PS3 80gb now $499; MS better answer back.

  • 175 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for MrShenmue
MrShenmue

778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 MrShenmue
Member since 2005 • 778 Posts

80gb is getting a $100 price cut also.

http://www.psu.com/40GB-PS3-confirmed-for-US-release-this-November-New s--a0001565-p0.php

Now its:

Playstation 3 40GB: $400

Xbox 360 Premium: $350 (Xbox live+Play and Charge kit = $420)

Xbox 360 Halo Edition: $400 (+Xbox live= $450)

Playstation 3 80GB: $500

Xbox 360 Elite: $470 (Xbox live+ Play and Charge kit= $540)

Now if anybody has a complaint this pretty much shuts them up. Xbox 360 is now more expensive than PS3. Dont act like people dont want Xbox live or a Play and charge kit.

Note to Microsoft, make Xbox Live Free and include a Play and Charge kit with every SKU. Because PSN does everything XBL does even though its free and Home is coming out soon(also free) which will be very impressive and do things Live cant.

Also announce some new exclusives. Cause I dont see anything else impressive for 2008 besides Halo Wars, Too Human and Mass Effect.. which is eventually coming to PS3 now that Bioware is owned by EA.

Avatar image for the-very-best
the-very-best

14486

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#2 the-very-best
Member since 2006 • 14486 Posts

You can't add in XBL. Not everyone who buys a 360 gets online. So the 360 is still cheaper.

And I don't see what more MS can do. They're getting great exclusives like Mass Effect, NG2, GTAIV DLC etc, so they just gotta wait and see how consumers will react now. Best thing for them to do is try and make the price of the 360 more affordable as soon as possible.

Avatar image for ByFly
ByFly

1917

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 ByFly
Member since 2006 • 1917 Posts

hmm 299 premium halo3pack is coming including the halo3 game i mean.... just wait

Avatar image for Nagidar
Nagidar

6231

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Nagidar
Member since 2006 • 6231 Posts
Wow, did you just add all that crap in? The 360's best SKU is still cheaper, deal with it.
Avatar image for Chutebox
Chutebox

51581

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Chutebox  Online
Member since 2007 • 51581 Posts

hmm 299 premium halo3pack is coming including the halo3 game i mean.... just wait

ByFly

No chance.

Avatar image for MrShenmue
MrShenmue

778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 MrShenmue
Member since 2005 • 778 Posts
You all have XBL and pay $50 a year and you know it. And atleast half of you got the Play and Charge Kit. Whats the difference on PS3? These things are free. Not to mention the system has a blu-ray player built in. (for those that care. I dont personaly but maybe I will a year from now) 
Avatar image for Nagidar
Nagidar

6231

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Nagidar
Member since 2006 • 6231 Posts

You all have XBL and pay $50 a year and you know it. And atleast half of you got the Play and Charge Kit.Whats the difference on PS3? These things are free. Not to mention the system has a blu-ray player built in. (for those that care. I dont personaly but maybe I will a year from now)MrShenmue

You're adding stuff thats not neccessary, we do not have to buy that crap. We buy the SKU and thats it, we're ready to game.

Avatar image for plainoldsam
plainoldsam

1038

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 plainoldsam
Member since 2006 • 1038 Posts
You all have XBL and pay $50 a year and you know it. And atleast half of you got the Play and Charge Kit. Whats the difference on PS3? These things are free. Not to mention the system has a blu-ray player built in. (for those that care. I dont personaly but maybe I will a year from now) MrShenmue
I don't have XBL or the play and charge kit. I use recharable batteries and just have a Silver account to download demos and stuff.
Avatar image for ss_49
ss_49

1337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 ss_49
Member since 2007 • 1337 Posts

Well...PSN doesn't do everything XBL does yet. It has virtually no cross-game functionality...which is a huge part of XBL.

