http://p.twipple.jp/0vG60
PS4 a beast confirmed
inb4hermits
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Deep down sounds like the sequel to Deep Throat.Â
Â
[spoiler] A great film to watch with your parents in the room. :) [/spoiler]
Dat damage control...this topic is not even about unreal engine 4. It's all about GDDR5 now.http://www.dsogaming.com/news/unreal-engine-4-not-as-impressive-on-ps4-as-on-pc-comparison-between-elemental-pc-ps4-demos/
lunar1122
LOL, of all the stupid things to get hyped over, this has to be the stupidest.
Maybe I could see the picture of his **** TV better if he took the time too clean the damn thing.
Â
Â
L0mak
Â
This is likely captured from a development studio. There is a chance Ono stolid a Ps4 dev kit and hooked it up to his dirty old TVÂ monitor to play a demo.
Â
. . . But I sincerely doubt it.
Off screen bad camera compressed blurry small image is supposed to be impressive? :? Jesus people are desperate for ownage this weather
The lighting however does look inetresting. Really hope the game can look similar to the demo, I would love to play it, really seems like my type of game. Also is it a console only, PS4 only or multiplat game?Â
lulz, console dudes get 6 month old mid range pc gfx... go bananas.
i mean sure i love consoles and all but can we try to be real just once in sw?
Â
lulz, console dudes get 6 month old mid range pc gfx... go bananas.
i mean sure i love consoles and all but can we try to be real just once in sw?
Â
Riverwolf007
Graphics are not everything. Something PC enthusiasts can't seem to understand.
[QUOTE="Riverwolf007"]
lulz, console dudes get 6 month old mid range pc gfx... go bananas.
i mean sure i love consoles and all but can we try to be real just once in sw?
Â
StrongBlackVine
Graphics are not everything. Something PC enthusiasts can't seem to understand.
A smooth frame rate is nice to have, right?[QUOTE="Riverwolf007"]
lulz, console dudes get 6 month old mid range pc gfx... go bananas.
i mean sure i love consoles and all but can we try to be real just once in sw?
Â
StrongBlackVine
Graphics are not everything. Something PC enthusiasts can't seem to understand.
i'm not saying gfx are everything.i'm saying when new consoles come out that at best the games look like 6 to 12 month old mid to high range pc gfx.
there is nothing wrong with that it is just the way things work.
the new ps4 and nextbox games are basically going to look like modded skyrim on a  $1,000 pc.
it's not some kind of emotional argument i'm trying to make here just an observation about how reality works.
[QUOTE="Riverwolf007"]
lulz, console dudes get 6 month old mid range pc gfx... go bananas.
i mean sure i love consoles and all but can we try to be real just once in sw?
Â
StrongBlackVine
Graphics are not everything. Something PC enthusiasts can't seem to understand.
That's not what he said and judging by consolites reactions these days to stuff like the PS4 and Killzone SF and Deep Down, I'd say they are lumped into that category along with herms
Assuming the game was being ran on the PS4 Console itself is rather silly. I presume the console itself isn't even ready. That was probably (And again) ran on a PS4 like custom PC. Although the poster did say it was running on PS4, Maybe he stole the image from anywhere else and then created a hoax.faizan_faizan
Probably just running on a dev kit
[QUOTE="faizan_faizan"]Assuming the game was being ran on the PS4 Console itself is rather silly. I presume the console itself isn't even ready. That was probably (And again) ran on a PS4 like custom PC. Although the poster did say it was running on PS4, Maybe he stole the image from anywhere else and then created a hoax.seanmcloughlin
Probably just running on a dev kit
I meant that when I said "PS4 like custom PC".[QUOTE="StrongBlackVine"]
[QUOTE="Riverwolf007"]
lulz, console dudes get 6 month old mid range pc gfx... go bananas.
i mean sure i love consoles and all but can we try to be real just once in sw?
Â
seanmcloughlin
Graphics are not everything. Something PC enthusiasts can't seem to understand.
That's not what he said and judging by consolites reactions these days to stuff like the PS4 and Killzone SF and Deep Down, I'd say they are lumped into that category along with herms
Well any one would be lying if they say they didn't want their games to look nice, but it isn't the top priority like it seems to be for most hermits. I am still enjoying visuals in games like Tomb Raider and Dead Space 3 that you probably think look like crap.
[QUOTE="Riverwolf007"]
lulz, console dudes get 6 month old mid range pc gfx... go bananas.
i mean sure i love consoles and all but can we try to be real just once in sw?
Â
StrongBlackVine
Graphics are not everything. Something PC enthusiasts can't seem to understand.
Explain that to Cows who's created that monster Killzone VS Crysis thread.[QUOTE="StrongBlackVine"][QUOTE="Riverwolf007"]
lulz, console dudes get 6 month old mid range pc gfx... go bananas.
i mean sure i love consoles and all but can we try to be real just once in sw?
Â
clyde46
Graphics are not everything. Something PC enthusiasts can't seem to understand.
Explain that to Cows who's created that monster Killzone VS Crysis thread.I thought Crysis 3 already settled this by failing commercially and critically. Exhibit #1 that graphics are not the most important thing.
[QUOTE="StrongBlackVine"]
[QUOTE="Riverwolf007"]
lulz, console dudes get 6 month old mid range pc gfx... go bananas.
i mean sure i love consoles and all but can we try to be real just once in sw?
Â
Michael0134567
Graphics are not everything. Something PC enthusiasts can't seem to understand.
A smooth frame rate is nice to have, right?Â
Not to bump in but, smooth frame rates can be achieved on almost any device with a computer chip and RAM.Â
Â
Why do you think handheld gaming has survived for so long despite having weaker processor tech?Â
Â
A smooth frame rate is nice to have, right?[QUOTE="Michael0134567"]
[QUOTE="StrongBlackVine"]
Graphics are not everything. Something PC enthusiasts can't seem to understand.
wakefulness
Â
Not to bump in but, smooth frame rates can be achieved on almost any device with a computer chip and RAM.Â
Â
Why do you think handheld gaming has survived for so long despite having weaker processor tech?Â
Â
What do you mean? Please elaborate.Explain that to Cows who's created that monster Killzone VS Crysis thread.[QUOTE="clyde46"][QUOTE="StrongBlackVine"]
Graphics are not everything. Something PC enthusiasts can't seem to understand.
StrongBlackVine
I thought Crysis 3 already settled this by failing commercially and critically. Exhibit #1 that graphics are not the most important thing.
Why change the subject?Deep down sounds like the sequel to Deep Throat.Â
Â
[spoiler] A great film to watch with your parents in the room. :) [/spoiler]
wakefulness
Â
You must mean the Richard Nixon scandal.
A smooth frame rate is nice to have, right?[QUOTE="Michael0134567"]
[QUOTE="StrongBlackVine"]
Graphics are not everything. Something PC enthusiasts can't seem to understand.
wakefulness
Â
Not to bump in but, smooth frame rates can be achieved on almost any device with a computer chip and RAM.Â
Â
Why do you think handheld gaming has survived for so long despite having weaker processor tech?Â
Â
Yeah I know, but I know the PC can have more frames per second, making games smoother.Â
Explain that to Cows who's created that monster Killzone VS Crysis thread.[QUOTE="clyde46"][QUOTE="StrongBlackVine"]
Graphics are not everything. Something PC enthusiasts can't seem to understand.
StrongBlackVine
I thought Crysis 3 already settled this by failing commercially and critically. Exhibit #1 that graphics are not the most important thing.
Crysis IS about the graphics though.[QUOTE="StrongBlackVine"][QUOTE="clyde46"] Explain that to Cows who's created that monster Killzone VS Crysis thread.clyde46
I thought Crysis 3 already settled this by failing commercially and critically. Exhibit #1 that graphics are not the most important thing.
Crysis IS about the graphics though.Yeah and it was a huge fail despite being the standard in visuals.
Crysis IS about the graphics though.[QUOTE="clyde46"][QUOTE="StrongBlackVine"]
I thought Crysis 3 already settled this by failing commercially and critically. Exhibit #1 that graphics are not the most important thing.
StrongBlackVine
Yeah and it was a huge fail despite being the standard in visuals.
Are you talking about the 3rd one or the series as a whole?Crysis IS about the graphics though.[QUOTE="clyde46"][QUOTE="StrongBlackVine"]
I thought Crysis 3 already settled this by failing commercially and critically. Exhibit #1 that graphics are not the most important thing.
StrongBlackVine
Yeah and it was a huge fail despite being the standard in visuals.
Crysis as a series has been commercially successful. Yes they may of not scored as well as say Uncharted or Halo but they are a very popular series of games. Crysis always has been about pushing graphics. Hell I thought that Crysis 1 was only good while you were fighting the Koreans, the second half of the game was meh.Crysis IS about the graphics though.[QUOTE="clyde46"][QUOTE="StrongBlackVine"]
I thought Crysis 3 already settled this by failing commercially and critically. Exhibit #1 that graphics are not the most important thing.
StrongBlackVine
Yeah and it was a huge fail despite being the standard in visuals.
Â
Huge fail? maybe. Still a decent game worth playing.
Â
Â
[QUOTE="StrongBlackVine"][QUOTE="clyde46"] Crysis IS about the graphics though.faizan_faizan
Yeah and it was a huge fail despite being the standard in visuals.
Are you talking about the 3rd one or the series as a whole?Just the 3rd one.
Are you talking about the 3rd one or the series as a whole?[QUOTE="faizan_faizan"][QUOTE="StrongBlackVine"]
Yeah and it was a huge fail despite being the standard in visuals.
