So I've finally broken down and decided to buy a new gaming system but I'm having a hard time deciding which one I want to get.
Typically I've been a PC person but it seems like getting a 360 or PS3 is way cheaper than investing in a gaming PC. On the other hand, PC's generally get much better game selection than any particular console, although consoles do have their own "brands" of games.
I've heard that the 360's have a lot of performance issues based on poor cooling design and that the PS3 suffers from too high a price and poor game selection. PC's are generally much more expensive and have a higher chance of having a fatal component error.
Anyway, what do you all think?
mattsesar
You will not be able to build a PC that can compete w/ the 360 for the price of the 360. That's a simple fact.
But you can't do everything you can do on a PC on a 360. the 360 is strictly for gaming.
the PS3 will bloom next year. probably around the summer. You should wait until at least then to buy one. They will use 65nm chips which will use 50% less electricity (they use A LOT now), they will include the rumble controllers (Dual Shock 3), there will actually be more than a small handful of games worth playing, and they will be less expensive.
The 65nm 360s will be arriving in the states about 2 weeks after HALO 3 arrives.
PCs are also just entering the crossover point. Quad cores are too expensive now, but in 9 months they will be very affordable, the current high end video cards will also be 1/2 the cost at that time as well.
So my recommendation would be this: Buy a 360 now (in 3 weeks). Enjoy it & save up for a PC. Buy/Build a PC when quad cores approach $150 in 9 months & when vid cards 1/2 in price. Then buy a PS3 after it moves to 65nm & Dual Shock 3 w/ price cut (should be $350 then).
Log in to comment