Please help me in deciding between Ps3 and Xbox 360.Long read.Plz read all.

[QUOTE="Jack-Napier"] ok so i get it, 6 months in and you want it to be on par with PC FPS, okay... :roll:Ninja-Vox

No, i dont recall saying anything even remotely like that. Did you by chance read another post, by mistake? On another forum? I remember him saying the PS3 has "loads more and better shooters", me not being able to think of any PS3 shooters other than resistance, and asking him to clarify this for me.

You get three: :| :| :| out of ten 

If money isn't an issue, get a 360 now and play Dead Rising, Crackdown, Saints Row and GeoW and then buy a PS3 in about 9 months when quite a few great games will be out for it.

OR, if you are worried about online, get a PS3 first to wet your feet, but also remember that you can get some 360 deals with 1 year free anyway. I bought my 360 camera and that came with 1 year free, but was only the cost of the camera, plus it had 2 free arcade games bundled with it too, all for $50.

 

SgtWhiskeyjack

Probably the best advice. The 360 is much cheaper, and if money isn't an option for you you can use the difference to buy far more games. The 360 has more games available right now and higher-scoring ones too.

If that doesn't do it for you, wait til spring next year and trade it all in for a PS3 which should have better games and hopefully a lower price by then. I cant see you being disappointed with the 360 though, but it's all down to personal taste. 

in my opinion, i think PS 3 is worth your money more than Xbox 360 Elite (you'll get the Elite if you plan to buy one right?)

here's reasons:

1) DVD vs Blu-Ray (which one you want?)

2) no Wi-Fi vs Wi-Fi included (which one you want?)

3) $50 XBL fee per year vs free online and HOME (which one you want?)

4) 120 GB HDD vs 60 GB HDD (which one you want?)

5) old generation HDMI output vs HDMI output that support real audio signal (which one you want?)

well... you get the idea.

 

Game13a13y

1.Well ok blu ray may be better 4 games i am assuming cuz if u mean movies then i dont care.

2.No use of wi-fi to me.

3.Doesnt matter really.$50 per year is no big deal at all.

4.Well what does this have to do with gaming.

5.I dont have the required setup to take advantage of that.

[QUOTE="Game13a13y"]

if you think thats unfair, may be because those FACTS really are the disadvantages of XBOX 360?

but still it doesnt make whatever i said less factual. free online vs $50 a year, its a fact, no more no less.

 

Ninja-Vox

Allow me to do what you just did, then:

"Aw man, it's a really simple choice. You're gonna get the core 360, right? Obviously....

So anyway,

Xbox 360 = $299, ps3 = $600 (which one do you want?)

Xbox 360 has proprietary wireless, ps3 has blu-tooth so you cant do LAN parties cause of the interferance (which do you want?)

xbox 360 has five AAAs, PS3 only has 1 (which one do you want?)

Xbox 360 can stream video and music off your PC wirelessly or through a LAN, PS3 cant (which one do you want?)

Clearly you'd answer Xbox 360 for every option. Because i've deliberately set it up that way. That's exactly what you did. And you know it.

Yea, the only problem with some of your facts is that they're not facts. You can still hold great LAN parties on the PS3, there is no interference with blu tooth and it actually turns out to be more of an advantage.

Secondly, you don't need a PC to stream from on the PS3 since you can do it directly on the PS3 if you want to.

No biggies, just thought I'd point that out.

other than your smart a$$ attitude your posts contains no substance, but hey your a lemming i dont blame you for what you cant control ;) it was obvious what he was saying is it has better FPS than ps2 did coming or already out. we know RFOM is out, they are working on the sequel, we know it is getting all the multiplat games. and EA said they are concentrating their FPS and other games on ps3 cus of the processing power, we know cryisis devs arelookingfor ps3 programmers on their website, we know haze is coming and looks good and seems to be concentrated on ps3(not saying it is, but seems so) we know UT3 main SKU is ps3.and we know killzone is coming with the big budget and one of the biggest dev teams ever, etc, etc, so stop with your dumb little quips and get a damn clue.Jack-Napier

Begging your pardon sir, but i just told the guy to get a 360 for the cheaper price and if he doesn't like it, trade it in for a PS3. Yesterday i made a thread on how disappointing the 360 elite is. But of course, because i'm not waving around a Sony flag i must be a lemming, right? Good show.

As for your post, if you look back, he said the PS3 has loads more and better shooters. I simply asked him to list these. I really dont know what you've taken so much offense to, but you've gone off on some god-forsaken tangent about comparing launch offerings of the PS2 to launch-offerings of the PS3 which he was apparently "obviously" talking about. Lord knows where you pulled that from.

I'd also love to know where you got that charming little fact about UT3 being mainly focused on PS3. It's not like the entire series has been PC-centric until this point. But hey, i'm sure they'd just turn their back on 90% of their audience. You're probably right.

To conclude; i was simply asking him to list all of these shooters the PS3 apparently has under its belt. That is all. You reacted to something i didn't even say, and now you're stuck trying to justify what you said, and you cant.

The end. 

Buy a 360 if you want games and a good online service

Buy a Ps3 if want potential(potential to become the next 3DO) , don't listen to cows on here, I know people with both the 360 and Ps3 and they don't even touch the Ps3 and if you didn't notice decent games come out a whole year later on the Ps3(Oblivion, Rainbow Six, ummmm you get my point)

Buy a Wii if you want a short lived gimmick, Gamers have always loved graphics and the Wiimote controller is a gimmick if ever I saw one but not as bad as the gimmick thrown in the Sixasses controller at the last minute cause it had no rumble - "corky tilt"

There you have it! I told you liked it is no dancing around the subject at hand talking about the Blu-ray or the 1080p experience which is not much better than the 1080i experience which Sony forgot to support with the Ps3.

[QUOTE="Game13a13y"]

if you think thats unfair, may be because those FACTS really are the disadvantages of XBOX 360?

but still it doesnt make whatever i said less factual. free online vs $50 a year, its a fact, no more no less.

 

Ninja-Vox

Allow me to do what you just did, then:

"Aw man, it's a really simple choice. You're gonna get the core 360, right? Obviously....

So anyway,

Xbox 360 = $299, ps3 = $600 (which one do you want?)

Xbox 360 has proprietary wireless, ps3 has blu-tooth so you cant do LAN parties cause of the interferance (which do you want?)

xbox 360 has five AAAs, PS3 only has 1 (which one do you want?)

Xbox 360 can stream video and music off your PC wirelessly or through a LAN, PS3 cant (which one do you want?)

Clearly you'd answer Xbox 360 for every option. Because i've deliberately set it up that way. That's exactly what you did. And you know it.

