Playstation Plus vs Xbox live Gold

  • 76 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for carljohnson3456
carljohnson3456

12489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#51 carljohnson3456
Member since 2007 • 12489 Posts
Xbox Live is for a SERVICE, PS+ is for a discount. I dont think it's very fair to compare the two to be honest.
Avatar image for carljohnson3456
carljohnson3456

12489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#52 carljohnson3456
Member since 2007 • 12489 Posts
people always say that ps+ isnt worth it because the free stuff is only free while you are a member. but so what. they only take away free games which are mostly small games i never have the need to play again once i beat them. they also dont take away the stuff i got a discount on which within the year will add up to more than $50 with map packs and games i buy off psn. so psn is better imo. but as its been said before time and time again they dont offer the same thing so it doesnt matterriver_rat3117
What I want to know... is after your membership is over, will you still be able to keep trophies from the games you played while a member?
Avatar image for gmaster456
gmaster456

7569

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#53 gmaster456
Member since 2008 • 7569 Posts
Why does it matter. People use what they want to use. They don't need a reason
Avatar image for ianuilliam
ianuilliam

4955

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 ianuilliam
Member since 2006 • 4955 Posts

[QUOTE="river_rat3117"]people always say that ps+ isnt worth it because the free stuff is only free while you are a member. but so what. they only take away free games which are mostly small games i never have the need to play again once i beat them. they also dont take away the stuff i got a discount on which within the year will add up to more than $50 with map packs and games i buy off psn. so psn is better imo. but as its been said before time and time again they dont offer the same thing so it doesnt mattercarljohnson3456
What I want to know... is after your membership is over, will you still be able to keep trophies from the games you played while a member?

Once you earn a trophy, you have that trophy. It doesn't matter if you bought the game used, rented the game, borrowed it, stole it, or whatever. Nor does it matter if you trade the game in, break it, lose it, delete it off your HDD or anything else. Why would you think you would lose trophies for stopping your psn+ subscription? The only way you'll ever lose trophies is if you get caught cheating or something and your account gets banned or something.

Avatar image for godzillavskong
godzillavskong

7904

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#56 godzillavskong
Member since 2007 • 7904 Posts

[QUOTE="campzor"]psn is better then both cause its free... THERE! Also ps+ is optional and doesnt effect content on your game.... xbox live does thus no point arguing 'thats optional too' cause really...its not.shahilsyed

Just because PSN is free doesn't mean plus is better. they're different. please don't mix them up. different stuff.

Agreed. Sometimes you get what you paid for. I have both ,but prefer my Xbox Live, and if games start charging subscription fees then I may switch over to the PSN, simply because I don't want to get hit twice to game online. I also think that all three will be charging in the near future.
Avatar image for FIipMode
FIipMode

10850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#57 FIipMode
Member since 2009 • 10850 Posts
Lol @ people who try to compare a rewards system to an online play subscription.
Avatar image for ianuilliam
ianuilliam

4955

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 ianuilliam
Member since 2006 • 4955 Posts

[QUOTE="shahilsyed"]

[QUOTE="campzor"]psn is better then both cause its free... THERE! Also ps+ is optional and doesnt effect content on your game.... xbox live does thus no point arguing 'thats optional too' cause really...its not.godzillavskong

Just because PSN is free doesn't mean plus is better. they're different. please don't mix them up. different stuff.

Agreed. Sometimes you get what you paid for. I have both ,but prefer my Xbox Live, and if games start charging subscription fees then I may switch over to the PSN, simply because I don't want to get hit twice to game online. I also think that all three will be charging in the near future.

You already are getting hit twice... You pay for the internt... you pay for the game... and then you have to pay again to be able to play your game on your internet.

