Playstation 3 and 1440x900/1680x1050 support.

  • 54 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts
The problem with plasma tvs is that the repair costs are practically the same price as a new tv. By the way, if you want a new tv, buy a Sony, Panasonic or Pioneer. Sony has never let me down on tv durability.sneslover
So what are the MTBF comparison of plasma, LCD, and traditional CRTs?
Avatar image for killab2oo5
killab2oo5

13621

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 killab2oo5
Member since 2005 • 13621 Posts
Why game on a monitor instead on a nice 50" 1080p plasma;)agentzero23
They're cheaper and you get higher resolutions?
Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts
[QUOTE="agentzero23"]Why game on a monitor instead on a nice 50" 1080p plasma;)killab2oo5
They're cheaper and you get higher resolutions?

TV's too big for my room?
Avatar image for HuhJustaBox
HuhJustaBox

1585

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#54 HuhJustaBox
Member since 2006 • 1585 Posts
[QUOTE="HuhJustaBox"]

Just no on so many levels.

8ms is very very slow and will blur like crazy!

Plasma has always been 480htz unless you are refering to some no name plasma manufacturer.

LCD's are cheaper? Just NO!!! Not even close! You can get the panasonic th50pz85u for around $2000 and the Samsung ln52a650 will run you near $3000 and the panasonic still runs circles around it.

I teach full time and work at Circuit City at night selling tvs. This is my line of work as my first degree was in electronics. Trust me, do the research. The Panasonic th50pz800u is now the highest rated tv in the world. They finally knocked off the Pioneer Kuro plasmas that have been king of the hill for the past several years. Go on CNET.com and other sites to read up on professional reviews if you don't believe me.

As for your computer moniter that has 2ms response time, you should not see any blurring on that at all. I don't follow moniters too much, as when I game, watch movies, etc. it is all on a big screen tv. But if you choose to do it on a moniter that has a 2ms response time, you should not see any blurring.

The only thing that holds plasma back are peoples' misconceptions. Most people looking for a tv ask me for LCD's and I ask why not consider plasma. They always tell me that their uncle's neighbors lawnboy said they were bad. Or they heard they don't last as long, the gases need recharged, they have burn in, etc.

After I educate them and give them the facts that none of that is true and show them the plasma next to the LCD, very few people choose LCD. Plasma now lasts 60,000 to 100,000 hours where LCD's are typically 40,000-60,000. You never need to recharge gases, and burn in is no longer an issue due to pixel shifter tech and the scrolling white bar tech.

Again, plasma all the way. Cheaper, better blacks, deeper truer color, lasts longer, gives much more natural picture, no blurring...then the question comes up....Why even look at LCD. My answer, don't waste your time looking. Not until the get better color, deeper blacks, and get that reponse time to under 2ms.

HuusAsking

What about in the sub-$500 range, for those who are getting a new TV because they have to..their last one just died?

Unfortunately, you are not going to be able to get much for $500. Maybe a decent 26 LCD. Plasmas don't come in sizes under 42inches. You would probably be looking at a 26 inch LG or Toshiba, which are not bad, but not the best either.