proof that the cell is the hidden power of the ps 3

[QUOTE="ahhaahahah"]

They are talking about texure resolution 2 different things.

just stop posting.

it's official console gamers are dumbest gamers alive.

fartmixer26

i thought u were a 360 gamer....switching sides now are we?:lol:

console gamers are dumb as hell, talking to them is useless you cannot explain **** to them they cannot comprehend anything.

They think large numbers=more powerful

Yea a 3.2 ghz pentium 4 is more powerful than a 2.0 core 2 duo right? LOL

[QUOTE="ahhaahahah"]

They are talking about texure resolution 2 different things.

just stop posting.

it's official console gamers are dumbest gamers alive.

fartmixer26

i thought u were a 360 gamer....switching sides now are we?:lol:

Yeah this guy confuse me, but common he said we can't play games because we know nothing about them, this guy just sounds desperate

[QUOTE="fartmixer26"][QUOTE="ahhaahahah"]

They are talking about texure resolution 2 different things.

just stop posting.

it's official console gamers are dumbest gamers alive.

ahhaahahah

i thought u were a 360 gamer....switching sides now are we?:lol:

console gamers are dumb as hell, talking to them is useless you cannot explain **** to them they cannot comprehend anything.

They think large numbers=more powerful

Yea a 3.2 ghz pentium 4 is more powerful than a 2.0 core 2 duo right? LOL

Yeah you are the smartes guy i ever knew:roll:

[QUOTE="Innovazero2000"][QUOTE="GARRYTH"][QUOTE="ahhaahahah"]

xbox360 literally does have more ram than ps3

512 mb + 10 mb edram 524 mb

ps3 256+256=512 mb lol

xbox360's edram is crazy it can help out graphics and crap.

ahhaahahah

so again ps 3 cpu/gpu/ram/ all are parallel to the cell.

Ahh, why do poeple in system wars try to talk tech when they have no clue.

further more, you cannot add the 512+10 from the EDRAM, because the EDRAM is nothing to do with textures.

Which brings me to my next point, Cell and the EDRAM are NOTHING alike. The EDRAM is purely the Frame Buffer (which Xenos ROPs are tied to which is why it's so damn efficent), and handles most if not all frame buffer effects. This helps is save a tremendous amount of bandwidth, because frame buffer effects (IE: alpha blending, HDR, Stencil/volume effects, etc) are traditionally the most resource hogs of the graphics subsystem.

As far as this threads go, this is nothing new. MS just released new tools (XDK, Complier, and D3D update) for the 360, and was already talking about how more games in the future are going to use the CPU more instead of the GPU. Cause as i've said before, even if fanboys don't wanna hear it...Xenon can push some nice vertex/FP numbers itself.

When did i say edram helps with textures?

i said edram can help with graphics like high dynamic range lighting and producing shadows and other stuff.

[QUOTE="ahhaahahah"][QUOTE="fartmixer26"][QUOTE="ahhaahahah"]

They are talking about texure resolution 2 different things.

just stop posting.

it's official console gamers are dumbest gamers alive.

Pelon208

i thought u were a 360 gamer....switching sides now are we?:lol:

console gamers are dumb as hell, talking to them is useless you cannot explain **** to them they cannot comprehend anything.

They think large numbers=more powerful

Yea a 3.2 ghz pentium 4 is more powerful than a 2.0 core 2 duo right? LOL

Yeah you are the smartes guy i ever knew:roll:

pc gamers know have more of a general understanding of hardware/software how games/hardware is made.

a 2.0 ghz core 2 duo will beat a 3.2 ghz pentium 4 because it does more work per clock .

[QUOTE="ahhaahahah"][QUOTE="Innovazero2000"][QUOTE="GARRYTH"][QUOTE="ahhaahahah"]

xbox360 literally does have more ram than ps3

512 mb + 10 mb edram 524 mb

ps3 256+256=512 mb lol

xbox360's edram is crazy it can help out graphics and crap.

GARRYTH

so again ps 3 cpu/gpu/ram/ all are parallel to the cell.