[QUOTE="Ninja-Vox"][QUOTE="Game13a13y"]

if you think thats unfair, may be because those FACTS really are the disadvantages of XBOX 360?

but still it doesnt make whatever i said less factual. free online vs $50 a year, its a fact, no more no less.

 

Sgt_Hale

Allow me to do what you just did, then:

"Aw man, it's a really simple choice. You're gonna get the core 360, right? Obviously....

So anyway,

Xbox 360 = $299, ps3 = $600 (which one do you want?)

Xbox 360 has proprietary wireless, ps3 has blu-tooth so you cant do LAN parties cause of the interferance (which do you want?)

xbox 360 has five AAAs, PS3 only has 1 (which one do you want?)

Xbox 360 can stream video and music off your PC wirelessly or through a LAN, PS3 cant (which one do you want?)

Clearly you'd answer Xbox 360 for every option. Because i've deliberately set it up that way. That's exactly what you did. And you know it.

Yea, the only problem with some of your facts is that they're not facts. You can still hold great LAN parties on the PS3, there is no interference with blu tooth and it actually turns out to be more of an advantage.

Secondly, you don't need a PC to stream from on the PS3 since you can do it directly on the PS3 if you want to.

No biggies, just thought I'd point that out.

I was simply showing how biased your post was. And you cannot have more than 12 PS3 controllers in the same vacinity at any given time.  

thats not what he did,you would take 60GB over 120GB ?Jack-Napier

One, out of all of them. I know you're enjoying shooting at all of my posts, but you're yet to make a valid point on anything i've said, so quit acting like a child, eh? 

[QUOTE="Game13a13y"]

if you think thats unfair, may be because those FACTS really are the disadvantages of XBOX 360?

but still it doesnt make whatever i said less factual. free online vs $50 a year, its a fact, no more no less.

 

Ninja-Vox

Allow me to do what you just did, then:

"Aw man, it's a really simple choice. You're gonna get the core 360, right? Obviously....

So anyway,

Xbox 360 = $299, ps3 = $600 (which one do you want?) you are using the Core unit to make the comparison, thats a deliberate choice, so you are biased already

Xbox 360 has proprietary wireless, ps3 has blu-tooth so you cant do LAN parties cause of the interferance (which do you want?) the key word PROPIETARY WIRELESS, that means you have to spend extra to get it.

xbox 360 has five AAAs, PS3 only has 1 (which one do you want?) which games are better than which is a subjective opinion

Xbox 360 can stream video and music off your PC wirelessly or through a LAN, PS3 cant (which one do you want?) or you can dothe same thing with PS 3, just saving files on a memory stick is all you need to do. and wirelessly.. you mean to spending extra money to buy the PROPRIETY WIRELESS ADOPTER right?

Clearly you'd answer Xbox 360 for every option. Because i've deliberately set it up that way. That's exactly what you did. And you know it.

Buy a 360 if you want games and a good online service

Buy a Ps3 if want potential(potential to become the next 3DO) , don't listen to cows on here, I know people with both the 360 and Ps3 and they don't even touch the Ps3 and if you didn't notice decent games come out a whole year later on the Ps3(Oblivion, Rainbow Six, ummmm you get my point)

Buy a Wii if you want a short lived gimmick, Gamers have always loved graphics and the Wiimote controller is a gimmick if ever I saw one but not as bad as the gimmick threw in the Sixasses controller at the last minute cause it had no rumble - "corky tilt"

There you have it! I told you liked it is no dancing around the subject at hand talking about the Blu-ray or the 1080p experience which is not much better than the 1080i experience which Sony forgot to support with the Ps3.

Fruity_Fantasy

The PS3 WILL get better games. Dont write it off so easily. He simply has to decide if he likes the current library of 360 games and the games it has coming out soon over that of the PS3. I would go with the 360 because it has more games, better-scoring games and decent stuff on the horizon like Mass Effect, Halo 3, Forza 2, DMC etc. But that's just my opinion. 

[QUOTE="Ninja-Vox"][QUOTE="Game13a13y"]

if you think thats unfair, may be because those FACTS really are the disadvantages of XBOX 360?

but still it doesnt make whatever i said less factual. free online vs $50 a year, its a fact, no more no less.

 

Game13a13y

Allow me to do what you just did, then:

"Aw man, it's a really simple choice. You're gonna get the core 360, right? Obviously....

So anyway,

Xbox 360 = $299, ps3 = $600 (which one do you want?) you are using the Core unit to make the comparison, thats a deliberate choice, so you are biased already

Xbox 360 has proprietary wireless, ps3 has blu-tooth so you cant do LAN parties cause of the interferance (which do you want?) the key word PROPIETARY WIRELESS, that means you have to spend extra to get it.

xbox 360 has five AAAs, PS3 only has 1 (which one do you want?) which games are better than which is a subjective opinion

Xbox 360 can stream video and music off your PC wirelessly or through a LAN, PS3 cant (which one do you want?) or you can dothe same thing with PS 3, just saving files on a memory stick is all you need to do. and wirelessly.. you mean to spending extra money to buy the PROPRIETY WIRELESS ADOPTER right?

Clearly you'd answer Xbox 360 for every option. Because i've deliberately set it up that way. That's exactly what you did. And you know it.

:lol: Oh dear lord. You think i'm being biased!? HOW DARE YOU MAKE SUCH AN ACCUSATION! It's not like it was clearly deliberate to make a point at how biased your post was.

Good grief. That honestly made me laugh.... 

[QUOTE="Jack-Napier"]other than your smart a$$ attitude your posts contains no substance, but hey your a lemming i dont blame you for what you cant control ;) it was obvious what he was saying is it has better FPS than ps2 did coming or already out. we know RFOM is out, they are working on the sequel, we know it is getting all the multiplat games. and EA said they are concentrating their FPS and other games on ps3 cus of the processing power, we know cryisis devs arelookingfor ps3 programmers on their website, we know haze is coming and looks good and seems to be concentrated on ps3(not saying it is, but seems so) we know UT3 main SKU is ps3.and we know killzone is coming with the big budget and one of the biggest dev teams ever, etc, etc, so stop with your dumb little quips and get a damn clue.Ninja-Vox

Begging your pardon sir, but i just told the guy to get a 360 for the cheaper price and if he doesn't like it, trade it in for a PS3. Yesterday i made a thread on how disappointing the 360 elite is. But of course, because i'm not waving around a Sony flag i must be a lemming, right? Good show.

As for your post, if you look back, he said the PS3 has loads more and better shooters. I simply asked him to list these. I really dont know what you've taken so much offense to, but you've gone off on some god-forsaken tangent about comparing launch offerings of the PS2 to launch-offerings of the PS3 which he was apparently "obviously" talking about. Lord knows where you pulled that from.