Also, Home=Free? Sure...if you wanna walk around with default clothes / no accessories /no furniture. Every little thing in Home costs $$$. It's microtransaction heaven. Have fun paying $2 for a virtual lamp :P

Avatar image for MrShenmue
MrShenmue

778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 MrShenmue
Member since 2005 • 778 Posts
Oh ya and if you want your 360 to be online AND Wireless.. add another $100 for your adapter. Again, free and built into every PS3. 
Avatar image for boyinfridge
boyinfridge

1796

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 boyinfridge
Member since 2006 • 1796 Posts

80gb is getting a $100 price cut also.

http://www.psu.com/40GB-PS3-confirmed-for-US-release-this-November-New s--a0001565-p0.php

Now its:

Playstation 3 40GB: $400

Xbox 360 Premium: $350 (Xbox live+Play and Charge kit = $420)

Xbox 360 Halo Edition: $400 (+Xbox live= $450)

Playstation 3 80GB: $500

Xbox 360 Elite: $470 (Xbox live+ Play and Charge kit= $540)

Now if anybody has a complaint this pretty much shuts them up. Xbox 360 is now more expensive than PS3. Dont act like people dont want Xbox live or a Play and charge kit.

Note to Microsoft, make Xbox Live Free and include a Play and Charge kit with every SKU. Because PSN does everything XBL does even though its free and Home is coming out soon(also free) which will be very impressive and do things Live cant.

Also announce some new exclusives. Cause I dont see anything else impressive for 2008 besides Halo Wars, Too Human and Mass Effect.. which is eventually coming to PS3 now that Bioware is owned by EA.

MrShenmue

you showed how ignorant and desperate you are by saying that it has been proven somewhere on this forum that ME will stay exclusive

Avatar image for Nagidar
Nagidar

6231

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Nagidar
Member since 2006 • 6231 Posts

Oh ya and if you want your 360 to be online AND Wireless.. add another $100 for your adapter.Again, free and built into every PS3.
MrShenmue

Again, not needed.

You're grasping for straws here...

Avatar image for Shazenab
Shazenab

3413

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Shazenab
Member since 2004 • 3413 Posts
MS response:Better games.
Avatar image for Shazenab
Shazenab

3413

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Shazenab
Member since 2004 • 3413 Posts
MS response:Better games.
Avatar image for Shazenab
Shazenab

3413

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Shazenab
Member since 2004 • 3413 Posts
MS response:Better games.
Avatar image for ss_49
ss_49

1337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 ss_49
Member since 2007 • 1337 Posts

You all have XBL and pay $50 a year and you know it. And atleast half of you got the Play and Charge Kit.Whats the difference on PS3? These things are free. Not to mention the system has a blu-ray player built in. (for those that care. I dont personaly but maybe I will a year from now)MrShenmue

I believe the official statement at E3'07 was "almost 6million XBL Gold subscribers". Almost 12 million 360's sold. 50%. Sorry.

Avatar image for klausklaus
klausklaus

268

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 klausklaus
Member since 2005 • 268 Posts

Oh yeah! MS, cut the price please. So i can buy a second XBOX. One left and one right of my dusty PS3.

Btw... i always wanted to try that Multiple screen thing in Forza ... hmmm :)

edit: the fact that you get bluray THIS "cheap" now is great actually. Competition is just good for us.

Avatar image for MrShenmue
MrShenmue

778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 MrShenmue
Member since 2005 • 778 Posts

Well...PSN doesn't do everything XBL does yet. It has virtually no cross-game functionality...which is a huge part of XBL.

Also, Home=Free? Sure...if you wanna walk around with default clothes / no accessories /no furniture. Every little thing in Home costs $$$. It's microtransaction heaven. Have fun paying $2 for a virtual lamp :P

ss_49
Cross game functionality is nice. (and its coming) but is totaly do able without. Id rather not pay $50 a year then just having to add a friend to a specific game. Which thats not even the case for some games. And Home will have plenty of free features to say its new and more interesting than looking at menu's on the 360 dashboard. 

Avatar image for ss_49
ss_49

1337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 ss_49
Member since 2007 • 1337 Posts
[QUOTE="MrShenmue"]

Mass Effect.. which is eventually coming to PS3 now that Bioware is owned by EA.

boyinfridge

you showed how ignorant and desperate you are by saying that it has been proven somewhere on this forum that ME will stay exclusive

MassEffect is confirmed exclusive. MS has publishing rights. However, they do not own the IP so the future games of the trilogy may indeed go multiplat.

Avatar image for MrShenmue
MrShenmue

778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 MrShenmue
Member since 2005 • 778 Posts

[QUOTE="MrShenmue"]Oh ya and if you want your 360 to be online AND Wireless.. add another $100 for your adapter.Again, free and built into every PS3.
Nagidar

Again, not needed.

You're grasping for straws here...

