PC's will be obsolete

[QUOTE="skrat_01"]

Macintosh Computers are Personal Computers

/thread

Zythyl

made me lol

but yeah, isn't a Mac a PC also? just with a different (less compatible with gaming) OS??

[QUOTE="zaku101"]

The extra features are actually pretty useless to an average labtop user

Bentham

Pretty useless, according to whom?

I would rather take the more powerful labtop over the weaker more expense MAC labtop.

zaku101

That's perfectly understandable. I go to college, and I bring my laptop everywhere, I need it to be durable. I don't really care about the .50 GHz or the extra 2GB of RAM. The MacBook Pro is an incredibly powerful laptop configuration. People have different needs when it comes to computers. You want power, and I want power+durability/dependability. 

amen to that and I leave it at that and say that, you can have an extremely fast computer, but what about the other major flaws all Pcs have. 

"You can put lipstick on a pig, but it's still a pig." 

You can put in a better processor, add ram, add something with a name that sounds like it will probably help a lot, but it's still a PC.

[QUOTE="zaku101"]

The extra features are actually pretty useless to an average labtop user

Bentham

Pretty useless, according to whom?

I would rather take the more powerful labtop over the weaker more expense MAC labtop.

zaku101

That's perfectly understandable. I go to college, and I bring my laptop everywhere, I need it to be durable. I don't really care about the .50 GHz or the extra 2GB of RAM. The MacBook Pro is an incredibly powerful laptop configuration. People have different needs when it comes to computers. You want power, and I want power+durability/dependability. 

I am sure if we took both of those labtops listed in the later posts and tried breaking them, either one could break first. I don't see any special durability design on the mac. I would also rather trust the dependability of the other computer since it's pretty much made by ASUS and they've made millions of boards rather than just Apple boards. Experience=power+durability/dependability-This is where ASUS shines, I also forgot to add price into it.

[QUOTE="Guybrush_3"]Because macs are insanely overpirced.Bentham

Not really. 

Yes really. Here in Australia, the 15" MacBook Pro costs $4000, while a Toshiba or Lenovo laptop with similar specs would cost $1600. This is just laptops, for desktops its even worse.

[QUOTE="Bentham"][QUOTE="zaku101"]

 

Pretty useless, according to whom?

 

[QUOTE="zaku101"]I would rather take the more powerful labtop over the weaker more expense MAC labtop.

PlayaInDaHood

That's perfectly understandable. I go to college, and I bring my laptop everywhere, I need it to be durable. I don't really care about the .50 GHz or the extra 2GB of RAM. The MacBook Pro is an incredibly powerful laptop configuration. People have different needs when it comes to computers. You want power, and I want power+durability/dependability. 

amen to that and I leave it at that and say that, you can have an extremely fast computer, but what about the other major flaws all Pcs have. 

"You can put lipstick on a pig, but it's still a pig." 

You can put in a better processor, add ram, add something with a name that sounds like it will probably help a lot, but it's still a PC.

 -You can put in a better processor, add ram, add something with a name that sounds like it will probably help a lot, but it's still a PC.-

No it's not just a PC, it's evolution, pay for a PC 3 years old and it can still be capable of running the nextgen hardware. Buy a mac and it's like limited evolution in which ends up costing you more as well. When you state PCs have their flaws, you seem to fail to realize that MACs have greater flaws. Limiting the ability of expansion almost makes them no different than labtops. Once you actually build a PC and learn more about hardware you'll understand everything.

[QUOTE="skrat_01"]

Macintosh Computers are Personal Computers

/thread

Zythyl

Id rather that than Apple marketing campaign generalisations ;)

A Mac with boot camp is a PC.RK-Mara

Except it will make your wallet thinner :P

A Mac with boot camp is a PC.RK-Mara

fin. thread

don't get me started on macs

1 they cost waaaay to much, you have to buy a power mac to get a mac comparable to a average desktop pc, imacs are laptops with faster hard drives

2 you can't easily upgrade macs and that is a big problem

3 if you buy a imac you waste the monitor when you buy a new one

4 you have to use pc mouse to make a mac fully useable

5 they crash just as much as a windows based pc

6 the imacs have crappy monitors

7 windows has way more software support

8 have to pay stupied amount of money just to put more ram in

I could go on all day about why macs aren't anything special  Until you can buy a imac for under $500 they wont become mainstream and until you can get a mac pro for a reasonable amount of money they will remain a niche market.  

A average gaming pc blows the fastet imac away in every way, imacs are laptops that want to be desktops, A gaming pc is most comareable to the mac pro

problems with consoles

1 they are trying to be a pc

2 you need a hdtv to fully enjoy them now

3 games are stupiedly expencive (fallout 3 pc $100nzd ps3 $130-$140nzd)

4 you are charged for downloading additional content (look at valve all free)

5 they lack many of the advatages they used to have (great local mp etc)

6 rrod

7 slow loading compared to pc

It won't be long until you can play all the same games on a mac. They are already selling some very decent games for mac like Call of duty 4. I also can't see how not understanding some of you are. It's like you've been brainwashed your whole life to think Pcs are the way to go. So what If they can be customized. You can do whatever you like to try to cover up the truth that it's a PC. Current Macs get it right the first time and don't need a lot of customization.PlayaInDaHood

so? that just makes pc gaming stronger.  until macs have decent gpu options they wont touch a windows based pc for gaming.  I want to pick the cpu, gpu mob etc mac forces me to buy stuff I don't want.  macs are pretty slow boxes that lock the user out of doing what they want.

[QUOTE="Bentham"]350 isn't insanely overpriced--and the MBP you linked me to is the older model. You definitely have to pay premium for it, but it's worth it for some.

 

AdrianWerner

Thinkpads are a different class of PC's. They aren't for consumers, rather businesses. They are rugged machines built with the best keyboard in the business. Macbooks are made for consumers, NOT businesses despite what people think. Mac's aren't leased nor are they financially viable for a product which battery life drops down to 30 minutes after a year and a half of use. 

[QUOTE="AdrianWerner"][QUOTE="Bentham"]350 isn't insanely overpriced--and the MBP you linked me to is the older model. You definitely have to pay premium for it, but it's worth it for some.

Bentham

I totally agree with you; that's why I get a bit annoyed when people refer to Macs as "insanely expensive."

Ok let me try this way "macs are insanely expencive for hardware they offer"

In other words,you can get same or bether hardware on pc for cheaper price

+ pc is upgradable,once mac gets old you have to buy all new one - with pc you just upgrade lets say gpu or processor

[QUOTE="Bentham"][QUOTE="AdrianWerner"]A lot of good laptops cost the same as Macbooks to be honest, Thinkpads for example are priced on similiar level and yet millions of people pick THinkpads over Macbooks. Price isn't the only reason why some people prefer PCs over Macs and vice versaLidve

I totally agree with you; that's why I get a bit annoyed when people refer to Macs as "insanely expensive."

Ok let me try this way "macs are insanely expencive for hardware they offer"

In other words,you can get same or bether hardware on pc for cheaper price

+ pc is upgradable,once mac gets old you have to buy all new one - with pc you just upgrade lets say gpu or processor

And to add to this they aren't worth the money: Glossy screens (HUGE NEGATIVE, the glare is horrid), some of the worse LCD panels on the macbook, not spill proof, no blu ray (Hell I can get a acer 17" with bluray for 900), and no 3G, WiMAX. Apple pc's are toys for consumers, I was speaking with the editors of CBC live and they laughed at the idea of using FCP for editing. aVID, and self-written programs are what they use, and PCs only (Not just windows).

[QUOTE="Lidve"][QUOTE="Bentham"]

 

I totally agree with you; that's why I get a bit annoyed when people refer to Macs as "insanely expensive."

Dynafrom

Ok let me try this way "macs are insanely expencive for hardware they offer"

In other words,you can get same or bether hardware on pc for cheaper price

+ pc is upgradable,once mac gets old you have to buy all new one - with pc you just upgrade lets say gpu or processor

And to add to this they aren't worth the money: Glossy screens (HUGE NEGATIVE, the glare is horrid), some of the worse LCD panels on the macbook, not spill proof, no blu ray (Hell I can get a acer 17" with bluray for 900), and no 3G, WiMAX. Apple pc's are toys for consumers, I was speaking with the editors of CBC live and they laughed at the idea of using FCP for editing. aVID, and self-written programs are what they use, and PCs only (Not just windows).

I love my glass screen (I have an HP media laptop) unless I have the brightness low in an overly lit area. It makes the picture much sharper than it would otherwise be. 

don't get me started on macs

1 they cost waaaay to much, you have to buy a power mac to get a mac comparable to a average desktop pc, imacs are laptops with faster hard drives

2 you can't easily upgrade macs and that is a big problem

3 if you buy a imac you waste the monitor when you buy a new one

4 you have to use pc mouse to make a mac fully useable

5 they crash just as much as a windows based pc

6 the imacs have crappy monitors

7 windows has way more software support

8 have to pay stupied amount of money just to put more ram in

I could go on all day about why macs aren't anything special Until you can buy a imac for under $500 they wont become mainstream and until you can get a mac pro for a reasonable amount of money they will remain a niche market.

A average gaming pc blows the fastet imac away in every way, imacs are laptops that want to be desktops, A gaming pc is most comareable to the mac pro

problems with consoles

1 they are trying to be a pc

2 you need a hdtv to fully enjoy them now

3 games are stupiedly expencive (fallout 3 pc $100nzd ps3 $130-$140nzd)

4 you are charged for downloading additional content (look at valve all free)

5 they lack many of the advatages they used to have (great local mp etc)

6 rrod

7 slow loading compared to pc

imprezawrx500

This man speaks the truth. Apple charges people an arm and a leg just for their brandname. When you buy a Mac, most of your money goes towards the Apple logo, and NOT build quality. Here in Australia, Apple charges $4000 for the MacBook Pro which has the same specs as a PC Laptop for $1600! How Apple can charge $4000 for a laptop with only 2 USB ports and standard hardware is beyond me.

[QUOTE="PlayaInDaHood"][QUOTE="Bentham"]

 

That's perfectly understandable. I go to college, and I bring my laptop everywhere, I need it to be durable. I don't really care about the .50 GHz or the extra 2GB of RAM. The MacBook Pro is an incredibly powerful laptop configuration. People have different needs when it comes to computers. You want power, and I want power+durability/dependability. zaku101

amen to that and I leave it at that and say that, you can have an extremely fast computer, but what about the other major flaws all Pcs have. 

"You can put lipstick on a pig, but it's still a pig." 

You can put in a better processor, add ram, add something with a name that sounds like it will probably help a lot, but it's still a PC.

 -You can put in a better processor, add ram, add something with a name that sounds like it will probably help a lot, but it's still a PC.-

No it's not just a PC, it's evolution, pay for a PC 3 years old and it can still be capable of running the nextgen hardware. Buy a mac and it's like limited evolution in which ends up costing you more as well. When you state PCs have their flaws, you seem to fail to realize that MACs have greater flaws. Limiting the ability of expansion almost makes them no different than labtops. Once you actually build a PC and learn more about hardware you'll understand everything.

What? The only thing that I can think macs are limited to is speed. Macs are more efficient. Listen to this: "Yes, PCs run at a faster clock speed than Macs, but they have 20 clock cycles per operation, meaning it will take longer to do an operation than a Mac running at 7 clock cycles per operation. PC makers have used this tactic for years, they thought that if they blotted the PC with gigahertz that the consumerwould be so dazzeled that they would forget every other factor."

Macs are more efficient, compact, and reliable, and I leave it at that, and it is a fact. No more comebacks, you'll just sound stupid. 

[QUOTE="PlayaInDaHood"]

Macs can run the same software as macs can with bootcamp right? Except for games right? Games are for consoles, not computers right? Why the heck would you buy a PC just for a PC only game right? Hmmm. So if everyone realized you can get everything you like on you PCs except the games on a Mac, wouldn't everyone's next computer be a Mac? So Pcs could eventually be obsolete right?

Can Bootcamp run all the software a PC can, I actually don't know.

bladeeagle

PCs are cheaper.

And an open architecture. I can do whatever I want to my PC. I need to go through Apple to do the same thing to a Mac.

If PC's are on the way out I wonder why then all the console manufacturers are trying to turn their gaming consoles, those plug-n-play machines of fun, into PC's by adding updates, downloadable content, harddisk installs and other PC-like features?foxhound_fox

Which is why ive said again and again..

Consoles as we used to know them are dead, and this is just further proof that the Term "Console" is on its way out, and everything else from now on will just be computers.

I am having a hard time trying to understand what you are saying.

But I think you are asking why someone would buy a PC when the could use a Mac?

Anyways, PCs are cheaper than Macs and have better hardware. So why would you buy a Mac?

[QUOTE="zaku101"][QUOTE="PlayaInDaHood"]

amen to that and I leave it at that and say that, you can have an extremely fast computer, but what about the other major flaws all Pcs have.

"You can put lipstick on a pig, but it's still a pig."

You can put in a better processor, add ram, add something with a name that sounds like it will probably help a lot, but it's still a PC.

PlayaInDaHood

-You can put in a better processor, add ram, add something with a name that sounds like it will probably help a lot, but it's still a PC.-

No it's not just a PC, it's evolution, pay for a PC 3 years old and it can still be capable of running the nextgen hardware. Buy a mac and it's like limited evolution in which ends up costing you more as well. When you state PCs have their flaws, you seem to fail to realize that MACs have greater flaws. Limiting the ability of expansion almost makes them no different than labtops. Once you actually build a PC and learn more about hardware you'll understand everything.

What? The only thing that I can think macs are limited to is speed. Macs are more efficient. Listen to this: "Yes, PCs run at a faster clock speed than Macs, but they have 20 clock cycles per operation, meaning it will take longer to do an operation than a Mac running at 7 clock cycles per operation. PC makers have used this tactic for years, they thought that if they blotted the PC with gigahertz that the consumerwould be so dazzeled that they would forget every other factor."

Macs are more efficient, compact, and reliable, and I leave it at that, and it is a fact. No more comebacks, you'll just sound stupid.

The 20 stage pipeline is referring to the Netburst architecture which has gone extinct.

[QUOTE="PlayaInDaHood"][QUOTE="zaku101"]

 

-You can put in a better processor, add ram, add something with a name that sounds like it will probably help a lot, but it's still a PC.-

No it's not just a PC, it's evolution, pay for a PC 3 years old and it can still be capable of running the nextgen hardware. Buy a mac and it's like limited evolution in which ends up costing you more as well. When you state PCs have their flaws, you seem to fail to realize that MACs have greater flaws. Limiting the ability of expansion almost makes them no different than labtops. Once you actually build a PC and learn more about hardware you'll understand everything.

mattbbpl

What? The only thing that I can think macs are limited to is speed. Macs are more efficient. Listen to this: "Yes, PCs run at a faster clock speed than Macs, but they have 20 clock cycles per operation, meaning it will take longer to do an operation than a Mac running at 7 clock cycles per operation. PC makers have used this tactic for years, they thought that if they blotted the PC with gigahertz that the consumerwould be so dazzeled that they would forget every other factor."

Macs are more efficient, compact, and reliable, and I leave it at that, and it is a fact. No more comebacks, you'll just sound stupid.

The 20 stage pipeline is referring to the Netburst architecture which has gone extinct.

Macs are still efficient... 

[QUOTE="mattbbpl"][QUOTE="PlayaInDaHood"]

What? The only thing that I can think macs are limited to is speed. Macs are more efficient. Listen to this: "Yes, PCs run at a faster clock speed than Macs, but they have 20 clock cycles per operation, meaning it will take longer to do an operation than a Mac running at 7 clock cycles per operation. PC makers have used this tactic for years, they thought that if they blotted the PC with gigahertz that the consumerwould be so dazzeled that they would forget every other factor."

Macs are more efficient, compact, and reliable, and I leave it at that, and it is a fact. No more comebacks, you'll just sound stupid.

PlayaInDaHood

The 20 stage pipeline is referring to the Netburst architecture which has gone extinct.

Macs are still efficient...

No argument here, but the fact the PC CPUs are now as efficient makes this argument moot.

[QUOTE="mattbbpl"][QUOTE="PlayaInDaHood"]

What? The only thing that I can think macs are limited to is speed. Macs are more efficient. Listen to this: "Yes, PCs run at a faster clock speed than Macs, but they have 20 clock cycles per operation, meaning it will take longer to do an operation than a Mac running at 7 clock cycles per operation. PC makers have used this tactic for years, they thought that if they blotted the PC with gigahertz that the consumerwould be so dazzeled that they would forget every other factor."

Macs are more efficient, compact, and reliable, and I leave it at that, and it is a fact. No more comebacks, you'll just sound stupid.

PlayaInDaHood

The 20 stage pipeline is referring to the Netburst architecture which has gone extinct.

Macs are still efficient...

I should have included this in the original reply to this post, but many Macs now use PC processors.

http://www.apple.com/imac/features/

don't get me started on macs

1 they cost waaaay to much, you have to buy a power mac to get a mac comparable to a average desktop pc, imacs are laptops with faster hard drives

2 you can't easily upgrade macs and that is a big problem

3 if you buy a imac you waste the monitor when you buy a new one

4 you have to use pc mouse to make a mac fully useable

5 they crash just as much as a windows based pc

6 the imacs have crappy monitors

7 windows has way more software support

8 have to pay stupied amount of money just to put more ram in

 

I could go on all day about why macs aren't anything special  Until you can buy a imac for under $500 they wont become mainstream and until you can get a mac pro for a reasonable amount of money they will remain a niche market.  

A average gaming pc blows the fastet imac away in every way, imacs are laptops that want to be desktops, A gaming pc is most comareable to the mac pro

 

problems with consoles

1 they are trying to be a pc

2 you need a hdtv to fully enjoy them now

3 games are stupiedly expencive (fallout 3 pc $100nzd ps3 $130-$140nzd)

4 you are charged for downloading additional content (look at valve all free)

5 they lack many of the advatages they used to have (great local mp etc)

6 rrod

7 slow loading compared to pc

 

imprezawrx500

next-gen... consoles will kill pcs in graphics. 'nuff said.

Macs can run the same software as Pcs can with bootcamp right? Except for games right? Games are for consoles, not computers right?  Why the heck would you buy a PC just for a PC only game right? Hmmm. So if everyone realized you can get everything you like on you PCs except the games on a Mac, wouldn't everyone's next computer be a Mac? So Pcs could eventually be obsolete right? 

Can Bootcamp run all the software a PC can, I actually don't know. 

PlayaInDaHood

First of all, since when did Macs become the superior computer?  I will take Vista over Leopard any day, not to mention the compatability I get with my PC laptop.  More colleges and businesses are becoming Mac friendly every day, but there are still many that aren't.

Also, some games are much better on PCs than their console counterparts.  FPS and RTS games are almost always superior on a computer because of the greatest game controller of all time: the mouse.

Finally, pricing is an issue with Macs.  If I am a travelling salesperson, I will take a light, efficient, $600 PC laptop over a $1200 laptop with features that aren't even useful to me.  Macs have their advantages over PCs, but, in my opinion, unless you are in graphic design, video/sound editing, or website entrepreneurship, most of the advantages to owning a Mac are useless to you.

Both PCs and Macs will become obsolete, probably within the next 20 years.  Technology is improving so quickly that the next breakthrough idea is literally right around the corner.

[QUOTE="PlayaInDaHood"]

Macs can run the same software as Pcs can with bootcamp right? Except for games right? Games are for consoles, not computers right?  Why the heck would you buy a PC just for a PC only game right? Hmmm. So if everyone realized you can get everything you like on you PCs except the games on a Mac, wouldn't everyone's next computer be a Mac? So Pcs could eventually be obsolete right? 

Can Bootcamp run all the software a PC can, I actually don't know. 

Metamorbis

First of all, since when did Macs become the superior computer?  I will take Vista over Leopard any day, not to mention the compatability I get with my PC laptop.  More colleges and businesses are becoming Mac friendly every day, but there are still many that aren't.

Also, some games are much better on PCs than their console counterparts.  FPS and RTS games are almost always superior on a computer because of the greatest game controller of all time: the mouse.

Finally, pricing is an issue with Macs.  If I am a travelling salesperson, I will take a light, efficient, $600 PC laptop over a $1200 laptop with features that aren't even useful to me.  Macs have their advantages over PCs, but, in my opinion, unless you are in graphic design, video/sound editing, or website entrepreneurship, most of the advantages to owning a Mac are useless to you.

Both PCs and Macs will become obsolete, probably within the next 20 years.  Technology is improving so quickly that the next breakthrough idea is literally right around the corner.

i doubt that... Macs are the bomb for the arts... the software just works better and its just more functional. 

PCs are better in every way

i can build and customise it myself, not pay for upgrades and labor.

I can play games on it. and from my experiences anyway, it is far more stable

[QUOTE="mattbbpl"][QUOTE="PlayaInDaHood"]

 

 

 

What? The only thing that I can think macs are limited to is speed. Macs are more efficient. Listen to this: "Yes, PCs run at a faster clock speed than Macs, but they have 20 clock cycles per operation, meaning it will take longer to do an operation than a Mac running at 7 clock cycles per operation. PC makers have used this tactic for years, they thought that if they blotted the PC with gigahertz that the consumerwould be so dazzeled that they would forget every other factor."

Macs are more efficient, compact, and reliable, and I leave it at that, and it is a fact. No more comebacks, you'll just sound stupid.

 

PlayaInDaHood

The 20 stage pipeline is referring to the Netburst architecture which has gone extinct.

Macs are still efficient... 

Dude. Macbook Pros and most modern windows notebooks use a core 2 duo processor (or have the option of using it). You don't know much about computers do you?

btw your fanboy is showing.

[QUOTE="Metamorbis"][QUOTE="PlayaInDaHood"]

Macs can run the same software as Pcs can with bootcamp right? Except for games right? Games are for consoles, not computers right?  Why the heck would you buy a PC just for a PC only game right? Hmmm. So if everyone realized you can get everything you like on you PCs except the games on a Mac, wouldn't everyone's next computer be a Mac? So Pcs could eventually be obsolete right? 

Can Bootcamp run all the software a PC can, I actually don't know. 

Adrian_Cloud

First of all, since when did Macs become the superior computer?  I will take Vista over Leopard any day, not to mention the compatability I get with my PC laptop.  More colleges and businesses are becoming Mac friendly every day, but there are still many that aren't.

Also, some games are much better on PCs than their console counterparts.  FPS and RTS games are almost always superior on a computer because of the greatest game controller of all time: the mouse.

Finally, pricing is an issue with Macs.  If I am a travelling salesperson, I will take a light, efficient, $600 PC laptop over a $1200 laptop with features that aren't even useful to me.  Macs have their advantages over PCs, but, in my opinion, unless you are in graphic design, video/sound editing, or website entrepreneurship, most of the advantages to owning a Mac are useless to you.

Both PCs and Macs will become obsolete, probably within the next 20 years.  Technology is improving so quickly that the next breakthrough idea is literally right around the corner.

i doubt that... Macs are the bomb for the arts... the software just works better and its just more functional. 

Which is why adobe dropped the bombshell on mac for CS4? LOL

Good freaking luck getting the linux community to use Macs buddy, Mac OS may be a *nix based system, but that doesn't stop them from being a pile of.....well I think you get my point.

 And Windows has been at the very core of the corporate buisness IT world for to many years to be dethroned by Mac of all things now. 

Technology-wise, computers will never be obsolete, they can only get better.

Gaming-wise, probably not, if you ever try to make a game the first one you'll make would be on a PC. They're easy for amatuer game makers to release on.

BTW, Macs are PCs.

Many major PC selling stores such as bestbuy don't even sell MACs.zaku101

And I have to say, my Mac feels way more like "my machine" than does my PC. There's not a lot of individuality in "oh, just grab the fastest Core 2 Duo I can afford, pair that with an 8800 GT, and shove it all in one of any number of hideous boxes on sale at Fry's". In contrast, my Mac just seems set up to work the way I think - stuff like the unified menu bar, Expose, Spaces, etc.. 

[QUOTE="zaku101"]Many major PC selling stores such as bestbuy don't even sell MACs.lowe0

And I have to say, my Mac feels way more like "my machine" than does my PC. There's not a lot of individuality in "oh, just grab the fastest Core 2 Duo I can afford, pair that with an 8800 GT, and shove it all in one of any number of hideous boxes on sale at Fry's". In contrast, my Mac just seems set up to work the way I think - stuff like the unified menu bar, Expose, Spaces, etc.. 

[QUOTE="lowe0"]

[QUOTE="zaku101"]Many major PC selling stores such as bestbuy don't even sell MACs.anshul89

And I have to say, my Mac feels way more like "my machine" than does my PC. There's not a lot of individuality in "oh, just grab the fastest Core 2 Duo I can afford, pair that with an 8800 GT, and shove it all in one of any number of hideous boxes on sale at Fry's". In contrast, my Mac just seems set up to work the way I think - stuff like the unified menu bar, Expose, Spaces, etc..

I'd get one of the new upcoming Intel Core i7 CPUs instead of C2D ;)

How many times have we seen ridicolous threads like this?

PC gamign will never die, learn to deal with it.

kozzy1234

did u read his post? 

he mentioned peole should buy macs because they can make it so macs can play pc things.  i would have to say no. macs r expensive then pc but have the same kind of things.