PlanetSide 2 will be better then BF3 MP.

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Jebus213
Jebus213

10056

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Jebus213
Member since 2010 • 10056 Posts
First off I'd like start with I'm sorry but BF3 fails in the authenticity, originality, variety, size, and scale of it's predecessors. The game is obviously directed at taking a chunk for the CoD audience. Played Operation Metro lately? Even with 24 players the map is a cluster ****. PlanetSide 2 will kick BF off it's thrown as being a combined arms warfare game. http://www.planetside2.com/

Persistence: In Planetside 2 battles will last longer than a match timer. Battles will last for days or weeks, and finally taking control of the base means it's yours until someone can take it back. Working strategically as a team to capture key tactical positions such as power plants and ammo depots will have long-lasting effects that can shift the tide of battle.

ENORMOUS MAPS: PlanetSide 2 will launch with several continent maps; every inch of which will be contestable space. With the new territorial control meta-game, landmass will have intrinsic value even without notable installations or major features.

VEHICLES: More than 10 vehicles with two unique vehicles per empire. Players will be able to customize each vehicle, unlocking new skills and features

Avatar image for DragonfireXZ95
DragonfireXZ95

26716

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 DragonfireXZ95
Member since 2005 • 26716 Posts
Played Wake Island lately? Or Gulf Of Oman lately?
Avatar image for nurnberg
nurnberg

1313

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 nurnberg
Member since 2005 • 1313 Posts

Looks interesting. And I am a Battlefield 3 fan.

Avatar image for painguy1
painguy1

8686

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 painguy1
Member since 2007 • 8686 Posts

halo 3 PC?

Avatar image for ShadowDeathX
ShadowDeathX

11699

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#5 ShadowDeathX
Member since 2006 • 11699 Posts
Too early to tell. With Sony's recent track record being so negative in comparison to their past selves, who knows really.
Avatar image for GeneralShowzer
GeneralShowzer

11598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#6 GeneralShowzer
Member since 2010 • 11598 Posts
Played Wake Island lately? Or Gulf Of Oman lately?DragonfireXZ95
Yeah, the good maps make the game worth playing. Avoid the bad ones. Can't wait to see what Planetside 2 looks like, hope I get picked for the beta.
Avatar image for DragonfireXZ95
DragonfireXZ95

26716

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 DragonfireXZ95
Member since 2005 • 26716 Posts
It won't throw BF3 off anything. Why? Because it's a different type of game. Planetside 2 is stat based as an RPG and thus you and enemies can take dozens of hits depending on your class and level. It's not as much of a skill based game, it's more of a time sink game where stats matter more than skills.
Avatar image for Zero_epyon
Zero_epyon

20501

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#8 Zero_epyon
Member since 2004 • 20501 Posts
[QUOTE="Jebus213"]First off I'd like start with I'm sorry but BF3 fails in the authenticity, originality, variety, size, and scale of it's predecessors. The game is obviously directed at taking a chunk for the CoD audience. Played Operation Metro lately? Even with 24 players the map is a cluster ****. PlanetSide 2 will kick BF off it's thrown as being a combined arms warfare game. http://www.planetside2.com/

Persistence: In Planetside 2 battles will last longer than a match timer. Battles will last for days or weeks, and finally taking control of the base means it's yours until someone can take it back. Working strategically as a team to capture key tactical positions such as power plants and ammo depots will have long-lasting effects that can shift the tide of battle.

ENORMOUS MAPS: PlanetSide 2 will launch with several continent maps; every inch of which will be contestable space. With the new territorial control meta-game, landmass will have intrinsic value even without notable installations or major features.

VEHICLES: More than 10 vehicles with two unique vehicles per empire. Players will be able to customize each vehicle, unlocking new skills and features

That looks bad. In fact it looks worse than Halo.
Avatar image for Jebus213
Jebus213

10056

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Jebus213
Member since 2010 • 10056 Posts

halo 3 PC?

painguy1
So is every sci-fi shooter a Halo copy now? People said the same thing about the new Tribe's and I've played it and it's nothing like Halo at all.
Avatar image for Jebus213
Jebus213

10056

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Jebus213
Member since 2010 • 10056 Posts
Played Wake Island lately? Or Gulf Of Oman lately?DragonfireXZ95
Yeah I have. They're slightly smaller. Highway Tampa laugh's at every BF3 map.
Avatar image for DragonfireXZ95
DragonfireXZ95

26716

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 DragonfireXZ95
Member since 2005 • 26716 Posts
[QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"]Played Wake Island lately? Or Gulf Of Oman lately?Jebus213
Yeah I have. They're slightly smaller. Highway Tampa laugh's at every BF3 map.