Pfft.. you are. Anyone that wants to play 360 multiplayer online on lets say a little game called Halo 3, needs to pay $50 a year. If Halo 3 was on PS3(not likely) you wouldnt have to pay squat extra to do so.Thats called a price difference. You dont walk up to the register just once in your life. 
Avatar image for mazdero
mazdero

1754

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 mazdero
Member since 2002 • 1754 Posts
MS doesn't have to do anything right now. Until the PS3 starts to make big jumps in sales to where it looks to threaten the 360, MS can keep doing what it has been. I don't see another price drop from MS until mid to late next year. The 360 looks to do very well this christmas.
Avatar image for nicenator
nicenator

1938

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 nicenator
Member since 2005 • 1938 Posts

I agree, the 360 doesn't NEED all those features. However, i think comparitively, the 360 seems kind of gimped without them. If you can get all those extra features for less than $50, and the PS3 has some games that appeal to you, thees no contest really.

Avatar image for Darth_Stalin
Darth_Stalin

8681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Darth_Stalin
Member since 2005 • 8681 Posts

You all have XBL and pay $50 a year and you know it. And atleast half of you got the Play and Charge Kit. Whats the difference on PS3? These things are free. Not to mention the system has a blu-ray player built in. (for those that care. I dont personaly but maybe I will a year from now) MrShenmue

The play and charge is piece of junk. The 2 port battery charger is much better. Atleast I can ALWAYS be on wireless.

Avatar image for ss_49
ss_49

1337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 ss_49
Member since 2007 • 1337 Posts
[QUOTE="ss_49"]

Well...PSN doesn't do everything XBL does yet. It has virtually no cross-game functionality...which is a huge part of XBL.

Also, Home=Free? Sure...if you wanna walk around with default clothes / no accessories /no furniture. Every little thing in Home costs $$$. It's microtransaction heaven. Have fun paying $2 for a virtual lamp :P

MrShenmue

Cross game functionality is nice. (and its coming) but is totaly do able without. Id rather not pay $50 a year then just having to add a friend to a specific game. Which thats not even the case for some games.And Home will have plenty of free features to say its new and more interesting than looking at menu's on the 360 dashboard.

Well considering I bought a 360 as a gaming platform (not a Second Life emulator :P) I usually only see the dashboard for 5 seconds before I launch a game :)

Avatar image for Darth_Stalin
Darth_Stalin

8681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 Darth_Stalin
Member since 2005 • 8681 Posts

You all have XBL and pay $50 a year and you know it. And atleast half of you got the Play and Charge Kit. Whats the difference on PS3? These things are free. Not to mention the system has a blu-ray player built in. (for those that care. I dont personaly but maybe I will a year from now) MrShenmue

The play and charge is piece of junk. The 2 port battery charger is much better. Atleast I can ALWAYS be on wireless.

Avatar image for Darth_Stalin
Darth_Stalin

8681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 Darth_Stalin
Member since 2005 • 8681 Posts

You all have XBL and pay $50 a year and you know it. And atleast half of you got the Play and Charge Kit. Whats the difference on PS3? These things are free. Not to mention the system has a blu-ray player built in. (for those that care. I dont personaly but maybe I will a year from now) MrShenmue

The play and charge is piece of junk. The 2 port battery charger is much better. Atleast I can ALWAYS be on wireless.

Avatar image for MrShenmue
MrShenmue

778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 MrShenmue
Member since 2005 • 778 Posts
MS doesn't have to do anything right now. Until the PS3 starts to make big jumps in sales to where it looks to threaten the 360, MS can keep doing what it has been. I don't see another price drop from MS until mid to late next year. The 360 looks to do very well this christmas.mazdero
I agree. 360 is going to do great this christmas. 2007 MS beat Sony. 2008 however... they need something to be more competative imo. 
Avatar image for plainoldsam
plainoldsam

1038

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 plainoldsam
Member since 2006 • 1038 Posts
Pfft.. you are. Anyone that wants to play 360 multiplayer online on lets say a little game called Halo 3, needs to pay $50 a month.MrShenmue
Since when was Live $50 a month? More like $50 a year. -_-
Avatar image for MrShenmue
MrShenmue

778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 MrShenmue
Member since 2005 • 778 Posts
Excuse me $50 a year. I know that because ive paid it for 4 years strait before.
Avatar image for azizalbaker
azizalbaker

409

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 azizalbaker
Member since 2005 • 409 Posts
You forgot to charge the Wi-Fi for the XBOX 360 now don't get me wrong alot of people have Wi-Fi and would have loved to use it on the X360, so the PS3 has that already.
Avatar image for ss_49
ss_49

1337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 ss_49
Member since 2007 • 1337 Posts
[QUOTE="ss_49"]

Well...PSN doesn't do everything XBL does yet. It has virtually no cross-game functionality...which is a huge part of XBL.

