Press conference grades

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for chikenfriedrice
chikenfriedrice

13561

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 chikenfriedrice
Member since 2006 • 13561 Posts

has anybody done this yet? I'm sure they have but here are my grades for the big 3's conferences after watching all 3

Microsoft- B ( loved the new live and of course Gears2 and Fable2 couldn't care less about FF )

Sony- B ( loved the LBP presentation and GOW3 will be great )

Nintendo- D ( even sheep had to be disappointed one of the worst PC's I have watched )

Avatar image for Lemmywinks_360
Lemmywinks_360

1996

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Lemmywinks_360
Member since 2007 • 1996 Posts

Sony- c+

ms-c

nintendo- lol

Avatar image for Tylendal
Tylendal

14681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#3 Tylendal
Member since 2006 • 14681 Posts

Our point of view.

Microsoft B

Sony C

Nintendo F

My point of view

Microsoft D (Other than FF, everything was old news)

Sony C

Nintendo C (Motion plus, animal crossing, and GTA. However, those were the only good parts. AT least there was no old news)

Press Conference Criteria

Microsoft D- (Old news)

Sony B (Showed good potential)

Nintendo A+ (What retailers, after seeing that, wouldn't want to be selling those products. What investers would doubt the future of that company)

Avatar image for EPaul
EPaul

9917

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 EPaul
Member since 2006 • 9917 Posts

Microsoft: C

Nintendo: D-

Sony: B

Avatar image for thrones
thrones

12178

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#5 thrones
Member since 2004 • 12178 Posts

For me!

Sony: 6/10

Microsoft: 5/10

Nintendo: 0/10

EA: 8/10

Activision: 7/10

Avatar image for Memnock
Memnock

15470

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#6 Memnock
Member since 2002 • 15470 Posts

Microsoft = C

Sony = D

Nintendo = F - ... hell they're not even deserving of an F. An F is too good for Nintendo at this point.

Overall, worst E3 I can remember.

Avatar image for dru26
dru26

5505

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 dru26
Member since 2005 • 5505 Posts

MS-A-

Whether you like FF or not, Sony losing exclusive rights is a huge story in the industry. Not a whole lot of new titles, but the games in production are shaping up nicely. 4 new RPGs in 08 will be on the 360 and no where else. Netflix deal has the potential to change the way we look at renting physical discs.

Sony - C

Games coming this year look great, but not a whole lot we haven't seen before. Teaser trailers for MAG and GoW3 were very cool, but no gameplay footage hurts. I had three hopes going into Sony's PC. 1- WKS release date and gameplay footage (not there), 2- A new exclusive rpg of any type, not related to a strategy form (not there), Home release date, and trophy support this week for at least 5 games (not there, and I was basically told to keep waiting). Overall I would say it was decent, but a big letdown.

Nintendo- D-

After Mario Kart was released I looked over Gamestop's upcoming game list and really couldn't name 3 games I would be buying for my Wii by year's end. E3 has come and gone, and the future is looking a little bleak. I guess Order Up, and that really bloody game are supposed to hold me over until the next mario, Zelda, and Metroid. Nintendo needs to dig deeper into it's roster.

Avatar image for dru26
dru26

5505

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 dru26
Member since 2005 • 5505 Posts

Our point of view.

Microsoft B

Sony C

Nintendo F

My point of view

Microsoft D (Other than FF, everything was old news)

Sony C

Nintendo C (Motion plus, animal crossing, and GTA. However, those were the only good parts. AT least there was no old news)

Press Conference Criteria

Microsoft D- (Old news)

Sony B (Showed good potential)

Nintendo A+ (What retailers, after seeing that, wouldn't want to be selling those products. What investers would doubt the future of that company)

Tylendal
U didn't see any potential in Fable 2 and Gears of War?
Avatar image for Tylendal
Tylendal

14681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#9 Tylendal
Member since 2006 • 14681 Posts

Microsoft = C

Sony = D

Nintendo = F - ... hell they're not even deserving of an F. An F is too good for Nintendo at this point.

Overall, worst E3 I can remember.

Memnock

But that means they earn an EPIC FAIL! Failing is bad, but an EPIC FAIL is something to be proud of. Maybe you should just leave it at F.

