Paved way from Nintendo and you'll failed

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for nchan
nchan

1059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 nchan
Member since 2004 • 1059 Posts

I heard Factor 5 went bankrup after they left Nintendo to make Lair for the PS3. Seem like developers that left Nintendo to make exclusive games for other consoles are either went bankrup or fail in making quality games. Any other developers?

Avatar image for VideoGameGuy
VideoGameGuy

7695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 VideoGameGuy
Member since 2002 • 7695 Posts

I heard Factor 5 went bankrup after they left Nintendo to make Lair for the PS3. Seem like developers that left Nintendo to make exclusive games for other consoles are either went bankrup or fail in making quality games. Any other developers?

nchan
Its not just companies who left Nintendo. Its developers who attempt to make a blockbuster on the 360 or Ps3 and have that game fail who are going under. Pretty sad that in most cases it's only ONE game that is tanking these developers.
Avatar image for Mr_Matthews
Mr_Matthews

277

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Mr_Matthews
Member since 2009 • 277 Posts

Well, the new Banjo Kazooie got pretty good reviews.

Avatar image for uglyhippos
uglyhippos

283

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 uglyhippos
Member since 2007 • 283 Posts

[QUOTE="nchan"]

I heard Factor 5 went bankrup after they left Nintendo to make Lair for the PS3. Seem like developers that left Nintendo to make exclusive games for other consoles are either went bankrup or fail in making quality games. Any other developers?

VideoGameGuy

Its not just companies who left Nintendo. Its developers who attempt to make a blockbuster on the 360 or Ps3 and have that game fail who are going under. Pretty sad that in most cases it's only ONE game that is tanking these developers.

I agree. HD games cost alot to make and need alot of sales just to stay afloat. I just think HD entered at the wrong time. Hopefully by the next gen of systems the economy is better and less developers will tank.

Avatar image for GundamGuy0
GundamGuy0

10970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 GundamGuy0
Member since 2003 • 10970 Posts

Well, the new Banjo Kazooie got pretty good reviews.

Mr_Matthews
But didn't sell well even at a discount price.
Avatar image for evilross
evilross

2076

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#6 evilross
Member since 2003 • 2076 Posts

I heard Factor 5 went bankrup after they left Nintendo to make Lair for the PS3. Seem like developers that left Nintendo to make exclusive games for other consoles are either went bankrup or fail in making quality games. Any other developers?

nchan

And What 3rd party is making alot of money by making Wii games? None.

The Wii is a money pot for Nintendo and a black hole for developers and publishers. Nintendo can put out anything it wants and slap a franchise name or character on it and it will sell to the Nintendo base like hotcakes. Without that name recognition, Wii games sit on the shelves and die.

Xbox 360 and PS3 games take more capital to make, and more talent and resources, but IF you make a quality game, the game can actually yeild results. The market is muck more crowded in PS3 and 360 gaming, so a game really has to stand out to bring in the money to turn a profit, and a subpar game (like Lair or Ninja Blade) will end up costing the publisher and devs a lot of money.

So its a risk/reward situation, were with creating a PS3/360 multiplat or exclusive, you take more risk by spending more money in the creation of the game, in a more competitve environment, in the hope you can score a hit, and and make the big bucks and maybe even start a franchise. With Wii games, its low risk, as development is cheap and doesn't require top level talent, but the reward factor is very low as your not going to turn much of a profit and are much less likely to get any brand recognition or start a franchise.

Avatar image for PSdual_wielder
PSdual_wielder

10646

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 PSdual_wielder
Member since 2003 • 10646 Posts

Sucker Punch made games exclusive to N64 and then left to make games for sony. Oh look, infamous is being released this month. So no, not all companies end up bad due to leaving nintendo.

Avatar image for wooooode
wooooode

16666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 wooooode
Member since 2002 • 16666 Posts

Well, the new Banjo Kazooie got pretty good reviews.

Mr_Matthews
Well Rare has not went under like the topic is about, though they have not really done anything that is truely great since they left Nintendo.
Avatar image for deactivated-5b78379493e12
deactivated-5b78379493e12

15625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#9 deactivated-5b78379493e12
Member since 2005 • 15625 Posts

I heard Factor 5 went bankrup after they left Nintendo to make Lair for the PS3. Seem like developers that left Nintendo to make exclusive games for other consoles are either went bankrup or fail in making quality games. Any other developers?

nchan

One case doesn't make a blanket statement. There are many publishers that have switched allegiance and still survived. FirstDiscovery was trying to blame the failure of Factor 5 on Nintendo. The ignorance goes both ways.

