@tormentos said:
@sts106mat said:
hahaha you haven't owned anyone.
I have a PS4, so have already played the best that the PS3 had to offer that being "the Uncharted games & of course The Last of Us" . besides Ace Combat (dont think its on PSnow) there isn't anything i'd be arsed to give a go.
I haven't even bothered using the free trial of PSnow, it is completely irrelevant to me. Though, i must say that I reckon anyone who has seen your posts / threads lately will have had more fun laughing at your crusade............. than we would have done streaming multiplat games down the internet.
keep it up eltormo, you are better value than PSnow, because you are free and exclusive to SW!
PlayStation Now will rely on the PS3s in the cloud to do all of the rendering and processing work, which is why Sony thinks it can get PS3 games running on almost any screen with an internet connection. Most titles on Sony’s regular local console platform run at 30 fps with 100-150ms of input lag. That doesn’t leave a lot of breathing room for internet latency — anything over 150ms starts to feel disconnected from controller input. Sony hasn’t said officially how the system compensates for this, but there are whispers.
http://www.extremetech.com/gaming/175005-sonys-playstation-now-uses-custom-designed-hardware-with-eight-ps3s-on-a-single-motherboard
Hahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa,,,,,
@HalcyonScarlet said:
You and your lemming BS. Xbox is redundant now. Consoles for me are redundant multiplat players. I wanted something that was different.
All gimmicks are more or less DOA when the market is segregated, they have to be built in, otherwise developers can't do anything meaningful with them, too much of a financial risk. You have NO idea what could have been, no one does. Price was the problem with the original concept.
We didn't need watered more down PCs which is essentially what the Xbox One and PS4 are.
Dude every one and the mother here knows you were a raging lemming last gen do i need to quote you on your crusades.?
Now you hide on PC because you feel the xbox one let you down power wise,like most lemmings you are disappointed with the xbox one specs,but at heart you still are a lemming and it shows specially when you call hololens or Kinect innovative.
At least i have the gust to see SONY's VR for what it is.
I knew the Xbox One was weaker before I got it at launch, chose it for the original concept. You do remember that I declared PS the winner when they dropped Kinect don't you?
Power is something you bring up more than me. You know, when you pathetically argue about specs when you don't even get their developmental context because ya know, you aren't a developer.
I have been unimpressed with both console graphics since their reveal this gen, apart from The Order. It's why I chose the weaker console with Kinect, it had the potential to be different from the other consoles. What was I going to do, rely on graphics? You know a gen sucks when the previous gen more than holds its own right.
And yes, I call a camera capable of knowing your heart rate by looking at you innovative technology, it was higher tech and had potential. Your opinions on VR are of no interest or consequence to me. But the idea that someone who sees technologies and their applications must be some sort of fanboy says volumes more about you than me, and none of it is positive.
If power truly bothered me, would I be happy gaming with a 750Ti? I am happy with it for now and actively argue against the idea that PC gaming is about power.
Don't project your agenda, wants and needs on me to claim some sort of victory. It's weak sauce.
I'm not hiding, I never hid my intentions. I moved on and that's what you don't like. It's just you that can't handle that, because now you have no ammo, does that hurt you somehow? Remember I told you that I'm never going back to a console (apart from maybe a Nintendo one), nothings changed. I've yet to see anything to come back to.
Log in to comment