Avatar image for Tylendal
Tylendal

14681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#10 Tylendal
Member since 2006 • 14681 Posts
[QUOTE="Tylendal"]

Our point of view.

Microsoft B

Sony C

Nintendo F

My point of view

Microsoft D (Other than FF, everything was old news)

Sony C

Nintendo C (Motion plus, animal crossing, and GTA. However, those were the only good parts. AT least there was no old news)

Press Conference Criteria

Microsoft D- (Old news)

Sony B (Showed good potential)

Nintendo A+ (What retailers, after seeing that, wouldn't want to be selling those products. What investers would doubt the future of that company)

dru26

U didn't see any potential in Fable 2 and Gears of War?

I saw plenty, weeks ago. I want to see news. Note that 75% of that word is NEW. Old news is no news in my books.

Avatar image for fixer293
fixer293

4770

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#11 fixer293
Member since 2003 • 4770 Posts

Microsoft-B+

Sony-C-

Nintendo-F-

Avatar image for angelkimne
angelkimne

14037

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 angelkimne
Member since 2006 • 14037 Posts

MS - B

Sony - C+

Nintendo D-

Avatar image for Gamer556
Gamer556

3846

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Gamer556
Member since 2006 • 3846 Posts

Our point of view.

Microsoft B

Sony C

Nintendo F

My point of view

Microsoft D (Other than FF, everything was old news)

Sony C

Nintendo C (Motion plus, animal crossing, and GTA. However, those were the only good parts. AT least there was no old news)

Press Conference Criteria

Microsoft D- (Old news)

Sony B (Showed good potential)

Nintendo A+ (What retailers, after seeing that, wouldn't want to be selling those products. What investers would doubt the future of that company)

Tylendal

This post blows my mind. How could you possibly rate Microsoft's conference below Nintendo's? None of them were any good, but Ninty's was almost unwatchable, and clearly the worst of the three.

Avatar image for death919
death919

4724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 92

User Lists: 0

#14 death919
Member since 2004 • 4724 Posts

OK, just so you have a benchmark, I consider Nintendo 2006 to be an A+.

Microsoft: B
Sony: C
Nintendo: The assignment was to write an essay on human literature. You submitted a picture of your reproductive parts. Not only am I giving you a failing grade, but you are expelled from this school.

:)

Avatar image for Gamer556
Gamer556

3846

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Gamer556
Member since 2006 • 3846 Posts

Microsoft: B- (Not really any better than Sony's, but FFXIII gives them the edge)

Sony: C (Had some decent games, but no huge games and not enough gameplay)

Nintendo: F (Nothing more needs to be said)

Avatar image for Sgt_Napalm
Sgt_Napalm

1811

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#16 Sgt_Napalm
Member since 2008 • 1811 Posts

Nintendo did average. Just average. Not bad, not good.

Have you noticed that Nintendo's PC's are always "We have more moneys!" but never show real games?

Same thing with all fo the other ones. They did average! Nothing to get pumped about was announced, for me.

Avatar image for Paul_Phoenicks
Paul_Phoenicks

1015

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#17 Paul_Phoenicks
Member since 2002 • 1015 Posts

Press Conference Criteria

Microsoft D- (Old news)

Sony B (Showed good potential)

Nintendo A+ (What retailers, after seeing that, wouldn't want to be selling those products. What investers would doubt the future of that company)

Tylendal
That's the closest to correct. Nintendo = A+ Sony = B Microsoft = C It's the E3 Media and Business Summit. Not E for All. If you want to see "hardcore" games, go look at 1UP.com. Nintendo made the best media and business decisions with their conference, showing about 6 or 7 titles that will each sell several million. In addition, they showed investors that they're going to continue to do what has made them #1 and hugely profitable. Sony showed the potential to do big business with unique titles, continued support of the PS2, one (final?) SKU for the PS3, continued support for the PSP, and the Greatest Hits line hitting the PS3. Microsoft did a great presentation for gamers, yes, and they showed excellent support from Netflix and NBC Universal, but you don't really get the perception that they're going to, not only catch Nintendo, but really do anything to stop the rise of Sony.
Avatar image for chikenfriedrice
chikenfriedrice

13561

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 chikenfriedrice
Member since 2006 • 13561 Posts
[QUOTE="Tylendal"]

Press Conference Criteria

Microsoft D- (Old news)

Sony B (Showed good potential)

Nintendo A+ (What retailers, after seeing that, wouldn't want to be selling those products. What investers would doubt the future of that company)

Paul_Phoenicks

That's the closest to correct. Nintendo = A+ Sony = B Microsoft = C It's the E3 Media and Business Summit. Not E for All. If you want to see "hardcore" games, go look at 1UP.com. Nintendo made the best media and business decisions with their conference, showing about 6 or 7 titles that will each sell several million. In addition, they showed investors that they're going to continue to do what has made them #1 and hugely profitable. Sony showed the potential to do big business with unique titles, continued support of the PS2, one (final?) SKU for the PS3, continued support for the PSP, and the Greatest Hits line hitting the PS3. Microsoft did a great presentation for gamers, yes, and they showed excellent support from Netflix and NBC Universal, but you don't really get the perception that they're going to, not only catch Nintendo, but really do anything to stop the rise of Sony.

how could anyone possibly give NiN an A+ that's crazy to me...I was being generous with a D

Avatar image for Sgt_Napalm
Sgt_Napalm

1811

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#19 Sgt_Napalm
Member since 2008 • 1811 Posts
[QUOTE="Tylendal"]

Press Conference Criteria

Microsoft D- (Old news)

Sony B (Showed good potential)

Nintendo A+ (What retailers, after seeing that, wouldn't want to be selling those products. What investers would doubt the future of that company)

Paul_Phoenicks

That's the closest to correct. Nintendo = A+ Sony = B Microsoft = C It's the E3 Media and Business Summit. Not E for All. If you want to see "hardcore" games, go look at 1UP.com. Nintendo made the best media and business decisions with their conference, showing about 6 or 7 titles that will each sell several million. In addition, they showed investors that they're going to continue to do what has made them #1 and hugely profitable. Sony showed the potential to do big business with unique titles, continued support of the PS2, one (final?) SKU for the PS3, continued support for the PSP, and the Greatest Hits line hitting the PS3. Microsoft did a great presentation for gamers, yes, and they showed excellent support from Netflix and NBC Universal, but you don't really get the perception that they're going to, not only catch Nintendo, but really do anything to stop the rise of Sony.

Correct. Nintendo is not about us, it's about the money!!!! They are showing the world that this is a good company with extremely good income. Besides, PC's are not about games, it's about the company and the future of the company. Nintendo is doing good. The games are just showing examples of growth. The games come at the floor.

Avatar image for chester706
chester706

3856

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 chester706
Member since 2007 • 3856 Posts

MS-B+

Sony- B

Nintendo- F-

Avatar image for lolag
lolag

2370

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 lolag
Member since 2004 • 2370 Posts
Sony: A loved how zipper came at the end to introduce Mag
MS: A wanted them to reveal new game, but Banjo 1 comng to xbla this is a wonderful thing
nintendo: A they made me lol
Avatar image for TBoogy
TBoogy

4382

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 TBoogy
Member since 2007 • 4382 Posts
[QUOTE="Tylendal"]

Press Conference Criteria

Microsoft D- (Old news)

Sony B (Showed good potential)

Nintendo A+ (What retailers, after seeing that, wouldn't want to be selling those products. What investers would doubt the future of that company)

Paul_Phoenicks

That's the closest to correct. Nintendo = A+ Sony = B Microsoft = C It's the E3 Media and Business Summit. Not E for All. If you want to see "hardcore" games, go look at 1UP.com. Nintendo made the best media and business decisions with their conference, showing about 6 or 7 titles that will each sell several million. In addition, they showed investors that they're going to continue to do what has made them #1 and hugely profitable. Sony showed the potential to do big business with unique titles, continued support of the PS2, one (final?) SKU for the PS3, continued support for the PSP, and the Greatest Hits line hitting the PS3. Microsoft did a great presentation for gamers, yes, and they showed excellent support from Netflix and NBC Universal, but you don't really get the perception that they're going to, not only catch Nintendo, but really do anything to stop the rise of Sony.

But MS did show games that will be out THIS YEAR fighting for crowded shelf space. They showed you how good they are with hands on presentations given by studio heads of the developers that made them, showing how dedicated to MS's platform they are. Had reps from BOTH music games come on back to back to talk about their song lineups, with one mentioning that it was exclusive to 360 for a short period.