Kind of like how BF3's destruction laughs at BF2's destruction. ;) Nice job trying to downplay BF3 compared to BF2 though.
Avatar image for Jebus213
Jebus213

10056

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Jebus213
Member since 2010 • 10056 Posts
[QUOTE="Jebus213"][QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"]Played Wake Island lately? Or Gulf Of Oman lately?DragonfireXZ95
Yeah I have. They're slightly smaller. Highway Tampa laugh's at every BF3 map.

Kind of like how BF3's destruction laughs at BF2's destruction. ;) Nice job trying to downplay BF3 compared to BF2 though.

Which....means nothing. If cheap scripted destruction is enough to get you sold then we have nothing else to argue about.
Avatar image for DragonfireXZ95
DragonfireXZ95

26716

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 DragonfireXZ95
Member since 2005 • 26716 Posts
[QUOTE="Jebus213"][QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"][QUOTE="Jebus213"] Yeah I have. They're slightly smaller. Highway Tampa laugh's at every BF3 map.

Kind of like how BF3's destruction laughs at BF2's destruction. ;) Nice job trying to downplay BF3 compared to BF2 though.

Which....means nothing...

Lol, you're such a horrible troll.
Avatar image for Arach666
Arach666

23285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 0

#14 Arach666
Member since 2009 • 23285 Posts

I don´t really care if its going to be better than BF3 or not,because its really not the same kind of game but I´m very interested in Planetside 2.

Avatar image for Jebus213
Jebus213

10056

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Jebus213
Member since 2010 • 10056 Posts
[QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"][QUOTE="Jebus213"][QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"] Kind of like how BF3's destruction laughs at BF2's destruction. ;) Nice job trying to downplay BF3 compared to BF2 though.

Which....means nothing...

Lol, you're such a horrible troll.

Not even trolling. Sorry I didn't get consumed by the BF3 hype like everyone else on this forum and defend it to death.
Avatar image for DragonfireXZ95
DragonfireXZ95

26716

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 DragonfireXZ95
Member since 2005 • 26716 Posts
[QUOTE="Jebus213"][QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"][QUOTE="Jebus213"] Which....means nothing...

Lol, you're such a horrible troll.

Not even trolling.

Yes, calling the destruction in Battlefield 3 nothing isn't trolling. :roll: Tell you what, you go back to your static environment shooters and I'll stick with my destructible environments, and we'll both be happy.
Avatar image for Jebus213
Jebus213

10056

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Jebus213
Member since 2010 • 10056 Posts
[QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"][QUOTE="Jebus213"][QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"] Lol, you're such a horrible troll.

Not even trolling.

Yes, calling the destruction in Battlefield 3 nothing isn't trolling. :roll: Tell you what, you go back to your static environment shooters and I'll stick with my destructible environments, and we'll both be happy.

So apparently that's the only thing BF3 has over BF2 other then less bullet deviation and graphics. Defend your beloved game to the death right? A generic military shooter with a cheap six hour campaign, a pointless Co-op, and a botched multiplayer mode aimed at the CoD audience.
Avatar image for SaltyMeatballs
SaltyMeatballs

25165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#18 SaltyMeatballs
Member since 2009 • 25165 Posts
Many good shooters next year. Tibes Ascend looking good, this also looking good, no modern military just big all maps and unique weapons.
Avatar image for Jebus213
Jebus213