Avatar image for omgimba
omgimba

2645

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 omgimba
Member since 2007 • 2645 Posts

Well, the new Banjo Kazooie got pretty good reviews.

Mr_Matthews

Compared to the predecessors of the series it was garbage reviews though.

Avatar image for Bread_or_Decide
Bread_or_Decide

29761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11 Bread_or_Decide
Member since 2007 • 29761 Posts

Well, the new Banjo Kazooie got pretty good reviews.

Mr_Matthews
Rare has made some of the most interesting games since they left Nintendo. I much prefer Viva Pinata over another Donkey Kong Country in 3D.
Avatar image for Bread_or_Decide
Bread_or_Decide

29761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#12 Bread_or_Decide
Member since 2007 • 29761 Posts
[QUOTE="omgimba"]

[QUOTE="Mr_Matthews"]

Well, the new Banjo Kazooie got pretty good reviews.

Compared to the predecessors of the series it was garbage reviews though.

8 is a garbage review? Man I hope most games are garbage then.
Avatar image for primitive013
primitive013

1422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 primitive013
Member since 2003 • 1422 Posts

They introduced HD gaming into consoles too soon IMO. The proof is in the pudding, just look at sales of the PS2 and Wii. Two non-HD consoles are killing the two HD consoles in sales. If the OG XBox was still supported, it would still sale too. The so-called hardcore are wrong, they're killing gaming, not so-called casuals. The casuals are carrying the industry, IMO.

Avatar image for Jimmi323
Jimmi323

870

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#14 Jimmi323
Member since 2006 • 870 Posts

[QUOTE="nchan"]

I heard Factor 5 went bankrup after they left Nintendo to make Lair for the PS3. Seem like developers that left Nintendo to make exclusive games for other consoles are either went bankrup or fail in making quality games. Any other developers?

evilross

And What 3rd party is making alot of money by making Wii games? None.

The Wii is a money pot for Nintendo and a black hole for developers and publishers. Nintendo can put out anything it wants and slap a franchise name or character on it and it will sell to the Nintendo base like hotcakes. Without that name recognition, Wii games sit on the shelves and die.

Xbox 360 and PS3 games take more capital to make, and more talent and resources, but IF you make a quality game, the game can actually yeild results. The market is muck more crowded in PS3 and 360 gaming, so a game really has to stand out to bring in the money to turn a profit, and a subpar game (like Lair or Ninja Blade) will end up costing the publisher and devs a lot of money.

So its a risk/reward situation, were with creating a PS3/360 multiplat or exclusive, you take more risk by spending more money in the creation of the game, in a more competitve environment, in the hope you can score a hit, and and make the big bucks and maybe even start a franchise. With Wii games, its low risk, as development is cheap and doesn't require top level talent, but the reward factor is very low as your not going to turn much of a profit and are much less likely to get any brand recognition or start a franchise.

How about Capcom? RE:4 Wii and Umbrella Chronicles both sold 1 million+ and they would have been very low budget games. There are more examples, but the point is that for Wii, not only is the risk lower, but the potential reward is higher.
Avatar image for thegoldenpoo
thegoldenpoo

5136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#15 thegoldenpoo
Member since 2005 • 5136 Posts

They introduced HD gaming into consoles too soon IMO. The proof is in the pudding, just look at sales of the PS2 and Wii. Two non-HD consoles are killing the two HD consoles in sales. If the OG XBox was still supported, it would still sale too. The so-called hardcore are wrong, they're killing gaming, not so-called casuals. The casuals are carrying the industry, IMO.

primitive013
You couldn't be more wrong.
Avatar image for Bread_or_Decide
Bread_or_Decide

29761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#16 Bread_or_Decide
Member since 2007 • 29761 Posts

They introduced HD gaming into consoles too soon IMO. The proof is in the pudding, just look at sales of the PS2 and Wii. Two non-HD consoles are killing the two HD consoles in sales. If the OG XBox was still supported, it would still sale too. The so-called hardcore are wrong, they're killing gaming, not so-called casuals. The casuals are carrying the industry, IMO.

primitive013
PC's have been doing HD games for a long time now. Consoles finally caught up. Consumers don't lead the trends they merely follow them. They will catch up soon and when they do the consoles will be ready for them.
Avatar image for primitive013
primitive013

1422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 primitive013
Member since 2003 • 1422 Posts

[QUOTE="primitive013"]

They introduced HD gaming into consoles too soon IMO. The proof is in the pudding, just look at sales of the PS2 and Wii. Two non-HD consoles are killing the two HD consoles in sales. If the OG XBox was still supported, it would still sale too. The so-called hardcore are wrong, they're killing gaming, not so-called casuals. The casuals are carrying the industry, IMO.

thegoldenpoo

You couldn't be more wrong.

You must be on the debate team or something. Your rebuttal was rock solid hahahahaha.

Avatar image for deactivated-5b78379493e12
deactivated-5b78379493e12

15625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#18 deactivated-5b78379493e12
Member since 2005 • 15625 Posts

[QUOTE="primitive013"]

They introduced HD gaming into consoles too soon IMO. The proof is in the pudding, just look at sales of the PS2 and Wii. Two non-HD consoles are killing the two HD consoles in sales. If the OG XBox was still supported, it would still sale too. The so-called hardcore are wrong, they're killing gaming, not so-called casuals. The casuals are carrying the industry, IMO.

thegoldenpoo

You couldn't be more wrong.

It's his opinion. How can it be wrong?

Avatar image for thegoldenpoo
thegoldenpoo

5136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#19 thegoldenpoo
Member since 2005 • 5136 Posts

[QUOTE="thegoldenpoo"][QUOTE="primitive013"]

They introduced HD gaming into consoles too soon IMO. The proof is in the pudding, just look at sales of the PS2 and Wii. Two non-HD consoles are killing the two HD consoles in sales. If the OG XBox was still supported, it would still sale too. The so-called hardcore are wrong, they're killing gaming, not so-called casuals. The casuals are carrying the industry, IMO.

primitive013

You couldn't be more wrong.

You must be on the debate team or something. Your rebuttal was rock solid hahahahaha.

Actually I am on the debate team :lol: (Recently did a good one on Scientology if you want to see it) , just short on posting time....
Avatar image for oldmanriver1
oldmanriver1

726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 oldmanriver1
Member since 2009 • 726 Posts

[QUOTE="omgimba"]

[QUOTE="Mr_Matthews"]

Well, the new Banjo Kazooie got pretty good reviews.

Bread_or_Decide

Compared to the predecessors of the series it was garbage reviews though.

8 is a garbage review? Man I hope most games are garbage then.

Its certainly not nearly as good as a 9.5 and 9.6 which is what Banjo kazooie and Tooie got on here. If your not comparing it to its predecessors than its definitely a solid score though.

Avatar image for SER69
SER69

7096

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 SER69
Member since 2003 • 7096 Posts

I heard Factor 5 went bankrup after they left Nintendo to make Lair for the PS3. Seem like developers that left Nintendo to make exclusive games for other consoles are either went bankrup or fail in making quality games. Any other developers?

nchan
- Rare - Silicon Knights - Flagship - Square
Avatar image for Filthybastrd
Filthybastrd

7124

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Filthybastrd
Member since 2009 • 7124 Posts

[QUOTE="Bread_or_Decide"][QUOTE="omgimba"]

Compared to the predecessors of the series it was garbage reviews though.

oldmanriver1

8 is a garbage review? Man I hope most games are garbage then.

Its certainly not nearly as good as a 9.5 and 9.6 which is what Banjo kazooie and Tooie got on here. If your not comparing it to its predecessors than its definitely a solid score though.

You make it sound like the gap between 8 and 9 is somehow larger than fx 6-7 or 7-8 :)

Avatar image for thegoldenpoo
thegoldenpoo

5136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#23 thegoldenpoo
Member since 2005 • 5136 Posts

[QUOTE="nchan"]

I heard Factor 5 went bankrup after they left Nintendo to make Lair for the PS3. Seem like developers that left Nintendo to make exclusive games for other consoles are either went bankrup or fail in making quality games. Any other developers?

SER69

- Rare - Silicon Knights - Flagship - Square

Square? Are you high?!

I see you've come out of the Wii forums to take a pot-shot at the vile scurge of HD :roll:

Sometimes Devs just make bad decisions, regardless of how many pixels they are using. Nintnedo is not autiomatically better for developers you know.

Avatar image for thepwninator
thepwninator

8134

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#24 thepwninator
Member since 2006 • 8134 Posts

[QUOTE="thegoldenpoo"][QUOTE="primitive013"]

They introduced HD gaming into consoles too soon IMO. The proof is in the pudding, just look at sales of the PS2 and Wii. Two non-HD consoles are killing the two HD consoles in sales. If the OG XBox was still supported, it would still sale too. The so-called hardcore are wrong, they're killing gaming, not so-called casuals. The casuals are carrying the industry, IMO.

jimkabrhel

You couldn't be more wrong.

It's his opinion. How can it be wrong?

Because what he's saying isn't actually an opinion. It's a hypothesis, and hypotheses CAN be very, very wrong. I abhor this "he can't be wrong because it's his opinion" crap that has plagued every corner of the internet for the past year or two BECAUSE no one seems to comprehend what separates an opinion from other things like hypotheses and theories.
Avatar image for deactivated-5b78379493e12
deactivated-5b78379493e12

15625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#25 deactivated-5b78379493e12
Member since 2005 • 15625 Posts

[QUOTE="jimkabrhel"]

[QUOTE="thegoldenpoo"] You couldn't be more wrong. thepwninator

It's his opinion. How can it be wrong?

Because what he's saying isn't actually an opinion. It's a hypothesis, and hypotheses CAN be very, very wrong. I abhor this "he can't be wrong because it's his opinion" crap that has plagued every corner of the internet for the past year or two BECAUSE no one seems to comprehend what separates an opinion from other things like hypotheses and theories.

Fair enough.

However, I abhor people giving a complete denial without provide any thoughts or evidence to back up what they deny. Speaking as a scientist, the line between opinion and hypothesis can oftentimes be very small.

Avatar image for thepwninator
thepwninator

8134

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#26 thepwninator
Member since 2006 • 8134 Posts

[QUOTE="thepwninator"][QUOTE="jimkabrhel"]

It's his opinion. How can it be wrong?

jimkabrhel

Because what he's saying isn't actually an opinion. It's a hypothesis, and hypotheses CAN be very, very wrong. I abhor this "he can't be wrong because it's his opinion" crap that has plagued every corner of the internet for the past year or two BECAUSE no one seems to comprehend what separates an opinion from other things like hypotheses and theories.

Fair enough.

However, I abhor people giving a complete denial without provide any thoughts or evidence to back up what they deny. Speaking as a scientist, the line between opinion and hypothesis can oftentimes be very small.

The difference? Hypotheses are disprovable, and the statement to which the guy said "you couldn't be more wrong" is most definitely disprovable through social science (though, as a chemist, I tend to look down on the social sciences :P ). I do, however, very much dislike the way the guy who said that the previous guy couldn't be more wrong did not actually try to prove his assertion.
Avatar image for SER69
SER69

7096

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 SER69
Member since 2003 • 7096 Posts

[QUOTE="SER69"][QUOTE="nchan"]

I heard Factor 5 went bankrup after they left Nintendo to make Lair for the PS3. Seem like developers that left Nintendo to make exclusive games for other consoles are either went bankrup or fail in making quality games. Any other developers?

thegoldenpoo

- Rare - Silicon Knights - Flagship - Square

Square? Are you high?!

I see you've come out of the Wii forums to take a pot-shot at the vile scurge of HD :roll:

Sometimes Devs just make bad decisions, regardless of how many pixels they are using. Nintnedo is not autiomatically better for developers you know.

I really dont know what you are talking about. When Square was around there were no HD consoles on the market.
Avatar image for thepwninator
thepwninator

8134

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#29 thepwninator
Member since 2006 • 8134 Posts
[QUOTE="thegoldenpoo"]

[QUOTE="SER69"] - Rare - Silicon Knights - Flagship - SquareSER69

Square? Are you high?!

I see you've come out of the Wii forums to take a pot-shot at the vile scurge of HD :roll:

Sometimes Devs just make bad decisions, regardless of how many pixels they are using. Nintnedo is not autiomatically better for developers you know.

I really dont know what you are talking about. When Square was around there were no HD consoles on the market.

Same could be said of Bungie, because both're still around, and both were around before this gen. Hell, it could be said of many, many developers :?
Avatar image for thegoldenpoo
thegoldenpoo

5136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#30 thegoldenpoo
Member since 2005 • 5136 Posts

[QUOTE="jimkabrhel"]

[QUOTE="thegoldenpoo"] You couldn't be more wrong. thepwninator

It's his opinion. How can it be wrong?

Because what he's saying isn't actually an opinion. It's a hypothesis, and hypotheses CAN be very, very wrong. I abhor this "he can't be wrong because it's his opinion" crap that has plagued every corner of the internet for the past year or two BECAUSE no one seems to comprehend what separates an opinion from other things like hypotheses and theories.

THANKYOU!

The "Well it's his opinion!" Defence of down right wrong comments is a thin one, this was nit an opinion. It was an assertion with IMO tacked on the end. IMO is not a defece for having your nonsense picked apart. You could just say "Oranges are Blue IMO". It's got IMO in it but it is a wrong assertion.

Ok now that's out of the way, yeah all these so called 'Hardcores' demanding decent software, not settling for gimped on-line. this is waht is killing gaming. Not software companies pandering to simplisitic formulaic games on the Wii. I mean heack it's not like the HD systems have any decent games on them, screw the facts i want more causal games so i can quote sales and tell people how we are saving gaming! Yey! :|.

The HD systems are not at a disadvantage, how could "Hardcore" gaming be killing gaming? You refer to the casuals but you never really define either party, is it just an arbitrary line? Well say the 'Casuals' are saving gaming is just plain wrong. sure they add gross to some companies but as far as decent gamea are concerned the traditional audience is still coughing up the dough to keep them coming.

Take for example the game in my sig STALKER, how are undergound gems like that "Help up by the casuals?" this is what gaming survies on, compaines taking risks becuase they know there is a decicated audience out there who want more than a shallow 5 minuite mini game. "Gaming" is a very broad thing, if you are talking about unit shifing then yes the casuals make an impace but if we are talking about developers and them being able to make decent games (ie what we want!!!) then your statements about the "Hardcore" gamer hold no water.

Avatar image for deactivated-5b78379493e12
deactivated-5b78379493e12

15625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#31 deactivated-5b78379493e12
Member since 2005 • 15625 Posts

[QUOTE="jimkabrhel"]

[QUOTE="thepwninator"] Because what he's saying isn't actually an opinion. It's a hypothesis, and hypotheses CAN be very, very wrong. I abhor this "he can't be wrong because it's his opinion" crap that has plagued every corner of the internet for the past year or two BECAUSE no one seems to comprehend what separates an opinion from other things like hypotheses and theories.thepwninator

Fair enough.

However, I abhor people giving a complete denial without provide any thoughts or evidence to back up what they deny. Speaking as a scientist, the line between opinion and hypothesis can oftentimes be very small.

The difference? Hypotheses are disprovable, and the statement to which the guy said "you couldn't be more wrong" is most definitely disprovable through social science (though, as a chemist, I tend to look down on the social sciences :P ). I do, however, very much dislike the way the guy who said that the previous guy couldn't be more wrong did not actually try to prove his assertion.

Quick off topic, but as a chemist, I tend to look down on the social sciences as well. :D

Avatar image for GundamGuy0
GundamGuy0

10970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 GundamGuy0
Member since 2003 • 10970 Posts

[QUOTE="thepwninator"][QUOTE="jimkabrhel"]

It's his opinion. How can it be wrong?

thegoldenpoo

Because what he's saying isn't actually an opinion. It's a hypothesis, and hypotheses CAN be very, very wrong. I abhor this "he can't be wrong because it's his opinion" crap that has plagued every corner of the internet for the past year or two BECAUSE no one seems to comprehend what separates an opinion from other things like hypotheses and theories.

THANKYOU!

The "Well it's his opinion!" Defence of down right wrong comments is a thin one, this was nit an opinion. It was an assertion with IMO tacked on the end. IMO is not a defece for having your nonsense picked apart. You could just say "Oranges are Blue IMO". It's got IMO in it but it is a wrong assertion.

Ok now that's out of the way, yeah all these so called 'Hardcores' demanding decent software, not settling for gimped on-line. this is waht is killing gaming. Not software companies pandering to simplisitic formulaic games on the Wii. I mean heack it's not like the HD systems have any decent games on them, screw the facts i want more causal games so i can quote sales and tell people how we are saving gaming! Yey! :|.

The HD systems are not at a disadvantage, how could "Hardcore" gaming be killing gaming? You refer to the casuals but you never really define either party, is it just an arbitrary line? Well say the 'Casuals' are saving gaming is just plain wrong. sure they add gross to some companies but as far as decent gamea are concerned the traditional audience is still coughing up the dough to keep them coming.

Take for example the game in my sig STALKER, how are undergound gems like that "Help up by the casuals?" this is what gaming survies on, compaines taking risks becuase they know there is a decicated audience out there who want more than a shallow 5 minuite mini game. "Gaming" is a very broad thing, if you are talking about unit shifing then yes the casuals make an impace but if we are talking about developers and them being able to make decent games (ie what we want!!!) then your statements about the "Hardcore" gamer hold no water.

PC is a different case, but PC game sales have been poor... everyone is expecting a really poor E3 on the PC side.
Avatar image for thegoldenpoo
thegoldenpoo

5136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#33 thegoldenpoo
Member since 2005 • 5136 Posts
[QUOTE="thegoldenpoo"]

[QUOTE="thepwninator"] Because what he's saying isn't actually an opinion. It's a hypothesis, and hypotheses CAN be very, very wrong. I abhor this "he can't be wrong because it's his opinion" crap that has plagued every corner of the internet for the past year or two BECAUSE no one seems to comprehend what separates an opinion from other things like hypotheses and theories.GundamGuy0

THANKYOU!

The "Well it's his opinion!" Defence of down right wrong comments is a thin one, this was nit an opinion. It was an assertion with IMO tacked on the end. IMO is not a defece for having your nonsense picked apart. You could just say "Oranges are Blue IMO". It's got IMO in it but it is a wrong assertion.

Ok now that's out of the way, yeah all these so called 'Hardcores' demanding decent software, not settling for gimped on-line. this is waht is killing gaming. Not software companies pandering to simplisitic formulaic games on the Wii. I mean heack it's not like the HD systems have any decent games on them, screw the facts i want more causal games so i can quote sales and tell people how we are saving gaming! Yey! :|.

The HD systems are not at a disadvantage, how could "Hardcore" gaming be killing gaming? You refer to the casuals but you never really define either party, is it just an arbitrary line? Well say the 'Casuals' are saving gaming is just plain wrong. sure they add gross to some companies but as far as decent gamea are concerned the traditional audience is still coughing up the dough to keep them coming.

Take for example the game in my sig STALKER, how are undergound gems like that "Help up by the casuals?" this is what gaming survies on, compaines taking risks becuase they know there is a decicated audience out there who want more than a shallow 5 minuite mini game. "Gaming" is a very broad thing, if you are talking about unit shifing then yes the casuals make an impace but if we are talking about developers and them being able to make decent games (ie what we want!!!) then your statements about the "Hardcore" gamer hold no water.

PC is a different case, but PC game sales have been poor... everyone is expecting a really poor E3 on the PC side.

How can it possibly be bad? PC is set for an epic year in 2009, hell we have already had one. that's kinda unfounded TBH.
Avatar image for Shinobishyguy
Shinobishyguy

22928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#34 Shinobishyguy
Member since 2006 • 22928 Posts

[QUOTE="thepwninator"][QUOTE="jimkabrhel"]

It's his opinion. How can it be wrong?

thegoldenpoo

Because what he's saying isn't actually an opinion. It's a hypothesis, and hypotheses CAN be very, very wrong. I abhor this "he can't be wrong because it's his opinion" crap that has plagued every corner of the internet for the past year or two BECAUSE no one seems to comprehend what separates an opinion from other things like hypotheses and theories.

THANKYOU!

The "Well it's his opinion!" Defence of down right wrong comments is a thin one, this was nit an opinion. It was an assertion with IMO tacked on the end. IMO is not a defece for having your nonsense picked apart. You could just say "Oranges are Blue IMO". It's got IMO in it but it is a wrong assertion.

I gotta agree with this. I've seen plenty of people use the "bu bu opinion" defence....and it's getting annoying.

Yes you have the right to your own opinion...but depending on what it is it IS entirely possible for your opinion to be wrong.

Avatar image for deactivated-5b78379493e12
deactivated-5b78379493e12

15625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#35 deactivated-5b78379493e12
Member since 2005 • 15625 Posts

[QUOTE="thegoldenpoo"]

[QUOTE="thepwninator"] Because what he's saying isn't actually an opinion. It's a hypothesis, and hypotheses CAN be very, very wrong. I abhor this "he can't be wrong because it's his opinion" crap that has plagued every corner of the internet for the past year or two BECAUSE no one seems to comprehend what separates an opinion from other things like hypotheses and theories.Shinobishyguy

THANKYOU!

The "Well it's his opinion!" Defence of down right wrong comments is a thin one, this was nit an opinion. It was an assertion with IMO tacked on the end. IMO is not a defece for having your nonsense picked apart. You could just say "Oranges are Blue IMO". It's got IMO in it but it is a wrong assertion.

I was trying to encourage him to give some evidence, isntead of the blanket statement " YOU ARE WRONG".

I gotta agree with this. I've seen plenty of people use the "bu bu opinion" defence....and it's getting annoying.

Yes you have the right to your own opinion...but depending on what it is it IS entirely possible for your opinion to be wrong.

Avatar image for thepwninator
thepwninator

8134

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#36 thepwninator
Member since 2006 • 8134 Posts

[QUOTE="Shinobishyguy"]

[QUOTE="thegoldenpoo"]

THANKYOU!

The "Well it's his opinion!" Defence of down right wrong comments is a thin one, this was nit an opinion. It was an assertion with IMO tacked on the end. IMO is not a defece for having your nonsense picked apart. You could just say "Oranges are Blue IMO". It's got IMO in it but it is a wrong assertion.

jimkabrhel

I gotta agree with this. I've seen plenty of people use the "bu bu opinion" defence....and it's getting annoying.

Yes you have the right to your own opinion...but depending on what it is it IS entirely possible for your opinion to be wrong.

I was trying to encourage him to give some evidence, isntead of the blanket statement " YOU ARE WRONG".

I think the three of us complaining about it are complaining about the trend in general, which is unarguably extremely annoying.

Avatar image for deactivated-5b78379493e12
deactivated-5b78379493e12

15625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#37 deactivated-5b78379493e12
Member since 2005 • 15625 Posts

[QUOTE="jimkabrhel"]

[QUOTE="Shinobishyguy"]

I gotta agree with this. I've seen plenty of people use the "bu bu opinion" defence....and it's getting annoying.

Yes you have the right to your own opinion...but depending on what it is it IS entirely possible for your opinion to be wrong.

thepwninator

I was trying to encourage him to give some evidence, isntead of the blanket statement " YOU ARE WRONG".

I think the three of us complaining about it are complaining about the trend in general, which is unarguably extremely annoying.

Which is why I'm going to stop using the "it's his opinion" defense, lest I become annoying myself. I don't want to contribute to a trend here.

Avatar image for gamer620
gamer620

3367

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 gamer620
Member since 2004 • 3367 Posts

I heard Factor 5 went bankrup after they left Nintendo to make Lair for the PS3. Seem like developers that left Nintendo to make exclusive games for other consoles are either went bankrup or fail in making quality games. Any other developers?

nchan
Silicon Knights stillin my opinion made a quality game. Too Human is quite fun despite its obvious flaws. I have put more time into it than most AAA titles this generation.
Avatar image for mariokart64fan
mariokart64fan

20828

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 101

User Lists: 1

#40 mariokart64fan
Member since 2003 • 20828 Posts

heres another one , ,free radical ,, they were doing well before they made haze for ps3,

now theres 3d realms whom made quake 4 for the 360 launch , , that was their last game lol

then theres midway who last mad mortal kombat dc univers for ps3 360 they should have made it for every console available they could have still been here

Avatar image for JLF1
JLF1

8263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 JLF1
Member since 2005 • 8263 Posts

heres another one , ,free radical ,, they were doing well before they made haze for ps3,

now theres 3d realms whom made quake 4 for the 360 launch , , that was their last game lol

then theres midway who last mad mortal kombat dc univers for ps3 360 they should have made it for every console available they could have still been here

mariokart64fan



You have a point with FR but not the rest.

3D Realms didn't release Quake 4, they released Prey and made money on it. The reason they went under is because they started developing a game 13 years ago that they never managed to release. Long before any HD console.

Midway actually made a ton of money on MK vs DC it's just that they have done a ton of bad games this gen that hasn't sold well from the start. It would not have mattered if Midway did a Wii version they would still not be here today.


You have two major faults in your post. One is the fact that the developers you mentioned was never Nintendo exclusive so they don't fit the TC claim that if you leave Nintendo you will go under. The second is mentioning Midway which has basically nothing to do with this thread as the reason they are out is because of a ton of failures this gen and not ONE failure.