Ahh, why do poeple in system wars try to talk tech when they have no clue.

further more, you cannot add the 512+10 from the EDRAM, because the EDRAM is nothing to do with textures.

Which brings me to my next point, Cell and the EDRAM are NOTHING alike. The EDRAM is purely the Frame Buffer (which Xenos ROPs are tied to which is why it's so damn efficent), and handles most if not all frame buffer effects. This helps is save a tremendous amount of bandwidth, because frame buffer effects (IE: alpha blending, HDR, Stencil/volume effects, etc) are traditionally the most resource hogs of the graphics subsystem.

As far as this threads go, this is nothing new. MS just released new tools (XDK, Complier, and D3D update) for the 360, and was already talking about how more games in the future are going to use the CPU more instead of the GPU. Cause as i've said before, even if fanboys don't wanna hear it...Xenon can push some nice vertex/FP numbers itself.

When did i say edram helps with textures?

i said edram can help with graphics like high dynamic range lighting and producing shadows and other stuff.

Cell can handle shaders very poorly < /a.i./physics

[QUOTE="ahhaahahah"][QUOTE="fartmixer26"][QUOTE="ahhaahahah"]

They are talking about texure resolution 2 different things.

just stop posting.

it's official console gamers are dumbest gamers alive.

fartmixer26

i thought u were a 360 gamer....switching sides now are we?:lol:

console gamers are dumb as hell, talking to them is useless you cannot explain **** to them they cannot comprehend anything.

They think large numbers=more powerful

Yea a 3.2 ghz pentium 4 is more powerful than a 2.0 core 2 duo right? LOL

YOUR CALLING YOURSELF DUMB TOO U DUMBASS!! U RANTING ABOUT THE 360 AND THEN U SAY "console gamers are dumb" UR SERIOUSLY ONE DUMB MOFO! GO KISS JOHN CARMACKS ASS, I KNOW HE'S WAITING FOR U U FAIL

john carmack is the best graphics engine designer ever.

[QUOTE="fartmixer26"][QUOTE="ahhaahahah"][QUOTE="fartmixer26"][QUOTE="ahhaahahah"]

They are talking about texure resolution 2 different things.

just stop posting.

it's official console gamers are dumbest gamers alive.

ahhaahahah

i thought u were a 360 gamer....switching sides now are we?:lol:

console gamers are dumb as hell, talking to them is useless you cannot explain **** to them they cannot comprehend anything.

They think large numbers=more powerful

Yea a 3.2 ghz pentium 4 is more powerful than a 2.0 core 2 duo right? LOL

YOUR CALLING YOURSELF DUMB TOO U DUMBASS!! U RANTING ABOUT THE 360 AND THEN U SAY "console gamers are dumb" UR SERIOUSLY ONE DUMB MOFO! GO KISS JOHN CARMACKS ASS, I KNOW HE'S WAITING FOR U U FAIL

john carmack is the best graphics engine designer ever.

i bet he makes u feel all warm and fuzzy doesn't he.

[QUOTE="Innovazero2000"][QUOTE="GARRYTH"][QUOTE="ahhaahahah"]

xbox360 literally does have more ram than ps3

512 mb + 10 mb edram 524 mb

ps3 256+256=512 mb lol

xbox360's edram is crazy it can help out graphics and crap.

MojondeVACA

so again ps 3 cpu/gpu/ram/ all are parallel to the cell.

Ahh, why do poeple in system wars try to talk tech when they have no clue.

further more, you cannot add the 512+10 from the EDRAM, because the EDRAM is nothing to do with textures.

Which brings me to my next point, Cell and the EDRAM are NOTHING alike. The EDRAM is purely the Frame Buffer (which Xenos ROPs are tied to which is why it's so damn efficent), and handles most if not all frame buffer effects. This helps is save a tremendous amount of bandwidth, because frame buffer effects (IE: alpha blending, HDR, Stencil/volume effects, etc) are traditionally the most resource hogs of the graphics subsystem.