Avatar image for DroidPhysX
DroidPhysX

17098

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#59 DroidPhysX
Member since 2010 • 17098 Posts

Lol @ people who try to compare a rewards system to an online play subscription.FIipMode
PS+ is a reward system? :|

Avatar image for Jynxzor
Jynxzor

9313

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#60 Jynxzor
Member since 2003 • 9313 Posts

Hi,

What is better? They both cost money so you can't say one of them is free. I like Xbox live is better. Whats your?

shahilsyed
But why would I compare a service that optional to pay for while the other is forced "Unless you don't want to play Online at all that is" PSN is superior for the reason that it's free. PSN+ is just a service they offer, if you feel it's worth the price of admision.
Avatar image for FIipMode
FIipMode

10850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#61 FIipMode
Member since 2009 • 10850 Posts

[QUOTE="FIipMode"]Lol @ people who try to compare a rewards system to an online play subscription.DroidPhysX

PS+ is a reward system? :|

Yes it's a rewards program, just like Modell's MVP program, or Gamestops Power Players program.
Avatar image for Pug-Nasty
Pug-Nasty

8508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#63 Pug-Nasty
Member since 2009 • 8508 Posts

PS+ is better because it isn't holding my games hostage. I do not negotiate with terrorists.

Avatar image for TheMoreYouOwn
TheMoreYouOwn

3927

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 TheMoreYouOwn
Member since 2010 • 3927 Posts
Still gotta go with psn. Holding a part of your game hostage with a service fee can never be successfully spun...not even with threads of silver and gold.
Avatar image for DroidPhysX
DroidPhysX

17098

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#65 DroidPhysX
Member since 2010 • 17098 Posts

Still gotta go with psn. Holding a part of your game hostage with a service fee can never be successfully spun...not even with threads of silver and gold.TheMoreYouOwn
Except for the fact that its PS+ vs XBL...not regular PSN

Avatar image for falconclan
falconclan

15885

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 48

User Lists: 0

#66 falconclan
Member since 2005 • 15885 Posts

I have Xbox Live Gold, I don't have PSN+, but I think thats why PSN+ is better, not because the product is better for $49.99 a year, though debateable, but because its an option that doesn't steal features like Xbox live.

Xbox live has a lot of features that they recently added such as ESPN, and now they charge more for these added features that I don't even want. If you want ESPN why can't you pay the extra $10 a month. While they take out basic features from Silver like Netflix, which I can use on PSN without paying $50 a year.

Avatar image for godzillavskong
godzillavskong

7904

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#67 godzillavskong
Member since 2007 • 7904 Posts

[QUOTE="godzillavskong"][QUOTE="shahilsyed"]

Just because PSN is free doesn't mean plus is better. they're different. please don't mix them up. different stuff.

ianuilliam

Agreed. Sometimes you get what you paid for. I have both ,but prefer my Xbox Live, and if games start charging subscription fees then I may switch over to the PSN, simply because I don't want to get hit twice to game online. I also think that all three will be charging in the near future.

You already are getting hit twice... You pay for the internt... you pay for the game... and then you have to pay again to be able to play your game on your internet.

I knew that was coming! How about I don't mind paying twice, once for internet,and once for Xbox Live, but I'm not going to pay for a subscription fee.
Avatar image for godzillavskong
godzillavskong

7904

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#68 godzillavskong
Member since 2007 • 7904 Posts

It's funny because a lot of Sony fanboys would scream how Playstation Network was better, simply because it is free, now with this PSN+, which charges, they are saying it's still better??I really think Sony put this PSN+ out there to see how it was recieved, and possibly use it as a model to eventually abandon free online all together, and charge like MS.Might not take effect in the next year or so, but I see them doing it in the future. I think all three will eventually charge for online, which sucks, but I think it is coming. Nintendo and Sony are watching MS get smothered in $$ of off Xbox Live, and I'm sure they would like to get a piece of that action.

Avatar image for ihatecrysis
ihatecrysis

247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 ihatecrysis
Member since 2010 • 247 Posts

[QUOTE="Riverwolf007"]

[QUOTE="heretrix"]

These threads should be instantly locked.This subject cannot possibly be more discussed than it already has.

balfe1990

i cannot agree more. pay for what you want to pay for it's none of my business.

Yes. Although I will say that PSN+ sounds far better on paper:

PSN+ - Online Gaming(which is actually free), Discounts, betas, games, demos etc, etcfor 50 quid.

XBL - Online Gaming, Deal of the Week and ehh....

