol
The only reason multiplats have looked better on 360 is cuz they were designed for it then ported to far differnet technology. Now that this game is being optimized for PS3 THEN ported lol you're gonna get the crap version. :lol:
Quote me on that...I KNOW it's what's gonna happen. Most likely the reason they stopped making it for 360 was cuz they realized early on 360 limited physics and particle effects were lacking LOL!
Quote me
Then take a look at Resistance...360 would PERISH if it even attempted physics and partcile effects like that...not to mention draw distance lol @ oblivion on 360! Teh fity fooot I can see no more KthanksBye LOL!
Â
lol whatever helps you sleep at night.
resistance wasnt that great. i can say for ppl who are big fans of fps or been playing over the years resistance was another generic fps game that brought nothing new to fps genre. seriously the thing that turned me off was it felt like i played the game before cause gameplay was so similar to other fps games that have come and gone. Others who havent really played fps as much or new to it but think otherwise. Its like comparing enchantment arms in the same level as FF.
I own or have owned every FPS this gen and last. So if you REALLY wanna walk into this debate I will....gladly. We can talk 360 FPS games....we can talk how R6 downgrades the hell outta its multiplayer graphics...or we can talk Prey with an atrocious online....and terrible AI....or we could get real nasty and talk PDZ....the only good multiplayer FPS worth its saltt on 360 right now is CoD3 which is better than the PS3 version. But if you REALLY wanna compare that to Resistance...a game that makes the joke that is Halo 3 stats look like a Dora game lets do it....lol @ 360....a console for shooters yet they have nothing to top R:FoM
so are you saying rvs gameplay is horrible cause the graphics are toned down compare to the single player. rsv is one of the better fps games that came out this gen on console. one of the reason they toned down the graphics was cause you can put your face on the characters on xbl and lag issues that ppl might have due to playing online. PS3 has 40 player games with zero lag. Plus it's free..so this does little for me other than make me say O RLY. The game while very tactical misses the mark becuz of graphics..I mean come on!! Sacrafice some customizations for gameplay ANYDAY.
Prey had nice graphics and was very detailed(speaking on PC perspectives). it was innovating with the whole moving 360, but gameplay was mediocre. Agreed, a shame too, because the game had some amazing potential..that and for those of us following it like Duke Nukem Forever, it was a tad bit lacking...though I commend it's single player for parts...it was basically a a game made for parts...
COD3 good game but i lost interest in ww2 games after mohaa and cod1 on pc. the spawn camping killed it as well. campaign was worth playing. CoD 3 is one of the better online Xbox 360 games. It is also the reason I have faith in CoD4 as much as I do...
 so you played halo 3 huh. thats nice. :roll: Played the beta..and I know enough about betas to know they represent the 95 percent final build of any game engine. As for the stats..the rank structure..it was literally arcadey compared to Resistance....I won't even discuss the 2D particle effects...
Answered
Log in to comment