PS3. Oblivion proves this once and for all.ironwarrior2
Â
Oblivion proved that with the right amount of dedication, it is possible to make a graphically superior game on the Playstation 3. I wonder if Bethesda is out there showing other devs under the 2K Games umbrella how they did it.Â
[QUOTE="ironwarrior2"]PS3. Oblivion proves this once and for all.TekkenMaster606
Â
Oblivion proved that with the right amount of dedication, it is possible to make a graphically superior game on the Playstation 3. I wonder if Bethesda is out there showing other devs under the 2K Games umbrella how they did it.
Â
I think so.
Until PS3 shows better graphics than Gears of War PS3 has nothing visually superior compared to the X360. Don't even say UT3, because EPIC already said UT3 won't look as good as Gears on X360 or PS3.
Kameo looks amazing so I'm going to go with the 360. I don't really like the look of Gears but people say that one is impressive too. DOA 4 and Lost Planet also look nice.
The cell is not overhyped. It's one thing to try to bash Sony, but in bashing the cell you're bashing IBM, Sony, and Toshiba. The cell is an exceptional processor. In a few years time you will know this.
I love this " for now" crap. Ps3 owners and even some website writers hoestly beleave that PS3 is just going to go into turbo mode and blow the 360's graphics away. Its not going to happen. IF the PS3 was has such superior hardware we would have seen the difference from day 1 like we did with xbox and ps2. fact is the difference is very minimal this gen. so there is no need to pay the extra $200 unless you have a major woody for BlueRay Movies.
[QUOTE="ironwarrior2"]PS3. Oblivion proves this once and for all.111v
Â
yeah thats why it got horrible framerate issuesÂ
many websites have said that the ps3 version is better just accept it and move on Yeah but is not one of the most impressive looking games on 360. The game had to work on low end PCs, as well as high end and wasn't really as well optimised for the 360 as many of it's other games. So the PS3 version looking better a year latter doesn't prove much.
The cell is not overhyped. It's one thing to try to bash Sony, but in bashing the cell you're bashing IBM, Sony, and Toshiba. The cell is an exceptional processor. In a few years time you will know this.dmaximum
The Cell isn't crap but it wasn't really designed with gaming in mind.
[QUOTE="dmaximum"]The cell is not overhyped. It's one thing to try to bash Sony, but in bashing the cell you're bashing IBM, Sony, and Toshiba. The cell is an exceptional processor. In a few years time you will know this.Paktahn
The Cell isn't crap but it wasn't really designed with gaming in mind. Yet namco is putting it in an arcade game.
The PS3 is less than a year old, so cut it some slack. Right now the 360 has better graphics because programmers have had time to figure out the code of it and get the full potential out of it. After they get the full potential out of the PS3, then we can really see which system has better graphics.
Log in to comment