No brainer really and I don't even own a Playstation

wtf how can you own a 360 and not know 360 has betas games demos etc it has everything psn+ has and more wtf betas demos games? really you think 360 doesnt have that?

Avatar image for lx_theo
lx_theo

6211

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#70 lx_theo
Member since 2010 • 6211 Posts

It's funny because a lot of Sony fanboys would scream how Playstation Network was better, simply because it is free, now with this PSN+, which charges, they are saying it's still better??I really think Sony put this PSN+ out there to see how it was recieved, and possibly use it as a model to eventually abandon free online all together, and charge like MS.Might not take effect in the next year or so, but I see them doing it in the future. I think all three will eventually charge for online, which sucks, but I think it is coming. Nintendo and Sony are watching MS get smothered in $$ of off Xbox Live, and I'm sure they would like to get a piece of that action.

godzillavskong
I know a large number of PS3 users would stop playing online if they starting charging for it. Myself included. I can't see them Taking that option. there's a difference between having a choice between all the discounts (that can pay for themselves if you buy a lot of those) or just online, to being forced to buy this possibly useless service (once again, depends) just so you can play online. Huge difference
Avatar image for ianuilliam
ianuilliam

4955

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 ianuilliam
Member since 2006 • 4955 Posts

It's funny because a lot of Sony fanboys would scream how Playstation Network was better, simply because it is free, now with this PSN+, which charges, they are saying it's still better??I really think Sony put this PSN+ out there to see how it was recieved, and possibly use it as a model to eventually abandon free online all together, and charge like MS.Might not take effect in the next year or so, but I see them doing it in the future. I think all three will eventually charge for online, which sucks, but I think it is coming. Nintendo and Sony are watching MS get smothered in $$ of off Xbox Live, and I'm sure they would like to get a piece of that action.

godzillavskong

PSN is better than Live Gold because it offers almost everything Live does, along with some extra stuff like Home, for free. PSN+ is not really comparable in any way to Gold. The only reason people are trying to compare them is they both have a subscription fee (with PSN+ being cheaper). Gold is a subscription to access Netflix, Facebook, Twitter, and online gaming (stuff that you already should get). PSN+ is more like a discount membership and content subscription. So yes, PSN is better than Gold because it's free, and PSN+, which charges, is also better than Gold because you are actually getting content for that fee, rather than getting access to content which you've already paid for.

Avatar image for godzillavskong
godzillavskong

7904

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#72 godzillavskong
Member since 2007 • 7904 Posts

[QUOTE="godzillavskong"]

It's funny because a lot of Sony fanboys would scream how Playstation Network was better, simply because it is free, now with this PSN+, which charges, they are saying it's still better??I really think Sony put this PSN+ out there to see how it was recieved, and possibly use it as a model to eventually abandon free online all together, and charge like MS.Might not take effect in the next year or so, but I see them doing it in the future. I think all three will eventually charge for online, which sucks, but I think it is coming. Nintendo and Sony are watching MS get smothered in $$ of off Xbox Live, and I'm sure they would like to get a piece of that action.

ianuilliam

PSN is better than Live Gold because it offers almost everything Live does, along with some extra stuff like Home, for free. PSN+ is not really comparable in any way to Gold. The only reason people are trying to compare them is they both have a subscription fee (with PSN+ being cheaper). Gold is a subscription to access Netflix, Facebook, Twitter, and online gaming (stuff that you already should get). PSN+ is more like a discount membership and content subscription. So yes, PSN is better than Gold because it's free, and PSN+, which charges, is also better than Gold because you are actually getting content for that fee, rather than getting access to content which you've already paid for.

Maybe so, and I'm not really going to dispute that, because I don't actually go on my PSN that much. I went on it last week, saw some interesting stuff , like add-on content for God of War 3, but I had to be a PSN+ subscriber. Then I found a few other things I was interested in, but they were also limited to PSN+ subscribers. I think I've just become comfortable with Xbox Live Gold, and prefer that over PSN, even with some of it's perks. I've had a few bad experiences with it when I was trying to play MGS4 online, and really haven't given it a chance since. I'm sure it's got a lot better, but we all have our preferences I guess.
Avatar image for MRBUCKMASTER
MRBUCKMASTER

758

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 MRBUCKMASTER
Member since 2010 • 758 Posts

How many times has this argument been brought up?!

