http://img208.imageshack.us/img208/9283/ps332pk7.jpg
That's why ps3 is inferior to xbox360^^ not to mention inferior gpu and crap cpu.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
http://img208.imageshack.us/img208/9283/ps332pk7.jpg
That's why ps3 is inferior to xbox360^^ not to mention inferior gpu and crap cpu.
ps3, cpu is less powerful for gaming, more powerful streaming videos ****.bobobobodfwofofstreaming videos? What are you talking about?
why would anyone go thru this much trouble but do such a bad arrow drawing job?whoisryanmack
yea it's bad, but need to understand ps3 is a gimped piece of crap, and will never match xbox 360's power because of technical limitations.
You know so much. Crap cpu, what is the xbox 360's cpu then?
nextgengaming18
[QUOTE="bobobobodfwofof"]ps3, cpu is less powerful for gaming, more powerful streaming videos ****.nextgengaming18streaming videos? What are you talking about?
home=streaming videos, ps3 is more of a multimedia processor rather than gaming processors.
all, you need to know, XBOX360 CPU CAN USE 512 MB theroretically
PS3 CPU only has access to 256 mb.thereoretically
Why do you think fight night round 3 has 2d models on ps3 and 3d models on xbox 360? ps3 simply was gimped and ea had no choice but to take out 3d crowds and add some 2d to save memory because it needed more than 256 mb to handle all 3d crowds.
Ps3 will never ever beat, 360 in graphics i dont give a damn what anyones says i know it's technical problems, the casuals dont.
I just showed a xbox360 fan a video of little Big Planet...He didn't even belive it was a game, and when I showed him the live demonstartion he ran out of the room :P lol.  He was my cousin.
this link>>>>> what ever the **** you were on when you made this thead. Have a nice day :)
http://www.gametrailers.com/player.php?id=17723&type=mov&pl=game
THREAD/
Why is this game hyped so much. It doesn't even look good...I just showed a xbox360 fan a video of little Big Planet...He didn't even belive it was a game, and when I showed him the live demonstartion he ran out of the room :P lol.  He was my cousin.
this link>>>>> what ever the **** you were on when you made this thead. Have a nice day :)
http://www.gametrailers.com/player.php?id=17723&type=mov&pl=game
THREAD/
proof11102
I just showed a xbox360 fan a video of little Big Planet...He didn't even belive it was a game, and when I showed him the live demonstartion he ran out of the room :P lol. He was my cousin.
this link>>>>> what ever the **** you were on when you made this thead. Have a nice day :)
http://www.gametrailers.com/player.php?id=17723&type=mov&pl=game
THREAD/
proof11102
Which explains why all the PS3 games going forward look a lot nicer than 360 games. I think it's time to face the music fellas.DaysAirlines
lol, wait till you see future 360 games, wait untill they start using memory export and stuff on 360, ps3 wont even beable to keep pace.
streaming videos? What are you talking about?[QUOTE="nextgengaming18"][QUOTE="bobobobodfwofof"]ps3, cpu is less powerful for gaming, more powerful streaming videos ****.bobobobodfwofof
home=streaming videos, ps3 is more of a multimedia processor rather than gaming processors.
Tell that to my sig.[QUOTE="bobobobodfwofof"]streaming videos? What are you talking about?[QUOTE="nextgengaming18"][QUOTE="bobobobodfwofof"]ps3, cpu is less powerful for gaming, more powerful streaming videos ****.Rashpal
home=streaming videos, ps3 is more of a multimedia processor rather than gaming processors.
Tell that to my sig. LOL! Seriously calm down andw ait to see waht developers do with each system.[QUOTE="DaysAirlines"]Which explains why all the PS3 games going forward look a lot nicer than 360 games. I think it's time to face the music fellas.bobobobodfwofof
lol, wait till you see future 360 games, wait untill they start using memory export and stuff on 360, ps3 wont even beable to keep pace.
I don't know. Ratchet and Clank Future looks leaps and bounds over anything I've seen on the 360 so far.There is no use arguing with you. My 4 year old computer if this is true will be 5x as powerful as a ps3 because it's cpu has 1 gb ram.. It is the clocked speed that makes the ps3 so powerful.nextgengaming18my 3 year old setup is 10X better than a ps3 by those standards thats insan. Why did I buy a ps3 at all?!