As far as this threads go, this is nothing new. MS just released new tools (XDK, Complier, and D3D update) for the 360, and was already talking about how more games in the future are going to use the CPU more instead of the GPU. Cause as i've said before, even if fanboys don't wanna hear it...Xenon can push some nice vertex/FP numbers itself.

the 360 is no slouch it can keep up to the ps 3. it just that the ps 3 is stronger when used correctly.

cell processor can do

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Procedural_generation

But it's very poor at it it needs a bunch of cell processors just to handle it decently.

ps3's original design was to have 2 cell processors one for main processing and other graphics, but sony found out cell sucks at graphics, so they rushed to nvidia and they threw a downgraded 7900 gt chip in ps3.

[QUOTE="ahhaahahah"][QUOTE="Innovazero2000"][QUOTE="GARRYTH"][QUOTE="ahhaahahah"]

xbox360 literally does have more ram than ps3

512 mb + 10 mb edram 524 mb

ps3 256+256=512 mb lol

xbox360's edram is crazy it can help out graphics and crap.

GARRYTH

so again ps 3 cpu/gpu/ram/ all are parallel to the cell.

Ahh, why do poeple in system wars try to talk tech when they have no clue.

further more, you cannot add the 512+10 from the EDRAM, because the EDRAM is nothing to do with textures.

Which brings me to my next point, Cell and the EDRAM are NOTHING alike. The EDRAM is purely the Frame Buffer (which Xenos ROPs are tied to which is why it's so damn efficent), and handles most if not all frame buffer effects. This helps is save a tremendous amount of bandwidth, because frame buffer effects (IE: alpha blending, HDR, Stencil/volume effects, etc) are traditionally the most resource hogs of the graphics subsystem.

As far as this threads go, this is nothing new. MS just released new tools (XDK, Complier, and D3D update) for the 360, and was already talking about how more games in the future are going to use the CPU more instead of the GPU. Cause as i've said before, even if fanboys don't wanna hear it...Xenon can push some nice vertex/FP numbers itself.

When did i say edram helps with textures?

i said edram can help with graphics like high dynamic range lighting and producing shadows and other stuff.

ROFL no, again you don't understand. Cell may be able to do "GPU" like functions, but it is not the frame buffer...nor does it have anything to do with it. Hypothetically even if it did, the EDRAM has WAY more bandwidth for the stuff then any of cell's links. It's moot though, because they are used for two completely different things.

Alos what your discribing is called "threading" (you know, the whole point of mulit-core cpu's) something the 360 can do just as much, difference being 360's thread's aren't as specialised, and aren't linked in the same way.

[QUOTE="Pelon208"][QUOTE="ahhaahahah"][QUOTE="fartmixer26"][QUOTE="ahhaahahah"]

They are talking about texure resolution 2 different things.

just stop posting.

it's official console gamers are dumbest gamers alive.

ahhaahahah

i thought u were a 360 gamer....switching sides now are we?:lol:

console gamers are dumb as hell, talking to them is useless you cannot explain **** to them they cannot comprehend anything.

They think large numbers=more powerful

Yea a 3.2 ghz pentium 4 is more powerful than a 2.0 core 2 duo right? LOL

Yeah you are the smartes guy i ever knew:roll:

pc gamers know have more of a general understanding of hardware/software how games/hardware is made.

a 2.0 ghz core 2 duo will beat a 3.2 ghz pentium 4 because it does more work per clock .

cell processor can do

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Procedural_generation

But it's very poor at it it needs a bunch of cell processors just to handle it decently.

ps3's original design was to have 2 cell processors one for main processing and other graphics, but sony found out cell sucks at graphics, so they rushed to nvidia and they threw a downgraded 7900 gt chip in ps3

/THREAD.

[QUOTE="ahhaahahah"][QUOTE="Pelon208"][QUOTE="ahhaahahah"][QUOTE="fartmixer26"][QUOTE="ahhaahahah"]

They are talking about texure resolution 2 different things.

just stop posting.

it's official console gamers are dumbest gamers alive.

GARRYTH

i thought u were a 360 gamer....switching sides now are we?:lol:

console gamers are dumb as hell, talking to them is useless you cannot explain **** to them they cannot comprehend anything.

