Planetside 2 - Halo Style (played by me)

  • 73 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for cobrax55
cobrax55

1364

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 cobrax55
Member since 2007 • 1364 Posts

[QUOTE="Jankarcop"]

[QUOTE="Sushiglutton"]Looks very standard and bland.Sushiglutton

Standard and bland, even though there is no FPS currently doing what this game does....while things like Cod/Halo are a dime a dozen..

Consolites am funnay

Please enlighten me. What was unique in that video that other FPS MP games don't allready do?

well, lets start with the fact that its designed for 2000 players....

Avatar image for Sushiglutton
Sushiglutton

10465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#52 Sushiglutton
Member since 2009 • 10465 Posts

[QUOTE="Sushiglutton"][QUOTE="Jankarcop"]Standard and bland, even though there is no FPS currently doing what this game does....while things like Cod/Halo are a dime a dozen..

Consolites am funnay

cobrax55

Please enlighten me. What was unique in that video that other FPS MP games don't allready do?

well, lets start with the fact that its designed for 2000 players....

And that manifests itself how in that video?
Avatar image for cobrax55
cobrax55

1364

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 cobrax55
Member since 2007 • 1364 Posts

[QUOTE="cobrax55"]

[QUOTE="Sushiglutton"] Please enlighten me. What was unique in that video that other FPS MP games don't allready do?Sushiglutton

well, lets start with the fact that its designed for 2000 players....

And that manifests itself how in that video?

I think he edited it, its a different one now. It was a different one before that was of a huge battle.

Avatar image for Loegi
Loegi

1692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 Loegi
Member since 2009 • 1692 Posts

[QUOTE="Loegi"]Looks too boring, slow, and clunky.mitu123

I'm in the beta and it's none of those things, and it does get really hectic like any other shooter with lots of players fighting at once as well.

I played it shortly too, and the slow and boring parts can probably be explained by me being in the wrong area though. It did feel too clunky for me to enjoy though. I wasn't able to get how and where I wanted to move in the game.

Movement is a pretty important part of FPS. Depending on how you play, it can vary in importance too. I like to move around quickly, and efficiently. I wasn't able to do that in PS2.
Avatar image for deactivated-5acbb9993d0bd
deactivated-5acbb9993d0bd

12449

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 deactivated-5acbb9993d0bd
Member since 2012 • 12449 Posts
Every time i play its frigging night time in game and it sucks.
Avatar image for RR360DD
RR360DD

14099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#56 RR360DD
Member since 2011 • 14099 Posts

Meh, Halo 4 looks so much better

Avatar image for deactivated-5acbb9993d0bd
deactivated-5acbb9993d0bd

12449

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 deactivated-5acbb9993d0bd
Member since 2012 • 12449 Posts

Meh, Halo 4 looks so much better

RR360DD

Yea, if you like 4 vs 4 moonwalking **** with noob guns.

Avatar image for nameless12345
nameless12345

15125

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 nameless12345
Member since 2010 • 15125 Posts

I thought the Master Race was beyond Halo and similar consoley kiddie crap? ;) :P

Avatar image for haberman13
haberman13

2414

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 haberman13
Member since 2003 • 2414 Posts

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iHt4j9Zrl0U&feature=plcp

Still an infantry focus, but some more big battles. The original vid was simply to prove that PS2 isn't JUST a massive battle, but also a bunch of skirmish fights throughout the continent.

Anyway ... at :15ish is a hilarious death by 4wheeler.

Truly a fun game, with friends it's probably the most fun you can have gaming.

Avatar image for Jankarcop
Jankarcop

11058

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 Jankarcop
Member since 2011 • 11058 Posts

Meh, Halo 4 looks so much better

RR360DD

-In gfx -> NO

-In battlefield scaling (from small to big skirmishes) -> NO

-In vehicles -> HELL NO (controls, numbers, importance)

-In skillcap and strategy -> No (autoaim vs actual aim, mass battle coordination vs arena spam fest)

..

..

-In ease of use and casual pick up N play -> YES! (congrats)

Avatar image for mems_1224
mems_1224

56919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 mems_1224
Member since 2004 • 56919 Posts

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

Meh, Halo 4 looks so much better

Jankarcop

-In gfx -> NO

-In battlefield scaling (from small to big skirmishes) -> NO

-In vehicles -> HELL NO (controls, numbers, importance)

-In skillcap and strategy -> No (autoaim vs actual aim, mass battle coordination vs arena spam fest)

..

..

-In ease of use and casual pick up N play -> YES! (congrats)

so then halo 4 will be a better game.
Avatar image for haberman13
haberman13

2414

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 haberman13
Member since 2003 • 2414 Posts

Halo is the same game we've all been playing for a decade. Not sure why people like repetitive games, but clearly CoD-sales indicate they do.

So while Halo will certainly out-profit PS2, PS2 is definitively and objectively the superior game.

Avatar image for mems_1224
mems_1224

56919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 mems_1224
Member since 2004 • 56919 Posts

Halo is the same game we've all been playing for a decade. Not sure why people like repetitive games, but clearly CoD-sales indicate they do.

So while Halo will certainly out-profit PS2, PS2 is definitively and objectively the superior game.

haberman13
every game is repetitive Planetside 2 certainly has a bigger battlefield, but Halo 4 offers a lot more content. Halo 4 is going to be amazing and PS2 is already amazing, why only play one when you can play both? :cool:
Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#64 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts
[QUOTE="haberman13"]

Halo is the same game we've all been playing for a decade. Not sure why people like repetitive games, but clearly CoD-sales indicate they do.

So while Halo will certainly out-profit PS2, PS2 is definitively and objectively the superior game.

mems_1224
every game is repetitive Planetside 2 certainly has a bigger battlefield, but Halo 4 offers a lot more content. Halo 4 is going to be amazing and PS2 is already amazing, why only play one when you can play both? :cool:

For once, you are actually making sense.
Avatar image for mems_1224
mems_1224

56919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 mems_1224
Member since 2004 • 56919 Posts

[QUOTE="mems_1224"][QUOTE="haberman13"]

Halo is the same game we've all been playing for a decade. Not sure why people like repetitive games, but clearly CoD-sales indicate they do.

So while Halo will certainly out-profit PS2, PS2 is definitively and objectively the superior game.

clyde46

every game is repetitive Planetside 2 certainly has a bigger battlefield, but Halo 4 offers a lot more content. Halo 4 is going to be amazing and PS2 is already amazing, why only play one when you can play both? :cool:

For once, you are actually making sense.

hey, im not always an obnoxious a**hole :P

Avatar image for haberman13
haberman13

2414

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 haberman13
Member since 2003 • 2414 Posts

[QUOTE="haberman13"]

Halo is the same game we've all been playing for a decade. Not sure why people like repetitive games, but clearly CoD-sales indicate they do.

So while Halo will certainly out-profit PS2, PS2 is definitively and objectively the superior game.

mems_1224

every game is repetitive Planetside 2 certainly has a bigger battlefield, but Halo 4 offers a lot more content. Halo 4 is going to be amazing and PS2 is already amazing, why only play one when you can play both? :cool:

Rational responses are strictly banned here... expect a 3 day suspension.

Avatar image for JangoWuzHere
JangoWuzHere

19032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#67 JangoWuzHere
Member since 2007 • 19032 Posts

Planetside 2 is NOTHING like Halo. It is far more like Battlefield in terms of the shooting and high player counts.

Avatar image for ShadowMoses900
ShadowMoses900

17081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 48

User Lists: 0

#68 ShadowMoses900
Member since 2010 • 17081 Posts

You can't aim down the sights in Halo....so you obviously are not playing it Halo style unless you are trying to use that gun like the Battle Rifle or something.

This game looks decent, but nothing amazing. The big deal about it is it has like hundreds of players, but that doesn't make the game better. I remember games like MAG which did something similar, it was not a very good game. I also hate games that don't have Single Player Campaigns.

Avatar image for mems_1224
mems_1224

56919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 mems_1224
Member since 2004 • 56919 Posts

You can't aim down the sights in Halo....so you obviously are not playing it Halo style unless you are trying to use that gun like the Battle Rifle or something.

This game looks decent, but nothing amazing. The big deal about it is it has like hundreds of players, but that doesn't make the game better. I remember games like MAG which did something similar, it was not a very good game. I also hate games that don't have Single Player Campaigns.

ShadowMoses900
it most definitely makes the game better when there are a ton of people and vehicles on screen. The first time I ever played PS2 some random dude invited me to his squad and we were rolling and taking points with about 10 tanks and a bunch of people on foot. It was like battlefield 3 on steroids, so amazing. MAG was garbage because the gameplay was garbage, PS2 has great gameplay.
Avatar image for haberman13
haberman13

2414

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 haberman13
Member since 2003 • 2414 Posts

You can't aim down the sights in Halo....so you obviously are not playing it Halo style unless you are trying to use that gun like the Battle Rifle or something.

This game looks decent, but nothing amazing. The big deal about it is it has like hundreds of players, but that doesn't make the game better. I remember games like MAG which did something similar, it was not a very good game. I also hate games that don't have Single Player Campaigns.

ShadowMoses900

It is amazing!

Comparing this to MAG is like comparing a toy car to a BMW. Similar in appearance, maybe even attritubes, but a whole different realm.

1000v1000v1000 per continent, 3 armies, fighting over 3 continents. No maps loading, no instancing. One big persistent conflict between nations.

Run with a 40 man platoon using voice, and you're mind will explode with fun.

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#71 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

You can't aim down the sights in Halo....so you obviously are not playing it Halo style unless you are trying to use that gun like the Battle Rifle or something.

This game looks decent, but nothing amazing. The big deal about it is it has like hundreds of players, but that doesn't make the game better. I remember games like MAG which did something similar, it was not a very good game. I also hate games that don't have Single Player Campaigns.

ShadowMoses900
Planetside 2 is much more fun than MAG though and looks way, way better!
Avatar image for R4gn4r0k
R4gn4r0k

49064

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 R4gn4r0k
Member since 2004 • 49064 Posts

You can't aim down the sights in Halo....so you obviously are not playing it Halo style unless you are trying to use that gun like the Battle Rifle or something.

This game looks decent, but nothing amazing. The big deal about it is it has like hundreds of players, but that doesn't make the game better. I remember games like MAG which did something similar, it was not a very good game. I also hate games that don't have Single Player Campaigns.

ShadowMoses900

let's not compare the game to its predecessor which handeled hundreds of players just fine... no, let's compare it to MAG.

Cuz that is the only example you've had on Playstation. One game couldn't handle the concept = all games with that concept must not be good.

Brilliant logic there ShadowMoses, absolutely brilliant

man-applauds.gif?w=400&h=300

Avatar image for mems_1224
mems_1224

56919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 mems_1224
Member since 2004 • 56919 Posts

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

You can't aim down the sights in Halo....so you obviously are not playing it Halo style unless you are trying to use that gun like the Battle Rifle or something.

This game looks decent, but nothing amazing. The big deal about it is it has like hundreds of players, but that doesn't make the game better. I remember games like MAG which did something similar, it was not a very good game. I also hate games that don't have Single Player Campaigns.

R4gn4r0k

let's not compare the game to its predecessor which handeled hundreds of players just fine... no, let's compare it to MAG.

Cuz that is the only example you've had on Playstation. One game couldn't handle the concept = all games with that concept must not be good.

Brilliant logic there ShadowMoses, absolutely brilliant

man-applauds.gif?w=400&h=300

ignore him. he doesn't know about any games outside of his playstation bubble. he claims to own all systems but his posts say otherwise.