[QUOTE="nextgengaming18"]There is no use arguing with you. My 4 year old computer if this is true will be 5x as powerful as a ps3 because it's cpu has 1 gb ram.. It is the clocked speed that makes the ps3 so powerful.MorisUkunRasikmy 3 year old setup is 10X better than a ps3 by those standards thats insan. Why did I buy a ps3 at all?! He doesn't know what he is talking about. RAM for cpu is useless for videogames.. It isn't need for particle effects, animation, or physics.
[QUOTE="bobobobodfwofof"][QUOTE="DaysAirlines"]Which explains why all the PS3 games going forward look a lot nicer than 360 games. I think it's time to face the music fellas.DaysAirlines
lol, wait till you see future 360 games, wait untill they start using memory export and stuff on 360, ps3 wont even beable to keep pace.
I don't know. Ratchet and Clank Future looks leaps and bounds over anything I've seen on the 360 so far.lol hell no, the textures dont even come close to kameo or shaders.
[QUOTE="DaysAirlines"][QUOTE="bobobobodfwofof"][QUOTE="DaysAirlines"]Which explains why all the PS3 games going forward look a lot nicer than 360 games. I think it's time to face the music fellas.bobobobodfwofof
lol, wait till you see future 360 games, wait untill they start using memory export and stuff on 360, ps3 wont even beable to keep pace.
I don't know. Ratchet and Clank Future looks leaps and bounds over anything I've seen on the 360 so far.lol hell no, the textures dont even come close to kameo or shaders.
That was from mapping. If you didn't know that is how most low polygon res count looks good.[QUOTE="MorisUkunRasik"][QUOTE="nextgengaming18"]There is no use arguing with you. My 4 year old computer if this is true will be 5x as powerful as a ps3 because it's cpu has 1 gb ram.. It is the clocked speed that makes the ps3 so powerful.nextgengaming18my 3 year old setup is 10X better than a ps3 by those standards thats insan. Why did I buy a ps3 at all?! He doesn't know what he is talking about. RAM for cpu is useless for videogames.. It isn't need for particle effects, animation, or physics.
LOL, BULLCRAP
on my x1900xtx 512 mb video ram , and 1gb of cpu main ram Quake 4 on ultra quality studders, if i add another 1gb for 2gb of main ram, the games butter smooth, main ram is just as important as video memory.
everyone,read my sigwiistation360he doesn't like its architechture, no one liked the ps2's architechture either and i guess thats why that system tanked.
[QUOTE="bobobobodfwofof"][QUOTE="DaysAirlines"][QUOTE="bobobobodfwofof"][QUOTE="DaysAirlines"]Which explains why all the PS3 games going forward look a lot nicer than 360 games. I think it's time to face the music fellas.nextgengaming18
lol, wait till you see future 360 games, wait untill they start using memory export and stuff on 360, ps3 wont even beable to keep pace.
I don't know. Ratchet and Clank Future looks leaps and bounds over anything I've seen on the 360 so far.lol hell no, the textures dont even come close to kameo or shaders.
That was from mapping. If you didn't know that is how most low polygon res count looks good.Well, kameo was a gamecube to xbox to xbox360 port, so you know didnt take advantage of 360 hardware, just so you know ps3 can only do 250 million polygons per second, xbox360 can do over 500 million +.
sorry bro, 360 later in future will be doing crap ps3 only dreamed of doing.
my 3 year old setup is 10X better than a ps3 by those standards thats insan. Why did I buy a ps3 at all?! He doesn't know what he is talking about. RAM for cpu is useless for videogames.. It isn't need for particle effects, animation, or physics.[QUOTE="nextgengaming18"][QUOTE="MorisUkunRasik"][QUOTE="nextgengaming18"]There is no use arguing with you. My 4 year old computer if this is true will be 5x as powerful as a ps3 because it's cpu has 1 gb ram.. It is the clocked speed that makes the ps3 so powerful.bobobobodfwofof
LOL, BULLCRAP
on my x1900xtx 512 mb video ram , and 1gb of cpu main ram Quake 4 on ultra quality studders, if i add another 1gb for 2gb of main ram, the games butter smooth, main ram is just as important as video memory.
