@GoldenElementXL said:
Come on Tormentos. Really? I quoted you saying it AND gave you the page number and link to the thread where you said it. All you had to do was read the post you just quoted.
Oh and you can stop with all the Lemming talk.
First of all i say aiming for 60FPS and i the second quote say supposedly in non i stated is 60FPS lock.
I and i even quote the link stating the game was supposedly aiming for 60FPS it wasn't confirmed by the way.
@tormentos said:
@gpuking said:
http://forum.beyond3d.com/showpost.php?p=1877261&postcount=4246
900p on Xbone confirmed tho still uncertain on the framerate, wouldn't be surprised if it's around the 30fps mark. It's rather embarrassing to see the Bone struggles at 900p while PS4 blitz it at 1080p/60.
900p 30FPS vs 1080p 60 would still be a quite rather large gap,maybe both are aiming for 30 or for 60 one 900p the other 1080p.
@deadline-zero0 said:
@gpuking said:
http://forum.beyond3d.com/showpost.php?p=1877261&postcount=4246
900p on Xbone confirmed tho still uncertain on the framerate, wouldn't be surprised if it's around the 30fps mark. It's rather embarrassing to see the Bone struggles at 900p while PS4 blitz it at 1080p/60.
Having watched a stream of the PS4 on Twitch, it was clearly 30fps. Unless Twitch capped me. Not sure where people are getting 60fps confirmations from.
All i could find was the IGN director quote. lol ign.
But i expected this. 900p on the bone, 1080p on the ps4, 30fps on both, most likely using high pre-sets, with texture quality set back to medium. Though, NeoGaf benchmarks are getting weird. I'm still trying to find out if 2GB can work on high sets, which seems correct, like WD.
http://www.twinstickgaming.com/2014/07/05/shadow-of-mordor-to-run-at-1080p-on-ps4-but-what-about-xbox-one/
Supposedly the game was confirmed to be 1080p 60 FPS for PS4.
1080p 60 vs 900p 30 it to big of a gap.
Hey look me saying that 1080p60 FPS vs 900p 30 was still to big of a gap you blind biased closet lemming...
Now stop your DC My thread was a rumor thread not a confirmation thread and i did not flame the xbox there all the contrary.
Hey look how i stated that maybe both are aiming for 30 or 60 and one is 900p and the other 1080p...
Your argument was completely destroy.
@glez13 said:
Is the amd 6350 that weak? A neighbor of mine has a r9 270 but some non K second gen i5. At 1080p, ultra except textures high, and with various FRAPS benchmarks and the ingame one it usually hovers around 40fps. The only problem is that it gets some ugly frame time spikes, probably because of the VRAM.
The game isn't CPU limited that i know off,and i am sure my 6350 is more than enough for it,mine does 40FPS but drops into the 20s and some time freezes which is not a CPU problem since PC with 2GB cards and intel CPU do the same.
@GoldenElementXL said:
Why are you laughing that your PC can't run a game as well as the PS4? I would be driving to Micro Center asap if I were you. That is the kind of performance you will see with a $130 CPU and a $170 GPU.
And what does any hermit with a good rig have to be butthurt about? You like the PS4 more than anything on earth. We get it. But your logic, reasoning and reading comprehension really doesn't help you in any of your "debates"
Simple because hermits here think that everything is black and white with consoles,this game have cause some rather disturbing results some GPU which are stronger than the problems with it and it is recommend in some to lock the game at 30FPS to lower stutter,my PC cost me close to $600+ and has more problems running this game than my PS4.
@tdkmillsy said:
@R3FURBISHED: He would need to own a console to do that. Nobody who owned either Xbox One or PS4 would spend so much time on these forums.
900p/1080p same fps is the way it will be moving forward with the odd exception of 1080p/1080p. As I said it would be, the funny thing is people thought PS4 would be 60fps. its simply is not that much more powerful.
A source claimed that it wasn't cows juts like gamespot claimed 1080p when it was not..lol
Log in to comment