From a business stance, retailers saw more reason to allocate resources to MS this year than to Sony.

From a gamer stance, MS showed that their games were good and gave them release dates. Sony basically said "And one day we will release GOW". Like we didn't know that already.

From a presentational stance, Nintendo's show was kinda corny. Sony's was boring. Jack admitted that he was nervous, and you could tell throughout the show. At one point I started to fall asleep. MS's show was perfectly paced. Kept your attention throughout. The first 30 minutes were game demos, then 5 minutes of sales data (credit to Sony for doing that with a LBP demo). Then a couple of nice trailers for new Live Video partners. Then new XBL updates and Arcade games. Then music games and Square. Perfectly executed.

MS = B (showed who the "hip" contender is. Appealed to the hardcore, the casual, and the investor.)

Sony = C (boring show, no release dates)

Nintendo = d (decent show, no games)

Avatar image for Paul_Phoenicks
Paul_Phoenicks

1015

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#23 Paul_Phoenicks
Member since 2002 • 1015 Posts
[QUOTE="Paul_Phoenicks"][QUOTE="Tylendal"]

Press Conference Criteria

Microsoft D- (Old news)

Sony B (Showed good potential)

Nintendo A+ (What retailers, after seeing that, wouldn't want to be selling those products. What investers would doubt the future of that company)

TBoogy

That's the closest to correct. Nintendo = A+ Sony = B Microsoft = C It's the E3 Media and Business Summit. Not E for All. If you want to see "hardcore" games, go look at 1UP.com. Nintendo made the best media and business decisions with their conference, showing about 6 or 7 titles that will each sell several million. In addition, they showed investors that they're going to continue to do what has made them #1 and hugely profitable. Sony showed the potential to do big business with unique titles, continued support of the PS2, one (final?) SKU for the PS3, continued support for the PSP, and the Greatest Hits line hitting the PS3. Microsoft did a great presentation for gamers, yes, and they showed excellent support from Netflix and NBC Universal, but you don't really get the perception that they're going to, not only catch Nintendo, but really do anything to stop the rise of Sony.

But MS did show games that will be out THIS YEAR fighting for crowded shelf space. They showed you how good they are with hands on presentations given by studio heads of the developers that made them, showing how dedicated to MS's platform they are. Had reps from BOTH music games come on back to back to talk about their song lineups, with one mentioning that it was exclusive to 360 for a short period.

From a business stance, retailers saw more reason to allocate resources to MS this year than to Sony.

From a gamer stance, MS showed that their games were good and gave them release dates. Sony basically said "And one day we will release GOW". Like we didn't know that already.

From a presentational stance, Nintendo's show was kinda corny. Sony's was boring. Jack admitted that he was nervous, and you could tell throughout the show. At one point I started to fall asleep. MS's show was perfectly paced. Kept your attention throughout. The first 30 minutes were game demos, then 5 minutes of sales data (credit to Sony for doing that with a LBP demo). Then a couple of nice trailers for new Live Video partners. Then new XBL updates and Arcade games. Then music games and Square. Perfectly executed.

MS = B (showed who the "hip" contender is. Appealed to the hardcore, the casual, and the investor.)

Sony = C (boring show, no release dates)

Nintendo = d (decent show, no games)

Ah, but you don't see that retailers already have a lot of shelf space dedicated to the PS2, which is not only not going away, but is being fully backed by Sony. Not only that, but the Greatest Hits line of inexpensive, but high-quality games, will surely sell, while Sony is still showing confidence in the PSP. Microsoft, if you haven't been paying attention to sales data from NPD (new data tomorrow, according to Reggie), hasn't been increasing hardware sales with all of these good games of theirs. We all saw that GTA IV didn't do anything to boost console sales. Halo 3 came, and Wii nearly outsold 360 with no real game released that month. In fact, Microsoft is actually starting to LOSE momentum, while Sony is gaining it, based on Metal Gear. I wouldn't be surprised if the PS3 outsold the 360 by several tens of thousands in June. Nintendo is going to sell a bajillion copies of every game that they showed. And, once again this holiday season, you're not going to find a Wii on the shelves, because every kid on the planet is going to want Animal Crossing, while every female, young and old, will want Wii Music after it gets hyped on Regis and Kelly and the Today show. E3 isn't about games. It's about business. If you want games, go to E for All.