Other than Halo4 what exactly is there to play this year on xbox?

[QUOTE="TintedEyes"][QUOTE="sts106mat"] but saying "downloadable games don't count" makes sense.sts106mat

the list is a mess, people are still arguing about games that should / should not be included. thats what makes it stupid.

i have never even looked at the spreadsheet once.

GRAW was a launch title on the 360, seven years ago. people are still arguing about its inclusion on this list today.

many people and reviewers have said before that many arcade / downloadable titles have more content / longevity / value thansome full price retail games.

the whole "my system has more games than yours if you dont count these type of games" argument is dumb.

it should be number of games released and thats it.

people argued about mlb the show being exclusive on the ps3 too

people are going to have problems with it because they want their console of choice to do better on it. but it makes sense, most downloadable game would get destroyed for 60 dollars, at 15 - 10 they are rated lightly and are not to be included with retail end of.

thats my problem with it, the value is placed on the game according to how much money its sold for. those downloadable games are still games. Retail games might be dearer but not necessarily better value and in many cases are actually lower value. look at the likes of them movie-tie in games, really short campaigns, little to no multiplayer selling for £40.

but trials evo as a recent example has potentially limitless playtime due to a single player & multiplayer modes plus, user created content etc. which is better value in terms of money spent and enjoyment? thats why they should count and those people who argue "they shouldn't count" only have one motive.

theres a good chance that next gen, downloadable games will be the norm, many 360 retail releases come out on the downloadable marketplace pretty soon anyway. then what do we just start saying "full price dowloads only count"?

sts106mat

[QUOTE="TintedEyes"]

[QUOTE="sts106mat"]

thats my problem with it, the value is placed on the game according to how much money its sold for. those downloadable games are still games. Retail games might be dearer but not necessarily better value and in many cases are actually lower value. look at the likes of them movie-tie in games, really short campaigns, little to no multiplayer selling for £40.

but trials evo as a recent example has potentially limitless playtime due to a single player & multiplayer modes plus, user created content etc. which is better value in terms of money spent and enjoyment? thats why they should count and those people who argue "they shouldn't count" only have one motive.

theres a good chance that next gen, downloadable games will be the norm, many 360 retail releases come out on the downloadable marketplace pretty soon anyway. then what do we just start saying "full price dowloads only count"?

sts106mat

[QUOTE="TintedEyes"]

[QUOTE="sts106mat"]

the list is a mess, people are still arguing about games that should / should not be included. thats what makes it stupid.

i have never even looked at the spreadsheet once.

GRAW was a launch title on the 360, seven years ago. people are still arguing about its inclusion on this list today.

many people and reviewers have said before that many arcade / downloadable titles have more content / longevity / value thansome full price retail games.

the whole "my system has more games than yours if you dont count these type of games" argument is dumb.

it should be number of games released and thats it.

sts106mat

people argued about mlb the show being exclusive on the ps3 too

people are going to have problems with it because they want their console of choice to do better on it. but it makes sense, most downloadable game would get destroyed for 60 dollars, at 15 - 10 they are rated lightly and are not to be included with retail end of.

thats my problem with it, the value is placed on the game according to how much money its sold for. those downloadable games are still games. Retail games might be dearer but not necessarily better value and in many cases are actually lower value. look at the likes of them movie-tie in games, really short campaigns, little to no multiplayer selling for £40.

but trials evo as a recent example has potentially limitless playtime due to a single player & multiplayer modes plus, user created content etc. which is better value in terms of money spent and enjoyment? thats why they should count and those people who argue "they shouldn't count" only have one motive.

theres a good chance that next gen, downloadable games will be the norm, many 360 retail releases come out on the downloadable marketplace pretty soon anyway. then what do we just start saying "full price dowloads only count"?

[QUOTE="sts106mat"]

[QUOTE="TintedEyes"]

people argued about mlb the show being exclusive on the ps3 too

people are going to have problems with it because they want their console of choice to do better on it. but it makes sense, most downloadable game would get destroyed for 60 dollars, at 15 - 10 they are rated lightly and are not to be included with retail end of.

delta3074

thats my problem with it, the value is placed on the game according to how much money its sold for. those downloadable games are still games. Retail games might be dearer but not necessarily better value and in many cases are actually lower value. look at the likes of them movie-tie in games, really short campaigns, little to no multiplayer selling for £40.

but trials evo as a recent example has potentially limitless playtime due to a single player & multiplayer modes plus, user created content etc. which is better value in terms of money spent and enjoyment? thats why they should count and those people who argue "they shouldn't count" only have one motive.

theres a good chance that next gen, downloadable games will be the norm, many 360 retail releases come out on the downloadable marketplace pretty soon anyway. then what do we just start saying "full price dowloads only count"?

Only weeks away and the comp has nothin like it...

http://www.metatube.com/en/videos/130790/Steel-Battalion-Heavy-Armor-Tutorial-Trailer-2012-HD/

First AAAE Kinect game me thinks. :o :P

Only weeks away and the comp has nothin like it...

http://www.metatube.com/en/videos/130790/Steel-Battalion-Heavy-Armor-Tutorial-Trailer-2012-HD/

First AAAE Kinect game me thinks. :o :P

SecretPolice

[QUOTE="SecretPolice"]

Only weeks away and the comp has nothin like it...

http://www.metatube.com/en/videos/130790/Steel-Battalion-Heavy-Armor-Tutorial-Trailer-2012-HD/

First AAAE Kinect game me thinks. :o :P

Heil68

And SB:HA just might make it worth if for the core gamers as well. :P

[QUOTE="SecretPolice"]

Only weeks away and the comp has nothin like it...

http://www.metatube.com/en/videos/130790/Steel-Battalion-Heavy-Armor-Tutorial-Trailer-2012-HD/

First AAAE Kinect game me thinks. :o :P

sts106mat

We shall see.

[QUOTE="TintedEyes"][QUOTE="sts106mat"] but saying "downloadable games don't count" makes sense.sts106mat

the list is a mess, people are still arguing about games that should / should not be included. thats what makes it stupid.

i have never even looked at the spreadsheet once.

GRAW was a launch title on the 360, seven years ago. people are still arguing about its inclusion on this list today.

many people and reviewers have said before that many arcade / downloadable titles have more content / longevity / value thansome full price retail games.

the whole "my system has more games than yours if you dont count these type of games" argument is dumb.

it should be number of games released and thats it.

And was it changed? Was it? NO! so what are you crying about?

The people who complained were told that this was the ruling (by the acting mod Casey Wager who ruled over the spreadsheet and all the lemmings agreed was fact) even though it was a special rule made up that only helped the 360 library, so what's your argument now?

What those rules that were once favored by lems aren't good anymore because it doesn't make the 360 look good anymore? lol Lemmings are the most desperate and pathetic fanboys.

[QUOTE="sts106mat"]

[QUOTE="TintedEyes"] that's the way system wars does it in the list, downloadable games are cheap and rated on a different scale, makes sense not to put them up against retail games for 60.casharmy

the list is a mess, people are still arguing about games that should / should not be included. thats what makes it stupid.

i have never even looked at the spreadsheet once.

GRAW was a launch title on the 360, seven years ago. people are still arguing about its inclusion on this list today.

many people and reviewers have said before that many arcade / downloadable titles have more content / longevity / value thansome full price retail games.

the whole "my system has more games than yours if you dont count these type of games" argument is dumb.

it should be number of games released and thats it.

And was it changed? Was it? NO! so what are you crying about?

The people who complained were told that this was the ruling (by the acting mod Casey Wager who ruled over the spreadsheet and all the lemmings agreed was fact) even though it was a special rule made up that only helped the 360 library, so what's your argument now?

What those rules that were once favored by lems aren't good anymore because it doesn't make the 360 look good anymore? lol Lemmings are the most desperate and pathetic fanboys.

didn't derpEnds just make this exact thread yesterday?shadow_hosi

STOP COPYING COWS

[QUOTE="sts106mat"]

[QUOTE="TintedEyes"] that's the way system wars does it in the list, downloadable games are cheap and rated on a different scale, makes sense not to put them up against retail games for 60.casharmy

the list is a mess, people are still arguing about games that should / should not be included. thats what makes it stupid.

i have never even looked at the spreadsheet once.

GRAW was a launch title on the 360, seven years ago. people are still arguing about its inclusion on this list today.

many people and reviewers have said before that many arcade / downloadable titles have more content / longevity / value thansome full price retail games.

the whole "my system has more games than yours if you dont count these type of games" argument is dumb.

it should be number of games released and thats it.

And was it changed? Was it? NO! so what are you crying about?

The people who complained were told that this was the ruling (by the acting mod Casey Wager who ruled over the spreadsheet and all the lemmings agreed was fact) even though it was a special rule made up that only helped the 360 library, so what's your argument now?

What those rules that were once favored by lems aren't good anymore because it doesn't make the 360 look good anymore? lol Lemmings are the most desperate and pathetic fanboys.

[QUOTE="casharmy"]

[QUOTE="sts106mat"]

the list is a mess, people are still arguing about games that should / should not be included. thats what makes it stupid.

i have never even looked at the spreadsheet once.

GRAW was a launch title on the 360, seven years ago. people are still arguing about its inclusion on this list today.

many people and reviewers have said before that many arcade / downloadable titles have more content / longevity / value thansome full price retail games.

the whole "my system has more games than yours if you dont count these type of games" argument is dumb.

it should be number of games released and thats it.

sts106mat

And was it changed? Was it? NO! so what are you crying about?

The people who complained were told that this was the ruling (by the acting mod Casey Wager who ruled over the spreadsheet and all the lemmings agreed was fact) even though it was a special rule made up that only helped the 360 library, so what's your argument now?

What those rules that were once favored by lems aren't good anymore because it doesn't make the 360 look good anymore? lol Lemmings are the most desperate and pathetic fanboys.

Like i said, i dont care about the spreadsheet at all, never once looked at it. i dont give a crap what it says / doesn't say.

I was arguing about cows creating lists using Metacritic and stuff and making up the rules as they go along (ie downloadable games dont count).

please dont come back at me with another "casey wegner said this" reply because i am not interested.

:lol: Cows DIDN'T make that rule, it was ruled that way since this generation started and agreed upon by all lems when they didn't need to depend on downloadale games in order to make their library look good.

haha why are you desperately trying to say cows made that decision???

again the spread sheet good all the way back to 2007, COWS didn't make it, and downloadable games were always in a separate category and all lems swore it's validity for years and now they are trying to backtrack and cry about the "rules" no longer make 360 look better.

Basically lems are the ones who approved of this rule and now they want to change it now so lems are the ones "making up the rules as they go along".

FAIL

[QUOTE="fire-dragon-90"]

Other than another generic halo game this year what exactly is there to play?? multiplats are much preferable on the PS3.

Xbox360 this year:

• Halo 4

PS3:

• Twisted Metal AAE
• Starhawk
• Tales of graces
• Last of Us-not confirmed for 2012 but things are looking bleak for sony
• LBPK
• Sly

and possiblity more,, if you are not a Halo fan then what exactly is there to play?

What a pathetic year for xbox fans,, is all you guys do is wait? waiting must be fun

Discuss!

ebrezzy1

will any of those games sell at least 2 million

tales of graces-fat chance

twisted metal-fat chance

????

plz sony give me more lists of games no one will care to buy lol

trials evolution and jeee i dunno all those fantastic games from the years before now..:roll:

razgriz_101

[QUOTE="sts106mat"]

[QUOTE="casharmy"]

And was it changed? Was it? NO! so what are you crying about?

The people who complained were told that this was the ruling (by the acting mod Casey Wager who ruled over the spreadsheet and all the lemmings agreed was fact) even though it was a special rule made up that only helped the 360 library, so what's your argument now?

What those rules that were once favored by lems aren't good anymore because it doesn't make the 360 look good anymore? lol Lemmings are the most desperate and pathetic fanboys.

casharmy

Like i said, i dont care about the spreadsheet at all, never once looked at it. i dont give a crap what it says / doesn't say.

I was arguing about cows creating lists using Metacritic and stuff and making up the rules as they go along (ie downloadable games dont count).

please dont come back at me with another "casey wegner said this" reply because i am not interested.

:lol: Cows DIDN'T make that rule, it was ruled that way since this generation started and agreed upon by all lems when they didn't need to depend on downloadale games in order to make their library look good.

haha why are you desperately trying to say cows made that decision???

again the spread sheet good all the way back to 2007, COWS didn't make it, and downloadable games were always in a separate category and all lems swore it's validity for years and now they are trying to backtrack and cry about the "rules" no longer make 360 look better.

Basically lems are the ones who approved of this rule and now they want to change it now so lems are the ones "making up the rules as they go along".

FAIL

[QUOTE="casharmy"]

[QUOTE="sts106mat"]

the list is a mess, people are still arguing about games that should / should not be included. thats what makes it stupid.

i have never even looked at the spreadsheet once.

GRAW was a launch title on the 360, seven years ago. people are still arguing about its inclusion on this list today.

many people and reviewers have said before that many arcade / downloadable titles have more content / longevity / value thansome full price retail games.

the whole "my system has more games than yours if you dont count these type of games" argument is dumb.

it should be number of games released and thats it.

WilliamRLBaker

And was it changed? Was it? NO! so what are you crying about?

The people who complained were told that this was the ruling (by the acting mod Casey Wager who ruled over the spreadsheet and all the lemmings agreed was fact) even though it was a special rule made up that only helped the 360 library, so what's your argument now?

What those rules that were once favored by lems aren't good anymore because it doesn't make the 360 look good anymore? lol Lemmings are the most desperate and pathetic fanboys.

like I said lems are so pathetic "after MLB 09" you say, that exclusive that would be another AAAe title for PS3. Again this determination was made by the same group that decided that Graw would count for 360...and that Ninja gaiden Sigma would would not count as a exclusive for PS3.

I'm not the one making up these rules s*** for brains, I am just telling it how it was. Why does that make you so mad? The rules were VERY subjective and made to favor 360. There was NEVER an objective way to determine how one game holding the exact same label as another game could be determined to be exclusive as opposed to another...I know because I (along with many others) have asked for this determination process and was never given a concrete method to theprocess.

Don't try to get out of line with me creaton. Just look at your moronic ass going right back to tryin to defend the "rules" that you think help the 360 look better. It's in direct opposition to the people in this thread that are questioning the established "rules" but I bet your stupid ass are one of these people who think that downloadable games should count.

[QUOTE="casharmy"]

[QUOTE="sts106mat"]

Like i said, i dont care about the spreadsheet at all, never once looked at it. i dont give a crap what it says / doesn't say.

I was arguing about cows creating lists using Metacritic and stuff and making up the rules as they go along (ie downloadable games dont count).

please dont come back at me with another "casey wegner said this" reply because i am not interested.

Frostbite24

:lol: Cows DIDN'T make that rule, it was ruled that way since this generation started and agreed upon by all lems when they didn't need to depend on downloadale games in order to make their library look good.

haha why are you desperately trying to say cows made that decision???

again the spread sheet good all the way back to 2007, COWS didn't make it, and downloadable games were always in a separate category and all lems swore it's validity for years and now they are trying to backtrack and cry about the "rules" no longer make 360 look better.

Basically lems are the ones who approved of this rule and now they want to change it now so lems are the ones "making up the rules as they go along".

FAIL

you have no argument pal. Seriously there are people who have been here for longer than me that can back up what I am saying. lol such a pathetic attempt at a rebuttal. You know its pretty easy to pull up old threads and the hoards of lemmings pointed the the spread sheet as fact.

Lol What lies are you referring to dumbass? The bold part of my post are irrefutable fact, sit down.

[QUOTE="casharmy"]

[QUOTE="sts106mat"]

Like i said, i dont care about the spreadsheet at all, never once looked at it. i dont give a crap what it says / doesn't say.

I was arguing about cows creating lists using Metacritic and stuff and making up the rules as they go along (ie downloadable games dont count).

please dont come back at me with another "casey wegner said this" reply because i am not interested.