I'd also love to know where you got that charming little fact about UT3 being mainly focused on PS3. It's not like the entire series has been PC-centric until this point. But hey, i'm sure they'd just turn their back on 90% of their audience. You're probably right.

To conclude; i was simply asking him to list all of these shooters the PS3 apparently has under its belt. That is all. You reacted to something i didn't even say, and now you're stuck trying to justify what you said, and you cant.

The end. 

[QUOTE="Sgt_Hale"]

Also, I can't see a huge leap in graphics b/w either system right now, but it is noticeable how much more action a few of the PS3 titles are paking onscreen at one time... really makes the gameplay more immersive. Not sure if that helps. Gears of War on the 360 and Motorstorm on the PS3 are the best games that I have ever played graphically. And Ninja Gaiden Sigma and Lair look better than both of them.

One poster posted a few games but it might help if you saw which systems they were for and did the research yourself:

360:

Halo 3

Lost Planet

Dead Rising

Crackdown

Bioshock

Forza 2

Too Human

(there are more titles coming out than this but I can't think of anymore that are in the genres you like so I included some of the good ones already out)

PS3:

Resistance: Fall of Man

Motorstorm

GTHD/GT5

Ninja Gaiden Sigma

Lair

Heavenly Sword

Metal Gear Solid 4

Rachet & Clank: Tools of Destruction

Warhawk

Eight Days

Killzone 2

Folks Soul: The Lost Folklore

Uncharted: Drakes Fortune

Take it from me, the 360 has more games out right now. But the PS3 has more of the ones you're looking for... I only listed those out and coming out this year... we will see even more announcements for next year at E3. And of course both systems have some great multi-platform titles out & coming out.

Sgt_Hale

I see you've started a fanboy war on this topic :). Just wanted to make sure you get to take a look at an actual unbiased account. Each of the titles in each of my lists are confirmed exclusives... some fanboys would have you believe that Sony doesn't have any more exclusives... and looking at that list that clearly is not the case.

The best thing to do is going to be to read up on as many of those games as you can and watch the vids & screen shots from each one. I'm pretty sure you'll have no problem making your decision for yourself after that.

[QUOTE="Game13a13y"][QUOTE="Ninja-Vox"][QUOTE="Game13a13y"]

if you think thats unfair, may be because those FACTS really are the disadvantages of XBOX 360?

but still it doesnt make whatever i said less factual. free online vs $50 a year, its a fact, no more no less.

 

Ninja-Vox

Allow me to do what you just did, then:

"Aw man, it's a really simple choice. You're gonna get the core 360, right? Obviously....

So anyway,

Xbox 360 = $299, ps3 = $600 (which one do you want?) you are using the Core unit to make the comparison, thats a deliberate choice, so you are biased already

Xbox 360 has proprietary wireless, ps3 has blu-tooth so you cant do LAN parties cause of the interferance (which do you want?) the key word PROPIETARY WIRELESS, that means you have to spend extra to get it.

xbox 360 has five AAAs, PS3 only has 1 (which one do you want?) which games are better than which is a subjective opinion

Xbox 360 can stream video and music off your PC wirelessly or through a LAN, PS3 cant (which one do you want?) or you can dothe same thing with PS 3, just saving files on a memory stick is all you need to do. and wirelessly.. you mean to spending extra money to buy the PROPRIETY WIRELESS ADOPTER right?

Clearly you'd answer Xbox 360 for every option. Because i've deliberately set it up that way. That's exactly what you did. And you know it.

:lol: Oh dear lord. You think i'm being biased!? HOW DARE YOU MAKE SUCH AN ACCUSATION! It's not like it was clearly deliberate to make a point at how biased your post was.

Good grief. That honestly made me laugh.... 

and yet, all you resort to do is personal attack, "OMG.. YOU SUCKORZZAA I RULZZZ... ~~!11!!"

[QUOTE="Ninja-Vox"][QUOTE="Game13a13y"]

if you think thats unfair, may be because those FACTS really are the disadvantages of XBOX 360?

but still it doesnt make whatever i said less factual. free online vs $50 a year, its a fact, no more no less.

 

Game13a13y

Allow me to do what you just did, then:

"Aw man, it's a really simple choice. You're gonna get the core 360, right? Obviously....

So anyway,

Xbox 360 = $299, ps3 = $600 (which one do you want?) you are using the Core unit to make the comparison, thats a deliberate choice, so you are biased already

Xbox 360 has proprietary wireless, ps3 has blu-tooth so you cant do LAN parties cause of the interferance (which do you want?) the key word PROPIETARY WIRELESS, that means you have to spend extra to get it.

xbox 360 has five AAAs, PS3 only has 1 (which one do you want?) which games are better than which is a subjective opinion

Xbox 360 can stream video and music off your PC wirelessly or through a LAN, PS3 cant (which one do you want?) or you can do the same thing with PS 3, just saving files on a memory stick is all you need to do. and wirelessly.. you mean to spending extra money to buy the PROPRIETY WIRELESS ADOPTER right?

Clearly you'd answer Xbox 360 for every option. Because i've deliberately set it up that way. That's exactly what you did. And you know it.

The Ps3 is 599 dollars and it has crap for games. Walking out of a store with tax and the extended warranty I always get cause It would be stupid not to would run you 700 dollars for the Ps3 without games.

Thrown in a couple games and if you add a extra controller your walking out of the store with the PS3DO and a lot of wasted money

Stop talking about potential and games that may never come out and posting pictures cause your system has nothing to play on it, oh let me guess the Resistance and the Motorstorm - derrrrrr

You and the other cow pies need to get a clue

[QUOTE="SgtWhiskeyjack"]

If money isn't an issue, get a 360 now and play Dead Rising, Crackdown, Saints Row and GeoW and then buy a PS3 in about 9 months when quite a few great games will be out for it.

OR, if you are worried about online, get a PS3 first to wet your feet, but also remember that you can get some 360 deals with 1 year free anyway. I bought my 360 camera and that came with 1 year free, but was only the cost of the camera, plus it had 2 free arcade games bundled with it too, all for $50.

 

Ninja-Vox

Probably the best advice. The 360 is much cheaper, and if money isn't an option for you you can use the difference to buy far more games. The 360 has more games available right now and higher-scoring ones too.

If that doesn't do it for you, wait til spring next year and trade it all in for a PS3 which should have better games and hopefully a lower price by then. I cant see you being disappointed with the 360 though, but it's all down to personal taste. 

Did you guys even read his post? With the type of games he likes of course he'd be disappointed in the 360. This isn't about what system you guys like best... you all should give helpful advice.

And as for the scores, why do you neglect to mention that it's been a while since any of the 360 games have scored higher than a PS3 game??? The standards have changed since the beginning of next gen when most of the 360's titles received those high scores. The truth is that both systems already have awesome games. But if he isn't in to tactical shooters or rpg's, he really isn't going to have much to look forward to on the 360.

Sure it's cheaper, but what's the point in saving money for a system that isn't getting the games you want to play. I like my 360, it's cool. But I love my PS3. I have similar taste in games to the poster with the exception that I also like rpgs. For gamers like us that loved games like ICO, GOW, & Shadow of the Collusus, the 360 is cool but just can't live up to that kind of legacy.

[QUOTE="Ninja-Vox"]

[QUOTE="Jack-Napier"]other than your smart a$$ attitude your posts contains no substance, but hey your a lemming i dont blame you for what you cant control ;) it was obvious what he was saying is it has better FPS than ps2 did coming or already out. we know RFOM is out, they are working on the sequel, we know it is getting all the multiplat games. and EA said they are concentrating their FPS and other games on ps3 cus of the processing power, we know cryisis devs arelookingfor ps3 programmers on their website, we know haze is coming and looks good and seems to be concentrated on ps3(not saying it is, but seems so) we know UT3 main SKU is ps3.and we know killzone is coming with the big budget and one of the biggest dev teams ever, etc, etc, so stop with your dumb little quips and get a damn clue.Jack-Napier

Begging your pardon sir, but i just told the guy to get a 360 for the cheaper price and if he doesn't like it, trade it in for a PS3. Yesterday i made a thread on how disappointing the 360 elite is. But of course, because i'm not waving around a Sony flag i must be a lemming, right? Good show.

As for your post, if you look back, he said the PS3 has loads more and better shooters. I simply asked him to list these. I really dont know what you've taken so much offense to, but you've gone off on some god-forsaken tangent about comparing launch offerings of the PS2 to launch-offerings of the PS3 which he was apparently "obviously" talking about. Lord knows where you pulled that from.

I'd also love to know where you got that charming little fact about UT3 being mainly focused on PS3. It's not like the entire series has been PC-centric until this point. But hey, i'm sure they'd just turn their back on 90% of their audience. You're probably right.

To conclude; i was simply asking him to list all of these shooters the PS3 apparently has under its belt. That is all. You reacted to something i didn't even say, and now you're stuck trying to justify what you said, and you cant.

The end.

Danced around what exactly? :| Also, please link me to Epic saying that the main focus of development is on the PS3. Until then, you're simply making things up. The Unreal Engine is made for PCs. Unreal has always been a PC game. You've simply ignored everything else i said with your usual "ah yes, but the substance..." nonsense.

Why? Because you know you're in the wrong. I asked him to list the shooters he was talking about, and you went nuts. Simple.

[QUOTE="Jack-Napier"]thats not what he did,you would take 60GB over 120GB ?Ninja-Vox

One, out of all of them. I know you're enjoying shooting at all of my posts, but you're yet to make a valid point on anything i've said, so quit acting like a child, eh? 

Did you guys even read his post? With the type of games he likes of course he'd be disappointed in the 360. This isn't about what system you guys like best... you all should give helpful advice.

And as for the scores, why do you neglect to mention that it's been a while since any of the 360 games have scored higher than a PS3 game??? The standards have changed since the beginning of next gen when most of the 360's titles received those high scores. The truth is that both systems already have awesome games. But if he isn't in to tactical shooters or rpg's, he really isn't going to have much to look forward to on the 360.

Sure it's cheaper, but what's the point in saving money for a system that isn't getting the games you want to play. I like my 360, it's cool. But I love my PS3. I have similar taste in games to the poster with the exception that I also like rpgs. For gamers like us that loved games like ICO, GOW, & Shadow of the Collusus, the 360 is cool but just can't live up to that kind of legacy.

Sgt_Hale

I hardly see how telling him to try the 360 and then trade it for a PS3 if he doesn't like it is biased advice. :| 

[QUOTE="Ninja-Vox"]

[QUOTE="Jack-Napier"]thats not what he did,you would take 60GB over 120GB ?Jack-Napier

One, out of all of them. I know you're enjoying shooting at all of my posts, but you're yet to make a valid point on anything i've said, so quit acting like a child, eh?

I think i'll just start ignoring you from now on. You appear to be on another planet, which is always quite unsettling.

:| :| :| :| :| :| :| :| :| :| :| :| :| 

and yet, all you resort to do is personal attack, "OMG.. YOU SUCKORZZAA I RULZZZ... ~~!11!!"

Game13a13y

I didn't attack anyone. I merely laughed at how you managed to completely miss the point of the post altogether. :|  Is it me or are you cows constantly arguing against points which haven't even been made?

I've got one guy claiming my joke-biased points are amazingly, biased, and another guy who yells "ZOMG! Resistance is a shooter how dare you say PS3 has no shooters what the hell is your problem!!!" when i ask a person to list the "loads of quality shootes" the ps3 apparently has.

Lordy lordy. 

[QUOTE="Game13a13y"][QUOTE="Ninja-Vox"][QUOTE="Game13a13y"]

if you think thats unfair, may be because those FACTS really are the disadvantages of XBOX 360?

but still it doesnt make whatever i said less factual. free online vs $50 a year, its a fact, no more no less.

 

Fruity_Fantasy

Allow me to do what you just did, then:

"Aw man, it's a really simple choice. You're gonna get the core 360, right? Obviously....

So anyway,

Xbox 360 = $299, ps3 = $600 (which one do you want?) you are using the Core unit to make the comparison, thats a deliberate choice, so you are biased already

Xbox 360 has proprietary wireless, ps3 has blu-tooth so you cant do LAN parties cause of the interferance (which do you want?) the key word PROPIETARY WIRELESS, that means you have to spend extra to get it.

xbox 360 has five AAAs, PS3 only has 1 (which one do you want?) which games are better than which is a subjective opinion

Xbox 360 can stream video and music off your PC wirelessly or through a LAN, PS3 cant (which one do you want?) or you can do the same thing with PS 3, just saving files on a memory stick is all you need to do. and wirelessly.. you mean to spending extra money to buy the PROPRIETY WIRELESS ADOPTER right?

Clearly you'd answer Xbox 360 for every option. Because i've deliberately set it up that way. That's exactly what you did. And you know it.

The Ps3 is 599 dollars and it has crap for games. Walking out of a store with tax and the extended warranty I always get cause It would be stupid not to would run you 700 dollars for the Ps3 without games.

Thrown in a couple games and if you add a extra controller your walking out of the store with the PS3DO and a lot of wasted money

Stop talking about potential and games that may never come out and posting pictures cause your system has nothing to play on it, oh let me guess the Resistance and the Motorstorm - derrrrrr

You and the other cow pies need to get a clue

first, all you labelling me as a cow really obscure, because i am a big sheep just happening to like PS 3 as well.

second, i don't want to do a game comparison in this thread, but while you're at it, there think about this, PS 3 is only out for half year, and Xbox 360 has been out for a completely whole year ahead. you making comparison with PS 3 first gen games with Xbox 360 2nd gen games really prove nothing.

well u say u like 3rd person action games ps3 is getting god of war 3(possibly 4,5,6), ninja gaiden sigma, devil may cry4, heavenly sword, eight days,grand theft auto4, assassins creed, metal gear solid, unreal tournament (i forget what its name is now) and uncharted drakes fortune. u like ico and team ico is creating a game. err 360 is has better fps but ps3 is getting killzone2, has resistance, resident evil 5 (is that a fps or tps?) various other multiplats like call of duty .racers u get motorstorm, gran turismo, and  burnout(dev says theyre focusing more on ps3 version.) and hopefully a midnight club game 

online 360 is better i havent used either network though but its  undisputed.

graphics are equal right now but i believe ps3 will have the better looking games when everythings said and done.

first, all you labelling me as a cow really obscure, because i am a big sheep just happening to like PS 3 as well.

second, i don't want to do a game comparison in this thread, but while you're at it, there think about this, PS 3 is only out for half year, and Xbox 360 has been out for a completely whole year ahead. you making comparison with PS 3 first gen games with Xbox 360 2nd gen games really prove nothing.

 

Game13a13y

The simple facts:

I tried to be fair. I told the guy what games were on the 360, and how it was cheaper so he'd be able to buy more games with the extra money if cash wasn't an issue. I told him if he didn't like it, wait until the PS3 has better games then trade it all in and buy a Playstation instead.

You, on the other hand, put a slant on everything to try and convince him that the PS3 is superior to the 360 and he should therefore get the playstation, making no effort at all to highlight the positive aspects of the 360. This is because you're a fanboy.

Simple as that.  

[QUOTE="Fruity_Fantasy"]

Buy a 360 if you want games and a good online service

Buy a Ps3 if want potential(potential to become the next 3DO) , don't listen to cows on here, I know people with both the 360 and Ps3 and they don't even touch the Ps3 and if you didn't notice decent games come out a whole year later on the Ps3(Oblivion, Rainbow Six, ummmm you get my point)

Buy a Wii if you want a short lived gimmick, Gamers have always loved graphics and the Wiimote controller is a gimmick if ever I saw one but not as bad as the gimmick threw in the Sixasses controller at the last minute cause it had no rumble - "corky tilt"

There you have it! I told you liked it is no dancing around the subject at hand talking about the Blu-ray or the 1080p experience which is not much better than the 1080i experience which Sony forgot to support with the Ps3.

Ninja-Vox

The PS3 WILL get better games. Dont write it off so easily. He simply has to decide if he likes the current library of 360 games and the games it has coming out soon over that of the PS3. I would go with the 360 because it has more games, better-scoring games and decent stuff on the horizon like Mass Effect, Halo 3, Forza 2, DMC etc. But that's just my opinion. 

Well if anybody ever payed attention to history a overpriced system that will cost you 700 dollars(tax+extended warranty) walking out of the store without games is not going to sell good and game developers won't care about it.

More games are being made for the Wii which I think is a gimmick and for the 360 cause they are in a decent price range. Look at how cows got mad at Capcom cause they decided to make for the 360, and look how angry they got with Ubisoft and how they are claiming Ubisoft is making bad ports for the Ps3 and how those ports come out a year later.

Is it taking a year later cause of the Ps3 user base or cause the thing is harder to develop for? I'm sure the intelligent gamers on here can figure that one out.

[QUOTE="Jack-Napier"][QUOTE="Ninja-Vox"]

[QUOTE="Jack-Napier"]other than your smart a$$ attitude your posts contains no substance, but hey your a lemming i dont blame you for what you cant control ;) it was obvious what he was saying is it has better FPS than ps2 did coming or already out. we know RFOM is out, they are working on the sequel, we know it is getting all the multiplat games. and EA said they are concentrating their FPS and other games on ps3 cus of the processing power, we know cryisis devs arelookingfor ps3 programmers on their website, we know haze is coming and looks good and seems to be concentrated on ps3(not saying it is, but seems so) we know UT3 main SKU is ps3.and we know killzone is coming with the big budget and one of the biggest dev teams ever, etc, etc, so stop with your dumb little quips and get a damn clue.Ninja-Vox

Begging your pardon sir, but i just told the guy to get a 360 for the cheaper price and if he doesn't like it, trade it in for a PS3. Yesterday i made a thread on how disappointing the 360 elite is. But of course, because i'm not waving around a Sony flag i must be a lemming, right? Good show.

As for your post, if you look back, he said the PS3 has loads more and better shooters. I simply asked him to list these. I really dont know what you've taken so much offense to, but you've gone off on some god-forsaken tangent about comparing launch offerings of the PS2 to launch-offerings of the PS3 which he was apparently "obviously" talking about. Lord knows where you pulled that from.

I'd also love to know where you got that charming little fact about UT3 being mainly focused on PS3. It's not like the entire series has been PC-centric until this point. But hey, i'm sure they'd just turn their back on 90% of their audience. You're probably right.

To conclude; i was simply asking him to list all of these shooters the PS3 apparently has under its belt. That is all. You reacted to something i didn't even say, and now you're stuck trying to justify what you said, and you cant.

The end.

Danced around what exactly? :| Also, please link me to Epic saying that the main focus of development is on the PS3. Until then, you're simply making things up. The Unreal Engine is made for PCs. Unreal has always been a PC game. You've simply ignored everything else i said with your usual "ah yes, but the substance..." nonsense.

Why? Because you know you're in the wrong. I asked him to list the shooters he was talking about, and you went nuts. Simple.

[QUOTE="Game13a13y"][QUOTE="Ninja-Vox"][QUOTE="Game13a13y"]

if you think thats unfair, may be because those FACTS really are the disadvantages of XBOX 360?

but still it doesnt make whatever i said less factual. free online vs $50 a year, its a fact, no more no less.

 

Fruity_Fantasy

Allow me to do what you just did, then:

"Aw man, it's a really simple choice. You're gonna get the core 360, right? Obviously....

So anyway,

Xbox 360 = $299, ps3 = $600 (which one do you want?) you are using the Core unit to make the comparison, thats a deliberate choice, so you are biased already

Xbox 360 has proprietary wireless, ps3 has blu-tooth so you cant do LAN parties cause of the interferance (which do you want?) the key word PROPIETARY WIRELESS, that means you have to spend extra to get it.

xbox 360 has five AAAs, PS3 only has 1 (which one do you want?) which games are better than which is a subjective opinion

Xbox 360 can stream video and music off your PC wirelessly or through a LAN, PS3 cant (which one do you want?) or you can do the same thing with PS 3, just saving files on a memory stick is all you need to do. and wirelessly.. you mean to spending extra money to buy the PROPRIETY WIRELESS ADOPTER right?

Clearly you'd answer Xbox 360 for every option. Because i've deliberately set it up that way. That's exactly what you did. And you know it.

The Ps3 is 599 dollars and it has crap for games. Walking out of a store with tax and the extended warranty I always get cause It would be stupid not to would run you 700 dollars for the Ps3 without games.

Thrown in a couple games and if you add a extra controller your walking out of the store with the PS3DO and a lot of wasted money

Stop talking about potential and games that may never come out and posting pictures cause your system has nothing to play on it, oh let me guess the Resistance and the Motorstorm - derrrrrr

You and the other cow pies need to get a clue

lol, you lemmings are funny. so ppl are supposed to act like announced titles aren't coming out??? well, i guess we shouldn't get excited for halo 3 or mass effect either! just accept that the system is coming out with some awesome games, if you don't want to play them, you don't have to.

And you'd be hosed to buy an extra warranty on the PS3... Unlike Microsoft, Sony has always provided a free 1 yr warranty (with free shipping) out of the box. Yes, Resistance, Motorstorm, and VF5 are the only great exclusives at the moment... but they're hardly the only games worth playing on the system. Unless you're one of those freaky gamers that don't play games if they're available on another system??? Plus, Sony's exclusive count for this year is the highest. If you'd be honest with yourslef, we've all played most of the good games on the 360 already (and the ps3 too for that matter). The most important thing IS what's left to look forward to for the rest of the year.

well u say u like 3rd person action games ps3 is getting god of war 3(possibly 4,5,6), ninja gaiden sigma, devil may cry4, heavenly sword, eight days,grand theft auto4, assassins creed, metal gear solid, unreal tournament (i forget what its name is now) and uncharted drakes fortune. u like ico and team ico is creating a game. err 360 is has better fps but ps3 is getting killzone2, has resistance, resident evil 5 (is that a fps or tps?) various other multiplats like call of duty .racers u get motorstorm, gran turismo, and  burnout(dev says theyre focusing more on ps3 version.) and hopefully a midnight club game 

online 360 is better i havent used either network though but its  undisputed.

graphics are equal right now but i believe ps3 will have the better looking games when everythings said and done.

AsadMahdi59

Why don't you talk about games that are out right now or coming out this year? The 360 blows the others away and thats a fact. Cows and sheep may not be able to handle that truth but it's still the way it is anyway.

[QUOTE="Game13a13y"]

first, all you labelling me as a cow really obscure, because i am a big sheep just happening to like PS 3 as well.

second, i don't want to do a game comparison in this thread, but while you're at it, there think about this, PS 3 is only out for half year, and Xbox 360 has been out for a completely whole year ahead. you making comparison with PS 3 first gen games with Xbox 360 2nd gen games really prove nothing.

 

Ninja-Vox

The simple facts:

I tried to be fair. I told the guy what games were on the 360, and how it was cheaper so he'd be able to buy more games with the extra money if cash wasn't an issue. I told him if he didn't like it, wait until the PS3 has better games then trade it all in and buy a Playstation instead.

You, on the other hand, put a slant on everything to try and convince him that the PS3 is superior to the 360 and he should therefore get the playstation, making no effort at all to highlight the positive aspects of the 360. This is because you're a fanboy.

Simple as that.  

ok, so the only thing Xbox 360 might be superior is about the game you mean?

and who can clearly say such thing without being biased?

how do you know 360's games are better when PS 3 is only out for half year? ya.. thats really unbiased.

wow just wow, there is no convincing you, i am in the wrong why cus you say so ? lol you are something else dude, at the end of that video they show they say it is from the ps3 version and of course like i said the only playable version so far was shown on ps3. oh yeah and show me where this guy said he wanted a PC ? cus the thread title says ps3 or 360, you are in the wrong now stop making yourself look even more pahetic than you already do.

"Well you seem to really like the kinds of games that were on PS2, and will therefore come to PS3. And this time around PS3 has a lot more and better shooters, so you're covered there. If you were happy with PS2 but wanted more shooters, PS3 will be great for you. "

he said ps3 has a lot better shooters, obvious hes saying btter than ps2 cus that was the genre ps2 lacked in. he never mentioned 360, looks like you thought he wa saying better than 360 cus you even go so far as to call him a fanboy.

you also said not one of those games i listed were coming out this year, when we know R&C is coming this year along with a lot of other games, thats why you didnt reply to what i said, anything you cant argue against you dont reply to, i suggest you do the same here.Jack-Napier

Do me a favour; go back and look at my post, and then your response. Then look at my response. Then look at the guy who openly laughs at how wrong you got it. Then look on the lovely daisy trail you run off on to try and justify your post. He said the PS3 has loads of quality shooters, i asked what these were, and you went crazy.

That is it. Since then, you've gone off on one completely yelling about all kinds of things to try and keep away from the simple mistake you made with your first post.

As for the rest of your banter:

Show me a link saying that UT3 is mainly developed on the PS3. I've asked once already. Just because they demo the game does not mean that is their focus of development. Perhaps they were simply happy with that current build. Or wanted to show something off on the PS3 considering they were flashing gears of war everywhere? Who knows? All i know is that you've taken that and jumped to a silly conclusion that out of the three platforms UT3 MUST be being developed centrally on the PS3 because they demoed the game on that console once. You know i'm right.

Next "when does the guy say he wanted a PC?" This is what leads me to believe that you actually dont read my posts before responding in a blind rage - because what does that have to do with ANYTHING i said at all? I simply highlighted that unreal has always been developed on the PC to counter your claim that UT 3 is being developed with focus on the PS3.

Now just leave me alone. I'm not the pathetic one here. I'm not the one being laughed at by other posters. You're doing the ****c thing where you're so desperate to come out on top that you continue to reply, even when it is pointless to do so. And it's so obvious, with the insecurity of strating each post with the likes of "wow, jus wow! you're even more pathetic yadda yada".

Just leave it alone.

[QUOTE="Ninja-Vox"][QUOTE="Game13a13y"]

first, all you labelling me as a cow really obscure, because i am a big sheep just happening to like PS 3 as well.

second, i don't want to do a game comparison in this thread, but while you're at it, there think about this, PS 3 is only out for half year, and Xbox 360 has been out for a completely whole year ahead. you making comparison with PS 3 first gen games with Xbox 360 2nd gen games really prove nothing.

 

Game13a13y

The simple facts:

I tried to be fair. I told the guy what games were on the 360, and how it was cheaper so he'd be able to buy more games with the extra money if cash wasn't an issue. I told him if he didn't like it, wait until the PS3 has better games then trade it all in and buy a Playstation instead.

You, on the other hand, put a slant on everything to try and convince him that the PS3 is superior to the 360 and he should therefore get the playstation, making no effort at all to highlight the positive aspects of the 360. This is because you're a fanboy.

Simple as that.

ok, so the only thing Xbox 360 might be superior is about the game you mean?

and who can clearly say such thing without being biased?

how do you know 360's games are better when PS 3 is only out for half year? ya.. thats really unbiased.

The PS3 has blu-ray wifi and HDMI. They are only useful to people who have wireless home networks and top-of-the-line HDTVs. Otherwise known as the minority. The xbox 360 on the other hand has the lower price, which means if he isn't bothered about the money he has $200 more to spend on games, of which the 360 has more and higher-scoring titles based on average reviews at gamerankings.

As for your last comment, you highlight that you dont even read my posts as i've said four times now that the 360 has better games than the PS3 right now but this could change in the future, so he'd be better off buying a 360 and trading it in for a PS3 if he doesn't like it and the PS3 gets better games.

I wonder if you can be a man and post an acceptance that you were wrong rather than go round and round til somebody leaves like the other guy is determined to do. 

[QUOTE="AsadMahdi59"]

well u say u like 3rd person action games ps3 is getting god of war 3(possibly 4,5,6), ninja gaiden sigma, devil may cry4, heavenly sword, eight days,grand theft auto4, assassins creed, metal gear solid, unreal tournament (i forget what its name is now) and uncharted drakes fortune. u like ico and team ico is creating a game. err 360 is has better fps but ps3 is getting killzone2, has resistance, resident evil 5 (is that a fps or tps?) various other multiplats like call of duty .racers u get motorstorm, gran turismo, and  burnout(dev says theyre focusing more on ps3 version.) and hopefully a midnight club game 

online 360 is better i havent used either network though but its  undisputed.

graphics are equal right now but i believe ps3 will have the better looking games when everythings said and done.

Fruity_Fantasy

Why don't you talk about games that are out right now or coming out this year? The 360 blows the others away and thats a fact. Cows and sheep may not be able to handle that truth but it's still the way it is anyway.

That's a pretty biased opinion. I postled a list in this topic of all the high profile games out this year and the PS3 list is at least twice as long. The 360 has some good games coming out but the only one which will clearly blow away the competition is Mass Effect. I think Halo 3 will be awesome too but not sure if it'll blow away the competition... having played the first 2, I can't even see it being more fun than Resistance quite yet so I'd rather wait to see gameplay from Killzone 2 before I decide which looks like the better shooter. Plus, Halo 3 obviously has some progress to go in the graphics dept. Including rpg's, 360 only has about 5-6 quality looking games to look forward to for the rest of the year though! The PS3 has at least 10 with a much wider variety.

Ok from the look of things it seems that the ps3 is best in my favourite genre i.e. third person action games.Can somebody now do a comparasion of the FPS on both consoles as it's my 2nd favourite genre.Vagalfiddle

I've told you already; you'll get nothing but fanboyism here. You're better off checking out both consoles on the site and seeing which is best for you. 

[QUOTE="Game13a13y"][QUOTE="Ninja-Vox"][QUOTE="Game13a13y"]

first, all you labelling me as a cow really obscure, because i am a big sheep just happening to like PS 3 as well.

second, i don't want to do a game comparison in this thread, but while you're at it, there think about this, PS 3 is only out for half year, and Xbox 360 has been out for a completely whole year ahead. you making comparison with PS 3 first gen games with Xbox 360 2nd gen games really prove nothing.

 

Ninja-Vox

The simple facts:

I tried to be fair. I told the guy what games were on the 360, and how it was cheaper so he'd be able to buy more games with the extra money if cash wasn't an issue. I told him if he didn't like it, wait until the PS3 has better games then trade it all in and buy a Playstation instead.

You, on the other hand, put a slant on everything to try and convince him that the PS3 is superior to the 360 and he should therefore get the playstation, making no effort at all to highlight the positive aspects of the 360. This is because you're a fanboy.

Simple as that.

ok, so the only thing Xbox 360 might be superior is about the game you mean?

and who can clearly say such thing without being biased?

how do you know 360's games are better when PS 3 is only out for half year? ya.. thats really unbiased.

The PS3 has blu-ray wifi and HDMI. They are only useful to people who have wireless home networks and top-of-the-line HDTVs. Otherwise known as the minority. The xbox 360 on the other hand has the lower price, which means if he isn't bothered about the money he has $200 more to spend on games, of which the 360 has more and higher-scoring titles based on average reviews at gamerankings.

As for your last comment, you highlight that you dont even read my posts as i've said four times now that the 360 has better games than the PS3 right now but this could change in the future, so he'd be better off buying a 360 and trading it in for a PS3 if he doesn't like it and the PS3 gets better games.

I wonder if you can be a man and post an acceptance that you were wrong rather than go round and round til somebody leaves like the other guy is determined to do. 

argh, thats because you keep saying "you're a fanboy blah blah blah" but can you just accept the fact that there's actual people (like me) who happens to favor PS 3 over Xbox 360 without being a fanboy, or someone hired by Sony (thats LMAO btw)?

and Blu-ray is not only useful for movies, it is for games too.

and if you take a break and give sometime for PS 3 games to show what it can really do, i appreciate that :wink:

argh, thats because you keep saying "you're a fanboy blah blah blah" but can you just accept the fact that there's actual people (like me) who happens to favor PS 3 over Xbox 360 without being a fanboy, or someone hired by Sony (thats LMAO btw)?

and Blu-ray is not only useful for movies, it is for games too.

and if you take a break and give sometime for PS 3 games to show what it can really do, i appreciate that :wink:

 

 

Game13a13y

I favour the 360, but i told the guy how the PS3 will probably get better games soon and he should trade the 360 in for a playstation if he doesn't like it. I called you a fanboy because you simply set out to convince the guy to get a Playstation 3, and made no effort whatsoever to highlight negetives of the PS3 or positives of the 360. You were horribly biased, and you know it. That's why i called you a fanboy. It was completely justified.

Blu-Ray is not for games as far as i'm concerned. When xbox 360 games are out on four discs, left right and centre, i will accept that as a valid point. Until then, it's nothing but speculation.  As for your final comment, my room mate owns a Playstation 3. We only have motorstorm and resistance and both agree that the 360 is better right now, hence my recommendation to the TC.

I also have a Wii. 

Ok from the look of things it seems that the ps3 is best in my favourite genre i.e. third person action games.Can somebody now do a comparasion of the FPS on both consoles as it's my 2nd favourite genre.However i hate tactical shooters like brothers in arms.Vagalfiddle

Lol, well this will be a pretty short list. Both system's have Call of Duty. But other than that the 360 does not have any good FPS exclusives at the moment. It does have two pretty decent ports though, Half Life 2 and Far Cry. And the PS3 only has one good one for the time being, Resistance: Fall of Man. This is the genre most lacking from this gen... Killzone 2 and Halo 3 should go a long way to fill this void.

That said, R:FOM will definitely be the best single player and online experience you've had in a really long time. Half Life 2 is fun too if you haven't played it already.

ninja actually makes me laugh out loud !!! the guy asks for ps3 and 360 comparison, its been said multiple times they are concentrating on the ps3 version, at one point there wasnt even a 360 version at all. then you go into damage control "but but teh pc is teh main skuz!1!!" its obvious the guy never mentioned pc so why you even mention it ?maybe because the 360 version seems t be getting the shaft ? and anything negative against 360 you have to refute it ? you are the pathetic fanboy and we all see it, and again you dodged when you said not one of those games are coming out this year. you are owned now get over it. im gonna go play GOW2 now and i eagerly anticipate GOW3, cus i know who won this argument and it is me, when you keep repeating yourself and dodging stuff you know you lost buddy. i made no mistakes, you are a big mistake walking and talking :lol: Jack-Napier

Again, just link me to this being said "multiple times". You keep saying that but i'm still not seeing any proof of this. Until then, you're just going round in circles of making a claim, and dodging giving any proof before making the claim again. And why did i mention the PS3? Because Epic have always concentrated UT development on the PC - so why would they suddenly change to the PS3? I'm not saying the guy should get a PC, i'm simply countering your claim that the PS3 is the main platform of focus for UT. And that's the second time i've explained that to you.

Now you're also doing the "we all realise it!" to try and make it look like you're not the only person shooting at every post i make in a desperate attempt to come out on top which you are yet to do.

I also love how you call me a fanboy after my numerous recommendations to the TC to get a PS3 if he dislikes the 360. Your post is simply a plethora of random insults amidst irrelevant babble.

I also see you took the "i won, you smell, screw you guys i'm going home" approach. Good riddance. 

Well i have been out of touch with gaming news and reviews and all of that for quite some time now.But it's finally time now.In 2 weeks i will have the choice of either getting a ps3 or 360.I am hard on reasearch on the internet now.But i want the opinion of u ppl.I know very well this place and wont be basing my decision on what is said here but their r still plenty of ppl here who give out unbiased and intelligent responses.

Ok i am listing out my prefences in gaming and other stuff in detail.

1.Genres or sub-genres I absolutely hate=Rpg's,strategy and fighting games.I also totally dislike tactical shooters.Now it's not that i never play a rpg or a fighter it's just that i want to say that a console having whatever advantages in these genres just doesnt count for me at all.I usually dont like cartoonish games however that is not always true for e.g. i loved okami.

2.My favourite type of games r arguably 3rd person action games.Third person action games like ninja gaiden,god of war,devil may cry,re4,gta,mgs and max payne r my favourite kind of games.However i also love first person shooters no doubt about it.I was very happy with my ps2 for a long time.But then i bought the xbox soley because i was very dissapointed with the quality of shooters on the ps2 and got the xbox only to play some damn shooters.So basically some damn action games is my favourite genre.However the important thing is that i would take a great 3rd person action game anyday over a similarly great FPS.

3.I also LOVE well made adventure games.I loved games like ICO and Dreamfall.However i dont usally enjoy every adventure game that get's good reviews for e.g. SOTC.I also like racing games quite alot whether it be burnout or forza or need 4 speed.In sports games i only play soccer but plenty of it.I also like platformers but only the very good ones.

4.What is my take on online gaming?Well the problem is that i have never played online cuz i dont have broadband but now i will have and cant wait to play online cuz i have waited too long for it.I dont know whether i will get addicted to it or not but the thought of competing online in a game in which i am good at and then climb the rankings certainly seems addicting.

5.Even if a console has a graphical advantage it doesnt really matter to me because i know that both systems have the graphics to satisfy me.However if a console has a SIGNIFICANT graphical advantage like the xbox had over the ps2 then do let me know.

6.The higher price of the ps3 is no problem and the charges for 360 online is also not a problem.I am not concerned with any NON-GAMING activities of either consoles.

If u take the effort to read all this and help me out in any way then i will be grateful.Thanks.

Vagalfiddle

Well your preferences are very close between 360 and Ps3, but I would say however that you would be more satisfies in all your prefered areas with the xbox 360. You like First Person Shooters and the 360 has extremely good games like Gears of War and Halo 3 coming out, Shadowrun and many more. Basically the 360 has alot of games coming out this time in every genre and I think you would be better off going for a 360. Plus the 360 will also have devil may cry 4, gta IV and alot more. And in terms of adventure games they have Kameo which is very well made and Oblivion is an very good adventure/action/rpg. The online is very good and even though technically the PS3 has greater graphics potential (even though it hasn't been shown yet) the difference isn't that much. Both of these systems have great graphics. Also the 360 costs less so that leaves more room for games to buy lol which is always a good thing. 

[QUOTE="AsadMahdi59"]

well u say u like 3rd person action games ps3 is getting god of war 3(possibly 4,5,6), ninja gaiden sigma, devil may cry4, heavenly sword, eight days,grand theft auto4, assassins creed, metal gear solid, unreal tournament (i forget what its name is now) and uncharted drakes fortune. u like ico and team ico is creating a game. err 360 is has better fps but ps3 is getting killzone2, has resistance, resident evil 5 (is that a fps or tps?) various other multiplats like call of duty .racers u get motorstorm, gran turismo, and  burnout(dev says theyre focusing more on ps3 version.) and hopefully a midnight club game 

online 360 is better i havent used either network though but its  undisputed.

graphics are equal right now but i believe ps3 will have the better looking games when everythings said and done.

Fruity_Fantasy

Why don't you talk about games that are out right now or coming out this year? The 360 blows the others away and thats a fact. Cows and sheep may not be able to handle that truth but it's still the way it is anyway.