lets look at the developers that ruined their awsome games by going after the console market and "dumbing down" their games
we had Morrowind...and then Oblivion (which was dumbed down)
we had Crysis..... and then Crysis 2 and 3 (dumbed down)
any more
When will people realize that Crysis being on consoles didn't necessarily made the game that way? it was more a decision on their part to have the game made that way in the first place. Crysis 2 could have been like crysis one and been on the consoles. Games like Far Cry 3 prove that it can be done no problem. Just becaus Crytec sucks doesn't mean you gotta blame it on the target audience.
Crysis like game could never be on the consoles. Crysis on the consoles is the proof of that. Far Cry 3 is a pretty bad example. Both play very differently.
it's just literally impossible for you to defend that argument right there.
I just did. Crysis triology on consoles if a proof of that RIGHT THERE and we have the devs remarks to back them up as well.
That doesn't make any sense when there's games available for the system that do open world FPS. Crytec sucks, that's just how it is.
None of it does what Crysis does. All the suits powers were butchered for consololes crowd. Game went from being open world to corridors, since it couldn't be done on consololes. No, Far Cry 3 is not a proof that Crysis can be done on consololes. Crysis maps were far far bigger. Have different environments all together. FC3 is pretty much your regular run to gun game with skyboxes, low draw distance, no long range battles and did I remind you that everything in Crysis was interactive. FC3 didn't and neither the Crysis sequels.
Log in to comment