Predictions for what each company will do next gen?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Shinno441
Shinno441

2792

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#1 Shinno441
Member since 2007 • 2792 Posts
I know it's still early in the current gen to be thinking but yeah, what are all your thoughts for what'll be happening next gen? Here's what I think. Microsoft: They'll probably end in 2010-2011 and sticking to the 5 year lifespan to upgrade their console's capabilities. They'll probably do it on a large scale too. Forcing graphics and all that cool stuff to a new level. Ninty: Nintendo will most likely keep their Wii-Mote set up and stick with it a while, focusing on making their system more powerful and making their graphics up to par and offer online from day one and do what they should have done this gen (keep in mind im half sheep) and if they're smart fire Reggie....... showing Wii Fit during the biggest video game conference out there... blech Sony:If they believe in the 10 year system cycle things will really get interesting in terms of system wars, if the next 360 and Wii surpass PS3's graphics. But if things don't go the way Sony predicts they might go to a PS4 and even try to do somewhat what Nintendo is doing. Anyway that's my opinion, what's yours?
Avatar image for frodnekcod
frodnekcod

488

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#2 frodnekcod
Member since 2006 • 488 Posts

Microsoft-Will try something revolutionary and unexpected, will probably succeed.

Nintendo-Will boast 1:1 motion control in all games and will keep up (more or less)with competitors in hardware specs.

Sony: No idea.

Avatar image for billyea
billyea

6153

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 billyea
Member since 2005 • 6153 Posts
I actually think that showing Wii Fit was really smart, there are a good amoutn of fat... excuse me, overweight, gamers watching the conference. =D
Avatar image for Shinno441
Shinno441

2792

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#4 Shinno441
Member since 2007 • 2792 Posts

Microsoft-Will try something revolutionary and unexpected, will probably succeed.

Nintendo-Will boast 1:1 motion control in all games and will keep up (more or less)with competitors in hardware specs.

Sony: No idea.

frodnekcod
I hadn't thought 1:1 at all that would be awesome if they did do that. Seeing as how Microsoft tried to appeal to the family during e3 I wouldn't be half surprised if your prediction came true.
Avatar image for Shadow_op
Shadow_op

4566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#5 Shadow_op
Member since 2006 • 4566 Posts

Nintendo: Wii-Nii (Nii is Japanese for 2), better graphics, ditch friend codes, 1:1 motion sensing.

Sony: PS4....what a shocker!!, better graphics, better physics, maybe something original.

MS: Xbox Truth, or something cool like that (doubtful they'll do 720, for all the idiots that will say that.), all MP games will be cross platform with PC, better graphics, better physics, lots o new IP's, Gears of War 4 at launch.

Avatar image for Lazy_Boy88
Lazy_Boy88

7418

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Lazy_Boy88
Member since 2003 • 7418 Posts

Probably every company will have some new form of control. Sony probably standard Eyetoy and motion control. Microsoft who knows. Nintendo maybe a Wiimote that doesn't suck?

Nintendo will probably barely upgrade the hardware again. Sony will probably learn from their pricing mistake and release a system with a more advanced Cell, GPU, RAM (and keep similar architechture) and have no new media format (Blu-ray will be fine for next-gen). MS could damned well not even release another system. But next gen they'll probably try to concentrate a lot more on aspects other than XBL.

And Sony said nothing about 10 year gaps between consoles. They said support for 10 years. Probably will see a new Playstation 4-7 years from now.

Avatar image for csgamer7399
csgamer7399

930

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 csgamer7399
Member since 2004 • 930 Posts

Nintendo: same hardware in a different package

Sony: just an upgraded ps3, maybe a motion sensing boomerang

Xbox: implement a blu-ray drive, lol

Avatar image for Shinno441
Shinno441

2792

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#8 Shinno441
Member since 2007 • 2792 Posts

Nintendo: same hardware in a different package

Sony: just an upgraded ps3, maybe a motion sensing boomerang

Xbox: implement a blu-ray drive, lol

csgamer7399
blu-ray in an Xbox? That's some dangerous thinking, SW would have a field day.
Avatar image for ryand2006
ryand2006

376

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 ryand2006
Member since 2006 • 376 Posts

Microsoft-Xbox 3, It's Three times better!

Sony- Giant Enemy Walrus, hit his Bukkit for massive damage.

Nintendo- One word: SMELLOVISION!

Avatar image for myke2010
myke2010

2747

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 myke2010
Member since 2002 • 2747 Posts
Nintendo: once again bucking the trend of using standard media formats all their games will come on cassette tapes (seriously, I've given up trying to predict what they'll do) MS: Basically a better 360 (case, power brick, controller, hard drive optional to ensure a low intro price point) Sony: No idea, but you can bet it won't cost 600 bucks after the stomping the Wii and 360 give them this gen. In all seriousness, I have no idea what the Big N will do. Microsoft will probably come out with a very similar, yet more powerful system. They'll be able to price the entry system lower since they're making their own chips next time around. Hard drive will be a permenant fixture once more and I also wouldn't be surprised if they didn't use any media format, but instead opted to make all games downloadable, thus saving devs a fortune and making them flock to their system. And, built in wi-fi. Sony could go either two ways. They could rein in their ambitions and make a more reasonably priced system, or they could continue to ignore market conditions and go the way of Sega. If the movie format wars are undecided then Blu Ray is a definite. If Blu Ray has gained market dominance, a fully downloadable library may be in store like I suggested with MS. Depending on how successful sixaxis and the wiimote are, motion sensing controllers may become as standard as the rumble feature and analog control. I also wouldn't be surprised to see the digital pad dissapear altogether.
Avatar image for whoisryanmack
whoisryanmack

7675

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11 whoisryanmack
Member since 2006 • 7675 Posts

Nintendo- continue to ruin gaming. Not sure how or why, but they're on a mission

Microsoft- More powerful console, more focus on interactivity such as IPTV, maybe a new LIVE setup or added features

Sony- attempt to climb out of the crater left by ps3, lower priced game-focused console to mimic ps2

Avatar image for umcommon
umcommon

2503

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#12 umcommon
Member since 2007 • 2503 Posts

Nintendo: sticks with the Wii-mote and fine tune it to be even smoother, have graphic hardware on par with competition, broader online options

Microsoft: who knows, they were talking about a motion sensing camera, free online maybe

Sony: refined version of the PS3 that has a much lower launch cost, a slightly redisigned controller with a refined sixaxis that doesn't look like a PS1/2 clone

Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#13 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64054 Posts
Nintendo-upgrade around to a stronger 360, continue the control scheme, and still have crappy online. But the 1st/2nd party games will still own.
Microsoft-upgrade graphics, etc, add Bluray, HD standard again for an xbox, no multiple skus. Launch with a brande new Bugie IP FPS.
Sony-PS4, once again another technological achievement and a big giant media device. expensive as heck. online still 2nd to XBOX live.
Avatar image for ultima-flare
ultima-flare

2259

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#14 ultima-flare
Member since 2003 • 2259 Posts

Nintendo- Wii2 with graphics on par with 360/ps3 and sell it with a huge profit margin(like they do with Wii/DS) Perhaps some new kind of innovation as well.

Sony- Make a cheaper and traditional console(not Wii route).

MS- If they don't turn a profit on 360, I would not be surprised if they abandon the Xbox brand and just focus on Games for Windows instead(just a possibility, not saying it is going to happen for sure, so don' t flame me please :) ). Why should they continue in the console bussiness if they can't make a profit? In the PC market, they don't have to worry about manufacturing costs for hardware, but they can still get money from publishers who put games on Windows.

Avatar image for Great_Ragnarok
Great_Ragnarok

3069

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#15 Great_Ragnarok
Member since 2007 • 3069 Posts

I think Nintendo will continue to address the casual market

Sony will come with their PS4 with PC features and

Microsoft will try to merge the PC gaming with consoles, giving a scalabilty to their console or something.

and I will come out with my own console dragonforce and win!!!

Avatar image for whoisryanmack
whoisryanmack

7675

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#16 whoisryanmack
Member since 2006 • 7675 Posts

Nintendo- Wii2 with graphics on par with 360/ps3 and sell it with a huge profit margin(like they do with Wii/DS) Perhaps some new kind of innovation as well.

Sony- Make a cheaper and traditional console(not Wii route).

MS- If they don't turn a profit on 360, I would not be surprised if they abandon the Xbox brand and just focus on Games for Windows instead(just a possibility, not saying it is going to happen for sure, so don' t flame me please :) ). Why should they continue in the console bussiness if they can't make a profit? In the PC market, they don't have to worry about manufacturing costs for hardware, but they can still get money from publishers who put games on Windows.

ultima-flare

I'm not flaming, just "suggesting" that MS is thinking further ahead than 360. They can afford massive losses, and keeping a hand in the fight might be worth it to them. 10 or 20 years down the line, they may just revolutionize the industry and make boatloads on it.

Avatar image for Great_Ragnarok
Great_Ragnarok

3069

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#17 Great_Ragnarok
Member since 2007 • 3069 Posts
btw Microsoft are fearcely aggressive!! trust me they are not going away till they win.It would be stupid of them to leave after all this effort.and yes they have started making profit.
Avatar image for ultima-flare
ultima-flare

2259

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#18 ultima-flare
Member since 2003 • 2259 Posts
[QUOTE="ultima-flare"]

Nintendo- Wii2 with graphics on par with 360/ps3 and sell it with a huge profit margin(like they do with Wii/DS) Perhaps some new kind of innovation as well.

Sony- Make a cheaper and traditional console(not Wii route).

MS- If they don't turn a profit on 360, I would not be surprised if they abandon the Xbox brand and just focus on Games for Windows instead(just a possibility, not saying it is going to happen for sure, so don' t flame me please :) ). Why should they continue in the console bussiness if they can't make a profit? In the PC market, they don't have to worry about manufacturing costs for hardware, but they can still get money from publishers who put games on Windows.

whoisryanmack

I'm not flaming, just "suggesting" that MS is thinking further ahead than 360. They can afford massive losses, and keeping a hand in the fight might be worth it to them. 10 or 20 years down the line, they may just revolutionize the industry and make boatloads on it.

I'm not so sure that investors are willing to wait 10 or 20 years, for a chance of something like that happening. What I said is possible(I personally think there is about a 30% chance if MS doesn't make a profit with 360), there are signs of it as well. MS spent quite a lot of time talking about Games for Windows at their E3 Press Confrence. Also, isn't it possible to use a 360 controller on the PC? Perhaps MS won't kill the XBOX brand, but just move it to PCs instead. Think of the advantages of Games for Windows, MS can charge publishers for putting games on Games for Windows just as much as they do for games to be on 360. This also would stop them from losing money on manufacturing new consoles. It must be realized that the big 3 don't just make money off of hardware sales(otherwise they would never sell their consoles at a loss) and 1st-party game sales, they make money off EVERY game sold for their systems due to licensing(obviously they make more from 1st-party games though). Games for Windows works just like a console, but without the heavy manufacturing costs.

Avatar image for myke2010
myke2010

2747

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19 myke2010
Member since 2002 • 2747 Posts
[QUOTE="whoisryanmack"][QUOTE="ultima-flare"]

Nintendo- Wii2 with graphics on par with 360/ps3 and sell it with a huge profit margin(like they do with Wii/DS) Perhaps some new kind of innovation as well.

Sony- Make a cheaper and traditional console(not Wii route).

MS- If they don't turn a profit on 360, I would not be surprised if they abandon the Xbox brand and just focus on Games for Windows instead(just a possibility, not saying it is going to happen for sure, so don' t flame me please :) ). Why should they continue in the console bussiness if they can't make a profit? In the PC market, they don't have to worry about manufacturing costs for hardware, but they can still get money from publishers who put games on Windows.

ultima-flare

I'm not flaming, just "suggesting" that MS is thinking further ahead than 360. They can afford massive losses, and keeping a hand in the fight might be worth it to them. 10 or 20 years down the line, they may just revolutionize the industry and make boatloads on it.

I'm not so sure that investors are willing to wait 10 or 20 years, for a chance of something like that happening. What I said is possible(I personally think there is about a 30% chance if MS doesn't make a profit with 360), there are signs of it as well. MS spent quite a lot of time talking about Games for Windows at their E3 Press Confrence. Also, isn't it possible to use a 360 controller on the PC? Perhaps MS won't kill the XBOX brand, but just move it to PCs instead. Think of the advantages of Games for Windows, MS can charge publishers for putting games on Games for Windows just as much as they do for games to be on 360. This also would stop them from losing money on manufacturing new consoles. It must be realized that the big 3 don't just make money off of hardware sales(otherwise they would never sell their consoles at a loss) and 1st-party game sales, they make money off EVERY game sold for their systems due to licensing(obviously they make more from 1st-party games though). Games for Windows works just like a console, but without the heavy manufacturing costs.

Good idea, but you're missing out on something. Every house with a MS console now has some access to XBox Live. All these people are potential XBL gold member, but more importantly, they are now a potential MS customer for on demand movies, music, games, shows and who knows what else will be introduced next gen. The potential for this downloadable market is enormous and could possibly dwarf the profits available from strictly software sales.
Avatar image for whoisryanmack
whoisryanmack

7675

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#20 whoisryanmack
Member since 2006 • 7675 Posts
[QUOTE="whoisryanmack"][QUOTE="ultima-flare"]

Nintendo- Wii2 with graphics on par with 360/ps3 and sell it with a huge profit margin(like they do with Wii/DS) Perhaps some new kind of innovation as well.

Sony- Make a cheaper and traditional console(not Wii route).

MS- If they don't turn a profit on 360, I would not be surprised if they abandon the Xbox brand and just focus on Games for Windows instead(just a possibility, not saying it is going to happen for sure, so don' t flame me please :) ). Why should they continue in the console bussiness if they can't make a profit? In the PC market, they don't have to worry about manufacturing costs for hardware, but they can still get money from publishers who put games on Windows.

ultima-flare

I'm not flaming, just "suggesting" that MS is thinking further ahead than 360. They can afford massive losses, and keeping a hand in the fight might be worth it to them. 10 or 20 years down the line, they may just revolutionize the industry and make boatloads on it.

I'm not so sure that investors are willing to wait 10 or 20 years, for a chance of something like that happening. What I said is possible(I personally think there is about a 30% chance if MS doesn't make a profit with 360), there are signs of it as well. MS spent quite a lot of time talking about Games for Windows at their E3 Press Confrence. Also, isn't it possible to use a 360 controller on the PC? Perhaps MS won't kill the XBOX brand, but just move it to PCs instead. Think of the advantages of Games for Windows, MS can charge publishers for putting games on Games for Windows just as much as they do for games to be on 360. This also would stop them from losing money on manufacturing new consoles. It must be realized that the big 3 don't just make money off of hardware sales(otherwise they would never sell their consoles at a loss) and 1st-party game sales, they make money off EVERY game sold for their systems due to licensing(obviously they make more from 1st-party games though). Games for Windows works just like a console, but without the heavy manufacturing costs.

MS wouldn't need "investors" to do this if they didn't want to. Also, we're talking about MS, lets say you invest money with them....you gonna trust your gut, or let the richest company on the planet take this one? I don't know about you, but I'll let MS call the shots. Besides, gaming is only one small fraction of the company, investors have many other areas in which to make quick profit.

It is MS's job to make sure that lucrative business keeps coming their way so investors will keep wanting to invest. They aren't going to do that by sitting back and milking current success alone.Windows already owns gaming, now, they're looking to dominate somewhere else.I don't know the timeframe, 10 or 20 years is a blind guess, but it's pretty safe to say that MS is thinking much longer term than the current console race.