10056

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 Jebus213
Member since 2010 • 10056 Posts
Lets see what BF2(PC) has and does better then BF3(PC). - Functioning two channel VoIP(squad internal & leader channels) - Functioning Commo Rose (The current one in BF3 is useless) - Better squad order system - Big maps with the ability to flank & no clustered flags - 64, 32, 16 player maps - More maps - Spawn on the Squad Leader (SL) only (SL deployable spawn point in BF2142) - More in depth Squad Management - Commander position - 6-man squads - mod tools - LAN - No auto health regen/vehicle self repair - Useful minimap with full terrain detail Oh and I forgot "TEAMWORK" and BF3 requires very minimal.
Avatar image for The_Capitalist
The_Capitalist

10838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#20 The_Capitalist
Member since 2004 • 10838 Posts

I played Planetside back when they had the "Planetside Reserves" program. Good game, had excellent scale. Will be keeping an eye on it - I hope it's one of those free to play games.

Avatar image for silversix_
silversix_

26347

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 silversix_
Member since 2010 • 26347 Posts
This must be a Wii exclusive? Dunno about its gameplay but it sure does look fugly.
Avatar image for Alex_Collier
Alex_Collier

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Alex_Collier
Member since 2008 • 25 Posts

Definitely gonna play this, miss the gal escort and mass air strike, good old times.

Avatar image for SaltyMeatballs
SaltyMeatballs

25165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#23 SaltyMeatballs
Member since 2009 • 25165 Posts

This must be a Wii exclusive? Dunno about its gameplay but it sure does look fugly.silversix_
http://ru.memegenerator.net/cache/instances/400x/10/10520/10773253.jpg

.

Avatar image for el3m2tigre
el3m2tigre

4232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#24 el3m2tigre
Member since 2007 • 4232 Posts

It doesn't look all that impressive. :|

Avatar image for HavocV3
HavocV3

8068

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 HavocV3
Member since 2009 • 8068 Posts

It doesn't look all that impressive. :|

el3m2tigre

because it's an MMO FPS and it also needs to be accessible to people with poorer hardware specs.

Avatar image for HavocV3
HavocV3

8068

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 HavocV3
Member since 2009 • 8068 Posts

That looks bad. In fact it looks worse than Halo.Zero_epyon

cool opinion.

too bad Halo isn't an MMO FPS and doesn't rely on unlock systems. so why exactly would you attempt to compare them out of the blue?

try comparing it to MAG or the original Planetside instead.

Avatar image for BrunoBRS
BrunoBRS

74156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#27 BrunoBRS
Member since 2005 • 74156 Posts
1- art styIe reminds me of halo. that's not bad, halo is a pretty game. 2- BF3 has some bad maps, yes. but it also has great maps, and now it has the back to karkand map pack that is composed entirely of amazing maps.
Avatar image for BrunoBRS
BrunoBRS

74156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#28 BrunoBRS
Member since 2005 • 74156 Posts

[QUOTE="silversix_"]This must be a Wii exclusive? Dunno about its gameplay but it sure does look fugly.SaltyMeatballs

http://ru.memegenerator.net/cache/instances/400x/10/10520/10773253.jpg

.

subtitles please :P

Avatar image for Bebi_vegeta
Bebi_vegeta

13558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 Bebi_vegeta
Member since 2003 • 13558 Posts

[QUOTE="el3m2tigre"]

It doesn't look all that impressive. :|

HavocV3

because it's an MMO FPS and it also needs to be accessible to people with poorer hardware specs.

And can someone tell me why it's going to beat BF3 MP... cause he's right, it doesn't look impressive at all, gameplay wise and graphics wise. Atleast if someone is going to make a thread saying it's better then anything... show me and point out why.
Avatar image for HavocV3
HavocV3

8068

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 HavocV3
Member since 2009 • 8068 Posts

[QUOTE="HavocV3"]

[QUOTE="el3m2tigre"]

It doesn't look all that impressive. :|

Bebi_vegeta

because it's an MMO FPS and it also needs to be accessible to people with poorer hardware specs.

And can someone tell me why it's going to beat BF3 MP... cause he's right, it doesn't look impressive at all, gameplay wise and graphics wise. Atleast if someone is going to make a thread saying it's better then anything... show me and point out why.

idk.

free-to-play is all I can come up with. but sometimes that means it's worse:|

probably shouldn't expect any real reasoning around here. and I'm guessing he only put it up against BF3 just to get more people posting here.