On topic: I don't have a PS3 but paying for xbox live does suck cause i don't use any other features except to play online. So, the one with more benefits, I guess.

Avatar image for coolkid93
coolkid93

6749

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 56

User Lists: 0

#74 coolkid93
Member since 2007 • 6749 Posts
PlayStation Plus. I get more things with that then I would get for live. And it saves you some money. But I'm good with the free version of PSN. :D
Avatar image for Pug-Nasty
Pug-Nasty

8508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#75 Pug-Nasty
Member since 2009 • 8508 Posts

[QUOTE="ianuilliam"]

[QUOTE="godzillavskong"]

It's funny because a lot of Sony fanboys would scream how Playstation Network was better, simply because it is free, now with this PSN+, which charges, they are saying it's still better??I really think Sony put this PSN+ out there to see how it was recieved, and possibly use it as a model to eventually abandon free online all together, and charge like MS.Might not take effect in the next year or so, but I see them doing it in the future. I think all three will eventually charge for online, which sucks, but I think it is coming. Nintendo and Sony are watching MS get smothered in $$ of off Xbox Live, and I'm sure they would like to get a piece of that action.

godzillavskong

PSN is better than Live Gold because it offers almost everything Live does, along with some extra stuff like Home, for free. PSN+ is not really comparable in any way to Gold. The only reason people are trying to compare them is they both have a subscription fee (with PSN+ being cheaper). Gold is a subscription to access Netflix, Facebook, Twitter, and online gaming (stuff that you already should get). PSN+ is more like a discount membership and content subscription. So yes, PSN is better than Gold because it's free, and PSN+, which charges, is also better than Gold because you are actually getting content for that fee, rather than getting access to content which you've already paid for.

Maybe so, and I'm not really going to dispute that, because I don't actually go on my PSN that much. I went on it last week, saw some interesting stuff , like add-on content for God of War 3, but I had to be a PSN+ subscriber. Then I found a few other things I was interested in, but they were also limited to PSN+ subscribers. I think I've just become comfortable with Xbox Live Gold, and prefer that over PSN, even with some of it's perks. I've had a few bad experiences with it when I was trying to play MGS4 online, and really haven't given it a chance since. I'm sure it's got a lot better, but we all have our preferences I guess.

MGO doesn't go through the psn, that's why it was such a pain.

Avatar image for godzillavskong
godzillavskong

7904

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#76 godzillavskong
Member since 2007 • 7904 Posts

[QUOTE="godzillavskong"][QUOTE="ianuilliam"]PSN is better than Live Gold because it offers almost everything Live does, along with some extra stuff like Home, for free. PSN+ is not really comparable in any way to Gold. The only reason people are trying to compare them is they both have a subscription fee (with PSN+ being cheaper). Gold is a subscription to access Netflix, Facebook, Twitter, and online gaming (stuff that you already should get). PSN+ is more like a discount membership and content subscription. So yes, PSN is better than Gold because it's free, and PSN+, which charges, is also better than Gold because you are actually getting content for that fee, rather than getting access to content which you've already paid for.

Pug-Nasty

Maybe so, and I'm not really going to dispute that, because I don't actually go on my PSN that much. I went on it last week, saw some interesting stuff , like add-on content for God of War 3, but I had to be a PSN+ subscriber. Then I found a few other things I was interested in, but they were also limited to PSN+ subscribers. I think I've just become comfortable with Xbox Live Gold, and prefer that over PSN, even with some of it's perks. I've had a few bad experiences with it when I was trying to play MGS4 online, and really haven't given it a chance since. I'm sure it's got a lot better, but we all have our preferences I guess.

MGO doesn't go through the psn, that's why it was such a pain.

Oh,I was wondering why it had me going from the pc back to the PS3, and then back again. I just gave up on it after that. The only other PS3 title that I played online was MOtorstorm. It was ok.