Frostbite24

:lol: Cows DIDN'T make that rule, it was ruled that way since this generation started and agreed upon by all lems when they didn't need to depend on downloadale games in order to make their library look good.

haha why are you desperately trying to say cows made that decision???

again the spread sheet good all the way back to 2007, COWS didn't make it, and downloadable games were always in a separate category and all lems swore it's validity for years and now they are trying to backtrack and cry about the "rules" no longer make 360 look better.

Basically lems are the ones who approved of this rule and now they want to change it now so lems are the ones "making up the rules as they go along".

FAIL

casharmy

[QUOTE="Frostbite24"][QUOTE="casharmy"]

:lol: Cows DIDN'T make that rule, it was ruled that way since this generation started and agreed upon by all lems when they didn't need to depend on downloadale games in order to make their library look good.

haha why are you desperately trying to say cows made that decision???

again the spread sheet good all the way back to 2007, COWS didn't make it, and downloadable games were always in a separate category and all lems swore it's validity for years and now they are trying to backtrack and cry about the "rules" no longer make 360 look better.

Basically lems are the ones who approved of this rule and now they want to change it now so lems are the ones "making up the rules as they go along".

FAIL

casharmy

you have no argument pal. Seriously there are people who have been here for longer than me that can back up what I am saying. lol such a pathetic attempt at a rebuttal. You know its pretty easy to pull up old threads and the hoards of lemmings pointed the the spread sheet as fact.

Lol What lies are you referring to dumbass? The bold part of my post are irrefutable fact, sit down.

casharmy

waltefmoney

[QUOTE="casharmy"]

[QUOTE="Frostbite24"] If you lie to yourself long enough you eventually start to believe your lies are true. Pathological fanboys...:roll:Frostbite24

you have no argument pal. Seriously there are people who have been here for longer than me that can back up what I am saying. lol such a pathetic attempt at a rebuttal. You know its pretty easy to pull up old threads and the hoards of lemmings pointed the the spread sheet as fact.

Lol What lies are you referring to dumbass? The bold part of my post are irrefutable fact, sit down.

:lol:

[QUOTE="sts106mat"]

[QUOTE="casharmy"]

And was it changed? Was it? NO! so what are you crying about?

The people who complained were told that this was the ruling (by the acting mod Casey Wager who ruled over the spreadsheet and all the lemmings agreed was fact) even though it was a special rule made up that only helped the 360 library, so what's your argument now?

What those rules that were once favored by lems aren't good anymore because it doesn't make the 360 look good anymore? lol Lemmings are the most desperate and pathetic fanboys.

Like i said, i dont care about the spreadsheet at all, never once looked at it. i dont give a crap what it says / doesn't say.

I was arguing about cows creating lists using Metacritic and stuff and making up the rules as they go along (ie downloadable games dont count).

please dont come back at me with another "casey wegner said this" reply because i am not interested.

:lol: Cows DIDN'T make that rule, it was ruled that way since this generation started and agreed upon by all lems when they didn't need to depend on downloadale games in order to make their library look good.

haha why are you desperately trying to say cows made that decision???

again the spread sheet good all the way back to 2007, COWS didn't make it, and downloadable games were always in a separate category and all lems swore it's validity for years and now they are trying to backtrack and cry about the "rules" no longer make 360 look better.

Basically lems are the ones who approved of this rule and now they want to change it now so lems are the ones "making up the rules as they go along".

FAIL

[QUOTE="Frostbite24"][QUOTE="casharmy"]

you have no argument pal. Seriously there are people who have been here for longer than me that can back up what I am saying. lol such a pathetic attempt at a rebuttal. You know its pretty easy to pull up old threads and the hoards of lemmings pointed the the spread sheet as fact.

Lol What lies are you referring to dumbass? The bold part of my post are irrefutable fact, sit down.

casharmy

:lol:

Edit: I never said anything about the cows being behind the change, I'm denying that the lemmings are.

[QUOTE="ebrezzy1"]

[QUOTE="fire-dragon-90"]

Other than another generic halo game this year what exactly is there to play?? multiplats are much preferable on the PS3.

Xbox360 this year:

• Halo 4

PS3:

• Twisted Metal AAE
• Starhawk
• Tales of graces
• Last of Us-not confirmed for 2012 but things are looking bleak for sony
• LBPK
• Sly

and possiblity more,, if you are not a Halo fan then what exactly is there to play?