They think large numbers=more powerful

Yea a 3.2 ghz pentium 4 is more powerful than a 2.0 core 2 duo right? LOL

Yeah you are the smartes guy i ever knew:roll:

pc gamers know have more of a general understanding of hardware/software how games/hardware is made.

a 2.0 ghz core 2 duo will beat a 3.2 ghz pentium 4 because it does more work per clock .

Actually gddr3 does more work per clock than xdr memory.

[QUOTE="MojondeVACA"][QUOTE="Innovazero2000"][QUOTE="GARRYTH"][QUOTE="ahhaahahah"]

xbox360 literally does have more ram than ps3

512 mb + 10 mb edram 524 mb

ps3 256+256=512 mb lol

xbox360's edram is crazy it can help out graphics and crap.

GARRYTH

so again ps 3 cpu/gpu/ram/ all are parallel to the cell.

Ahh, why do poeple in system wars try to talk tech when they have no clue.

further more, you cannot add the 512+10 from the EDRAM, because the EDRAM is nothing to do with textures.

Which brings me to my next point, Cell and the EDRAM are NOTHING alike. The EDRAM is purely the Frame Buffer (which Xenos ROPs are tied to which is why it's so damn efficent), and handles most if not all frame buffer effects. This helps is save a tremendous amount of bandwidth, because frame buffer effects (IE: alpha blending, HDR, Stencil/volume effects, etc) are traditionally the most resource hogs of the graphics subsystem.

As far as this threads go, this is nothing new. MS just released new tools (XDK, Complier, and D3D update) for the 360, and was already talking about how more games in the future are going to use the CPU more instead of the GPU. Cause as i've said before, even if fanboys don't wanna hear it...Xenon can push some nice vertex/FP numbers itself.

the 360 is no slouch it can keep up to the ps 3. it just that the ps 3 is stronger when used correctly.

I won't disagree, Cell is a caluculation monster....and is a stronger overall CPU then Xenon. I'm just mearly stating that developers really haven't used Xenon in conjuntion with Xenos until recently or in the near future.

cell processor can do

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Procedural_generation

But it's very poor at it it needs a bunch of cell processors just to handle it decently.

ps3's original design was to have 2 cell processors one for main processing and other graphics, but sony found out cell sucks at graphics, so they rushed to nvidia and they threw a downgraded 7900 gt chip in ps3.

ahhaahahah

gddr3 at 815 mhz 128 bit offers 26.1 gb bandwidth

XDR at 3200 mhz 64 bit offers 25.6

gddr3 does more work per clock than xdr.

cell processor can do

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Procedural_generation

But it's very poor at it it needs a bunch of cell processors just to handle it decently.

ps3's original design was to have 2 cell processors one for main processing and other graphics, but sony found out cell sucks at graphics, so they rushed to nvidia and they threw a downgraded 7900 gt chip in ps3

/THREAD.

ahhaahahah

nice. proof from wikipedia. how do we know u didn't edit urself:P

[QUOTE="ahhaahahah"]

cell processor can do

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Procedural_generation

But it's very poor at it it needs a bunch of cell processors just to handle it decently.

ps3's original design was to have 2 cell processors one for main processing and other graphics, but sony found out cell sucks at graphics, so they rushed to nvidia and they threw a downgraded 7900 gt chip in ps3

/THREAD.

fartmixer26

nice. proof from wikipedia. how do we know u didn't edit urself:P

that's the only way ps3 cell cpu can do graphics is PROCEDURAL GENERATION SMART GUY.

and 1 cell processor is too slow at it.

[QUOTE="ahhaahahah"]

cell processor can do

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Procedural_generation

But it's very poor at it it needs a bunch of cell processors just to handle it decently.

ps3's original design was to have 2 cell processors one for main processing and other graphics, but sony found out cell sucks at graphics, so they rushed to nvidia and they threw a downgraded 7900 gt chip in ps3

/THREAD.

fartmixer26

nice. proof from wikipedia. how do we know u didn't edit urself:P

because that really was sony's first idea, to have two cell's. RSX was a late min change. A 7800GTX with half it's ROPS/bandiwdth cut + added turbocache. Cell is great at assisting the GPU, but it would never perform like a real GPU in a real world gaming situation by itself.

[QUOTE="fartmixer26"][QUOTE="ahhaahahah"]

cell processor can do

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Procedural_generation

But it's very poor at it it needs a bunch of cell processors just to handle it decently.

ps3's original design was to have 2 cell processors one for main processing and other graphics, but sony found out cell sucks at graphics, so they rushed to nvidia and they threw a downgraded 7900 gt chip in ps3

/THREAD.

ahhaahahah

nice. proof from wikipedia. how do we know u didn't edit urself:P

that's the only way ps3 cell cpu can do graphics is PROCEDURAL GENERATION SMART GUY.

and 1 cell processor is too slow at it.

:|ok...well it was nice listening to ur bullsh!t. i gotta go play all of my consoles to remind myself how i'm not a fanboy like some people. say hi to ur boyfriend John Carmack for me!:P

gddr3 at 815 mhz 128 bit offers 26.1 gb bandwidth

XDR at 3200 mhz 64 bit offers 25.6

gddr3 does more work per clock than xdr.

ahhaahahah

im confused because sony/gamespot/ign all said that the ram in the ps 3 is faster clock speed but there split up into 2 differant function rams. i will go look it up.

[QUOTE="ahhaahahah"][QUOTE="fartmixer26"][QUOTE="ahhaahahah"]

cell processor can do

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Procedural_generation

But it's very poor at it it needs a bunch of cell processors just to handle it decently.

ps3's original design was to have 2 cell processors one for main processing and other graphics, but sony found out cell sucks at graphics, so they rushed to nvidia and they threw a downgraded 7900 gt chip in ps3

/THREAD.

fartmixer26

nice. proof from wikipedia. how do we know u didn't edit urself:P

that's the only way ps3 cell cpu can do graphics is PROCEDURAL GENERATION SMART GUY.

and 1 cell processor is too slow at it.

:|ok...well it was nice listening to ur bullsh!t. i gotta go play all of my consoles to remind myself how i'm not a fanboy like some people. say hi to ur boyfriend John Carmack for me!:P

john carmack made the graphics engine to my favorite games ever quake 1 quake 2 and quake 3

those were very impressive for the time

Did you know source engine aka orange box on ps3 uses the quake 1 engine? it uses code from it.

valve licensed the quake 1 engine from john carmack and used to graphics code to make the source engine.

[QUOTE="fartmixer26"][QUOTE="ahhaahahah"][QUOTE="fartmixer26"][QUOTE="ahhaahahah"]

cell processor can do

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Procedural_generation

But it's very poor at it it needs a bunch of cell processors just to handle it decently.

ps3's original design was to have 2 cell processors one for main processing and other graphics, but sony found out cell sucks at graphics, so they rushed to nvidia and they threw a downgraded 7900 gt chip in ps3

/THREAD.

ahhaahahah

nice. proof from wikipedia. how do we know u didn't edit urself:P

that's the only way ps3 cell cpu can do graphics is PROCEDURAL GENERATION SMART GUY.

and 1 cell processor is too slow at it.

:|ok...well it was nice listening to ur bullsh!t. i gotta go play all of my consoles to remind myself how i'm not a fanboy like some people. say hi to ur boyfriend John Carmack for me!:P

john carmack made the graphics engine to my favorite games ever quake 1 quake 2 and quake 3

those were very impressive for the time

Did you know source engine aka orange box on ps3 uses the quake 1 engine? it uses code from it.

valve licensed the quake 1 engine from john carmack and used to graphics code to make the source engine.

heres a cookie for ur "vast knowledge"

have a nice day

[QUOTE="fartmixer26"][QUOTE="ahhaahahah"]

cell processor can do

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Procedural_generation

But it's very poor at it it needs a bunch of cell processors just to handle it decently.

ps3's original design was to have 2 cell processors one for main processing and other graphics, but sony found out cell sucks at graphics, so they rushed to nvidia and they threw a downgraded 7900 gt chip in ps3

/THREAD.

Innovazero2000

nice. proof from wikipedia. how do we know u didn't edit urself:P

because that really was sony's first idea, to have two cell's. RSX was a late min change. A 7800GTX with half it's ROPS/bandiwdth cut + added turbocache. Cell is great at assisting the GPU, but it would never perform like a real GPU in a real world gaming situation by itself.

john carmack graphics engine god

the makers of half life used the quake 1 engine to make half life 1# and used code from quake 1 engine to make their own graphics engine the source engine for half life 2.

[QUOTE="fartmixer26"][QUOTE="ahhaahahah"][QUOTE="fartmixer26"][QUOTE="ahhaahahah"]

cell processor can do

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Procedural_generation

But it's very poor at it it needs a bunch of cell processors just to handle it decently.

ps3's original design was to have 2 cell processors one for main processing and other graphics, but sony found out cell sucks at graphics, so they rushed to nvidia and they threw a downgraded 7900 gt chip in ps3

/THREAD.

ahhaahahah

nice. proof from wikipedia. how do we know u didn't edit urself:P

that's the only way ps3 cell cpu can do graphics is PROCEDURAL GENERATION SMART GUY.

and 1 cell processor is too slow at it.

:|ok...well it was nice listening to ur bullsh!t. i gotta go play all of my consoles to remind myself how i'm nota fanboy like some people. say hi to ur boyfriend John Carmack for me!:P

john carmack made the graphics engine to my favorite games ever quake 1 quake 2 and quake 3

those were very impressive for the time

Did you know source engine aka orange box on ps3 uses the quake 1 engine? it uses code from it.

valve licensed the quake 1 engine from john carmack and used to graphics code to make the source engine.

im old been playing first person shooters since they have been invented.

you people dont seem to get john carmack, this guy made the first fully 3D graphics engine for a first person shooter.

called quake or quake 1.

i think you people should respect a legend.

[QUOTE="ahhaahahah"][QUOTE="Innovazero2000"][QUOTE="GARRYTH"][QUOTE="ahhaahahah"]

xbox360 literally does have more ram than ps3

512 mb + 10 mb edram 524 mb

ps3 256+256=512 mb lol

xbox360's edram is crazy it can help out graphics and crap.

GARRYTH

so again ps 3 cpu/gpu/ram/ all are parallel to the cell.

Ahh, why do poeple in system wars try to talk tech when they have no clue.

further more, you cannot add the 512+10 from the EDRAM, because the EDRAM is nothing to do with textures.

Which brings me to my next point, Cell and the EDRAM are NOTHING alike. The EDRAM is purely the Frame Buffer (which Xenos ROPs are tied to which is why it's so damn efficent), and handles most if not all frame buffer effects. This helps is save a tremendous amount of bandwidth, because frame buffer effects (IE: alpha blending, HDR, Stencil/volume effects, etc) are traditionally the most resource hogs of the graphics subsystem.

As far as this threads go, this is nothing new. MS just released new tools (XDK, Complier, and D3D update) for the 360, and was already talking about how more games in the future are going to use the CPU more instead of the GPU. Cause as i've said before, even if fanboys don't wanna hear it...Xenon can push some nice vertex/FP numbers itself.

When did i say edram helps with textures?

i said edram can help with graphics like high dynamic range lighting and producing shadows and other stuff.

Do you even understand a god damn word you speak? You just keep repeating comments you've read and don't even know how to explain it yourself. Regurgitating facts from a press release helps no one. Fanboy.

anyone who disrespect john carmack is not a gamer.

he changed gaming forever.

[QUOTE="GARRYTH"]you just named what the cell does for the ps 3 and there alot more there than 10 edram. we have 6 sprees free that run together. one spree used for all the lighting another for animation another for shadows another one for textures ect. wich the ycan do because the sprees all run together. this nauthy dog in the link i gave you pritty much summed up of what the cell can do with the edge tool.Kantroce

Do you even understand a god damn word you speak? You just keep repeating comments you've read and don't even know to explain it yourself. Regurgitating facts from a press release helps no one. Fanboy.

Dude, he's talking about the power of the

:shock:

[QUOTE="ahhaahahah"]

Too bad insomniac games confirmed xbox360 gpu is more powerful than ps3's.

only thing more powerful in ps3 is the processor...too bad it cannot produce as good of graphics as 360.

ps3 can handle better physics, more a.i on screen....better textures nope....xbox360 has more ram better shaders nope 360 can do more advanced.

Pelon208

You are 100% right my level one poster :roll:, and you better use a link before you said such things, because you just sound like a troll, and if you show me on 360 exclusive game pic that looks better than this i'll give you a cookie

No need to ask for images of an exlusive. This isn't an argument about who has the prettiest exclusive games. I'm not saying that there is a mult-plat out there that looks better on the 360 and looks better than Uncharted, but just pointing out that your request for a images from a 360 exclusive to compare against a Sony exclusive is misplaced. All that you should really need for proof is an image of a 360 game that looks better, regardless of whether it is exlusive or multiplat.

While I am sure the highly clocked vector processing units they have strapped to Cell will eventually enable the PS3 to do what 360 cannot; it is majorly let down by the rest of the system not quite being at the same level.

Oh sure you can use Cell for something such as additional physics work like interactive objects; but then you need the ram to hold the additional physics calculations and game assets, the GPU power to push the additional polys and shaders on screen, the vram to texture and normal map all the additional objects and so on.

The point is Cell enables the PS3 to do more but the rest of the system prevents it from doing so. It doesn't have more memory or GPU power than 360, which is going to severally limit what they can do with Cell.

It is like if you had a 8800GTX with 128mb vram, it has all that processing power but the memory allowance prevents it from fully taking advantage of it.

You are 100% right my level one poster :roll:, and you better use a link before you said such things, because you just sound like a troll, and if you show me on 360 exclusive game pic that looks better than this i'll give you a cookie

i give you 2

!

i wont my cookie now pls

Nisim19

You are 100% right my level one poster :roll:, and you better use a link before you said such things, because you just sound like a troll, and if you show me on 360 exclusive game pic that looks better than this i'll give you a cookie

i give you 2

!

i wont my cookie now pls

Kameo has terrible graphics compared to the new games out there and the textures in that game are outdated. Even Ratchet and Clank Future beats it. So dont post those pics. Gears 2 looks better though so i give you credit for that.

Heres a Ratchet and Clank Future screenshot just incase you wanted to see. This ONLY against Kameo not gears 2.

i wont my cookie now pls

Nisim19

If there is no jaggies it's a bullshot.

[QUOTE="Nisim19"]

i wont my cookie now pls

leejohnson7

If there is no jaggies it's a bullshot.

Yea its the SAME picture that every single lemming uses and they always deny that pic a bullshot. That pic is definitely a bullshot.

[QUOTE="Nisim19"]

i wont my cookie now pls

leejohnson7

If there is no jaggies it's a bullshot.

That makes all the uncharted screens posted bullshots as well.

[QUOTE="MojondeVACA"]Sony exclusive devs :roll: ,Carmack> sony devs.GARRYTH

Well said.

Cows and Lemmings....

BOTH OF YOU.

Stop posting bullshots!

Sony exclusive devs :roll: ,Carmack> sony devs.MojondeVACA

Dude Carmack> World :P...

[QUOTE="leejohnson7"][QUOTE="Nisim19"]

i wont my cookie now pls

Marka1700

If there is no jaggies it's a bullshot.

That makes all the uncharted screens posted bullshots as well.

Sorry my friend i post a gameplay scree, i can assure you because the game has been out for year and a half, and that screen its the way the game looks, sorry you fail

[QUOTE="ahhaahahah"]

Too bad insomniac games confirmed xbox360 gpu is more powerful than ps3's.

only thing more powerful in ps3 is the processor...too bad it cannot produce as good of graphics as 360.

ps3 can handle better physics, more a.i on screen....better textures nope....xbox360 has more ram better shaders nope 360 can do more advanced.

Pelon208

You are 100% right my level one poster :roll:, and you better use a link before you said such things, because you just sound like a troll, and if you show me on 360 exclusive game pic that looks better than this i'll give you a cookie

you should have given a better pic.. that's not really good. water looks good but the jet ski and character models in that one are meh.