That picture is stupid, and just plain wrong. This is what happens when people who don't understand hardware use MS Paint.Teufelhuhn
the arrows are a mess, but it's correct, CELL CAN ONLY ACCESS 256 MB OF IT'S DEDICATED XDR,
show me link proof anything cell can also access rsx's gddr3 for main memory.
do u even understand the diagram...Are you some pro at computer motherboards or are u just taking the authors word for it?http://img208.imageshack.us/img208/9283/ps332pk7.jpg
That's why ps3 is inferior to xbox360^^ not to mention inferior gpu and crap cpu.
bobobobodfwofof
[QUOTE="bobobobodfwofof"]my 3 year old setup is 10X better than a ps3 by those standards thats insan. Why did I buy a ps3 at all?! He doesn't know what he is talking about. RAM for cpu is useless for videogames.. It isn't need for particle effects, animation, or physics.[QUOTE="nextgengaming18"][QUOTE="MorisUkunRasik"][QUOTE="nextgengaming18"]There is no use arguing with you. My 4 year old computer if this is true will be 5x as powerful as a ps3 because it's cpu has 1 gb ram.. It is the clocked speed that makes the ps3 so powerful.Teufelhuhn
LOL, BULLCRAP
on my x1900xtx 512 mb video ram , and 1gb of cpu main ram Quake 4 on ultra quality studders, if i add another 1gb for 2gb of main ram, the games butter smooth, main ram is just as important as video memory.
[QUOTE="bobobobodfwofof"]my 3 year old setup is 10X better than a ps3 by those standards thats insan. Why did I buy a ps3 at all?! He doesn't know what he is talking about. RAM for cpu is useless for videogames.. It isn't need for particle effects, animation, or physics.[QUOTE="nextgengaming18"][QUOTE="MorisUkunRasik"][QUOTE="nextgengaming18"]There is no use arguing with you. My 4 year old computer if this is true will be 5x as powerful as a ps3 because it's cpu has 1 gb ram.. It is the clocked speed that makes the ps3 so powerful.Teufelhuhn
LOL, BULLCRAP
on my x1900xtx 512 mb video ram , and 1gb of cpu main ram Quake 4 on ultra quality studders, if i add another 1gb for 2gb of main ram, the games butter smooth, main ram is just as important as video memory.
ok better example, dreamcast 16 mb main ram, 8 mb video ram, ps2 4 mb video ram 32 mb main ram,
unreal tournament 1999 ran and looked better on ps2, why? because lack of main ram hurt dreamcast, they had to take out polygons and effects because it didnt have the main memory ps2 did, even with more video ram still had to be downgraded...so goes to show you main memory is more important than video memory basically.
[QUOTE="nextgengaming18"][QUOTE="bobobobodfwofof"][QUOTE="DaysAirlines"][QUOTE="bobobobodfwofof"][QUOTE="DaysAirlines"]Which explains why all the PS3 games going forward look a lot nicer than 360 games. I think it's time to face the music fellas.bobobobodfwofof
lol, wait till you see future 360 games, wait untill they start using memory export and stuff on 360, ps3 wont even beable to keep pace.
I don't know. Ratchet and Clank Future looks leaps and bounds over anything I've seen on the 360 so far.lol hell no, the textures dont even come close to kameo or shaders.
That was from mapping. If you didn't know that is how most low polygon res count looks good.Well, kameo was a gamecube to xbox to xbox360 port, so you know didnt take advantage of 360 hardware, just so you know ps3 can only do 250 million polygons per second, xbox360 can do over 500 million +.
sorry bro, 360 later in future will be doing crap ps3 only dreamed of doing.
link?[QUOTE="bobobobodfwofof"][QUOTE="nextgengaming18"][QUOTE="bobobobodfwofof"][QUOTE="DaysAirlines"][QUOTE="bobobobodfwofof"][QUOTE="DaysAirlines"]Which explains why all the PS3 games going forward look a lot nicer than 360 games. I think it's time to face the music fellas.Viviath
lol, wait till you see future 360 games, wait untill they start using memory export and stuff on 360, ps3 wont even beable to keep pace.
I don't know. Ratchet and Clank Future looks leaps and bounds over anything I've seen on the 360 so far.lol hell no, the textures dont even come close to kameo or shaders.