What a pathetic year for xbox fans,, is all you guys do is wait? waiting must be fun

Discuss!

danish-death

will any of those games sell at least 2 million

tales of graces-fat chance

twisted metal-fat chance

????

plz sony give me more lists of games no one will care to buy lol

Playing sales must be really fun to them i'd say

[QUOTE="ebrezzy1"]

[QUOTE="fire-dragon-90"]

Other than another generic halo game this year what exactly is there to play?? multiplats are much preferable on the PS3.

Xbox360 this year:

• Halo 4

PS3:

• Twisted Metal AAE
• Starhawk
• Tales of graces
• Last of Us-not confirmed for 2012 but things are looking bleak for sony
• LBPK
• Sly

and possiblity more,, if you are not a Halo fan then what exactly is there to play?

What a pathetic year for xbox fans,, is all you guys do is wait? waiting must be fun

Discuss!

danish-death

will any of those games sell at least 2 million

tales of graces-fat chance

twisted metal-fat chance

????

plz sony give me more lists of games no one will care to buy lol

Why are you guys going on about the spreadsheet? The title's asking what games there are to play on 360 this year...and the answer is a lot, regardless of where they're found/from.Ravensmash

[QUOTE="Ravensmash"]Why are you guys going on about the spreadsheet? The title's asking what games there are to play on 360 this year...and the answer is a lot, regardless of where they're found/from.Heil68

You know cows are desperate when they bring up topics from 5 years ago.

Halo 4 destroys all of the pathetic PoS3 exclusives. Sorry cows. Get over it. Either man up and buy a 360 and enjoy the greatness that is the Halo series or STFU. Sorry cows can't get a good exclusive FPS game. Probably never will either.FPSDad1161

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!! .....hehehHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!! You almost killed me. :lol:

[QUOTE="FPSDad1161"]Halo 4 destroys all of the pathetic PoS3 exclusives. Sorry cows. Get over it. Either man up and buy a 360 and enjoy the greatness that is the Halo series or STFU. Sorry cows can't get a good exclusive FPS game. Probably never will either.GamerwillzPS

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!! .....hehehHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!! You almost killed me. :lol:

[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

[QUOTE="FPSDad1161"]Halo 4 destroys all of the pathetic PoS3 exclusives. Sorry cows. Get over it. Either man up and buy a 360 and enjoy the greatness that is the Halo series or STFU. Sorry cows can't get a good exclusive FPS game. Probably never will either.FPSDad1161

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!! .....hehehHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!! You almost killed me. :lol:

I agree that Halo are great games but the PS3 have more variety as indicated with Resistance and Killzone instead of being 1. However, I have to say that online multiplayer in Resistance: Fall of Man was the best thing ever! I was so addicted to it. Perfect gameplay and mechanics. Sadly, the game is dead. (Thanks to COD!) and that fantastic multiplayer component, unfortunately, doesn't exist in R2 and R3. I'm not happy with Insomniac about this. They have made such a stupid decision!

Killzone 3 multiplayer is a blast! Can't see how anyone deny this.

Yes, I do have an Xbox 360 and I played Halo. Here's my gamertag - Gamerwillz.

[QUOTE="FPSDad1161"]Halo 4 destroys all of the pathetic PoS3 exclusives. Sorry cows. Get over it. Either man up and buy a 360 and enjoy the greatness that is the Halo series or STFU. Sorry cows can't get a good exclusive FPS game. Probably never will either.GamerwillzPS

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!! .....hehehHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!! You almost killed me. :lol:

[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

[QUOTE="FPSDad1161"]Halo 4 destroys all of the pathetic PoS3 exclusives. Sorry cows. Get over it. Either man up and buy a 360 and enjoy the greatness that is the Halo series or STFU. Sorry cows can't get a good exclusive FPS game. Probably never will either.TintedEyes

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!! .....hehehHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!! You almost killed me. :lol:

Sorry but I had to express my thoughts when I read his post.

[QUOTE="TintedEyes"][QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!! .....hehehHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!! You almost killed me. :lol:

GamerwillzPS

Sorry but I had to express my thoughts when I read his post.