Also, Home=Free? Sure...if you wanna walk around with default clothes / no accessories /no furniture. Every little thing in Home costs $$$. It's microtransaction heaven. Have fun paying $2 for a virtual lamp :P

MrShenmue
Cross game functionality is nice. (and its coming) but is totaly do able without. Id rather not pay $50 a year then just having to add a friend to a specific game. Which thats not even the case for some games.And Home will have plenty of free features to say its new and more interesting than looking at menu's on the 360 dashboard.

Well considering I bought a 360 as a gaming platform (not a Second Life emulator :P) I usually only see the dashboard for 5 seconds before I launch a game :) Don't get me wrong, I applaud Sony for bringing a life sim to consoles...but it's not going to take the world by storm the way cows seem to think it will. I also can't help but think of the potential ramifications of having a program like Home running at all times...considering that the tiny XMB already robs the ps3 of precious resources as it is. Memory problems caused by the current OS are well documented.
Avatar image for toxicmog
toxicmog

6355

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 toxicmog
Member since 2006 • 6355 Posts

You all have XBL and pay $50 a year and you know it. And atleast half of you got the Play and Charge Kit. Whats the difference on PS3? These things are free. Not to mention the system has a blu-ray player built in. (for those that care. I dont personaly but maybe I will a year from now) MrShenmue

i dont use xbl :S

i have a silver membership for demos. (which is freeeeeee....)

Avatar image for MrShenmue
MrShenmue

778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 MrShenmue
Member since 2005 • 778 Posts
[QUOTE="MrShenmue"][QUOTE="ss_49"]

Well...PSN doesn't do everything XBL does yet. It has virtually no cross-game functionality...which is a huge part of XBL.

Also, Home=Free? Sure...if you wanna walk around with default clothes / no accessories /no furniture. Every little thing in Home costs $$$. It's microtransaction heaven. Have fun paying $2 for a virtual lamp :P

ss_49
Cross game functionality is nice. (and its coming) but is totaly do able without. Id rather not pay $50 a year then just having to add a friend to a specific game. Which thats not even the case for some games.And Home will have plenty of free features to say its new and more interesting than looking at menu's on the 360 dashboard.

Well considering I bought a 360 as a gaming platform (not a Second Life emulator :P) I usually only see the dashboard for 5 seconds before I launch a game :) Don't get me wrong, I applaud Sony for bringing a life sim to consoles...but it's not going to take the world by storm the way cows seem to think it will. I also can't help but think of the potential ramifications of having a program like Home running at all times...considering that the tiny XMB already robs the ps3 of precious resources as it is. Memory problems caused by the current OS are well documented.

Correct me if im wrong. I imagine Home will be alot like running a game you can jump in and out of just like everything else.. with load times. So I dont see the problem.  
Avatar image for ss_49
ss_49

1337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 ss_49
Member since 2007 • 1337 Posts

[QUOTE="mazdero"]MS doesn't have to do anything right now. Until the PS3 starts to make big jumps in sales to where it looks to threaten the 360, MS can keep doing what it has been. I don't see another price drop from MS until mid to late next year. The 360 looks to do very well this christmas.MrShenmue
I agree. 360 is going to do great this christmas. 2007 MS beat Sony. 2008 however... they need something to be more competative imo.

Well the 2008 debate is personal opinion. I happen to think both consoles have great lineups next year.

Anyways, does it really matter? Even if Sony outsold MS 2:1 all year (highly unlikely) the best they could do is close the gap and create a very interesting battle for 2009.

Avatar image for toxicmog
toxicmog

6355

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 toxicmog
Member since 2006 • 6355 Posts
[QUOTE="MrShenmue"][QUOTE="ss_49"]

Well...PSN doesn't do everything XBL does yet. It has virtually no cross-game functionality...which is a huge part of XBL.

Also, Home=Free? Sure...if you wanna walk around with default clothes / no accessories /no furniture. Every little thing in Home costs $$$. It's microtransaction heaven. Have fun paying $2 for a virtual lamp :P

ss_49

Cross game functionality is nice. (and its coming) but is totaly do able without. Id rather not pay $50 a year then just having to add a friend to a specific game. Which thats not even the case for some games.And Home will have plenty of free features to say its new and more interesting than looking at menu's on the 360 dashboard.

Well considering I bought a 360 as a gaming platform (not a Second Life emulator :P) I usually only see the dashboard for 5 seconds before I launch a game :) Don't get me wrong, I applaud Sony for bringing a life sim to consoles...but it's not going to take the world by storm the way cows seem to think it will. I also can't help but think of the potential ramifications of having a program like Home running at all times...considering that the tiny XMB already robs the ps3 of precious resources as it is. Memory problems caused by the current OS are well documented.

no way will sony run home all the time in the background, wasting more memory for a fancy operating system is not worth game devs having to reduce items in the games.

It will maybe take up a few extra mb (keeping the most important section of home loaded) so when you quit the game with the ps button you will almost instantly be shot back into home (with maybe a small wait)

I would bet any form of bet on that ;) Sony might have made some mistakes this gen, but they wont rob devs of needed memory.

Avatar image for ss_49
ss_49

1337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 ss_49
Member since 2007 • 1337 Posts
[QUOTE="mazdero"]MS doesn't have to do anything right now. Until the PS3 starts to make big jumps in sales to where it looks to threaten the 360, MS can keep doing what it has been. I don't see another price drop from MS until mid to late next year. The 360 looks to do very well this christmas.MrShenmue
I agree. 360 is going to do great this christmas. 2007 MS beat Sony. 2008 however... they need something to be more competative imo.

Well the 2008 debate is personal opinion. I happen to think both consoles have great lineups next year.

Anyways, does it really matter? Even if Sony outsold MS 2:1 all year (highly unlikely) the best they could do is close the gap and create a very interesting battle for 2009.
Avatar image for ss_49
ss_49

1337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 ss_49
Member since 2007 • 1337 Posts
[QUOTE="mazdero"]MS doesn't have to do anything right now. Until the PS3 starts to make big jumps in sales to where it looks to threaten the 360, MS can keep doing what it has been. I don't see another price drop from MS until mid to late next year. The 360 looks to do very well this christmas.MrShenmue
I agree. 360 is going to do great this christmas. 2007 MS beat Sony. 2008 however... they need something to be more competative imo.

Well the 2008 debate is personal opinion. I happen to think both consoles have great lineups next year.

Anyways, does it really matter? Even if Sony outsold MS 2:1 all year (highly unlikely) the best they could do is close the gap and create a very interesting battle for 2009.
Avatar image for MrShenmue
MrShenmue

778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 MrShenmue
Member since 2005 • 778 Posts
[QUOTE="MrShenmue"][QUOTE="mazdero"]MS doesn't have to do anything right now. Until the PS3 starts to make big jumps in sales to where it looks to threaten the 360, MS can keep doing what it has been. I don't see another price drop from MS until mid to late next year. The 360 looks to do very well this christmas.ss_49
I agree. 360 is going to do great this christmas. 2007 MS beat Sony. 2008 however... they need something to be more competative imo.

Well the 2008 debate is personal opinion. I happen to think both consoles have great lineups next year.

Anyways, does it really matter? Even if Sony outsold MS 2:1 all year (highly unlikely) the best they could do is close the gap and create a very interesting battle for 2009.

It matters when most people dont pay attention or cant add for themselves. All im saying about 2008 is not that Sony is going to win. But that if MS wants to continue being the popular vote then they need to do something. Preferably make XBL Gold free. 
Avatar image for ss_49
ss_49

1337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 ss_49
Member since 2007 • 1337 Posts
[QUOTE="ss_49"][QUOTE="MrShenmue"][QUOTE="ss_49"]

Well...PSN doesn't do everything XBL does yet. It has virtually no cross-game functionality...which is a huge part of XBL.

Also, Home=Free? Sure...if you wanna walk around with default clothes / no accessories /no furniture. Every little thing in Home costs $$$. It's microtransaction heaven. Have fun paying $2 for a virtual lamp :P

toxicmog

Cross game functionality is nice. (and its coming) but is totaly do able without. Id rather not pay $50 a year then just having to add a friend to a specific game. Which thats not even the case for some games.And Home will have plenty of free features to say its new and more interesting than looking at menu's on the 360 dashboard.

Well considering I bought a 360 as a gaming platform (not a Second Life emulator :P) I usually only see the dashboard for 5 seconds before I launch a game :) Don't get me wrong, I applaud Sony for bringing a life sim to consoles...but it's not going to take the world by storm the way cows seem to think it will. I also can't help but think of the potential ramifications of having a program like Home running at all times...considering that the tiny XMB already robs the ps3 of precious resources as it is. Memory problems caused by the current OS are well documented.

no way will sony run home all the time in the background, wasting more memory for a fancy operating system is not worth game devs having to reduce items in the games.

It will maybe take up a few extra mb (keeping the most important section of home loaded) so when you quit the game with the ps button you will almost instantly be shot back into home (with maybe a small wait)

I would bet any form of bet on that ;) Sony might have made some mistakes this gen, but they wont rob devs of needed memory.

It would have to have something substantial running in the background. Sony wants Home to be the "hub" of ps3 gaming and the answer to the cross-game functions of XBL. I have no idea what kind of resources this would require but it would almost definitely have to use more than the current OS wouldn't it?

Avatar image for MrShenmue
MrShenmue

778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 MrShenmue
Member since 2005 • 778 Posts
[QUOTE="toxicmog"][QUOTE="ss_49"][QUOTE="MrShenmue"][QUOTE="ss_49"]

Well...PSN doesn't do everything XBL does yet. It has virtually no cross-game functionality...which is a huge part of XBL.

Also, Home=Free? Sure...if you wanna walk around with default clothes / no accessories /no furniture. Every little thing in Home costs $$$. It's microtransaction heaven. Have fun paying $2 for a virtual lamp :P

ss_49

Cross game functionality is nice. (and its coming) but is totaly do able without. Id rather not pay $50 a year then just having to add a friend to a specific game. Which thats not even the case for some games.And Home will have plenty of free features to say its new and more interesting than looking at menu's on the 360 dashboard.

Well considering I bought a 360 as a gaming platform (not a Second Life emulator :P) I usually only see the dashboard for 5 seconds before I launch a game :) Don't get me wrong, I applaud Sony for bringing a life sim to consoles...but it's not going to take the world by storm the way cows seem to think it will. I also can't help but think of the potential ramifications of having a program like Home running at all times...considering that the tiny XMB already robs the ps3 of precious resources as it is. Memory problems caused by the current OS are well documented.

no way will sony run home all the time in the background, wasting more memory for a fancy operating system is not worth game devs having to reduce items in the games.

It will maybe take up a few extra mb (keeping the most important section of home loaded) so when you quit the game with the ps button you will almost instantly be shot back into home (with maybe a small wait)

I would bet any form of bet on that ;) Sony might have made some mistakes this gen, but they wont rob devs of needed memory.

It would have to have something substantial running in the background. Sony wants Home to be the "hub" of ps3 gaming and the answer to the cross-game functions of XBL. I have no idea what kind of resources this would require but it would almost definitely have to use more than the current OS wouldn't it?

Why would they need to do anything besides add alittle friends menu inside home and then have it request the game you want to jump into with your friend. Done.. 
Avatar image for DementedDragon
DementedDragon

5095

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 DementedDragon
Member since 2003 • 5095 Posts

You can't just assume anyone who owns a 360 will also have the $50 Gold subscription; Xbox Live is the least attractive feature to me, it was so on my Xbox and it'll more than likely be true when I get my 360.

Oh and there's also an Xbox 360 for less than $300.

Avatar image for MrShenmue
MrShenmue

778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 MrShenmue
Member since 2005 • 778 Posts

Oh and there's also an Xbox 360 for less than $300.

DementedDragon
Its also horrible. Dont even try and upgrade it. and if you dont want to.. honestly you arnt serious about the system. Likely your mom got it for you thinking it had everything you needed. 
Avatar image for ss_49
ss_49

1337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 ss_49
Member since 2007 • 1337 Posts
[QUOTE="ss_49"][QUOTE="toxicmog"][QUOTE="ss_49"][QUOTE="MrShenmue"][QUOTE="ss_49"]

Well...PSN doesn't do everything XBL does yet. It has virtually no cross-game functionality...which is a huge part of XBL.

Also, Home=Free? Sure...if you wanna walk around with default clothes / no accessories /no furniture. Every little thing in Home costs $$$. It's microtransaction heaven. Have fun paying $2 for a virtual lamp :P

MrShenmue

Cross game functionality is nice. (and its coming) but is totaly do able without. Id rather not pay $50 a year then just having to add a friend to a specific game. Which thats not even the case for some games.And Home will have plenty of free features to say its new and more interesting than looking at menu's on the 360 dashboard.

Well considering I bought a 360 as a gaming platform (not a Second Life emulator :P) I usually only see the dashboard for 5 seconds before I launch a game :) Don't get me wrong, I applaud Sony for bringing a life sim to consoles...but it's not going to take the world by storm the way cows seem to think it will. I also can't help but think of the potential ramifications of having a program like Home running at all times...considering that the tiny XMB already robs the ps3 of precious resources as it is. Memory problems caused by the current OS are well documented.

no way will sony run home all the time in the background, wasting more memory for a fancy operating system is not worth game devs having to reduce items in the games.

It will maybe take up a few extra mb (keeping the most important section of home loaded) so when you quit the game with the ps button you will almost instantly be shot back into home (with maybe a small wait)

I would bet any form of bet on that ;) Sony might have made some mistakes this gen, but they wont rob devs of needed memory.

It would have to have something substantial running in the background. Sony wants Home to be the "hub" of ps3 gaming and the answer to the cross-game functions of XBL. I have no idea what kind of resources this would require but it would almost definitely have to use more than the current OS wouldn't it?

Why would they need to do anything besides add alittle friends menu inside home and then have it request the game you want to jump into with your friend. Done..

Because the ps3 already has memory problems just running XMB. XMB + Home = more problems, no? The size of the Home's resources are irrelevant...no matter how you look at it you have less memory to work with.
Avatar image for buuzer0
buuzer0

3792

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 buuzer0
Member since 2005 • 3792 Posts
Oh well, since you're adding things besides the SKU, you should add the price of all the great games that Xbox 360 owners have to buy. It's way more expensive to be a 360 owner because of this. ;)
Avatar image for DementedDragon
DementedDragon

5095

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 DementedDragon
Member since 2003 • 5095 Posts
[QUOTE="DementedDragon"]

Oh and there's also an Xbox 360 for less than $300.

MrShenmue

Its also horrible. Dont even try and upgrade it.and if you dont want to.. honestly you arnt serious about the system. Likely your mom got it for you thinking it had everything you needed.

Yes, the core 360 is s*** but it still counts.

Avatar image for MrShenmue
MrShenmue

778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 MrShenmue
Member since 2005 • 778 Posts
I have no idea what you're talking about cause ive never had one problem with the XMB or anything else with the system at all. 


Avatar image for buuzer0
buuzer0

3792

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 buuzer0
Member since 2005 • 3792 Posts

Oh yeah, add $150 for the Wii, since everyone who has one MUST have 3 extra remote/nunchucks. I mean, the Wii is for playing with friends you know...

That makes it $400, right?!!!

Avatar image for MrShenmue
MrShenmue

778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 MrShenmue
Member since 2005 • 778 Posts
[QUOTE="MrShenmue"][QUOTE="DementedDragon"]

Oh and there's also an Xbox 360 for less than $300.

DementedDragon

Its also horrible. Dont even try and upgrade it.and if you dont want to.. honestly you arnt serious about the system. Likely your mom got it for you thinking it had everything you needed.

Yes, the core 360 is s*** but it still counts.

It doesnt count if nobody cares about it.frankly id rather buy an Xbox 1 with a bunch of games then a Core 360. 
Avatar image for The_Crucible
The_Crucible

3305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 The_Crucible
Member since 2007 • 3305 Posts

Well...PSN doesn't do everything XBL does yet. It has virtually no cross-game functionality...which is a huge part of XBL.

Also, Home=Free? Sure...if you wanna walk around with default clothes / no accessories /no furniture. Every little thing in Home costs $$$. It's microtransaction heaven. Have fun paying $2 for a virtual lamp :P

ss_49

Have you played with home? Seen some sort of pricing sheet for available items in Home? Some sort of great connection to the Playstation underground news syndicate?

You haven't a clue on how things will run on Home. Maybe items can be earned through achievements. Maybe you spend $300 on a whole set for a room that would include all of the furniture you'd need. Whatever.

The point is, you haven't a clue yet you speak as if you been there. Stop making assumptions. It just makes an ass out of you and umption.