That was from mapping. If you didn't know that is how most low polygon res count looks good.Well, kameo was a gamecube to xbox to xbox360 port, so you know didnt take advantage of 360 hardware, just so you know ps3 can only do 250 million polygons per second, xbox360 can do over 500 million +.
sorry bro, 360 later in future will be doing crap ps3 only dreamed of doing.
link?just google it, it's a known fact xbox360 can pull off more polygons than ps3.
my 3 year old setup is 10X better than a ps3 by those standards thats insan. Why did I buy a ps3 at all?! He doesn't know what he is talking about. RAM for cpu is useless for videogames.. It isn't need for particle effects, animation, or physics.[QUOTE="nextgengaming18"][QUOTE="MorisUkunRasik"][QUOTE="nextgengaming18"]There is no use arguing with you. My 4 year old computer if this is true will be 5x as powerful as a ps3 because it's cpu has 1 gb ram.. It is the clocked speed that makes the ps3 so powerful.bobobobodfwofof
LOL, BULLCRAP
on my x1900xtx 512 mb video ram , and 1gb of cpu main ram Quake 4 on ultra quality studders, if i add another 1gb for 2gb of main ram, the games butter smooth, main ram is just as important as video memory.
You don't know what you are talking about.. Don't stae idiotic statements like this. If you upgrade 2gb main ram, you are also upgrading the speed. You don't need that much ram to play a game, higher ram will allow you to have more applications going on at the same time. It has no use at all for playing a game. THe gpu though will make a game look better if you upgrade it.[QUOTE="Teufelhuhn"]That picture is stupid, and just plain wrong. This is what happens when people who don't understand hardware use MS Paint.bobobobodfwofof
the arrows are a mess, but it's correct, CELL CAN ONLY ACCESS 256 MB OF IT'S DEDICATED XDR,
show me link proof anything cell can also access rsx's gddr3 for main memory.
[QUOTE="bobobobodfwofof"]my 3 year old setup is 10X better than a ps3 by those standards thats insan. Why did I buy a ps3 at all?! He doesn't know what he is talking about. RAM for cpu is useless for videogames.. It isn't need for particle effects, animation, or physics.[QUOTE="nextgengaming18"][QUOTE="MorisUkunRasik"][QUOTE="nextgengaming18"]There is no use arguing with you. My 4 year old computer if this is true will be 5x as powerful as a ps3 because it's cpu has 1 gb ram.. It is the clocked speed that makes the ps3 so powerful.nextgengaming18
LOL, BULLCRAP
on my x1900xtx 512 mb video ram , and 1gb of cpu main ram Quake 4 on ultra quality studders, if i add another 1gb for 2gb of main ram, the games butter smooth, main ram is just as important as video memory.
You don't know what you are talking about.. Don't stae idiotic statements like this. If you upgrade 2gb main ram, you are also upgrading the speed. You don't need that much ram to play a game, higher ram will allow you to have more applications going on at the same time. It has no use at all for playing a game. THe gpu though will make a game look better if you upgrade it.no, you dont know what you are talking about.
F.E.A.R ON MAX WITH 1GB OF RAM =STUDDERS WITH 2GB OF MAIN RAM, THE GAMES ALOT SMOOTHER, STUDDERS=WHEN YOU OPEN DOORS GAME FREEZES UP HAS TO LOAD STUFF FROM MEMORY.
im a pc gamer and done it all my life, i have ran f.e.a.r with 1gb of ram and 2gb, f.e.a.r and quake 4 on max with 1gb of system memory isnt even playable, 2gb of ram makes world of difference.
[QUOTE="Teufelhuhn"][QUOTE="bobobobodfwofof"]my 3 year old setup is 10X better than a ps3 by those standards thats insan. Why did I buy a ps3 at all?! He doesn't know what he is talking about. RAM for cpu is useless for videogames.. It isn't need for particle effects, animation, or physics.[QUOTE="nextgengaming18"][QUOTE="MorisUkunRasik"][QUOTE="nextgengaming18"]There is no use arguing with you. My 4 year old computer if this is true will be 5x as powerful as a ps3 because it's cpu has 1 gb ram.. It is the clocked speed that makes the ps3 so powerful.bobobobodfwofof
LOL, BULLCRAP
on my x1900xtx 512 mb video ram , and 1gb of cpu main ram Quake 4 on ultra quality studders, if i add another 1gb for 2gb of main ram, the games butter smooth, main ram is just as important as video memory.
ok better example, dreamcast 16 mb main ram, 8 mb video ram, ps2 4 mb video ram 32 mb main ram,
unreal tournament 1999 ran and looked better on ps2, why? because lack of main ram hurt dreamcast, they had to take out polygons and effects because it didnt have the main memory ps2 did, even with more video ram still had to be downgraded...so goes to show you main memory is more important than video memory basically.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment