PS one and Squaresoft Best Era of Gaming Ever?

I think this was the most sublime period of gaming.

16 bit Genesis vs SNES >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Allheretrix

This

However for JRPG fans like myself the PSX and Squaresoft era was godly but not the best :P

It's one of the best eras. Squaresoft was amazing back then.mo0ksi

16 bit Genesis vs SNES >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Allheretrix

PS1 and N64 is the best ever.

The era with the best console wins. PS2>>>>>>>>>>all.TheGrat1

[QUOTE="heretrix"]16 bit Genesis vs SNES >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>AllnVidiaGaMer

PS1 and N64 is the best ever.

No, the PS2 had lots more better games IMO.

PS2 = One of the Best Consoles of all time.

if so, then its only true for the rpg genreogvampire

[QUOTE="heretrix"]16 bit Genesis vs SNES >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>AllnVidiaGaMer

PS1 and N64 is the best ever.

No, the PS2 had lots more better games IMO.

PS2 = One of the Best Consoles of all time.

SynisterGamer

It's a fact that the console had sold alot more than the competition and had a good / decent libary and SOMETIMES made amazing games I.E MGS 2 and ICO.

But clearly the Xbox / Gamecube defined the generation and set the standard future generations I.E Halo / Halo 2, Ninja Gaiden / Ninja Gaiden Black, Resident Evil Remake and Resident Evil 4, Forza, Super Smash Bros Melee, Zelda: Wind Waker, Stars Wars Knights of the old Republic upon many others.

PS2 was clear winner in console sales, that can't be debated.

Clear winner in making quality games?

No, not at all.

[QUOTE="SynisterGamer"]

No, the PS2 had lots more better games IMO.

PS2 = One of the Best Consoles of all time.

Synthetic_NinJI

[QUOTE="SynisterGamer"]

No, the PS2 had lots more better games IMO.

PS2 = One of the Best Consoles of all time.

Synthetic_NinJI

[QUOTE="Synthetic_NinJI"][QUOTE="SynisterGamer"]

No, the PS2 had lots more better games IMO.

PS2 = One of the Best Consoles of all time.

AirGuitarist87

[QUOTE="Synthetic_NinJI"][QUOTE="SynisterGamer"]

No, the PS2 had lots more better games IMO.

PS2 = One of the Best Consoles of all time.

AirGuitarist87

Actually the correct answer is the SNES/Genesis eraomarguy01

Wrong. Ball in a cup Vs Plate on a stick era was the best.

[QUOTE="tOtalPWNaAe"][QUOTE="Rahnyc4"]too bad for the ps3, huh? Synthetic_NinJI

[QUOTE="tOtalPWNaAe"][QUOTE="Synthetic_NinJI"] The 360 also gets "all those sequels" :lol:Synthetic_NinJI

[QUOTE="nVidiaGaMer"]

[QUOTE="heretrix"]16 bit Genesis vs SNES >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>AllRahnyc4

PS1 and N64 is the best ever.

Even though this is more of an opinion why which one is better when you look at the number of hit games and new games that are still around today they came out during the PS1 and N64 era.

1995-2000 was the best peroid for games ever. PC/N64/PS/Sat= EPIC win.Guybrush_3

I agree.

[QUOTE="Guybrush_3"]1995-2000 was the best peroid for games ever. PC/N64/PS/Sat= EPIC win.glez13

I agree.

No, the PS2 had lots more better games IMO.

PS2 = One of the Best Consoles of all time.

It's a fact that the console had sold alot more than the competition and had a good / decent libary and SOMETIMES made amazing games I.E MGS 2 and ICO.

But clearly the Xbox / Gamecube defined the generation and set the standard future generations I.E Halo / Halo 2, Ninja Gaiden / Ninja Gaiden Black, Resident Evil Remake and Resident Evil 4, Forza, Super Smash Bros Melee, Zelda: Wind Waker, Stars Wars Knights of the old Republic upon many others.

PS2 was clear winner in console sales, that can't be debated.

Clear winner in making quality games?

No, not at all.

Yes, definitely.

Final Fantasy VII, VIII, IX, Tactics

Resident Evil 1, 2, 3

Silent Hill

Xenogears

Parasite Eve, 2

Valkyrie Profile

Dino Crisis

Chrono Cross

And thats not even counting the Saturn, Dreamcast, and N64 titles.

Devil May Cry was released 3 year prior to Ninja Gaiden (the Xbox version, not the NES...duh:P) and whether you'll admit to it or not was a major influence on it. Not that I care for numbers, but DMC got 95% on Metacritics and NG got 91%. Whether you think it was the best game last gen is your opinion. TimeSplitters was far greater than Halo, in my opinion. The style, the controls, the humour, it had them all down to a T. TimeSplitters 2 has always been my favourite console shooter. Halo, I felt, did nothing new except for maybe that regenerating health, but in all honesty I hate that. Silent Hill 2 may have been ported to the Xbox, but Silent Hill 3 didn't. As far as the "gold standard" for the industry, I can't say I see a lot of that from any singular console. Those are down to the developers themselves, not the consoles. I can't declare that the PC is the unarguable king of all systems simply because Monkey Island 2 is on it.

Devil may Cry was released proir to any console / competition and was the first of the "Over-The-Top" action-adventure title of the generation.

Devil May Cry 2 scored a 68 and was considered one of the "Worst Sequels Ever Made" and won "The Most Dissappointing Game of 2003" right here on spot.

Devil May 3 was released two years later and scored 84, which is a flop considering the former first title, and later released a Special Edition which scored a 87 Good Job DMC3, two tries and still couldn't hit the mark.

Ninja Gaiden was released a YEAR BEFORE DMC3 and won "Best Action Adventure Game" and "Game of the Year" among various Websites, Magizines, Critiics ETC including Gamespot which says "one of the best most challenging action adventure games ever made" and IGNs "sets a new standard for third-person action games in terms of length, depth, speed, and gore" and enter Gamespots "Hall Of Fame"

You intentionnaly ignored Ninja Gaiden Black which scored 94 on Metacritics which is 10 points better than the latest DMC 3 and 1 point off from the original DMC.

Also, I'll take Team Ninja at their word when if they ever admit that DMC inspired Ninja Gaiden.

So I refute "GOLD STANDARD SET" Silent Hill 2 was better than all of the Silent Hills and says right here on gamespot BEST ON XBOX.

I can care less about Timesplitters, you not understanding what a "STANDARD" means.

Devil may Cry was released proir to any console / competition and was the first of the "Over-The-Top" action-adventure title of the generation.

Devil May Cry 2 scored a 68 and was considered one of the "Worst Sequels Ever Made" and won "The Most Dissappointing Game of 2003" right here on spot.

Devil May 3 was released two years later and scored 84, which is a flop considering the former first title, and later released a Special Edition which scored a 87 Good Job DMC3, two tries and still couldn't hit the mark.

Synthetic_NinJI

If I recall correctly, I stated that the original Devil May Cry was a good game. I never mentioned the other two.

Ninja Gaiden was released a YEAR BEFORE DMC3 and won "Best Action Adventure Game" and "Game of the Year" among various Websites, Magizines, Critiics ETC including Gamespot which says "one of the best most challenging action adventure games ever made" and IGNs "sets a new standard for third-person action games in terms of length, depth, speed, and gore" and enter Gamespots "Hall Of Fame"

You intentionnaly ignored Ninja Gaiden Black which scored 94 on Metacritics which is 10 points better than the latest DMC 3 and 1 point off from the original DMC.

Also, I'll take Team Ninja at their word when if they ever admit that DMC inspired Ninja Gaiden.

Synthetic_NinJI

I ignored Gaiden Black as...well it's a remake. Either way, DMC still scored that oh-so-important one percentage on Metacritics.

So I refute "GOLD STANDARD SET" Silent Hill 2 was better than all of the Silent Hills and says right here on gamespot BEST ON XBOX.

I can care less about Timesplitters, you not understanding what a "STANDARD" means.

Synthetic_NinJI

Okay, so now we're reduced to personal attacks. A little premature but, oh well, time is money. This "Gold Standard" you've been parading is a very loose disguise for "in my opinion, this is a good game". Throwing numbers and titles at me is about as effective in swaying my opinion as shouting in leet, I stopped reading reviews and GOTY titles round about the time Final Fantasy X won RPG of the Year. I base how good a game is off my own opinions regardless of what others have said (for example Tokobot Plus) and I rarely see any game being touted as this "Gold Standard".

Oh, and it's "couldn't care less". If you "can" care less, that means you do care, even a little.

too bad for the ps3, huh? Rahnyc4

If I recall correctly, I stated that the original Devil May Cry was a good game. I never mentioned the other two.

I ignored Gaiden Black as...well it's a remake. Either way, DMC still scored that oh-so-important one percentage on Metacritics.

Okay, so now we're reduced to personal attacks.

This "Gold Standard" you've been parading is a very loose disguise for "in my opinion, this is a good game".

"I rarely see any game being touted as this "Gold Standard"

Oh, and it's "couldn't care less". If you "can" care less, that means you do care, even a little.

You didn't have to :| DMC 3 is better than DMC 1 Synthetic_NinJI

No offense, I stopped reading there.

[QUOTE="Synthetic_NinJI"]You didn't have to :| DMC 3 is better than DMC 1 AirGuitarist87

No offense, I stopped reading there.

[QUOTE="AirGuitarist87"]

[QUOTE="Synthetic_NinJI"]You didn't have to :| DMC 3 is better than DMC 1 Synthetic_NinJI

No offense, I stopped reading there.

[QUOTE="Synthetic_NinJI"][QUOTE="AirGuitarist87"]

No offense, I stopped reading there.

AirGuitarist87

[QUOTE="heretrix"]16 bit Genesis vs SNES >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>AllnVidiaGaMer

PS1 and N64 is the best ever.

[QUOTE="AirGuitarist87"][QUOTE="Synthetic_NinJI"] Then you clearly lost the argument.Synthetic_NinJI