over 100 halo reach pics!

[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

[QUOTE="NVIDIATI"] SH is on a much higher technical level than any console game and its engine (3Dmark Vantage Engine) is capable of a lot of things. Also being apart of acronuats and I can tell you some of the new things being tested are more along the lines of the benchmark. The scale, lighting, phsysics and visuals in SH are on a level above any other PC game aside from Crysis. And maybe for consoles scale/visuals have to suffer, but PC you can create that high detail. And you ask why we compare PC and Consoles, well its because this is System Wars. Not Console Wars, I use my PC to game the same way I'd use my Console so I see no reason why you would have to separate them, eventhough consoles have limited hardware.

NVIDIATI

So you use your PC how ever you want,its just that you dont have to point so obvious that PC and SH are more technically advance then anything on consoles,its well known fact.But that does not mean Reach is not impressive(ok for you its not,for others it is).The thing is i find UC2 more impressive then SH.Yes SH has better lightning,textures...but i find UC2 better looking game,and most of all,FAR more fun to play,so its all about opinions,games looking impressive on PC does not make console game less impressive.

Dont you realize?Even if they put all the wonders in the world in it i still would not find SH impressive.Is it because of dumb art style or boring look i dont know but its nothing spectacular to ME.On the other hand its far more spectacular and impressive when something like UC2 comes to LIMITED consoles.It just shows how much more work and dedication those devs put in comparison with some PC counterparts.

For me its more impressive if game looks better then other on 10 times weaker hardware even if its technically inferior.

[QUOTE="Arbiterisl33t69"]What the H are you guys talking about?NVIDIATI

What?I how can i convince you to be impressed by those screens?I just said that MAJORITY of people are impressed and told you why.You answered how PC can have better graphics then consoles,which i think even 3 yr olds know.

[QUOTE="NVIDIATI"]

[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

So you use your PC how ever you want,its just that you dont have to point so obvious that PC and SH are more technically advance then anything on consoles,its well known fact.But that does not mean Reach is not impressive(ok for you its not,for others it is).The thing is i find UC2 more impressive then SH.Yes SH has better lightning,textures...but i find UC2 better looking game,and most of all,FAR more fun to play,so its all about opinions,games looking impressive on PC does not make console game less impressive.

Dont you realize?Even if they put all the wonders in the world in it i still would not find SH impressive.Is it because of dumb art style or boring look i dont know but its nothing spectacular to ME.On the other hand its far more spectacular and impressive when something like UC2 comes to LIMITED consoles.It just shows how much more work and dedication those devs put in comparison with some PC counterparts.

For me its more impressive if game looks better then other on 10 times weaker hardware even if its technically inferior.

Seriously am I the only one who is not impressed with these? :?

NVIDIATI

Way to go NVIDIATI and Bus-A-Bus :(

But on topic, I see alot more detail on those designs compared to the last one. That's a good sign for things to come at least. Can't wait for the beta.

[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

[QUOTE="NVIDIATI"] Why are you bringing gameplay into this? I'm talking about visuals and technical components. Obviously I don't play games for there graphics. And SH'svisuals on a technical levelarn't just better than every console game, but almost all PC games too.

NVIDIATI

Dont you realize?Even if they put all the wonders in the world in it i still would not find SH impressive.Is it because of dumb art style or boring look i dont know but its nothing spectacular to ME.On the other hand its far more spectacular and impressive when something like UC2 comes to LIMITED consoles.It just shows how much more work and dedication those devs put in comparison with some PC counterparts.

For me its more impressive if game looks better then other on 10 times weaker hardware even if its technically inferior.

technical aspects aside...Reach will be a way better game overall than any SH.

[QUOTE="Ninja-Bear"]Where are we getting 'over 100 new pics' by the way? So far i count 28, 30 tops. Anjunaddict

[QUOTE="Arbiterisl33t69"]What the H are you guys talking about?NVIDIATI

I think they look pretty impressive. Definitely alot more detailed then Halo 3s assets. Looking good. But I can see where NvidiaATI is coming from, but he should have kept his mouth shut. :P

oooh shiney guns

well they got renders of every weapon in reach, the vehicles and some character models,

http://www.jeuxvideo.com/news/2010/00041695-interview-halo-reach.htm

all are shapping up really welly and if you look at the old renders some weapons look better.

mayceV

All I know is I'm absolutely loving all I see & hear about Reach and the anticipation builds.

Cool pics and thanks. :)

[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

[QUOTE="NVIDIATI"] Why are you bringing gameplay into this? I'm talking about visuals and technical components. Obviously I don't play games for there graphics. And SH'svisuals on a technical levelarn't just better than every console game, but almost all PC games too.

NVIDIATI

Dont you realize?Even if they put all the wonders in the world in it i still would not find SH impressive.Is it because of dumb art style or boring look i dont know but its nothing spectacular to ME.On the other hand its far more spectacular and impressive when something like UC2 comes to LIMITED consoles.It just shows how much more work and dedication those devs put in comparison with some PC counterparts.

For me its more impressive if game looks better then other on 10 times weaker hardware even if its technically inferior.

He's talking about technical graphics too.

Instead of trying to argue with him, why don't you try to understand where he's coming from?

I agree with him... I take into consideration the hardware the software is running on.... when you consider the System RAM & GPU RAM in the PS3/360... its very impressive how UC2, Alan Wake, Halo REach & KZ2 look.

I game on all the systems... mostly PC right now (Just Cause 2 is hella fun & beautiful)... but that doesnt stop me from appreciating what some devs are managing to do on the console front.

looks completly awsome. A game of this calibur is worth being a fanboy of.

i like the gun models. But I want to see some more scans of the environments. The interiors and buildings don't showcase the overhaul in the graphics engine as much as the outdoor stuff will. I want to see the sprawling sandbox environments and great draw distances they're promising.

I wonder if anyone else besides me finds the significance in "Misriah Armory". Ah nevermind. I forgot this was SW after all. :roll:

[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

[QUOTE="NVIDIATI"] No I can tell you I'm not. Seriously. I'm not some console gamer who gets blown away by this stuff. Now I'm not bashing it or anything, because its obviously beta. But people are freaking out over these mediocrescreens. Maybe by Halo standards its a jump, but seriously its nothing special.

NVIDIATI

Im also not console gamer,im primary PC gamer and enjoy its technical dominance,but no,just no.This screens are impressive,sure Crysis looks better but then again its not that you PC-only guys are only used for top quality.Sure PC is by FAR the most powerful system its just that devs dont tend to push it to its limits(except Crytek).

every halo game is 10x more fun than that one though....

Seriously am I the only one who is not impressed with these? :?

NVIDIATI

He's talking about technical graphics too.

Instead of trying to argue with him, why don't you try to understand where he's coming from?

I agree with him... I take into consideration the hardware the software is running on.... when you consider the System RAM & GPU RAM in the PS3/360... its very impressive how UC2, Alan Wake, Halo REach & KZ2 look.

I game on all the systems... mostly PC right now (Just Cause 2 is hella fun & beautiful)... but that doesnt stop me from appreciating what some devs are managing to do on the console front.

moistsandwich

[QUOTE="NVIDIATI"]

Seriously am I the only one who is not impressed with these? :?

Bus-A-Bus

I am sure you are.

I don't care what his opinion is but I am not impressedby these screens.

[QUOTE="NVIDIATI"]

[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

Im also not console gamer,im primary PC gamer and enjoy its technical dominance,but no,just no.This screens are impressive,sure Crysis looks better but then again its not that you PC-only guys are only used for top quality.Sure PC is by FAR the most powerful system its just that devs dont tend to push it to its limits(except Crytek).

lespaul1919

every halo game is 10x more fun than that one though....

No, you came in here saying you found it hard to believe other people found these impressive. Clearly a lot of us do, so rather than trying to change our opinions on the matter, why not just accept you are different and drop it.Anjunaddict

[QUOTE="NVIDIATI"]

Seriously am I the only one who is not impressed with these? :?

Bus-A-Bus

I am sure you are.

[QUOTE="Anjunaddict"] Don't put words in my mouth. I stated:

[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

[QUOTE="NVIDIATI"]

Seriously am I the only one who is not impressed with these? :?

NVIDIATI

I am sure you are.

LOL you got it wrong.You asked if you are ONLY one who is not impressed?I replied with:im sure you are(the only one thats not,not that you are impressed).

Its stupid to think otherwise,i cant make you to be impressed with something you dont like,but majority is impressed.

LOL you got it wrong.You asked if you are ONLY one who is not impressed?I replied with:im sure you are(the only one,not impressed).

Its stupid to think otherwise,i cant make you to be impressed with something you dont like,but majority is impressed.

Bus-A-Bus