StrongBlackVine
Just the 3rd one.
Relevant.[QUOTE="StrongBlackVine"]
[QUOTE="clyde46"] Crysis IS about the graphics though.FashionFreak
Yeah and it was a huge fail despite being the standard in visuals.
Â
Huge fail? maybe. Still a decent game worth playing.
Â
Â
The thing about about those graphics is yes they look great, but boring a the same time. I don't like the jungle setting much. Although I guess it is good for showing off the foilage.
[QUOTE="FashionFreak"]
[QUOTE="StrongBlackVine"]
Yeah and it was a huge fail despite being the standard in visuals.
StrongBlackVine
Â
Huge fail? maybe. Still a decent game worth playing.
Â
Â
The thing about about those graphics is yes they look great, but boring a the same time. I don't like the jungle setting much. Although I guess it is good for showing off the foilage.
3rd game was a LOT open than Crysis 2.[QUOTE="wakefulness"]
[QUOTE="Michael0134567"] A smooth frame rate is nice to have, right?
Michael0134567
Â
Not to bump in but, smooth frame rates can be achieved on almost any device with a computer chip and RAM.Â
Â
Why do you think handheld gaming has survived for so long despite having weaker processor tech?Â
Â
Yeah I know, but I know the PC can have more frames per second, making games smoother.Â
Â
What metrics are you using to prove this?
Â
Edit: I mean, what is the 'smooth-osity' of frames-per-second? And do you think it's really an exclusive thing to have? (bc I just said it wasn't)
Like i been saying, nothing looks as good as Deep Down or Knack on PCxboxiphoneps3You haven't played PC Games then. I think Crysis 3 holds up to Deep Down pretty well. And I watched the uncompressed video.
[QUOTE="Michael0134567"]
[QUOTE="wakefulness"]
Â
Not to bump in but, smooth frame rates can be achieved on almost any device with a computer chip and RAM.Â
Â
Why do you think handheld gaming has survived for so long despite having weaker processor tech?Â
Â
wakefulness
Yeah I know, but I know the PC can have more frames per second, making games smoother.Â
Â
What metrics are you using to prove this?
I'm not a PC gamer, but I do know PC games can have higher frames per second.[QUOTE="Michael0134567"]
[QUOTE="wakefulness"]
Â
Not to bump in but, smooth frame rates can be achieved on almost any device with a computer chip and RAM.Â
Â
Why do you think handheld gaming has survived for so long despite having weaker processor tech?Â
Â
wakefulness
Yeah I know, but I know the PC can have more frames per second, making games smoother.Â
Â
What metrics are you using to prove this?
Â
Edit: I mean, what is the 'smooth-osity' of frames-per-second? And do you think it's really an exclusive thing to have? (bc I just said it wasn't)
Once you go 45FPS or more, You're never going back to consoles unless you really want to.[QUOTE="wakefulness"]
[QUOTE="Michael0134567"]
Yeah I know, but I know the PC can have more frames per second, making games smoother.Â
Michael0134567
Â
What metrics are you using to prove this?
I'm not a PC gamer, but I do know PC games can have higher frames per second.Â
You can have all the frames you want on a chip with more flops. But, what's (scientifically) a "smooth" fps range?Â
Â
Bc if a console can pull of that optical illusion, than it will meet your requisite of wanting "smooth" motion in a game. That's all I'm saying.
[QUOTE="wakefulness"][QUOTE="Michael0134567"]
Yeah I know, but I know the PC can have more frames per second, making games smoother.Â
faizan_faizan
Â
What metrics are you using to prove this?
Â
Edit: I mean, what is the 'smooth-osity' of frames-per-second? And do you think it's really an exclusive thing to have? (bc I just said it wasn't)
Once you go 45FPS or more, You're never going back to consoles unless you really want to.Â
If that's the case, than next gen will (more likely than not) be able to meet that level.
Â
That's what I meant.Â
Seems cows are locked in a cycle of hypocrisy these days, they'll gladly tout the "superior graphics capabilities" of the PS4, insult the 720 for being "weak" based on some rumors, try to pit KZ:SF against best looking PC titles, but when their idiocy backfires and they get proven wrong, it's back to the "graphics don't matter!"
Gotta love the SW! :)
I'm not a PC gamer, but I do know PC games can have higher frames per second.[QUOTE="Michael0134567"]
[QUOTE="wakefulness"]
Â
What metrics are you using to prove this?
wakefulness
Â
You can have all the frames you want on a chip with more flops. But, what's (scientifically) a "smooth" fps range?Â
Â
Bc if a console can pull of that optical illusion, than it will meet your requisite of wanting "smooth" motion in a game. That's all I'm saying.
The answer would be 60FPS. Modern Consoles games cant even maintain a consistent 30FPS. They go down to 15FPS.Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment