Peter Molyneux says natal is not precise as Move

Thats how i see it in this quote about Move.

"This is purely me talking personally, but I think maybe it's slightly more a device for the core than it is for the casual market, because I think it's quite precise."

Being that he's developing for NATAL with that kid game and Fable 3, I'm sure he noticed Sony was aiming for precsion, and Sonly already dabbled with this stuff with the Sixaxis, EyeToy, and PSEeye. Sony had a clear objective when they were making MOVE, whether that will translate to good sales, is up to the future and games.

Still, Natal will have it's place as well.

It's kind of telling in his quote : "(PS Move) is more a device for the core than it is for the casual market".

That could indicate what the two console makers are going for.

Well with Move you are actually holding on to the device itself, it would be weird if it wasn't more precise. I don't think anyone expects it not to be.

thanks tips

Well with Move you are actually holding on to the device itself, it would be weird if it wasn't more precise. I don't think anyone expects it not to be.

WhyS

I interpret it as Molyneux simply giving Sony props.

I don't really need Peter Molyneux to tell me that 4 cm X-Y-Z spatial resolution is less precise than sub-1 mm X-Y/1 cm Z spatial resolution.

He tried to touch Milo but just couldn't get to the right place :( Peter sadsalxis

Really? I never would have guessed.

Is this the same guy that said Fable 2 would be the greatest RPG ever? After that claim, i could care less.

Is this the same guy that said Fable 2 would be the greatest RPG ever? After that claim, i could care less.

Modern_Unit

Of course it's not. Who expected that body-recognition technology would be more accurate than using a wand? Jesus...

Of course it's not. Who expected that body-recognition technology would be more accurate than using a wand? Jesus...

KristoffBrujah

Exactly. Natal inspects your entire body while Move is on a much smaller scale (your hand).

While good ol' Peter exaggerates quite a bit with his game he is one of the main figures of Natal when people think about it and talk about it. I'd say him giving Sony props on how well they are making it is a good sign for Move, and not necessarily a bad one for Natal (except for here where Cows will have a field day).

That quote says no such thing :|

natal is nothing more than a eye toy copy cat, its the same thing, since the eye toy has been in development since before natal came out, its better.

He tried to touch Milo but just couldn't get to the right place :( Peter sadsalxis

for me it sounds like

"sony you arent going to steal a piece of nintendos casual pie, ouer product is much better suited for the jobb"

Meh, I hope all motion sensing gimmicks crash & burn.

[QUOTE="KristoffBrujah"]

Of course it's not. Who expected that body-recognition technology would be more accurate than using a wand? Jesus...

Supaman222

Exactly. Natal inspects your entire body while Move is on a much smaller scale (your hand).

He tried to touch Milo but just couldn't get to the right place :( Peter sadsalxis

Not that I care but how does him saying that Move is quite precise mean that he doesn't like Natal?

Thats how i see it in this quote about Move.

"This is purely me talking personally, but I think maybe it's slightly more a device for the core than it is for the casual market, because I think it's quite precise."

killzowned24

I'm not particularly excited for either but at least Natal will be used for less types of games. I can't see them implementing it in a FPS or action type of game. It'll probably stick to casual games genres meaning it won't mess up the genres I care about like Move potentially can.Zero5000X

He tried to touch Milo but just couldn't get to the right place :( Peter sadsalxis

natal is nothing more than a eye toy copy cat, its the same thing, since the eye toy has been in development since before natal came out, its better.

PSNIDCiocio313