Own a ps4 and no Vita? You're doing it WRONG!

I only used remote play once with BF4. The experience was alright it still had some stutters here and there but wasn't too bad. Don't see myself using it anytime soon.

I plan on getting a Vita eventually. I have so many games waiting to be played on it from PS+.

And that is relevant to what I said, how?

Because I'm not in any minority. I can't play sales either, so any minority I might have been in doesn't affect me as I can play games instead that justify the price of the Vita.

Clearly what I said went over your head.

The Vita does not interest me, nor is paying that much for something that does not have any games I really want to play.

Nah, explain the minority I'm in. Seriously, go for it.

@AmazonTreeBoa: Can't explain it?

The big question is would you rather have 4 full priced games or a Vita. I am sure the vita improves the PS4 just like Smartglass improves Xbox One, but I don't see how it could be worth the price just for that.

Because SW only cares about high sales of hardware. Vita doesn't qualify.

What's a Vita?

ITT

cows say xbox is too expensive

happy to spend $230 extra for a useless vita

lol

dear o dear.

If they sell it in a bundle for 100 bucks more then the PS4? Then yes. Otherwise a big no.

Love my Vita, dont understand the hate

I love my 3DS too, they both great in own each way

such a bullsjiiit OP

Marketing much ....

I'd own a Vita but Jesus Christ could comeback from the dead and offer me a PS4and id laugh and say "no thanks".

I use remote play all the time and it's not glitchy or laggy for me. Every once in awhile it will disconnect and I just re-connect and continue playing.

Handhelds aren't even attractive, there is no point in them for people who likes to play games at home. There is nothing wrong about owning a PS4 without Vita.

The difference is 3rd party support. Right now I can play bf4 for example using remote play but can that be done on the Wii U? PS: I own a Wii U as well.

That's a broad overgeneralization you got going there

Opinions, opinions everywhere!

@Cyberdot: That's not an opinion; as someone who doesn't own handhelds, I don't think you're in a position to talk for people and when and where they like to play on their handhelds.

@joel_c17: I have both, but have yet to try the remote play yet. I'll give it a try the next time I play ACIV: Black Flag. Not every game is set up for Remote Play though. Sony needs to start a list.

That does not sound like a good use of money.

I wonder how much control does the PR department have in this guy's topic...

I've owned a Vita since day AND it had games back then

Don't know what was up with mine, but it was unplayable. This was AC4.

People who think it is worth it. Why you actually need this explained to you is beyond me. Maybe I was thinking you were older than you actually are, I don't know.

Most people don't think it is worth it or it would be selling a lot better, therefor you are in the minority with thinking it is worth it.

Then what's the majority? The people who don't think it's worth it? That logic would apply to every console and handheld then.

So the minority for the Vita is the people who think it is worth it, let's say 4 million+ people who bought it. The majority then being the 7 billion+ who haven't bought it?

Seriously, the only reason I'm asking you to explain this is because it's too easy to see what you're saying is for the sake of saying it and not actually thought out. Let's ask another question since you're going to skirt around again: what's the majority then?

People have enough problems playing Battlefield 4 as it is without trying to stream it to their Vita. Not that I would want to anyway. Can you steam Wii U? Don't know, don't care same with the Vita if I'm not in front of my TV I might as wall get out my iphone or Android.

It is just that Vita is a completly useless system for anyone with a PS3, since all its major games are on PS3

Vita is like non existent system, one of the worse of all time probably or just the worst

It is not unlike Ouya or any other system that has zero exclusives

If it was not for the Sony name, Vita would have been fogotten as a gaming system the second it hit the market

i love my Vita, it's awesome

@loosingENDS: Did you bump a nine day old thread because the Vita with its superior library has made you this butthurt?

I take it this is sarcastic post

Vita has a library ? That is exactly the problem, Vita has not got a single worthy exclusive game, no game library to speak of

The question is not whether each individual may like his Vita or not, that is irrelevant

The question is WHY get a Vita when i can play all its worthy games like Dragons Crown on PS3 ?

PSV is a great handheld with many games available !!

PS4 is a great console which needs more 'exclusives' but including multiplats it already has a good selection of titles..

PS4 + PSV combo is amazing :) (remote play works fine at least from my short experience)